A Surrogate Model Based Multi-Objective Optimization Method for Optical Imaging System
Source abstract
Abstract
An optimization model for the optical imaging system was established in this paper. It combined the modern design of experiments (DOE) method known as Latin hypercube sampling (LHS), Kriging surrogate model training, and the multi-objective optimization algorithm NSGA-III into the optimization of a triplet optical system. Compared with the methods that rely mainly on optical system simulation, this surrogate model-based multi-objective optimization method can achieve a high-accuracy result with significantly improved optimization efficiency. Using this model, case studies were carried out for two-objective optimizations of a Cooke triplet optical system. The results showed that the weighted geometric spot diagram and the maximum field curvature were reduced 5.32% and 11.59%, respectively, in the first case. In the second case, where the initial parameters were already optimized by Code-V, this model further reduced the weighted geometric spot diagram and the maximum field curvature by another 3.53% and 4.33%, respectively. The imaging quality in both cases was considerably improved compared with the initial design, indicating that the model is suitable for the optimal design of an optical system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced optical system design · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 3888 Dongnanhu Road, Changchun 130033, China
Shanghai RayTech Software Co., Ltd., 778 Jinji Road, Pudong New Area, Shanghai 201206, China
National Basic Science Data Center, 2 Dongsheng South Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Jamieson, T.H. (1971). Optimization Techniques in Lens Design, A. Hilger.
2. Automatic Lens Optimization: Recent Improvements
3. Ernest, B.R. (2003). [Dynamic Programming], Dover Publications Inc.
4. Accelerating optics design optimizations with deep learning10.1117/1.OE.58.6.065103 ↗
5. Surrogate-based analysis and optimization10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.001 ↗
6. Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.11.001 ↗
7. Training Deep Neural Networks for the Inverse Design of Nanophotonic Structures10.1021/jacs.7b10501 ↗
8. Generative Model for the Inverse Design of Metasurfaces10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03171 ↗
9. Efficient Spectrum Prediction and Inverse Design for Plasmonic Waveguide System Based on Artificial Neural Networks10.1364/PRJ.7.000368 ↗
10. Plasmonic nanostructure design and characterization via Deep Learning10.1038/s41377-018-0060-7 ↗
11. Pushing the limits of optical information storage using deep learning10.1038/s41565-018-0346-1 ↗
12. Intelligent Nanophotonics: Merging Photonics and Artificial Intelligence at the Nanoscale
13. Deep-Learning-Enabled On-Demand Design of Chiral Metamaterials10.1021/acsnano.8b03569 ↗
14. Neural network based design of metagratings10.1063/1.5033327 ↗
15. Dealing with categorical and integer-valued variables in Bayesian Optimization with Gaussian processes10.1016/j.neucom.2019.11.004 ↗
16. Kriging metamodeling in simulation: A review10.1016/j.ejor.2007.10.013 ↗
17. Audet, C., Denni, J., Moore, D., Booker, A., and Frank, P. (2000, January 6–8). A Surrogate-Model-Based Method for Constrained Optimization. Proceedings of the AIAA/USAF/NASA/ASSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization, Long Beach, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2000-4891 ↗
18. Aerodynamic optimization design with Kriging model10.2322/tjsass.48.161 ↗
19. Kriging-based approach to predict missing air temperature data10.1016/j.compag.2017.09.033 ↗
20. An adaptive order response surface method for structural reliability analysis10.1108/EC-09-2018-0428 ↗
21. Open-Source Optimization Algorithms for Optical Design10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.10.073 ↗
22. Automatic lens design methods10.1364/JOSA.47.000902 ↗
23. Lens Designing by Electronic Digital Computer: I10.1088/0370-1328/73/5/310 ↗
24. The Sample Problem: A Comparative Study of Lens Design Programs and Users
25. Approaching direct optimization of as-built lens performance
26. Lens design for active alignment of mobile phone cameras10.1117/1.OE.56.6.065102 ↗
27. High-Quality Computational Imaging Through Simple Lenses10.1145/2516971.2516974 ↗
28. Computational imaging through chromatic aberration corrected simple lenses10.1080/09500340.2017.1347723 ↗
29. Distortion optimization for wide-angle computational cameras10.1364/OE.26.005478 ↗
30. Least-Squares Method for Optical Correction10.1364/JOSA.44.000250 ↗
31. Damped Least-Squares Method for Automatic Lens Design10.1364/JOSA.55.001105 ↗
32. Damping Factor for the Least-Squares Method of Optical Design10.1364/AO.7.002433 ↗
33. Optimization by least squares10.1137/0705006 ↗
34. Least squares methods
35. Berge, J. (1993). Least Squares Optimization in Multivariate Analysis, DSWO Press, Leiden University.
36. Kidger, M.J. (1971). The Application of Electronic Computers to the Design of Optical Systems, Including Aspheric Lenses. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of London].
