Experimental Analysis of Constrained Layer Damping Structures for Vibration Isolation in Lightweight Railway Vehicles
Source abstract
Abstract
Rolling stock manufacturers face the challenge of manufacturing lightweight high-speed trains without deteriorating comfort. One of the difficulties is to mantain or increase structural stiffness and damping as the car bodies become lighter. Leaving aside active solutions, which are expensive and generally complex to implement, increasing structural damping by means of viscoelastic patches (via Constrained Layer Damping) seems to be a viable solution which is in fact already used for acoustic insulation in automotive, aerospace and even railway applications. Although there are works in the literature that try to optimise viscoelastic panels, this work presents an experimental study with two essential contributions: (i) to analyse the influence of a broad set of design parameters such as type of the constraining layer (uniform or honeycomb), thickness of the viscoelastic layer, location, covered area and continuity between patches; and (ii) to consider absolute and specific (per unit mass) damping depending on the design scenario. To locally increase the structural damping of an existing lightweight structure without compromising its weight, partial application of thin viscoelastic and constraining layers turned out to be the best solution. To enhance structural damping from the design stages, disregarding constraining layer mass by incorporating its stiffness into the overall stiffness of the structure, full coverage with thick viscoelastic layer and a honeycomb constraining layer with a high cross-section moment of inertia turned out to be the best option, reaching modal damping ratios up to 22 times higher than structures without viscoelastic materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
E.T.S. Ingeniería Industrial de Ciudad Real, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain
Funding
MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 · JCCM-ERDF
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Influences of car body vertical flexibility on ride quality of passenger railway vehicles10.1243/09544097JRRT272 ↗
2. Nashif, A., Jones, D., and Henderson, J. (1985). Vibration Damping, John Wiley.
3. Mead, D. (1998). Passive Vibration Control, John Wiley & Sons.
4. Recent applications of viscoelastic damping for noise control in automobiles and commercial airplanes10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00106-8 ↗
5. Experimental study of the effect of viscoelastic damping materials on noise and vibration reduction within railway vehicles10.1016/j.jsv.2008.03.071 ↗
6. Analysis of structural damping performance in passenger vehicles chassis10.1121/1.3249345 ↗
7. Modal methodology for the simulation and optimization of the free-layer damping treatment of a car body10.1115/1.4000844 ↗
8. Giannella, V., Branda, F., Passaro, J., Petrone, G., Barbarino, M., and Citarella, R. (2020). Acoustic improvements of aircraft headrests based on Electrospun Mats evaluated through Boundary Element Method. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10165712 ↗
9. Giannella, V., Colangeli, C., Cuenca, J., Citarella, R., and Barbarino, M. (2020). Experimental/Numerical acoustic assessment of aircraft seat headrests based on Electrospun Mats. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11146400 ↗
10. Fomin, O., Gorbunov, M., Lovska, A., Gerlici, J., and Kravchenko, K. (2021). Dynamics and strength of circular tube open wagons with aluminum foam filled center sills. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14081915 ↗
11. Fomin, O., Gorbunov, M., Gerlici, J., Vatulia, G., Lovska, A., and Kravchenko, K. (2021). Research into the strength of an open wagon with double sidewalls filled with aluminium foam. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14123420 ↗
12. Vibration and damping analysis of multilayered rectangular plates with constrained viscoelastic layers10.1016/0022-460X(84)90511-X ↗
13. Optimum thickness distribution of unconstrained viscoelastic layer treatment for plates10.1016/0022-460X(85)90232-9 ↗
14. Constrained layer damping with partial coverage
15. Partial coverage of rectangular plates by unconstrained layer damping treatments10.1016/S0022-460X(85)80053-5 ↗
16. Vibration and damping analysis of rectangular plate with partially covered constrained viscoelastic layer10.1115/1.3269427 ↗
17. Damping analysis of partially covered sandwich beams10.1016/S0022-460X(88)80109-3 ↗
18. Minimizing vibration response of cylindrical shells through layout optimization of passive constrained layer damping treatments10.1016/j.jsv.2003.11.020 ↗
19. Topology optimization of constrained layer damping on plates using Method of Moving Asymptote MMA approach10.1155/2011/830793 ↗
20. Application of level set method to optimal vibration control of plate structures10.1016/j.jsv.2012.09.006 ↗
21. Topology optimization of damping material for reducing resonance response based on complex dynamic compliance10.1016/j.jsv.2015.11.045 ↗
22. Topology optimization of viscoelastic materials on damping and frequency of macrostructures10.1016/j.cma.2018.03.044 ↗
23. Explicit and efficient topology optimization of frequency-dependent damping patches using moving morphable components and reduced-order models10.1016/j.cma.2019.06.039 ↗
24. Multiobjective optimization of constrained layer damping treatments in composite plate structures10.1080/15376494.2016.1190427 ↗
25. Modal parameter estimation from input-output Fourier data using frequency-domain maximum likelihood identification10.1016/j.jsv.2003.08.044 ↗
26. Constrained maximum likelihood modal parameter identification applied to structural dynamics