journal article·2025-12Open access

High-Performance Aerospace Components Design with Architected Cellular Materials

Sina Rastegarzadeh, Jun Wang, Jida Huang

Abstract

Abstract High-performance and lightweight materials design is a pressing need in aerospace applications (e.g., aircraft ailerons, flaps, and rudders). However, the unique functionality requirements in strength, weight, and resistance to environmental factors, such as temperature fluctuations and corrosion, challenge traditional structure design methods such as topology optimization. While sandwich panel composites with lattice cores are widely used in aerospace components and modern additive manufacturing techniques open new possibilities for sandwich core structure design with requirement functionalities, the delicate design brings computational challenges for both optimization and manufacturing. This paper presents an inverse design framework for sandwich structure optimization with implicitly represented architected cellular materials to address these issues. Specifically, cellular materials are implicitly represented (described by implicit functions) as building blocks in the core structure design. A multi-objective topology optimization problem is formulated to maximize the core structure’s mechanical and thermal performances. Lastly, the nature of function representation for ease-of-additive manufacturing computations is illustrated with a direct slicing algorithm without generating memory-expensive standard tessellation language (STL) files. The proposed design framework is validated in two practical aerospace design case studies, and experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed optimization algorithm and STL-free scheme for additive manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Topology Optimization in Engineering · Cellular and Composite Structures · Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Bitzer T (1997) Honeycomb core. In: Honeycomb technology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 10–42.10.1007/978-94-011-5856-5_2 ↗
2. Plantema F (1966) The bending and buckling of sandwich beams, plates and shells. Sandwich Construction
3. Farooq U, Ahmad M, Rakha S, Ali N, Khurram A, Subhani T (2017) Interfacial mechanical performance of composite honeycomb sandwich panels for aerospace applications. Arab J Sci Eng 42(5):1775–178210.1007/s13369-016-2307-z ↗
4. Pawlyn M (2019) Biomimicry in architecture. Riba Publishing, Routledge10.4324/9780429346774 ↗
5. Du Plessis A, Broeckhoven C, Yadroitsava I, Yadroitsev I, Hands CH, Kunju R, Bhate D (2019) Beautiful and functional: a review of biomimetic design in additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 27:408–427
6. Tsai KJ, Dixon S, Hale LR, Darbyshire A, Martin D, Mel A (2017) Biomimetic heterogenous elastic tissue development. NPJ Regen Med 2(1):1–810.1038/s41536-017-0021-4 ↗
7. Dong X, Gan W, Shang Y, Tang J, Wang Y, Cao Z, Xie Y, Liu J, Bai L, Li J et al (2022) Low-value wood for sustainable high-performance structural materials. Nat Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00887-810.1038/s41893-022-00887-8 ↗
8. Ghazlan A, Ngo T, Nguyen T, Linforth S, Van Le T (2020) Uncovering a high-performance bio-mimetic cellular structure from trabecular bone. Sci Rep 10(1):1–1310.1038/s41598-020-70536-7 ↗
9. Birman V, Kardomateas GA (2018) Review of current trends in research and applications of sandwich structures. Compos Part B Eng 142:221–24010.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.027 ↗
10. Gibson LJ (1997) Cellular materials: structure, properties, and applications. In: Frontiers of engineering: reports on leading edge engineering from the 1996 NAE Symposium on Frontiers of Engineering, p. 75. National Academies Press
11. Matthews FL, Rawlings RD (1999) Composite materials: engineering and science. Woodhead Publishing, Amsterdam
12. Campbell FC Jr (2003) Manufacturing processes for advanced composites. Elsevier, Amsterdam
13. Meraghni F, Desrumaux F, Benzeggagh M (1999) Mechanical behaviour of cellular core for structural sandwich panels. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 30(6):767–77910.1016/S1359-835X(98)00182-1 ↗
14. Tee YL, Maconachie T, Pille P, Leary M, Do T, Tran P (2021) From nature to additive manufacturing: Biomimicry of porcupine quill. Mater Des 210:11004110.1016/j.matdes.2021.110041 ↗
15. Otsuki B, Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T (2006) Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: three-dimensional microct based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials 27(35):5892–590010.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.013 ↗
16. Fousov´a M, Vojtˇech D, Kub´asek J, Jablonsk´a E, Fojt J (2017) Promising characteristics of gradient porosity Ti-6Al-4V alloy prepared by SLM process. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 69:368–37610.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.043 ↗
