DRRU-Net: DCT-Coefficient-Learning RRU-Net for Detecting an Image-Splicing Forgery
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a lightweight deep learning network (DRRU-Net) for image-splicing forgery detection. DRRU-Net is an architecture that combines RRU-Net for learning the visual content of images and image acquisition artifacts, and a JPEG artifact learning module for learning compression artifacts in the discrete cosine transform (DCT) domain. The backbone model of a network based on pre-training, such as CAT-Net, a representative network for image forgery detection, has a relatively large number of parameters, resulting in overfitting in a small dataset, which hinders generalization performance. Therefore, in this paper, the learning module is designed to learn the characteristics according to the DCT domain in real time without pre-training. In the experiments, the proposed network architecture and training method of DRRU-Net show that the network parameters are smaller than CAT-Net, the forgery detection performance is better than that of RRU-Net, and the generalization performance for various datasets can be improved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Digital Media Forensic Detection · Cell Image Analysis Techniques · Image Processing Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Information Security Engineering, Sangmyung University, 31 Sangmyungdae-gil, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan-si 31066, Republic of Korea
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Changing history: Doctored photographs affect memory for past public events10.1002/acp.1394 ↗
2. Mishra, M., and Adhikary, F. (2013). Digital Image Tamper Detection Techniques-A Comprehensive Study. arXiv.
3. Bharti, C.N., and Tandel, P. (2016). A Survey of Image Forgery Detection Techniques, IEEE.10.1109/WiSPNET.2016.7566257 ↗
4. A Survey of Partition-Based Techniques for Copy-Move Forgery Detection
5. Pixel-Based Image Forgery Detection: A Review10.1080/09747338.2014.921415 ↗
6. Digital image forgery detection using passive techniques: A survey10.1016/j.diin.2013.04.007 ↗
7. Survey on blind image forgery detection10.1049/iet-ipr.2012.0388 ↗
8. NGDNet: Nonuniform Gaussian-label distribution learning for infrared head pose estimation and on-task behavior understanding in the classroom10.1016/j.neucom.2020.12.090 ↗
9. Anisotropic angle distribution learning for head pose estimation and attention understanding in human-computer interaction10.1016/j.neucom.2020.09.068 ↗
10. EHPE: Skeleton Cues-based Gaussian Coordinate Encoding for Efficient Human Pose Estimation
11. Shi, Y., Chen, C., and Chen, W. (2007). A Natural Image Model Approach to Splicing Detection, ACM.10.1145/1288869.1288878 ↗
12. Digital image splicing detection based on Markov features in DCT and DWT domain10.1016/j.patcog.2012.05.014 ↗
13. An infrared image denoising model with unidirectional gradient and sparsity constraint on biomedical images10.1016/j.infrared.2022.104348 ↗
14. MFDNet: Collaborative Poses Perception and Matrix Fisher Distribution for Head Pose Estimation10.1109/TMM.2021.3081873 ↗
15. GMDL: Toward precise head pose estimation via Gaussian mixed distribution learning for students’ attention understanding10.1016/j.infrared.2022.104099 ↗
16. A Novel Forgery Detection in Image Frames of the Videos Using Enhanced Convolutional Neural Network in Face Images
17. Mo, H., Chen, B., and Luo, W. (2018). Fake Faces Identification via Convolutional Neural Network, ACM.10.1145/3206004.3206009 ↗
18. Fast Blind Instrument Function Estimation Method for Industrial Infrared Spectrometers
19. Efficient Blind Signal Reconstruction with Wavelet Transforms Regularization for Educational Robot Infrared Vision Sensing10.1109/TMECH.2018.2870056 ↗
20. Flexible FTIR Spectral Imaging Enhancement for Industrial Robot Infrared Vision Sensing10.1109/TII.2019.2934728 ↗
21. Wu, Y., AbdAlmageed, W., and Natarajan, P. (2019). ManTra-Net: Manipulation Tracing Network for Detection and Localization of Image Forgeries with Anomalous Features, IEEE.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00977 ↗
22. Bi, X., Wei, Y., Xiao, B., and Li, W. (2019, January 16–19). RRU-Net: The ringed residual U-Net for image splicing forgery detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPRW.2019.00010 ↗
23. Learning JPEG Compression Artifacts for Image Manipulation Detection and Localization10.1007/s11263-022-01617-5 ↗
24. Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognition10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2983686 ↗
25. ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y ↗
26. Mahfoudi, G., Tajini, B., Retraint, F., Morain-Nicolier, F., Dugelay, J.L., and Pic, M. (2019). DEFACTO: Image and Face Manipulation Dataset, EURASIP.10.23919/EUSIPCO.2019.8903181 ↗
27. Dong, J., Wang, W., and Tan, T. (2013). CASIA Image Tampering Detection Evaluation Database, IEEE.10.1109/ChinaSIP.2013.6625374 ↗
28. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition, IEEE.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
29. Hsu, Y., and Chang, S. (2006). Detecting Image Splicing Using Geometry Invariants and Camera Characteristics Consistency, IEEE.10.1109/ICME.2006.262447 ↗
30. (2023, January 20). DEFACTO Splicing Image Set. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/defactodataset/defactosplicing.
31. (2023, January 20). CASIA v2 Dataset. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/divg07/casia-20-image-tampering-detection-dataset.
32. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv.