A Semantic Framework for Decision Making in Forest Fire Emergencies
Source abstract
Abstract
Forest fires can have devastating effects on the environment, communities, individuals, economy, and climate change in many countries. During a forest fire crisis, massive amounts of data, such as weather patterns and soil conditions, become available. Efficient management, intelligent integration, and processing the available information in order to extract useful insights and knowledge to facilitate advanced whereas and support human operators and authorities in a real operational scenario is a challenge. In this work, we present ONTO-SAFE, an ontology-based framework for wildfire events, adopting Semantic Web technologies for data integration and infusion of domain and background knowledge. More specifically, the framework creates a unified representation of the available assets, taking into account data generated from different sources, such as sensors, weather forecasts, earth observations, etc. To this end, previously existing ontologies and standards are used, such as Empathi and EmergencyFire ontology, to provide the conceptual model and the necessary level of abstraction in the form of interconnected knowledge graphs to satisfy the modeling requirements. On top of the generated knowledge graphs, a declarative framework extracts facts and higher-level inferred knowledge from asserted data to support users in decision making. In addition, the framework supports the generation of recommendations, such as sharing important wildfire information with citizens and professionals, that can be adjusted based on user-defined factors and the current disaster risk management phase.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fire effects on ecosystems · Data Management and Algorithms · Geographic Information Systems Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Research & Technology Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
School of Informatics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Funding
EC
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Forest fires and adaptation options in Europe10.1007/s10113-014-0621-0 ↗
2. Managing wildfire events: Risk-based decision making among a group of federal fire managers10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01534.x ↗
3. Resilient landscapes to prevent catastrophic forest fires: Socioeconomic insights towards a new paradigm10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102458 ↗
4. Kotroni, V., Cartalis, C., Michaelides, S., Stoyanova, J., Tymvios, F., Bezes, A., Christoudias, T., Dafis, S., Giannakopoulos, C., and Giannaros, T.M. (2020). DISARM early warning system for wildfires in the eastern Mediterranean. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12166670 ↗
5. The use of Semantic Web technologies for decision support—A survey10.3233/SW-2012-0084 ↗
6. Gordon, S.N., Murphy, P.J., Gallo, J.A., Huber, P., Hollander, A., Edwards, A., and Jankowski, P. (2021). People, Projects, Organizations, and Products: Designing a Knowledge Graph to Support Multi-Stakeholder Environmental Planning and Design. Isprs Int. J. Geo-Inf., 10.10.3390/ijgi10120823 ↗
7. Mhammedi, S., and Gherabi, N. (2021). Intelligent Systems in Big Data, Semantic Web and Machine Learning, Springer.
8. Gupta, J.N., Forgionne, G.A., Mora T, M., Lu, J., Roberts, C., Lang, K., Stirling, A., and Madelin, K. (2006). Intelligent Decision-Making Support Systems: Foundations, Applications and Challenges, Springer.
9. Masa, P., Meditskos, G., Kintzios, S., Vrochidis, S., and Kompatsiaris, I. (2022, January 7–9). Ontology-based Modelling and Reasoning for Forest Fire Emergencies in Resilient Societies. Proceedings of the 12th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Corfu, Greece.10.1145/3549737.3549765 ↗
10. The semantic web10.1038/scientificamerican0501-34 ↗
11. Fisher, M., Blace, R., Hebeler, J., and Perez-Lopez, A. (2011). Semantic Web Programming, John Wiley & Sons.
12. Davies, J., Fensel, D., and Van Harmelen, F. (2003). Ontology-Driven Knowledge Management, John Wiley & Sons.
13. Fensel, D., and Fensel, D. (2001). Ontologies, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-04396-7 ↗
14. An Introduction to the Resource Description Framework10.1300/J111v34n03_04 ↗
15. Pan, J.Z. (2009). Handbook on Ontologies, Springer.
16. Schenk, S., and Staab, S. (2008, January 21–25). Networked graphs: A declarative mechanism for SPARQL rules, SPARQL views and RDF data integration on the web. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, Beijing, China.10.1145/1367497.1367577 ↗
17. Ma, L., Yang, Y., Qiu, Z., Xie, G., Pan, Y., and Liu, S. (2006, January 11–14). Towards a complete OWL ontology benchmark. Proceedings of the The Semantic Web: Research and Applications: 3rd European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2006, Budva, Montenegro. Proceedings 3.
18. Horrocks, I., and Patel-Schneider, P.F. (2003, January 20–23). Reducing OWL entailment to description logic satisfiability. Proceedings of the The Semantic Web-ISWC 2003: Second International Semantic Web Conference, Sanibel Island, FL, USA. Proceedings 2.10.1007/978-3-540-39718-2_2 ↗
19. OWL web ontology language overview
20. De Bruijn, J., Lara, R., Polleres, A., and Fensel, D. (2005, January 10–14). OWL DL vs. OWL Flight: Conceptual modeling and reasoning for the semantic web. Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web, Chiba, Japan.10.1145/1060745.1060836 ↗
21. SPARQL 1.1 query language
22. Babitski, G., Bergweiler, S., Grebner, O., Oberle, D., Paulheim, H., and Probst, F. (June, January 29). SoKNOS-Using Semantic Technologies in Disaster Management Software. Proceedings of the ESWC (2), Crete, Greece.
23. Gaur, M., Shekarpour, S., Gyrard, A., and Sheth, A. (2019–1, January 30). empathi: An ontology for emergency managing and planning about hazard crisis. Proceedings of the IEEE 13th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), Newport Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/ICOSC.2019.8665539 ↗
24. Brickley, L.M.D. (2023, July 17). FOAF Vocabulary Specification. Available online: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/.
25. (2023, July 17). SIOC Core Ontology Specification. Available online: https://www.w3.org/Submission/sioc-spec/.
26. (2023, July 17). DCMI Metadata Terms. Available online: https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/.
27. (2023, July 18). LODE: An ontology for Linking Open Descriptions of Events. Available online: https://linkedevents.org/ontology/.
28. An ontological model for fire emergency situations10.1587/transinf.2017SWP0003 ↗
29. SIADEX: An interactive knowledge-based planner for decision support in forest fire fighting
30. A geo-ontology-based approach to decision-making in emergency management of meteorological disasters10.1007/s11069-017-2979-z ↗
31. OntoFire: An ontology-based geo-portal for wildfires10.5194/nhess-11-3157-2011 ↗
32. Kontopoulos, E., Mitzias, P., Moßgraber, J., Hertweck, P., van der Schaaf, H., Hilbring, D., Lombardo, F., Norbiato, D., Ferri, M., and Karakostas, A. (2018, January 20–23). Ontology-based Representation of Crisis Management Procedures for Climate Events. Proceedings of the ISCRAM, Rochester NY, USA.
33. (2023, July 18). beAWARE. Available online: https://beaware-project.eu/.
34. Limbu, M.K. (2012). Integration of Crowdsourced Information with Traditional Crises and Disaster Management Information Using Linked Data. [Marter’s Thesis, Institute for Geoinformatics, University of Muenster].
35. Oops!(ontology pitfall scanner!): An on-line tool for ontology evaluation10.4018/ijswis.2014040102 ↗
36. Grüninger, M., and Fox, M.S. (1995). Benchmarking—Theory and Practice, Springer.
37. How do scientists respond to anomalies? Different strategies used in basic and applied science10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01036.x ↗
38. Standardized anomalies applied to significant cold season weather events: Preliminary findings10.1175/1520-0434(2001)016<0736:SAATSC>2.0.CO;2 ↗
39. Van Wagner, C.E. (1974). Structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index, Environment Canada, Forestry Service.
40. Lawson, B.D., and Armitage, O. (2008). Weather Guide for the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System, Canadian Forest Service Northern Forestry Centre.
41. Using fire in forest management: Decision making under uncertainty10.1287/inte.14.5.8 ↗
42. Climate drivers of global wildfire burned area10.1088/1748-9326/ac5fa1 ↗
43. Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 201310.1038/ncomms8537 ↗
44. Where to prescribe burn: The costs and benefits of prescribed burning close to houses10.1071/WF18192 ↗
45. Values of the public at risk of wildfire and its management10.1071/WF18038 ↗
46. Rigolot, E., Gaulier, A., Vauche, D., and Guarnieri, F. (1996, January 27–31). Toward a prescribed burning decision support system for the French Mediterranean region. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Fire and Meteorology: International Perspectives on Landscape Fire, Lorne, Australia.
47. Burning for biodiversity or burning biodiversity? Prescribed burn vs. wildfire impacts on plants, lizards, and mammals10.1890/10-2351.1 ↗
48. Cattle grazing in a hummock grassland regenerating after fire: The short-term effects of cattle exclusion on vegetation in south-western Queensland10.1071/RJ04003 ↗
49. Effects of weed-management burning on reptile assemblages in Australian tropical savannas10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01074.x ↗
50. Fonou-Dombeu, J.V., and Viriri, S. (2019, January 26–29). OntoMetrics evaluation of quality of e-government ontologies. Proceedings of the Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective: 8th International Conference, EGOVIS 2019, Linz, Austria. Proceedings 8.10.1007/978-3-030-27523-5_14 ↗
51. (2023, July 18). OntoMetrics. Available online: https://ontometrics.informatik.uni-rostock.de/ontologymetrics/.
52. Lantow, B. (2016, January 9–11). OntoMetrics: Putting Metrics into Use for Ontology Evaluation. Proceedings of the KEOD, Porto, Portugal.10.5220/0006084601860191 ↗
53. d’Aquin, M., Baldassarre, C., Gridinoc, L., Angeletou, S., Sabou, M., and Motta, E. (2007, January 11). Characterizing knowledge on the semantic web with watson, Busan, South Korea. Proceedings of the Evaluation of Ontologies and OntologyBased Tools: 5th International EON Workshop, Busan, Republic of Korea.
54. (2023, July 18). SAFERS. Available online: https://safers-project.eu/.