CRISPR-Based Multi-Gene Integration Strategies to Create Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains for Consolidated Bioprocessing
Source abstract
Abstract
Significant engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required to enable consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) of lignocellulose to ethanol. Genome modification in S. cerevisiae has been successful partly due to its efficient homology-directed DNA repair machinery, and CRISPR technology has made multi-gene editing even more accessible. Here, we tested the integration of cellulase encoding genes to various sites on the yeast genome to inform the best strategy for creating cellulolytic strains for CBP. We targeted endoglucanase (EG) or cellobiohydrolase (CBH) encoding genes to discreet chromosomal sites for single-copy integration or to the repeated delta sites for multi-copy integration. CBH1 activity was significantly higher when the gene was targeted to the delta sequences compared to single gene integration loci. EG production was comparable, though lower when the gene was targeted to a chromosome 10 site. We subsequently used the information to construct a strain containing three cellulase encoding genes. While individual cellulase activities could be assayed and cellulose conversion demonstrated, it was shown that targeting specific genes to specific loci had dramatic effects on strain efficiency. Since marker-containing plasmids could be cured from these strains, additional genetic changes can subsequently be made to optimize strains for CBP conversion of lignocellulose.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CRISPR and Genetic Engineering · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biotechnology, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, Cape Town 7530, South Africa
Funding
National Research Foundation
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Budding yeast for budding geneticists: A primer on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae model system10.1534/genetics.114.163188 ↗
2. Advances in metabolic engineering of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of chemicals10.1002/biot.201300445 ↗
3. Demeke, M.M., Dumortier, F., Li, Y., Broeckx, T., Foulquie-Moreno, M.R., and Thevelein, J.M. (2013). Combining inhibitor tolerance and D-xylose fermentation in industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient lignocellulose-based bioethanol production. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 6.10.1186/1754-6834-6-120 ↗
4. Recent advances in bioethanol production from lignocelluloses: A comprehensive review with a focus on enzyme engineering and designer biocatalysts10.18331/BRJ2020.7.4.5 ↗
5. Development of yeast cell factories for consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose to bioethanol through cell surface engineering10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.10.011 ↗
6. Oh, E.J., and Jin, Y.S. (2020). Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient fermentation of cellulose. FEMS Yeast Res., 20.10.1093/femsyr/foz089 ↗
7. Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: An update10.1016/j.copbio.2005.08.009 ↗
8. Consolidated Bioprocessing for Bioethanol Production Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae
9. Endowing non-cellulolytic microorganisms with cellulolytic activity aiming for consolidated bioprocessing10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.02.007 ↗
10. Progress and challenges in the engineering of non-cellulolytic microorganisms for consolidated bioprocessing10.1016/j.copbio.2014.10.003 ↗
11. Value-added biotransformation of cellulosic sugars by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.013 ↗
12. Den Haan, R., Rose, S.H., Cripwell, R.A., Trollope, K.M., Myburgh, M.W., Viljoen-Bloom, M., and van Zyl, W.H. (2021). Heterologous production of cellulose- and starch-degrading hydrolases to expand Saccharomyces cerevisiae substrate utilization: Lessons learnt. Biotechnol. Adv., 53.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107859 ↗
13. Application of synthetic biology for production of chemicals in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
14. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems10.1038/nrmicro3569 ↗
15. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems10.1093/nar/gkt135 ↗
16. CRISPR−Cas system enables fast and simple genome editing of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains10.1016/j.meteno.2015.03.001 ↗
17. Ronda, C., Maury, J., Jakočiunas, T., Jacobsen, S.A., Germann, S.M., Harrison, S.J., Borodina, I., Keasling, J.D., Jensen, M.K., and Nielsen, A.T. (2015). CrEdit: CRISPR mediated multi-loci gene integration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb. Cell Fact., 14.10.1186/s12934-015-0288-3 ↗
18. Brevnova, E., McBride, J., Wiswall, E., Wenger, K., Caiazza, N., Hau, H., Argyros, A., Agbogbo, F., Rice, C., and Barret, T. (2011). Yeast Expressing Saccharolytic Enzymes for Consolidated Bioprocessing Using Starch and Cellulose. (WO/2011/153516).