17. Gattas JM, You Z (2015) Geometric assembly of rigid-foldable morphing sandwich structures. Eng Struct 94:149–15910.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.019 ↗
18. Mart´ınez-Mart´ın F, Thrall A (2014) Honeycomb core sandwich panels for origami-inspired deployable shelters: multi-objective optimization for minimum weight and maximum energy efficiency. Eng Struct 69:158–16710.1016/j.engstruct.2014.03.012 ↗
19. Hou Y, Neville R, Scarpa F, Remillat C, Gu B, Ruzzene M (2014) Graded conventional-auxetic kirigami sandwich structures: flatwise compression and edgewise loading. Compos Part B Eng 59:33–4210.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.084 ↗
20. Song K, Zhou X, Zang S, Wang H, You Z (2017) Design of rigid-foldable doubly curved origami tessellations based on trapezoidal crease patterns. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 473(2200):20170016
21. Kshad MAE, Naguib HE (2016) Development and modeling of multi-phase polymeric origami inspired architecture by using pre-molded geometrical features. Smart Mater Struct 26(2):02501210.1088/1361-665X/26/2/025012 ↗
22. Feng J, Fu J, Shang C, Lin Z, Li B (2019) Sandwich panel design and performance optimization based on triply periodic minimal surfaces. Comput Aided Des 115:307–32210.1016/j.cad.2019.06.007 ↗
23. Liu T, Deng Z, Lu T (2007) Structural modeling of sandwich structures with lightweight cellular cores. Acta Mech Sin 23(5):545–55910.1007/s10409-007-0096-z ↗
24. Kim T, Zhao C, Lu T, Hodson H (2004) Convective heat dissipation with lattice-frame materials. Mech Mater 36(8):767–78010.1016/j.mechmat.2003.07.001 ↗
25. Tian J, Kim T, Lu T, Hodson H, Queheillalt D, Sypeck D, Wadley H (2004) The effects of topology upon fluid-flow and heat-transfer within cellular copper structures. Int J Heat Mass Transf 47(14–16):3171–318610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.02.010 ↗
26. Lu T, Valdevit L, Evans A (2005) Active cooling by metallic sandwich structures with periodic cores. Prog Mater Sci 50(7):789–81510.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.03.001 ↗
27. Liu T, Deng Z, Lu T (2007) Bi-functional optimization of actively cooled, pressurized hollow sandwich cylinders with prismatic cores. J Mech Phys Solids 55(12):2565–260210.1016/j.jmps.2007.04.007 ↗
28. Xue Z, Hutchinson JW (2006) Crush dynamics of square honeycomb sandwich cores. Int J Numer Methods Eng 65(13):2221–224510.1002/nme.1535 ↗
29. Xue Z, Hutchinson JW (2004) Constitutive model for quasi-static deformation of metallic sandwich cores. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61(13):2205–223810.1002/nme.1142 ↗
30. Lu TJ, Chen F, He D (2000) Sound absorption of cellular metals with semiopen cells. J Acoust Soc Am 108(4):1697–170910.1121/1.1286812 ↗
31. Ruzzene M (2004) Vibration and sound radiation of sandwich beams with honeycomb truss core. J Sound Vib 277(4–5):741–76310.1016/j.jsv.2003.09.026 ↗
32. Hutchinson R, Wicks N, Evans A, Fleck N, Hutchinson J (2003) Kagome plate structures for actuation. Int J Solids Struct 40(25):6969–698010.1016/S0020-7683(03)00348-2 ↗
33. Dong G, Tang Y, Zhao YF (2019) A 149 line homogenization code for three-dimensional cellular materials written in matlab. J Eng Mater Technol 141(1):01100510.1115/1.4040555 ↗
34. Bici M, Brischetto S, Campana F, Ferro CG, Secl`ı C, Varetti S, Maggiore P, Mazza A (2018) Development of a multifunctional panel for aerospace use through slm additive manufacturing. Proced CIRP 67:215–22010.1016/j.procir.2017.12.202 ↗
35. Rastegarzadeh S, Muthusamy S, Huang J (2023) Mechanical profile of smooth cellular materials. J Manuf Sci Eng 145(2):02100510.1115/1.4055520 ↗
36. Li D, Dai N, Tang Y, Dong G, Zhao YF (2019) Design and optimization of graded cellular structures with triply periodic level surface-based topological shapes. J Mech Des. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404261710.1115/1.4042617 ↗
37. Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71(2):197–22410.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2 ↗
38. Goraj Z (2004) An overview of the deicing and anti-icing technologies with prospects for the future. In: 24th international congress of the aeronautical sciences, vol. 29
39. Hung C-C, Dillehay ME, Stahl M (1987) A heater made from graphite composite material for potential deicingapplication. J Aircraft 24(10):725–73010.2514/3.45513 ↗
40. Thompson MK, Moroni G, Vaneker T, Fadel G, Campbell RI, Gibson I, Bernard A, Schulz J, Graf P, Ahuja B et al (2016) Design for additive manufacturing: trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints. CIRP Ann 65(2):737–76010.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004 ↗
41. Rastegarzadeh S, Huang J (2024) Standard tessellation language-free adaptive slicing scheme for additive manufacturing of cellular materials. J Comput Inf Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.406322710.1115/1.4063227 ↗
42. Rastegarzadeh S, Wang J, Huang J (2023) Implicitly represented architected materials for multi-scale design and high-resolution additive manufacturing. Adv Mater Technol 8(17):230027410.1002/admt.202300274 ↗