journal article·2023-03-30Open access

Selection of Investment Policy Using a Novel Three-Way Group Decision Model under Intuitionistic Hesitant Fuzzy Sets

Wajid Ali, Tanzeela Shaheen, Hamza Ghazanfar Toor, Faraz Akram, Md. Zia Uddin, Mohammad Mehedi Hassan

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 7

Abstract

In today’s fast-paced and dynamic business environment, investment decision making is becoming increasingly complex due to the inherent uncertainty and ambiguity of the financial data. Traditional decision-making models that rely on crisp and precise data are no longer sufficient to address these challenges. Fuzzy logic-based models that can handle uncertain and imprecise data have become popular in recent years. However, they still face limitations when dealing with complex, multi-criteria decision-making problems. To overcome these limitations, in this paper, we propose a novel three-way group decision model that incorporates decision-theoretic rough sets and intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets to provide a more robust and accurate decision-making approach for selecting an investment policy. The decision-theoretic rough set theory is used to reduce the information redundancy and inconsistency in the group decision-making process. The intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets allow the decision makers to express their degrees of hesitancy in making a decision, which is not possible in traditional fuzzy sets. To combine the group opinions, we introduce novel aggregation operators under intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets (IHFSs), including the IHF Aczel-Alsina average (IHFAAA) operator, the IHF Aczel-Alsina weighted average (IHFAAWAϣ) operator, the IHF Aczel-Alsina ordered weighted average (IHFAAOWAϣ) operator, and the IHF Aczel-Alsina hybrid average (IHFAAHAϣ) operator. These operators have desirable properties such as idempotency, boundedness, and monotonicity, which are essential for a reliable decision-making process. A mathematical model is presented as a case study to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed model in selecting an investment policy. The results show that the proposed model is effective and provides more accurate investment policy recommendations compared to existing methods. This research can help investors and financial analysts in making better decisions and achieving their investment goals.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic · Fuzzy Systems and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mathematics, Air University, E-9, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

Biomedical Engineering Department, Riphah International University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