19. Ilmén, M., Den Haan, R., Brevnova, E., McBride, J., Wiswall, E., Froehlich, A., Koivula, A., Voutilainen, S.P., Siika-aho, M., and Lagrange, D.C. (2011). High level secretion of cellobiohydrolases by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 4.10.1186/1754-6834-4-30 ↗
20. Improving the functionality of surface-engineered yeast cells by altering the cell wall morphology of the host strain10.1007/s00253-021-11440-6 ↗
21. Surface tethered xylosidase activity improved xylan conversion in engineered strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae10.1002/jctb.7044 ↗
22. Heterologous expression of cellulase genes in natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains10.1007/s00253-016-7735-x ↗
23. δ-Integration of endo/exo-glucanase and β-glucosidase genes into the yeast chromosomes for direct conversion of cellulose to ethanol10.1016/S0141-0229(99)00011-3 ↗
24. Moriguchi, K., Yamamoto, S., Ohmine, Y., and Suzuki, K. (2016). A fast and practical yeast transformation method mediated by Escherichia coli based on a trans-kingdom conjugal transfer system: Just mix two cultures and wait one hour. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0148989 ↗
25. E-CRISP: Fast CRISPR target site identification10.1038/nmeth.2812 ↗
26. A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli10.1016/0378-1119(87)90131-4 ↗
27. Improvement of cell-tethered cellulase activity in recombinant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae10.1007/s00253-022-12114-7 ↗
28. Degradation of xylan to D-xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae coexpressing the Aspergillus niger beta-xylosidase (xlnD) and the Trichoderma reesei xylanase II (xyn2) genes10.1128/AEM.67.12.5512-5519.2001 ↗
29. Den Haan, R., van Zyl, J.M., Harms, T.M., and Van Zyl, W.H. (2013). Modeling the minimum enzymatic requirements for optimal cellulose conversion. Environ. Res. Lett, 8.10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025013 ↗
30. Teste, M.A., Duquenne, M., Francois, J.M., and Parrou, J.L. (2009). Validation of reference genes for quantitative expression analysis by real-time RT-PCR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Mol. Biol., 10.10.1186/1471-2199-10-99 ↗
31. Construction of a quadruple auxotrophic mutant of an industrial polyploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain by using RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease10.1128/AEM.02310-14 ↗
32. Van Wyk, N., Kroukamp, H., Espinosa, M.I., von Wallbrunn, C., Wendland, J., and Pretorius, I.S. (2020). Blending wine yeast phenotypes with the aid of CRISPR DNA editing technologies. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 324.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108615 ↗
33. Microbial production of indolylglucosinolate through engineering of a multi-gene pathway in a versatile yeast expression platform10.1016/j.ymben.2012.01.006 ↗
34. Characterization of chromosomal integration sites for heterologous gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae10.1002/yea.1705 ↗
35. Mitsui, R., Yamada, R., and Ogino, H. (2019). CRISPR system in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its application in the bioproduction of useful chemicals. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 35.10.1007/s11274-019-2688-8 ↗
36. Yamada, R., Taniguchi, N., Tanaka, T., Ogino, C., Fukuda, H., and Kondo, A. (2010). Cocktail δ-integration: A novel method to construct cellulolytic enzyme expression ratio-optimized yeast strains. Microb. Cell Fact., 9.10.1186/1475-2859-9-32 ↗
37. Secretory overexpression of the endoglucanase by Saccharomyces cerevisiae via CRISPR-δ-integration and multiple promoter shuffling10.1016/j.enzmictec.2018.10.014 ↗
38. A highly efficient single-step, markerless strategy for multi-copy chromosomal integration of large biochemical pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae10.1016/j.ymben.2015.10.011 ↗
39. Fleiss, A., O’Donnell, S., Fournier, T., Lu, W., Agier, N., Delmas, S., Schacherer, J., and Fischer, G. (2019). Reshuffling yeast chromosomes with CRISPR/Cas9. PLoS Genet., 15.10.1371/journal.pgen.1008332 ↗
40. EasyClone: Method for iterative chromosomal integration of multiple genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae10.1111/1567-1364.12118 ↗
41. Wu, X.-L., Li, B.-Z., Zhang, W.-Z., Song, K., Qi, H., Dai, J.-B., and Yuan, Y.-J. (2017). Genome-wide landscape of position effects on heterogeneous gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 10.10.1186/s13068-017-0872-3 ↗
42. Perspectives and new directions for the production of bioethanol using consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose10.1016/j.copbio.2009.05.006 ↗
43. A review of lignocellulose bioconversion using enzymatic hydrolysis and synergistic cooperation between enzymes--factors affecting enzymes, conversion and synergy10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.03.002 ↗
44. Adiego-Pérez, B., Randazzo, P., Daran, J.M., Verwaal, R., Roubos, J.A., Daran-Lapujade, P., and van der Oost, J. (2019). Multiplex genome editing of microorganisms using CRISPR-Cas. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 366.10.1093/femsle/fnz086 ↗
45. CRISPOR: Intuitive guide selection for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing experiments and screens10.1093/nar/gky354 ↗
46. Refined sgRNA efficacy prediction improves large- and small-scale CRISPR-Cas9 applications10.1093/nar/gkx1268 ↗
47. CHOPCHOP v3: Expanding the CRISPR web toolbox beyond genome editing10.1093/nar/gkz365 ↗
48. Liao, C., Ttofali, F., Slotkowski, R.A., Denny, S.R., Cecil, T.D., Leenay, R.T., Keung, A.J., and Beisel, C.L. (2019). Modular one-pot assembly of CRISPR arrays enables library generation and reveals factors influencing crRNA biogenesis. Nat. Commun., 10.10.1038/s41467-019-10747-3 ↗
49. A highly characterized synthetic landing pad system for precise multicopy gene integration in yeast10.1021/acssynbio.8b00339 ↗
50. The yeast platform engineered for synthetic gRNA-landing pads enables multiple gene integrations by a single gRNA/Cas9 system10.1016/j.ymben.2021.01.011 ↗
51. Mans, R., van Rossum, H.M., Wijsman, M., Backx, A., Kuijpers, N.G., van den Broek, M., Daran-Lapujade, P., Pronk, J.T., van Maris, A.J., and Daran, J.M. (2015). CRISPR/Cas9: A molecular Swiss army knife for simultaneous introduction of multiple genetic modifications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res., 15.10.1093/femsyr/fov004 ↗
52. The influence of eukaryotic chromatin state on CRISPR-Cas9 editing efficiencies10.1016/j.copbio.2018.07.005 ↗
53. A Cas9-based toolkit to program gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae10.1093/nar/gkw1023 ↗
54. Rational strain engineering interventions to enhance cellulase secretion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae10.1002/bbb.1824 ↗
55. Exploiting strain diversity and rational engineering strategies to enhance recombinant cellulase secretion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae10.1007/s00253-020-10602-2 ↗