journal article·2023-01-05Open access

Application of Response Surface Method in Pulsed Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Complex Plant Materials—A Case Study on Cannabis sativa L.

Zbigniew Kobus, Agnieszka Buczaj, Anna Pecyna, Jacek Kapica, Pavol Findura, Sławomir Kocira

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 2

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to optimize the effect of particle size, time and ultrasonic intensity on the extraction of phenolic compounds and energy efficiency. Sonication was performed with a VC750 Sonics processor at the following amplitudes: 30, 50 and 70%, which corresponds to the ultrasonic intensity, respectively: 1.6; 5.1 and 8.6 W∙cm−2. The frequency of ultrasound was 20 kHz. Extraction was carried out in a 5 s on–10 s off pulse system. The content of polyphenols and their antioxidant activity were assayed by the spectrophotometric method. Response surface methodology (RMS) was used to optimize the investigated variables. On the basis of the developed model, the highest polyphenols yield was obtained under the following extraction conditions (particle size 0.65 mm, extraction time 13.14 min, ultrasound intensity 6.92 W∙cm−2, which resulted in a maximum value of 15.24 mg GAE∙g−1 dry matter of hemp. Taking into account the lowest unit energy consumption, the best conditions were obtained for particle size of approx. 0.5 mm, extraction time 7.7 min, and ultrasound intensity 1.8 W∙cm−2, which resulted in a phenolic yield of 10.14 mg GAE∙g−1 dry matter of hemp. The best agreement between values of optimization variables within investigated criteria was obtained for the variable particle size. The developed models of pulsed ultrasound-assisted extraction can be used for obtaining polyphenols from Cannabis sativa L. at low unit energy consumption.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities · Microbial Inactivation Methods · Microencapsulation and Drying Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Technology Fundamentals, University of Life Sciences, Głęboka 28, 20-612 Lublin, Poland

