Application-Specific Computational Materials Design via Multiscale Modeling and the Inductive Design Exploration Method (IDEM)
Source abstract
Abstract
The development of materials is a laborious, iterative, expensive, and intuitive process, often requiring decades to transition from early laboratory studies to commercial applications. This research seeks to address this issue by demonstrating a systematic process for linking process-structure-property-performance (PSPP) relations. We argue that the limitations on time for the material development process arise in large part due to lack of effective approaches for exploring the material design space that anticipates application requirements, objectives, and constraints. The material design process employed here utilizes hierarchical multiscale modeling, analytical models, and associated metamodels to construct a set of bottom-up deductive mappings, along with the inductive design exploration method (IDEM) to account for uncertainty in pursuing top-down inductive decision support problems that address application-specific design objectives. The demonstrated problem considers the simultaneous design of ultra-high-performance concrete material and a structural panel able to withstand a 1.5-MPa-ms reflected blast wave impulse. A set of PSPP mappings were constructed across micro-, meso-, and macro-length-scales using analytical expressions and a hierarchical multiscale finite element model at the single fiber, multiple fiber, and structural length scales. The set of PSPP deductive mappings considered seven design variables-panel thickness, fiber pitch, ratio of water to cementitious materials, curing temperature, and volume fractions of fibers, cement, and silica fume-across four hierarchical levels. After the set of deductive PSPP mappings were constructed and validated, ranged sets of feasible values for each design variable were determined via IDEM. Starting with the highest and next-to-higher hierarchical levels as the output and input spaces, respectively, IDEM was implemented via application of three steps-discretization of input variables, projection of discretized sets of input variables with account of uncertainty to a range in the output space, and determination of which sets of discrete input values satisfy the output space requirement(s). By recursively applying these three steps, the PSPP relations were robustly searched for properties, structures, and processes that satisfy the performance requirement(s). The advantages of this approach are the identification of ranged sets of values of design variables and the ability to account for propagated uncertainty. By defining additional mass and cost objectives, the feasible input space was then searched to find the preferred combination of values of design variables that minimized mass and minimized cost while maintaining a robust material and structural design.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Holdren JP (2011) Materials genome initiative. National Science and Technology Council, Washington, D.C. Available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/materials_genome_initiative-final.pdf . Accessed 29 Mar 2016
2. McDowell DL, Panchal J, Choi HJ, Seepersad C, Allen J, Mistree F (2009) Integrated design of multiscale, multifunctional materials and products. Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington
3. McDowell DL, Olson GB (2008) Concurrent design of hierarchical materials and structures. Sci Model Simul 15:207–240. doi: 10.1007/s10820-008-9100-610.1007/s10820-008-9100-6 ↗
4. Ashby MF (2011) Materials selection in mechanical design, 4th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington
5. Ellis BD, McDowell DL, Zhou M (2014) Simulation of single fiber pullout response with account of fiber morphology. Cem Conc Comp 48:42–5210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.01.003 ↗
6. Grote DL, Park SW, Zhou M (2001) Dynamic behavior of concrete at high strain rates and pressures: I. Experimental characterization. Int J Impact Eng 25:869–88610.1016/S0734-743X(01)00020-3 ↗
7. Olson GB (1997) Computational design of hierarchically structured materials. Science 277:1237–124210.1126/science.277.5330.1237 ↗
8. Fullwood DT, Niezgoda SR, Adams BL, Kalidindi SR (2010) Microstructure sensitive design for performance optimization. Prog Mater Sci 55:477–56210.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.08.002 ↗
9. Choi HJ, Allen JK, Rosen D, McDowell DL, Mistree F (2005) An inductive design exploration method for the integrated design of multi-scale materials and products. In: Proceedings of ASME 2005 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Long Beach, pp 859–87010.1115/DETC2005-85335 ↗
10. Choi HJ, Austin R, Allen JK, McDowell DL, Mistree F, Benson DJ (2005) An approach for robust design of reactive powder metal mixtures based on non-deterministic micro-scale shock simulation. J Computer-Aided Mater Des 12:57–8510.1007/s10820-005-1056-1 ↗
11. Choi HJ, McDowell DL, Allen JK, Rosen D, Mistree F (2008) An inductive design exploration method for robust multiscale materials design. J Mech Des 130:031402–03141310.1115/1.2829860 ↗
12. Ruderman A, Choi SK, Patel J, Kumar A, Allen JK (2012) Simulation-based robust design of multi-scale products. J Mech Des 132:101003-1–101003-12
13. Richard P, Cheyrezy M, Dugat J (1996) Method and a composition for preparing concrete elements having remarkable compressive strength and fracture energy, and elements obtained thereby. US Patent 5,522,926, 4 June 1996
14. Graybeal B (2006) Material property characterization of ultra-high performance concrete. U.S. Department of Transportation, RHWA-HRT-06-103, McLean
15. Mehta PK, Monteiro PJM (2005) Concrete: microstructure, properties, and materials, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
16. Thomas MDA, Green B, O’Neal E, Perry V, Hayman S, Hossack A (2012) Marine performance of UHPC at Treat Island. In: Ultra-high performance concrete and nanotechnology in construction, Kassel, Germany, pp 365–370
