A Corpus-Based Word Classification Method for Detecting Difficulty Level of English Proficiency Tests
Source abstract
Abstract
Many education systems globally adopt an English proficiency test (EPT) as an effective mechanism to evaluate English as a Foreign Language (EFL) speakers’ comprehension levels. Similarly, Taiwan’s military academy also developed the Military Online English Proficiency Test (MOEPT) to assess EFL cadets’ English comprehension levels. However, the difficulty level of MOEPT has not been detected to help facilitate future updates of its test banks and improve EFL pedagogy and learning. Moreover, it is almost impossible to carry out any investigation effectively using previous corpus-based approaches. Hence, based on the lexical threshold theory, this research adopts a corpus-based approach to detect the difficulty level of MOEPT. The function word list and Taiwan College Entrance Examination Center (TCEEC) word list (which includes Common European Framework of Reference for Language (CEFR) A2 and B1 level word lists) are adopted as the word classification criteria to classify the lexical items. The results show that the difficulty level of MOEPT is mainly the English for General Purposes (EGP) type of CEFR A2 level (lexical coverage = 74.46%). The findings presented in this paper offer implications for the academy management or faculty to regulate the difficulty and contents of MOEPT in the future, to effectively develop suitable EFL curriculums and learning materials, and to conduct remedial teaching for cadets who cannot pass MOEPT. By doing so, it is expected the overall English comprehension level of EFL cadets is expected to improve.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Text Readability and Simplification
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Foreign Languages, R.O.C. Military Academy, Kaohsiung 830, Taiwan
Institute of Education, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan
Department of Management Sciences, R.O.C. Military Academy, Kaohsiung 830, Taiwan
Funding
National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. What does it mean? EL-identified adolescents’ interpretations of testing and course placement10.1002/tesq.3099 ↗
2. Comparing writing proficiency assessments used in professional medical registration: A methodology to inform policy and practice10.1016/j.asw.2020.100493 ↗
3. Using multistage testing to enhance measurement of an English language proficiency test10.1080/15434303.2021.1988953 ↗
4. A longitudinal study at an English medium instruction university in Turkey: The interplay between English language improvement and academic success
5. Using utterance recall to assess second language proficiency10.1111/lang.12399 ↗
6. Young Korean EFL learners’ reading and test-taking strategies in a paper and a computer-based reading comprehension tests10.1080/15434303.2020.1731753 ↗
7. English language proficiency testing in Asia: A new paradigm bridging global and local contexts10.1177/00336882211017367 ↗
8. Test review: Current options in at-home language proficiency tests for making high-stakes decisions10.1177/0265532220943483 ↗
9. Developments and challenges in the use of computer-based testing for assessing second language ability10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00976.x ↗
10. Computer-based diagnostic assessment of high school students’ grammar skills with automated feedback–An international trial10.1080/0969594X.2021.1970513 ↗
11. The effects of individualized, online vocabulary instruction on picture vocabulary scores: An efficacy study10.1080/09588221.2011.586640 ↗
12. A systematic review of item response theory in language assessment: Implications for the dimensionality of language ability10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100963 ↗
13. Psychometrics behind computerized adaptive testing10.1007/s11336-014-9401-5 ↗
14. IRT-based classification analysis of an English language reading proficiency subtest10.1177/02655322211068847 ↗
15. Developing and evaluating a computerized adaptive testing version of the word part levels test10.1177/0265532217725776 ↗
16. Item response theory test equating in health sciences education10.1007/s10459-006-9020-8 ↗
17. Machine learning-driven language assessment10.1162/tacl_a_00310 ↗
18. Development and validation of a computer adaptive EFL test10.1080/15434303.2016.1162793 ↗
19. Is there a core general vocabulary? Introducing the new general service list10.1093/applin/amt018 ↗
20. Vocabulary size and depth as predictors of second language speaking ability10.1016/j.system.2021.102521 ↗
21. West, M.P. (1953). A General Service List of English Words: With Semantic Frequencies and a Supplementary Word-List for the Writing Of Popular Science and Technology, Longman Green.
22. A new academic word list10.2307/3587951 ↗
23. Browne, C., Culligan, B., and Phillips, J. (2022, November 10). The New General Service List. [Corpus Data]. Available online: http://www.newgeneralservicelist.org.
