journal article·2023-05-05Open access

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Finite Element Analysis (FEM) of a Customized Stent-Graft for Endovascular (EVAR) Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurism (AAA)

Emanuela Bologna, Ettore Dinoto, Francesco Di Simone, Felice Pecoraro, Sara Ragusa, Katia Siciliano, Massimiliano Zingales

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 9

Abstract

Background: The treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is today commonly treated by inserting a stent-graft by the endovascular route, without resorting to open surgery. However, some clinical cases do not allow this less invasive approach, meaning that the stent-graft cannot be inserted and open surgery is used. Methods: In the study, we propose a fluid–structure interaction (FSI) analysis of an aneurysmatic aorta that could not be treated with Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR). The vessel is reconstructed through segmentation from CT scans and subsequently modeled on CAD software to create the surface and thickness of the vessel itself. Subsequently, we proceeded to carry out Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and FSI simulation. We propose a computational study on a vessel geometry that is faithful to reality and customized. Results: Hemodynamic variable results of the carried out simulations indicate that low velocity and consequently very low WSS areas located in aneurysmal site are no longer found when conventional or patient-specific grafts are inserted. The wall stress distribution of aorta FEM analysis enabled the identification of the area at risk of failure, that is, in the posterior part of the aneurysm (∼107 Pa), while FSI analysis of the patient-specific graft led to a uniform von Mises stresses distribution (∼105 Pa), except for the junctions where peak stress occurred. Conclusion: The importance of this study is to highlight the benefits of the personalized stent/graft. As the authors expected, the study shows the numerous benefits of the customized stent/graft in terms of blood flow trend and wall stress compared to a traditional stent/graft by supporting the tendency to want to shift the target towards customized stents/grafts, also in the vascular surgery sector.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aortic aneurysm repair treatments · Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze Ed. 8, 90128 Palermo, Italy

Vascular Surgery Unit—AOUP ‘p. Giaccone’, 90127 Palermo, Italy

Advanced Medical Engineering Devices srl, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy

Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy

Funding

MUR

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281 ↗
2. Mechanisms of abdominal aortic aneurysm formation10.1007/s11883-002-0023-5 ↗
3. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: A comprehensive review
4. Patient-based abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction with fluid structure interaction modeling10.1007/s10439-010-0094-3 ↗
5. Multi-objective optimization of nitinol stent design10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.06.026 ↗
6. Wolters, B.J.B.M., Rutten, M.C.M., Schurink, G.W.H., Kose, U., de Hart, J., and van de Vosse, F.N. (2005). A patient-specific computational model of fluid–structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Med. Eng. Phys., 871–883.10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.06.008 ↗
7. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: Wall stress versus diameter10.1067/mva.2003.213 ↗
8. Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysms: A comparison with solid stress models10.1186/1475-925X-5-33 ↗
9. Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: Influence of diameter and asymmetry10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70227-7 ↗
10. Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm10.1067/mva.2002.126087 ↗
11. Computational fluid–structure interaction analysis of blood flow on patient-specific reconstructed aortic anatomy and aneurysm treatment with Dacron graft10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.06.008 ↗
12. Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm10.1067/mva.2000.103971 ↗
13. CFD Modelling of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm on Hemodynamic Loads Using a Realistic Geometry with CT10.1155/2013/472564 ↗
14. Stergiou, Y.G., Kanaris, A.G., Mouza, A.A., and Paras, S.V. (2019). Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: Effect of haematocrit. Fluids, 4.10.3390/fluids4010011 ↗
15. Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysm: Effect of modeling techniques10.1155/2017/7023078 ↗
16. Hemodynamic simulation of abdominal aortic aneurysm on idealised models: Investigation of stress parameters during disease progression10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106508 ↗
17. Computational Investigation of the Effect of Wall Thickness on Rupture Risk in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
18. Đorovic, S., and Filipovic, N. (2019). Computational analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysm before and after endovascular aneurysm repair. Comput. Model. Bioeng. Bioinform., 353.10.1016/B978-0-12-819583-3.00011-4 ↗
19. Blood flow and structure interactions in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm model10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.12.003 ↗
20. Dinoto, E., Mirabella, D., Ferlito, F., Tortomasi, G., Turchino, D., Evola, S., Zingales, M., Bologna, E., and Pecoraro, F. (2023). Carotid Artery Disease in the Era of Biomarkers: A Pilot Study. Diagnostics, 13.10.3390/diagnostics13040644 ↗
21. Challamel, N., Kaplunov, J., and Takewaki, I. (2021). Modern Trends in Structural and Solid Mechanics 1: Statics and Stability, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119831891 ↗
22. Alotta, G., Bologna, E., and Zingales, M. (2020). Exact mechanical hierarchy of non-linear fractional-order hereditariness. Symmetry, 12.10.3390/sym12040673 ↗
23. Bologna, E., Di Paola, M., and Zingales, M. (2020). Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer.
24. A Fractional Approach to Non-Newtonian Blood Rheology in Capillary Vessels10.1007/s42102-019-00007-9 ↗
25. Power-Laws hereditariness of biomimetic ceramics for cranioplasty neurosurgery10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2019.01.008 ↗
26. Posterior meniscal root repair: A biomechanical comparison between human and porcine menisci10.32098/mltj.01.2019.03 ↗
27. De Caro, V., Murgia, D., Seidita, F., Bologna, E., Alotta, G., Zingales, M., and Campisi, G. (2019). Enhanced in situ availability of Aphanizomenon Flos-Aquae constituents entrapped in buccal films for the treatment of oxidative stress-related oral diseases: Biomechanical characterization and in vitro/ex vivo evaluation. Pharmaceutics, 11.10.3390/pharmaceutics11010035 ↗
28. A Fractional-Order Model of Biopolyester Containing Naturally Occurring Compounds for Soil Stabilization10.1155/2019/5986564 ↗
29. Alotta, G., Bologna, E., Di Giuseppe, M., Zingales, M., Dimitri, R., Pinnola, F.P., and Zavarise, G. (2018, January 10–13). A Non-Local Mode-I Cohesive Model for Ascending Thoracic Aorta Dissections (ATAD). Proceedings of the IEEE 4th International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry, RTSI 2018, Palermo, Italy.10.1109/RTSI.2018.8548349 ↗
30. Di Giuseppe, M., Zingales, M., Bologna, E., Pasta, S., and Alotta, G. (2018, January 10–13). Hereditariness of Aortic Tissue: In-Vitro Time-Dependent Failure of Human and Porcine Specimens. Proceedings of the IEEE 4th International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry, RTSI, Palermo, Italy.10.1109/RTSI.2018.8548387 ↗
31. Barrera, O., Bologna, E., Alotta, G., and Zingales, M. (2018, January 10–13). Experimental Characterization of the Human Meniscal Tissues. Proceedings of the IEEE 4th International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry, RTSI, Palermo, Italy.10.1109/RTSI.2018.8548369 ↗
32. Bologna, E., Zingales, M., Alotta, G., and Deseri, L. (2018, January 10–13). Quasi-Fractional Models of Human Tendons Hereditariness. Proceedings of the IEEE 4th International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry, RTSI, Palermo, Italy.10.1109/RTSI.2018.8548419 ↗
33. Stability analysis of beck’s column over a fractional-order hereditary foundation
34. Multifibrillar bundles of a self-assembling hyaluronic acid derivative obtained through a microfluidic technique for aortic smooth muscle cell orientation and differentiation10.1039/C8BM00647D ↗
35. Bologna, E., Deseri, L., and Zingales, M. (2017, January 4–7). A state-space approach to dynamic stability of fractional-order systems: The extended Routh-Hurwitz theorem. Proceedings of the AIMETA 2017—Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the Italian Association of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Salerno, Italy.
36. Holzapfel, G.A., and Ogden, R.W. (2014). Biomechanics of Soft Tissue in Cardiovascular Systems, Springer.
37. Biomechanical relevance of the microstructure in artery walls with a focus on passive and active components10.1152/ajpheart.00117.2018 ↗
38. Biomechanics of soft tissue
39. Mechanical properties of collagen fascicles from the rabbit patellar tendon10.1115/1.2798033 ↗
40. How preconditioning and pretensioning of grafts used in ACLigaments surgical reconstruction are influenced by their mechanical time-dependent characteristics: Can we optimize their initial loading state?10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105294 ↗
41. Fractional-order nonlinear hereditariness of tendons and ligaments of the human knee10.1098/rsta.2019.0294 ↗
42. A non-linear stochastic approach of ligaments and tendons fractional-order hereditariness10.1016/j.probengmech.2020.103034 ↗
43. A fractional-order theory of phase transformation in presence of anomalous heat transfer10.21741/9781644902431-13 ↗
44. Fractional diffusion of membrane receptors in endocytosis pathway10.21741/9781644902431-50 ↗
45. Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analysis of 3D printing personalized stent-graft for aortic endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)10.21741/9781644902431-49 ↗
46. Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations10.1098/rsif.2005.0073 ↗
47. Patient-specific initial wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms with a backward incremental method10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.04.019 ↗
48. Compliant biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A fluid–structure interaction study10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.041 ↗
49. Computational analysis of type II endoleaks in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm model10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.09.002 ↗
50. Modeling endoleaks and collateral reperfusion following endovascular AAA exclusion10.1177/152660280301000305 ↗
51. Fluid–structure interaction within realistic three-dimensional models of the aneurysmatic aorta as a guidance to assess the risk of rupture of the aneurysm10.1016/S1350-4533(01)00093-5 ↗
52. Dacron graft as replacement to dissected aorta: A three-dimensional fluid-structure-interaction analysis10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.029 ↗
53. Finite element analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Geometrical and structural reconstruction with application of an anisotropic material model10.1093/imamat/hxu037 ↗
54. Fluid-structure interaction of a patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with an endovascular stent-graft10.1186/1475-925X-8-24 ↗
55. Shape-memory alloys: Modelling and numerical simulations of the finite-strain superelastic behavior10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01147-4 ↗
56. Molony, D.S., Broderick, S., Callanan, A., McGloughlin, T.M., and Walsh, M.T. (2011). Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Aneurysms, Springer.
57. A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.12.013 ↗
58. Effect of variation in intraluminal thrombus constitutive properties on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress10.1114/1.1581880 ↗
59. Scotti, C.M. (2004). Computational Modeling of Patient-Specific AAAs: A Comparison of Pre- and Post-Operative Flow Hemodynamics and Wall Mechanics. [Master’s Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University].