journal article·2023-12Open access

Process–Structure–Property Simulation Approach to the Estimation of Tensile Anisotropy in 3D Printed Meta-stable $$\beta $$ Titanium Alloy

Luis M. Reig Buades, Martin P. Persson

Abstract

Developing accurate process–structure–property models for metal additive manufacturing is crucial due to the numerous process parameters, extended build times, and high material costs which make it impractical to rely solely on an experimental trial and error approach when optimizing the process. In this work, a multiscale digital approach to estimate tensile anisotropy along selective laser melted titanium meta-stable (eta ) alloys is presented. The approach uses a component scale thermal FEA model of the process to calculate temperature, a meso-scale phase field model to calculate microstructure evolution, and a microscale crystal plasticity model to calculate the effect of texture on the tensile properties in different directions. The model has predicted isotropic yield strength for this material, which could guide designers to choose orientations freely. However, anisotropy in hardening behavior could be expected but is caused by porosity and cracking, which are not considered in the presented models. We believe the presented approach, which relies solely on easy to use commercial simulation tools, lays a good foundation for the development of process–structure–property models to optimize process parameters. The modeling approach should be applicable to other mechanical properties and materials with appropriate considerations.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · High Entropy Alloys Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Jiang W, Guo X, Deng Y (2022) Anisotropic response in mechanical behavior of additively manufactured Al-Mn-Sc alloys by in-situ ebsd tensile tests. Mater Sci Eng A 858:144155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14415510.1016/j.msea.2022.144155 ↗
2. Zhang Q, Xie J, Gao Z, London T, Griffiths D, Oancea V (2019) A metallurgical phase transformation framework applied to slm additive manufacturing processes. Mater Des 166:107618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10761810.1016/j.matdes.2019.107618 ↗
3. Yan W, Lian Y, Yu C, Kafka OL, Liu Z, Liu WK, Wagner GJ (2018) An integrated process-structure-property modeling framework for additive manufacturing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 339:184–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.05.00410.1016/j.cma.2018.05.004 ↗
4. Turner JA, Belak J, Barton N, Bement M, Carlson N, Carson R, DeWitt S, Fattebert J-L, Hodge N, Jibben Z, King W, Levine L, Newman C, Plotkowski A, Radhakrishnan B, Reeve ST, Rolchigo M, Sabau A, Slattery S, Stump B (2022) ExaAM: Metal additive manufacturing simulation at the fidelity of the microstructure. Int J High Perform Comput Appl 36(1):13–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342021104255810.1177/10943420211042558 ↗
5. Motaman SAH, Kies F, Köhnen P, Létang M, Lin M, Molotnikov A, Haase C (2020) Optimal design for metal additive manufacturing: an integrated computational materials engineering (ICME) approach. JOM 72(3):1092–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04028-410.1007/s11837-020-04028-4 ↗
6. Knapp GL, Coleman J, Rolchigo M, Stoyanov M, Plotkowski A (2023) Calibrating uncertain parameters in melt pool simulations of additive manufacturing. Comput Mater Sci 218:111904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.11190410.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111904 ↗
7. Abaqus User Manual. https://www.3ds.com/support/documentation/. Accessed: 2010-09-30
8. Materials Studio Collection. https://www.3ds.com/products-services/biovia/products/molecular-modeling-simulation/biovia-materials-studio/materials-studio-collection/
9. OpenPhase-Solutions. https://openphase-solutions.com/
10. Steinbach I (2009) Phase-field models in materials science. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 17(7):073001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/17/7/07300110.1088/0965-0393/17/7/073001 ↗
11. Steinbach I (2013) Why solidification? why phase-field? JOM 65(9):1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0681-510.1007/s11837-013-0681-5 ↗
12. Materials Studio Collection. https://www.3ds.com/products-services/biovia/products/molecular-modeling-simulation/biovia-materials-studio/
13. Agius D, O’Toole P, Wallbrink C, Sterjovski Z, Wang C-H, Schaffer GB (2021) Integrating phase field and crystal plasticity finite element models for simulations of titanium alloy ti-5553. J Phys: Mater 4(4):044014. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/ac194f10.1088/2515-7639/ac194f ↗
14. Thermo-Calc. https://thermocalc.com/
15. Peirce D, Asaro RJ, Needleman A (1982) An analysis of nonuniform and localized deformation in ductile single crystals. Acta Metall 30(6):1087–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(82)90005-010.1016/0001-6160(82)90005-0 ↗
16. Huang Y (1991) A user-material subroutine incroporating single crystal plasticity in the ABAQUS finite element program. Harvard Univ, Cambridge
17. Pilgar CM, Fernandez AM, Segurado J (2023) Microstructure sensitive fatigue life prediction model for slm fabricated hastelloy-x. Int J Fatigue 168:107372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10737210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107372 ↗
18. Sedighiani K, Shah V, Traka K, Diehl M, Roters F, Sietsma J, Raabe D (2021) Large-deformation crystal plasticity simulation of microstructure and microtexture evolution through adaptive remeshing. Int J Plast 146:103078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.10307810.1016/j.ijplas.2021.103078 ↗
19. Emdadi A, Asle Zaeem M (2021) Phase-field modeling of crack propagation in polycrystalline materials. Comput Mater Sci 186:110057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.11005710.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110057 ↗
20. Schwab H, Palm F, Kühn U, Eckert J (2016) Microstructure and mechanical properties of the near-beta titanium alloy ti-5553 processed by selective laser melting. Mater Design 105:75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.10310.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.103 ↗
21. Hicks C, Konkova T, Blackwell P (2020) Influence of laser power and powder feed rate on the microstructure evolution of laser metal deposited Ti-5553 on forged substrates. Mater Charact 170:110675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11067510.1016/j.matchar.2020.110675 ↗
22. Huang H, Zhang T, Chen C, Hosseini SRE, Zhang J, Zhou K (2022) Anisotropy in the tensile properties of a selective laser melted Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-1Cr-1Fe alloy during aging treatment. Materials (Basel) 15(16):5493. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1516549310.3390/ma15165493 ↗
23. Gopalakrishnan S, Bandyopadhyay R, Sangid MD (2022) A framework to enable microstructure-sensitive location-specific fatigue life analysis of components and connectivity to the product lifecycle. Int J Fatigue 165:107211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10721110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107211 ↗
24. Li K-S, Wang R-Z, Yuan G-J, Zhu S-P, Zhang X-C, Tu S-T, Miura H (2021) A crystal plasticity-based approach for creep-fatigue life prediction and damage evaluation in a nickel-based superalloy. Int J Fatigue 143:106031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10603110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106031 ↗
25. Agaram S, Srinivasan SM, Kanjarla AK (2022) Crystal plasticity modelling of stability of residual stresses induced by shot peening. Int J Mech Sci 230:107526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10752610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107526 ↗
26. Lucarini S, Dunne FPE, Martínez-Pañeda E (2023) An fft-based crystal plasticity phase-field model for micromechanical fatigue cracking based on the stored energy density. Int J Fatigue 172:107670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10767010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107670 ↗