Software and Service Innovation, SINTEF Digital, 0373 Oslo, Norway

Information Systems Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia

Funding

King Saud University

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Using Rough Set Theory for Reasoning on Vague Ontologies
2. Vague Multiple Criteria Decision Making Analysis Method for Fighter Aircraft Selection
4. The quotient space theory of problem solving
5. Rough set theory and its applications to data analysis10.1080/019697298125470 ↗
6. An extended hesitant fuzzy set using SWARA-MULTIMOORA approach to adapt online education for the control of the pandemic spread of COVID-19 in higher education institutions10.1007/s10462-021-10029-9 ↗
7. Xie, X., Jia, Z., Shi, H., and Zhu, X. (2022). A Location–Time-Aware Factorization Machine Based on Fuzzy Set Theory for Game Perception. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122412819 ↗
8. Kim, K.B., Park, H.J., and Song, D.H. (2022). Combining Supervised and Unsupervised Fuzzy Learning Algorithms for Robust Diabetes Diagnosis. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13010351 ↗
9. Atanassov, K.T. (2012). On Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Theory, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-29127-2 ↗
10. Hesitant fuzzy sets
11. Various aggregation operators of the generalized hesitant fuzzy numbers based on Archimedean t-norm and t-conorm functions10.1007/s00500-022-07516-8 ↗
12. Dual hesitant q-rung orthopair fuzzy Dombi t-conorm and t-norm based Bonferroni mean operators for solving multicriteria group decision making problems10.1002/int.22417 ↗
13. Multiattribute Decision-Making Method Based on Hesitant Triangular Fuzzy Power Average Operator
14. Power aggregation operators and similarity measures based on improved intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision making
15. Generalized OWA aggregation operators10.1023/B:FODM.0000013074.68765.97 ↗
16. Prioritized aggregation operators10.1016/j.ijar.2007.08.009 ↗
17. Spherical fuzzy Dombi power Heronian mean aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision-making10.1007/s40314-022-01785-7 ↗
18. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets10.1080/03081070600574353 ↗
19. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.890678 ↗
20. Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Bonferroni Means and Its Applications in Decision-Making
21. A novel approach to MADM problems using Fermatean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators10.1002/int.22423 ↗
22. Statistical metrics10.1073/pnas.28.12.535 ↗
23. Characterizations of some classes of quasilinear functions with applications to triangular norms and to synthesizing judgements10.1007/BF02189626 ↗
24. Ahmmad, J., Mahmood, T., Mehmood, N., Urawong, K., and Chinram, R. (2022). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Rough Aczel-Alsina Average Aggregation Operators and Their Applications in Medical Diagnoses. Symmetry, 14.10.3390/sym14122537 ↗
25. Novel Aczel–Alsina operations-based hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications in cyclone disaster assessment10.1080/03081079.2022.2036140 ↗
26. Novel edas methodology based on single-valued neutrosophic aczel-alsina aggregation information and their application in complex decision-making10.1155/2022/2394472 ↗
27. Wang, H., Xu, T., Feng, L., Mahmood, T., and Ullah, K. (2023). Aczel–Alsina Hamy Mean Aggregation Operators in T-Spherical Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making. Axioms, 12.10.3390/axioms12020224 ↗
28. Sarfraz, M., Ullah, K., Akram, M., Pamucar, D., and Božanić, D. (2022). Prioritized Aggregation Operators for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information Based on Aczel–Alsina T-Norm and T-Conorm and Their Applications in Group Decision-Making. Symmetry, 14.10.3390/sym14122655 ↗
29. Jin, H., Hussain, A., Ullah, K., and Javed, A. (2022). Novel Complex Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets under Aczel–Alsina Operators and Their Application in Multi-Attribute Decision Making. Symmetry, 15.10.3390/sym15010068 ↗
30. Aczel–Alsina aggregation operators and their application to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making10.1002/int.22684 ↗
31. Novel Aczel–Alsina operations-based interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications in multiple attribute decision-making process10.1002/int.22751 ↗
32. Three-way decisions and cognitive computing10.1007/s12559-016-9397-5 ↗
33. Yao, Y. (2012). International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-32115-3 ↗
34. The geometry of three-way decision10.1007/s10489-020-02142-z ↗
35. Application of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Tracking Control of 3WD Omnidirectional Mobile Robot10.5755/j01.itc.50.3.25979 ↗
36. A novel multi-granularity three-way decision making approach in q-rung orthopair fuzzy information systems10.1016/j.ijar.2021.08.004 ↗
37. Yao, Y., and Deng, X. (2011, January 18–20). Sequential three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets. Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing (ICCI-CC’11), Banff, AB, Canada.10.1109/COGINF.2011.6016129 ↗
38. Three-way investment decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets
39. A novel TOPSIS method with decision-theoretic rough fuzzy sets10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.009 ↗
40. Multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets10.1016/j.ijar.2013.03.004 ↗
41. Deriving three-way decisions from intuitionistic fuzzy decision-theoretic rough sets10.1016/j.ins.2014.12.036 ↗
42. Ali, Z., Mahmood, T., and Smarandache, F. (2021). Neutrosophic Operational Research, Springer.
43. Decision-Theoretic Rough Sets based automated scheme for object and background classification in unevenly illuminated images10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108596 ↗
44. Three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets in multiset-valued information tables10.1016/j.ins.2018.08.024 ↗
45. Senapati, T., Mesiar, R., Simic, V., Iampan, A., Chinram, R., and Ali, R. (2022). Analysis of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy aczel–alsina geometric aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision-making. Axioms, 11.10.3390/axioms11060258 ↗
46. Intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision-making10.1007/s41066-019-00209-y ↗
47. A Novel SIR Approach to Closeness Coefficient-Based MAGDM Problems Using Pythagorean Fuzzy Aczel–Alsina Aggregation Operators for Investment Policy10.1155/2022/5172679 ↗
48. Radenovic, S., Ali, W., Shaheen, T., ul Haq, I., Akram, F., and Toor, H. (2022). Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Based on Bonferroni Mean Operators under Square Root Fuzzy Set Environment. J. Comput. Cogn. Eng.10.47852/bonviewJCCE2202366 ↗
49. An Intelligent Medical Expert System Using Temporal Fuzzy Rules and Neural Classifier10.32604/iasc.2023.027024 ↗
50. Ali, W., Shaheen, T., Haq, I.U., Toor, H.G., Akram, F., Jafari, S., Uddin, M.Z., and Hassan, M.M. (2023). Multiple-Attribute Decision Making Based on Intuitionistic Hesitant Fuzzy Connection Set Environment. Symmetry, 15.10.3390/sym15030778 ↗