Faculty of Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia

Department of Machinery Exploitation and Management of Production Processes, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Techniques for extraction and isolation of natural products: A comprehensive review10.1186/s13020-018-0177-x ↗
2. Impact of conventional/non-conventional extraction methods on the untargeted phenolic profile of Moringa oleifera leaves10.1016/j.foodres.2018.11.046 ↗
3. Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction and pressurized liquid extraction of phenolic compounds fromMoringa oleiferaleaves by multiresponse surface methodology10.1002/elps.201600071 ↗
4. Turrini, F., Donno, D., Beccaro, G.L., Zunin, P., Pittaluga, A., and Boggia, R. (2019). Pulsed Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction as an Alternative Method to Conventional Maceration for the Extraction of the Polyphenolic Fraction of Ribes nigrum Buds: A New Category of Food Supplements Proposed by The FINNOVER Project. Foods, 8.10.3390/foods8100466 ↗
5. Review of Green Food Processing techniques. Preservation, transformation, and extraction10.1016/j.ifset.2017.04.016 ↗
6. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2019, July 26). Green Chemistry’s 12 Principles, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/greenchemistry/basics-green-chemistry#twelve.
7. Extraction of pectin from passion fruit peel assisted by ultrasound10.1016/j.lwt.2016.03.027 ↗
8. Ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE) of bioactive compounds from fruit and vegetable processing by-products: A review10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105325 ↗
9. Review on the extraction of bioactive compounds and characterization of fruit industry by-products10.1186/s40643-022-00498-3 ↗
10. Dynamic ultrasound-assisted extraction of oleuropein and related biophenols from olive leaves10.1016/j.chroma.2005.12.106 ↗
11. Modeling and optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of polyphenolic compounds from Aronia melanocarpa by-products from filter-tea factory10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.10.002 ↗
12. Mehta, N., Kumar, P., Verma, A.K., Umaraw, P., Khatkar, S.K., Khatkar, A.B., Pathak, D., Kaka, U., and Sazili, A.Q. (2022). Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction and the Encapsulation of Bioactive Components for Food Applications. Foods, 11.10.3390/foods11192973 ↗
13. Response surface optimization of ultrasound assisted extraction of pectin from pomegranate peel10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.10.037 ↗
14. Ultrasound assisted extraction of pectin from waste Artocarpus heterophyllus fruit peel10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.06.015 ↗
15. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of polysaccharide from Nephelium lappaceum L. fruit peel10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.07.032 ↗
16. Effects of ultrasound and/or heating on the extraction of pectin from grapefruit peel10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.11.004 ↗
17. Optimization of pulsed ultrasound-assisted technique for extraction of phenolics from pomegranate peel of Malas variety: Punicalagin and hydroxybenzoic acids10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.017 ↗
18. Valorisation of baobab (Adansonia digitata) seeds by ultrasound assisted extraction of polyphenolics. Optimisation and comparison with conventional methods10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.11.023 ↗
19. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of functional compound from mulberry (Morus alba L.) leaf using response surface methodology and effect of microencapsulation by spray drying on quality of optimized extract10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105806 ↗
20. Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Phenolic Compounds, Antioxidants, and Anthocyanins from Grape (Vitis vinifera) Seeds10.1021/jf9001439 ↗
21. Improving the extraction of carotenoids from tomato waste by application of ultrasound under pressure10.1016/j.seppur.2014.09.008 ↗
22. Ultrasonic-assisted extraction for flavonoid compounds content and antioxidant activities of India Moringa oleifera L. leaves: Simultaneous optimization, HPLC characterization and comparison with other methods
23. Ultrasound as an alternative technology to extract carotenoids and lipids from Heterochlorella luteoviridis10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.107 ↗
24. Ultrasound-assisted extraction and bioaccessibility of saponins from edible seeds: Quinoa, lentil, fenugreek, soybean and lupin10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.058 ↗
25. Dry matter extraction from valerian roots (Valeriana officinalis L.) with the help of pulsed acoustic field
26. Continuous and pulsed ultrasound-assisted extractions of antioxidants from pomegranate peel10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.05.015 ↗
27. Pulsed ultrasound-assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from papaya pulp and papaya peel using response surface methodology: Optimization and comparison with hot water extraction10.1016/j.afres.2022.100178 ↗
28. Pulsed ultrasound assisted extraction of protein from defatted Bitter melon seeds (Momardica charantia L.) meal: Kinetics and quality measurements10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112997 ↗
29. Characterization of olive pomace extract obtained by cyclodextrin-enhanced pulsed ultrasound assisted extraction10.1016/j.lwt.2018.02.011 ↗
30. Continuous and pulsed ultrasound-assisted extraction of carob’s antioxidants: Processing parameters optimization and identification of polyphenolic composition10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105630 ↗
31. Ultrasound-assisted rapid extraction and kinetic modelling of influential factors: Extraction of camptothecin from Nothapodytes nimmoniana plant10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.02.015 ↗
32. Continuous and pulsed ultrasound pectin extraction from navel orange peels10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105480 ↗
33. Kobus, Z., Krzywicka, M., Pecyna, A., and Buczaj, A. (2021). Process Efficiency and Energy Consumption during the Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Bioactive Substances from Hawthorn Berries. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14227638 ↗
34. Kobus, Z., Wilczynski, K., Nadulski, R., Rydzak, L., and Guz, T. (2017, January 20–22). Effect of Solvent Polarity on the Efficiency of Ultrasound-assisted Extraction of Polyphenols from Apple Pomace. Proceedings of the IX International Scientific Symposium Farm Machinery and Processes Management in Sustainable Agriculture, Lublin, Poland.10.24326/fmpmsa.2017.29 ↗
35. Kobus, Z., Pecyna, A., Buczaj, A., Krzywicka, M., Przywara, A., and Nadulski, R. (2022). Optimization of the Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Cannabis sativa L. Leaves and Inflorescences Using Response Surface Methodology. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12136747 ↗
36. Effect of the duty cycle of the ultrasonic processor on the efficiency of extraction of phenolic compounds from Sorbus intermedia10.1038/s41598-022-12244-y ↗
37. Bibi Sadeer, N., Montesano, D., Albrizio, S., Zengin, G., and Mahomoodally, M.F. (2020). The Versatility of Antioxidant Assays in Food Science and Safety—Chemistry, Applications, Strengths, and Limitations. Antioxidants, 9.10.3390/antiox9080709 ↗
38. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay10.1006/abio.1996.0292 ↗
39. Nutraceutical potential of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) seeds and sprouts10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.04.078 ↗
40. Effect of extraction conditions on total polyphenol contents, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Cannabis sativa L. Electron
41. Siano, F., Moccia, S., Picariello, G., Russo, G.L., Sorrentino, G., Di Stasio, M., La Cara, F., and Volpe, M.G. (2018). Comparative Study of Chemical, Biochemical Characteristic and ATR-FTIR Analysis of Seeds, Oil and Flour of the Edible Fedora Cultivar Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Molecules, 24.10.3390/molecules24010083 ↗
42. Seed composition of ten industrial hemp cultivars approved for production in Canada10.1016/j.jfca.2014.11.004 ↗
43. Antiproliferative and antioxidant effect of polar hemp extracts (Cannabis sativa L., Fedora cv.) in human colorectal cell lines10.1080/09637486.2019.1666804 ↗
44. Izzo, L., Castaldo, L., Narváez, A., Graziani, G., Gaspari, A., Rodríguez-Carrasco, Y., and Ritieni, A. (2020). Analysis of Phenolic Compounds in Commercial Cannabis sativa L. Inflorescences Using UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap HRMS. Molecules, 25.10.3390/molecules25030631 ↗
45. Effect of extraction solvent on total polyphenols content and antioxidant activity of Cannabis sativa L.
46. Multiple pharmacognostic characterization on hemp commercial cultivars: Focus on inflorescence water extract activity10.1016/j.fct.2019.01.035 ↗
47. Influence of particle size and extraction solvent on antioxidant properties of extracts of tea, ginger, and tea-ginger blend10.1002/fsn3.509 ↗
48. Ultrasound assisted extraction of polyphenols from black chokeberry10.1016/j.seppur.2012.03.024 ↗
49. Investigation in solid–liquid extraction: Influence of ultrasound10.1016/S1385-8947(01)00206-6 ↗
50. Optimization of Extraction of Phenolic and Antioxidant Activities from Celosia cristata Seeds Using Response Surface Methodology10.33263/BRIAC132.148 ↗
51. Effect of ultrasound treatment on particle size and molecular weight of whey proteins10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.08.012 ↗
52. Batch and Continuous Ultrasound Assisted Extraction of Boldo Leaves (Peumus boldus Mol.)10.3390/ijms14035750 ↗
53. Some neglected or rejected paths in sonochemistry–A very personal view10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.11.014 ↗
54. Effect of ultrasonic treatment on the polyphenol content and antioxidant capacity of extract from defatted hemp, flax and canola seed cakes10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.08.002 ↗
55. Energetyczne aspekty sonifikacji suszu z marchwi
56. Reduction of environmental impacts of caffeine extraction from guarana by using ultrasound assistance10.1016/j.fbp.2021.02.014 ↗
57. The kinetics of the extraction of caffeine from guarana seed under the action of ultrasonic field with simultaneous cooling10.1515/gps-2020-0003 ↗