24. Chen, L.C., Chang, K.H., and Chung, H.Y. (2020). A novel statistic-based corpus machine processing approach to refine a big textual data: An ESP case of COVID-19 news reports. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10165505 ↗
25. TCEEC (2022, November 10). The TCEEC Word List [Corpus data]. Available online: https://www.ceec.edu.tw/SourceUse/ce37/ce37.htm.
26. Comparing incidental vocabulary learning from reading-only and reading-while-listening10.1016/j.system.2020.102442 ↗
27. Lexical thresholds for reading comprehension: What they are and how they can be used for teaching purposes10.1002/tesq.140 ↗
28. How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59 ↗
29. Contribution of English aural vocabulary size levels to L2 listening comprehension10.1515/iral-2020-0004 ↗
30. The development and validation of a lemma-based yes/no vocabulary size test10.1177/21582440221074355 ↗
31. Predicting L2 reading proficiency with modalities of vocabulary knowledge: A bootstrapping approach10.1177/0265532219898380 ↗
32. Strategy use in second language vocabulary learning and its relationships with the breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: A structural equation modeling study10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00752 ↗
33. An integrated corpus-based text mining approach used to process military technical information for facilitating EFL troopers’ linguistic comprehension: US anti-tank missile systems as an example10.4038/jnsfsr.v49i3.10146 ↗
34. Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective10.1111/1467-9922.00193 ↗
35. Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524759 ↗
36. The vocabulary thresholds of business textbooks and business research articles for EFL learners10.1016/j.esp.2011.04.005 ↗
37. Nation, I.S.P., and Heatley, A. (2022, November 15). RANGE [Computer software]. Available online: http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/staff/paul-nation/nation.aspx.
38. To what extent is the academic vocabulary list relevant to university student writing?10.1016/j.esp.2016.01.004 ↗
39. A new academic vocabulary list10.1093/applin/amt015 ↗
40. Anthony, L. (2022, November 01). AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software]. Available online: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/.
41. The vocabulary of agriculture semi-popularization articles in English: A corpus-based study10.1016/j.esp.2015.04.001 ↗
42. A novel corpus-based computing method for handling critical word ranking issues: An example of COVID-19 research articles10.1002/int.22413 ↗
43. The general English proficiency test10.1080/15434300701776377 ↗
44. Is Korea ready to be a key player in the medical tourism industry? An English education perspective
45. Nguyen, V.T. (2022). Towards a New Paradigm for English Language Teaching: English for Specific Purposes in Asia and Beyond, Routledge.10.1080/10357823.2022.2051224 ↗
46. Peers, study effort, and academic performance in college education: Evidence from randomly assigned roommates in a flipped classroom10.1007/s11162-019-09571-x ↗
47. Students’ ability to work with graphs in physics studies related to three typical student groups10.33225/jbse/20.19.298 ↗
48. The relationship between three measures of L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading10.1177/0265532216676851 ↗
49. Contribution of vocabulary knowledge to reading comprehension among Chinese students: A meta-analysis10.3389/fpsyg.2020.525369 ↗
50. Teaching English to the test: Why does negative washback exist within secondary education in Bangladesh?10.1080/15434303.2020.1717495 ↗
51. Assessing the lexical richness of figurative expressions in Taiwanese EFL learners’ writing10.1016/j.asw.2019.06.007 ↗
52. Appropriating automated feedback in L2 writing: Experiences of Chinese EFL student writers10.1080/09588221.2020.1799824 ↗
53. “It is complicated!”: Practices and challenges of generic skills assessment in Vietnamese universities10.1080/03055698.2017.1347496 ↗
54. Santucci, V., Santarelli, F., Forti, L., and Spina, S. (2020). Automatic Classification of Text Complexity. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10207285 ↗
55. Forti, L., Bolli, G.G., Santarelli, F., Santucci, V., and Spina, S. (2016, January 11–16). MALT-IT2: A New Resource to Measure Text Difficulty in Light of CEFR Levels for Italian L2 Learning. Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Marseille, France.
56. Santucci, V., Bartoccini, U., Mengoni, P., and Zanda, F. (2022). International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, Springer.