Estimating Liquefaction Susceptibility Using Machine Learning Algorithms with a Case of Metro Manila, Philippines
Source abstract
Abstract
Soil liquefaction is a phenomenon that can occur when soil loses strength and behaves like a liquid during an earthquake. A site investigation is essential for determining a site’s susceptibility to liquefaction, and these investigations frequently generate project-specific geotechnical reports. However, many of these reports are frequently stored unused after construction projects are completed. This study suggests that when these unused reports are consolidated and integrated, they can provide valuable information for identifying potential challenges, such as liquefaction. The study evaluates the susceptibility of liquefaction by considering several geotechnical factors modeled by machine learning algorithms. The study estimated site-specific characteristics, such as ground elevation, groundwater table elevation, SPT N-value, soil type, and fines content. Using a calibrated model represented by an equation, the investigation determined several soil properties, including the unit weight and peak ground acceleration (PGA). The study estimated PGA using a linear model, which revealed a significant positive correlation (R2 = 0.89) between PGA, earthquake magnitude, and distance from the seismic source. On the Marikina West Valley Fault, the study also assessed the liquefaction hazard for an anticipated 7.5 M and delineated a map that was validated by prior studies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Landslides and related hazards
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, De La Salle University, Manila 1004, Philippines
Funding
Department of Science and Technology Grants-in-Aid (DOST-GIA) GEMMMS Project
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:4(297) ↗
2. Liquefaction caused by the 2009 Olancha, California (USA), M5.2 earthquake10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.07.009 ↗
3. Liquefaction mechanisms and mitigation-a review10.19026/rjaset.5.4992 ↗
4. Liquefaction in the Chi-Chi earthquake-effect of fines and capping non-liquefiable layers10.3208/sandf.45.89 ↗
5. Field investigation and model tests on differential settlement of houses due to liquefaction in the Niigata-ken Chuetsu-Oki earthquake of 200710.1016/j.sandf.2014.06.022 ↗
6. Liquefaction due to the 2006 Yogyakarta Earthquake: Field Occurrence and Geotechnical Analysis10.1016/j.proeps.2013.01.050 ↗
7. Definition of terms related to liquefaction10.1061/AJGEB6.0000688 ↗
8. Depositional environment effects on observed liquefaction performance in silt swamps during the Canterbury earthquake sequence10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.035 ↗
9. Estimating free field seismic settlement history in a saturated layered soil profile10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106937 ↗
10. Extended equivalent linear model (X-ELM) to assess liquefaction triggering: Application to the City of Urayasu during the 2011 Tohoku earthquake10.1016/j.sandf.2019.02.002 ↗
11. Re-calibrating the thresholds for the classification of liquefaction potential index based on the 2004 Niigata-ken Chuetsu earthquake10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.11.012 ↗
12. Chapter 16 Ground improvement for mitigating liquefaction-induced geotechnical hazards10.1016/S1571-9960(05)80019-9 ↗
13. Venkata, N., and Kumar Velpuri, P. (2015). Factors Influencing the Microbial Calcium Carbonate Precipitation Performance in Sands, The University of Texas at Arlington.
14. Evaluation of Some Geotechnical Properties and Liquefaction Potential from Seismic Parameters10.37650/ijce.2010.14135 ↗
15. Utilization of Philippine gold mine tailings as a material for geopolymerization
16. Machine learning models to generate a subsurface soil profile: A case of Makati City, Philippines10.21660/2022.95.3029 ↗
17. Quezon City soil profile reference10.21660/2019.58.8129 ↗
18. Look, B. (2007). Handbook of Geotechnical Investigation and Design Tables, Taylor & Francis/Balkema.10.1201/9780203946602 ↗
19. Development of a probabilistic liquefaction potential map for Metro Manila
20. Peck, R., Hanson, W., and Thornburn, T. (1974). Foundation Engineering, John Wiley & Sons. [2nd ed.].
21. An AI driven, mechanistically grounded geospatial liquefaction model for rapid response and scenario planning10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107348 ↗
22. Ameratunga, J., Sivakugan, N., and Das, B.M. (2016). Correlations of Soil and Rock Properties in Geotechnical Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-81-322-2629-1 ↗
23. Geotechnical map of Holocene alluvial soil deposits in the metropolitan area of Granada (Spain): A GIS approach10.1007/s10064-013-0540-1 ↗
24. Evaluating liquefaction potential and lateral spreading in a probabilistic ground motion environment10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.050 ↗
25. A study of the liquefaction risk potential at Yuanlin, Taiwan10.1016/S0013-7952(03)00128-5 ↗
26. Local and regional evaluation of liquefaction potential index and liquefaction severity number for liquefaction-induced sand boils in pohang, South Korea10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106459 ↗
27. Three-dimensional liquefaction potential analysis using geostatistical interpolation10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.02.008 ↗
28. Machine learning methods to map stabilizer effectiveness based on common soil properties10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100506 ↗
29. Artificial neural network permeability modeling of soil blended with fly ash10.21660/2017.31.6549 ↗
30. M5 model tree for pier scour prediction using field dataset10.1007/s12205-012-1472-1 ↗
31. A novel liquefaction study for fine-grained soil using PCA-based hybrid soft computing models10.1007/s12046-021-01640-1 ↗
32. Prediction of the Seismic Effect on Liquefaction Behavior of Fine-Grained Soils Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Hybridized Modeling10.1007/s13369-022-06697-6 ↗
33. Liquefaction behavior of Indo-Gangetic region using novel metaheuristic optimization algorithms coupled with artificial neural network10.1007/s11069-021-05165-y ↗
34. Uy, E.E.S., Dadios, E.P., and Dungca, J.R. (2015, January 9–12). Preliminary assessment of liquefiable area in Ermita, Manila using genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment and Management, HNICEM 2015, Cebu City, Philippines.10.1109/HNICEM.2015.7393263 ↗
35. Wang, H., and Wang, X. (2020). Study of AI Based Methods for Characterization of Geotechnical Site Investigation Data, Ohio Department of Transportation, Office of Statewide Planning and Research.
36. Geostatistics of strength, modeling and GIS mapping of soil properties for residential purpose for Sulaimani City soils, Kurdistan Region, Iraq10.1007/s40808-020-00715-y ↗
37. Non-parametric machine learning methods for interpolation of spatially varying non-stationary and non-Gaussian geotechnical properties10.1016/j.gsf.2020.01.011 ↗
38. University of Southern California (2023, May 10). Uses of Geospatial Intelligence. Available online: https://gis.usc.edu/blog/4-uses-of-geospatial-intelligence/.
39. Validation of terrestrial laser scanning and artificial intelligence for measuring deformations of cultural heritage structures10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108291 ↗
40. Current status, advancements and development needs of geospatial decision support tools for marine spatial planning in European seas10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105644 ↗
41. Prediction of soil compression coefficient for urban housing project using novel integration machine learning approach of swarm intelligence and Multi-layer Perceptron Neural Network10.1016/j.aei.2018.09.005 ↗
42. Fire severity and soil erosion susceptibility mapping using multi-temporal Earth Observation data: The case of Mati fatal wildfire in Eastern Attica, Greece10.1016/j.catena.2019.104320 ↗
43. Estimation, modeling, and prediction of land subsidence using Sentinel-1 time series in Tehran-Shahriar plain: A machine learning-based investigation
44. Determination of soil erodibility using fluid energy method and measurement of the eroded mass10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.08.006 ↗
45. Forest fire induced Natech risk assessment: A survey of geospatial technologies10.1016/j.ress.2019.106558 ↗
46. Machine learning-based methods in structural reliability analysis: A review10.1016/j.ress.2021.108223 ↗
47. Bishop, C. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing.
48. Bowles, J.E. (1997). Civil Engineering Materials, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
49. Prediction of Geotechnical Parameters Using Machine Learning Techniques10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.066 ↗
50. Foundation Design using Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N-value
51. Correlation of densities with shear wave velocities and SPT N values10.1088/1742-2132/13/3/320 ↗
52. Terzaghi, K., Peck, R., and Mesr, G. (1996). Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
53. Metropolitan Manila Seismic Hazard Map Using Midorikawa & Hori Site Amplification Model10.21660/2022.93.3056 ↗