Show source-provided references
1. Nof, S. (2009). Automation: What It Means to Us Around the World. Springer Handbook of Automation, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-540-78831-7 ↗3. (2016). Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles (Standard No. J3016_202104).
4. Evans, L., and Schwing, R.C. (1985). A critical view of driver behavior models: What do we know, what should we do?. Human Behavior and Traffic Safety, Springer Science & Business Media.
10.1007/978-1-4613-2173-6 ↗6. Lyons, J.B. (2013, January 25–27). Being transparent about transparency: A model for human- robot interaction. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium: Trust and Autonomous System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
8. How to make automated systems team players
9. Meixner, G., and Müller, C. (2017). From Car-Driver-Handovers to Cooperative Interfaces: Visions for Driver–Vehicle Interaction in Automated Driving. Automotive User Interfaces, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-49448-7 ↗10. Endsley, M.R. (1988, January 24–28). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. Proceedings of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA, USA.
13. Beggiato, M., Schleinitz, K., and Krems, J. (2015, January 25–26). What would drivers like to know during automated driving? Information needs at different levels of automation. Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Driver Assistance, Munich, Germany.
14. Diels, C., and Thompson, S. (2018). Information expectations in highly and fully automated vehicles. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 17–21 July 2017, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_71 ↗15. Principles of transparency for autonomous vehicles: First results of an experiment with an augmented reality human–machine interface
10.1007/s10111-019-00552-9 ↗16. Driver error or designer error: Using the Perceptual Cycle Model to explore the circumstances surrounding the fatal Tesla crash on 7th May 2016
10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.023 ↗18. Experiment Research on HMI Usability Test Environment Based on Driving Simulator
19. Psychometric evaluation of an after-scenario questionnaire for computer usability studies: The ASQ
10.1145/122672.122692 ↗21. Endsley, M.R. (2000). Direct Measurement of Situation Awareness: Validity and Use of SAGAT. Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
10.1201/b12461 ↗