17. Oh B, Cha SW, Jang BS, Jang SY (2002) Development of high-performance concrete having high resistance to chloride penetration. Nucl Eng Des 212:221–23110.1016/S0029-5493(01)00484-8 ↗
18. Kelly TD, van Oss HG, Matos GR (2012) U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 140: Cement statistics. Reston, VA
19. Bache HH (1980) Shaped and composite material and procedure for the preparation of the same. Danish Patent 151,378, 2 June 1980
20. Graybeal B (2012) Construction of field-cast ultra-high performance concrete connections. U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA-HRT-12-038, McLean, VA
21. Mindess S, Young JF, Darwin D (2002) Concrete, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
22. Taguchi G (1992) Taguchi on robust technology development: bringing quality engineering upstream. ASME Press, New York
23. Chen W, Allen JK, Tsui KL, Mistree F (1996) A procedure for robust design: minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors. J Mech Des 118:478–48510.1115/1.2826915 ↗
24. Ellis BD (2013) Multiscale modeling and design of ultra-high-performance concrete. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta
25. Klobes P, Rübner K, Hempel S, Prinz C (2008) Investigation of the microstructure of ultra high performance concrete. In: Characterisation of porous solids VIII, Edinburgh, pp 354–361
26. Cheyrezy M, Maret V, Frouin L (1995) Microstructural analysis of RPC (reactive powder concrete). Cem Concr Res 25:1491–150010.1016/0008-8846(95)00143-Z ↗
27. Scheydt JC, Müller HS (2012) Microstructure of ultra high performance concrete (UHPC) and its impact on durability. In Proceedings of HiPerMat 2012 3rd international symposium on UHPC and nanotechnology for high performance construction materials, Kassel, Germany, pp 349–356
28. Garboczi EJ, Bentz DP (1998) Multiscale analytical/numerical theory of the diffusivity of concrete. Adv Cem Based Mater 8:77–8810.1016/S1065-7355(98)00010-8 ↗
29. Lu B, Torquato S (1992) Nearest-surface distribution functions for polydispersed particle systems. Phys Rev A 45:5530–554410.1103/PhysRevA.45.5530 ↗
30. Ollivier JP, Maso JC, Bourdette B (1995) Interfacial transition zone in concrete. Adv Cem Based Mater 2:30–3810.1016/1065-7355(95)90037-3 ↗
31. Stovall T, de Larrard F, Buil M (1986) Linear packing density model of grain mixtures. Powder Technol 48:1–1210.1016/0032-5910(86)80058-4 ↗
32. Yazıcı H, Yardımcı MY, Aydın S, Karabulut AŞ (2009) Mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete containing mineral admixtures under different curing regimes. Constr Build Mater 23:1223–123110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.003 ↗
33. Dessault Systemes (2010) Abaqus v6.10 theory manual. Dassault Systemes, Providence
34. Baltay P, Gjelsvik A (1990) Coefficient of friction for steel on concrete at high normal stress. J Mater Civ Eng 2:46–4910.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1990)2:1(46) ↗
35. Sujivorakul C (2002) Development of high performance fiber reinforced cement composites using twisted polygonal steel fibers. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
36. Bolander JE Jr, Saito S (1997) Discrete modeling of short-fiber reinforcement in cementitious composites. Adv Cem Based Mater 6:76–8610.1016/S1065-7355(97)90014-6 ↗
37. DiPaolo BP, Johnson CF, Green BH, Hart WS, Magee RE, and Robbins BA (2012) Structured-materials ( Stuc’d Mats) design concept and its application for protective structures panels: Blast and sequence ballistic-blast testing, U.S. Army Engineering Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, ERDC/GSL TR-12, Feb. 2012
38. Li VC, Wang Y, Backer S (1990) Effect of inclining angle, bundling and surface treatment on synthetic fibre pull-out from a cement matrix. Composites 21:132–14010.1016/0010-4361(90)90005-H ↗
39. Ellis BD, DiPaolo BP, McDowell DL, Zhou M (2014) Experimental investigation and multiscale modeling of ultra-high-performance concrete panels subject to blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 69:95–10310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.12.011 ↗
40. Powers TC (1958) Structure and physical properties of hardened Portland cement paste. J Am Ceram Soc 41:1–610.1111/j.1151-2916.1958.tb13494.x ↗
41. Odler I, Rößler M (1985) Investigations on the relationship between porosity, structure and strength of hydrated Portland cement pastes. II. Effect of pore structure and of degree of hydration. Cem Concr Res 15:401–41010.1016/0008-8846(85)90113-9 ↗
42. Kumar R, Bhattacharjee B (2003) Porosity, pore size distribution and in situ strength of concrete. Cem Concr Res 33:155–16410.1016/S0008-8846(02)00942-0 ↗
43. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos T Roy Soc A 221:163–19810.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
44. ASTM International (2012) Standard test method for flexural performance of fiber-reinforced concrete (using beam with third-point loading). Testing Standard C1609/C1609M-12, ASTM, West Conshohocken
45. ASTM International (2004) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. Testing Standard C 496/C 496M, ASTM, West Conshohocken.
46. Oluokun F (1991) Prediction of concrete tensile strength from its compressive strength: evaluation of existing relations for normal weight concrete. ACI Mater J 88:302–309
47. Garas-Yanni VY (2009) Multi-scale investigation of tensile creep of ultra-high performance concrete for bridge applications. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.01.002 ↗
48. Pul S (2008) Experimental investigation of tensile behaviour of high strength concrete. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 15:467–472
49. Zheng W, Kwan AKH, Lee PKK (2001) Direct tension test of concrete. ACI Mater J 98:63–71
50. National Institute of Standards and Technology (2001) Cost Optimization Software Tool (COST). Available at http://ciks.cbt.nist.gov/cost/ . Accessed 1 Apr 2013