37. A Flexible Automatic Lens Correction Procedure10.1364/AO.2.001257 ↗
38. Aberration Theories for Semiautomatic Lens Design by Electronic Computers. I. Preliminary Remarks10.1364/JOSA.53.000672 ↗
39. Aberration Theories for Semiautomatic Lens Design by Electronic Computers. II. A Specific Computer Program10.1364/JOSA.53.000677 ↗
40. Lavi, A., and Vogl, T.P. (1966). The generalized orthonormal optimization program and its applications. Recent Advances in Optimization Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
41. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines10.1063/1.1699114 ↗
42. Optimization by Simulated Annealing10.1126/science.220.4598.671 ↗
43. Adaptive Automatic Correction in Optical Design10.1364/AO.7.000265 ↗
44. Ten Years of Lens Design with Glatzel’s Adaptive Method
45. Darwin, C.R. (1913). The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, Books, Incorporated, Pub.
46. Holland, J.H. (1992). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, MIT Press. [2nd ed.].10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 ↗
47. Jong, K.D. (1975). An Analysis of the Behaviore of a Class of Genetic Adaptive Systems. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan].
48. Goldberg, D.E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization & Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc.
49. Davis, L. (1991). Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, Van Nostrand Reinhold.
50. Schwefell, H.P. (1995). Evolution and Optimum Seeking, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
51. Vasiljevi, D. (2012). Classical and Evolutionary Algorithms in the Optimization of Optical Systems, Springer Science & Business Media.
52. Direct generation of starting points for freeform off-axis three-mirror imaging system design using neural network based deep-learning10.1364/OE.27.017228 ↗
53. Hegde, R. (2019, January 9). Deep neural network (DNN) surrogate models for the accelerated design of optical devices and systems. Proceedings of the Novel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXII, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1117/12.2528380 ↗
54. Peter, T. (2018). Using Deep Learning as a Surrogate Model in Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms. [Ph.D. Thesis, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität].
55. A comprehensive survey of fitness approximation in evolutionary computation10.1007/s00500-003-0328-5 ↗
56. Weighted gradient-enhanced kriging for high-dimensional surrogate modeling and design optimization10.2514/1.J055842 ↗
57. Some Approximation Concepts for Structural Synthesis10.2514/3.49321 ↗
58. Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces
59. A Statistical Approach to Some Basic Mine Valuation Problems on the Witwatersrand
60. Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments
61. Powell, M.J.D. (1987). Algorithms for Approximation, Oxford University Press.
62. Extended Radial Basis Functions: More Flexible and Effective Metamodeling10.2514/1.11292 ↗
63. Universal Approximation Using RadialBasis-Function Networks10.1162/neco.1991.3.2.246 ↗
64. Radial Basis Function Neural Network for Approximation and Estimation of Nonlinear Stochastic Dynamic Systems10.1109/72.298229 ↗
65. Tutorial on Support Vector Regression10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 ↗
66. Zhang, K.S., and Han, Z.H. (2013, January 7–10). Support Vector Regression-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization in Aircraft Conceptual Design. Proceedings of the 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, TX, USA. AIAA Paper.10.2514/6.2013-1160 ↗
67. Anthony, A.G., Vladimir, B., Dan, H., Bernard, G., William, H.M., Layne, T.W., and Raphael, T.H. (1997). Multidisciplinary Optimization of a Supersonic Transport Using Design of Experiments Theory and Response Surface Modeling, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University.
68. Balabanov, V., and Haftka, R. (1998, January 2–4). Multifidelity response surface model for HSCT wing bending material weight. Proceedings of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, MO, USA.10.2514/6.1998-4804 ↗
69. A statistical approach to some mine valuation and allied problems on the Witwatersrand
70. Principles of geostatistics10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246 ↗
71. Rasmussen, C.E., and Williams, C. (2006). Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 ↗
72. Rasmussen, C.E., and Williams, C. (2005). Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 ↗
73. Metamodeling Approach to Optimization of Steady-State Flowsheet Simulations10.1205/026387602320776830 ↗
74. Metamodeling Development for Vehicle Frontal Impact Simulation10.1115/1.1906264 ↗
75. Predictive modeling for pharmaceutical processes using kriging and response surface10.1007/s12247-009-9070-6 ↗
76. Feasibility and flexibility analysis of black-box processes part 2: Surrogate-based flexibility analysis10.1016/j.ces.2015.06.026 ↗
77. A novel feasibility analysis method for black-box processes using a radial basis function adaptive sampling approach10.1002/aic.15362 ↗
78. CH4 parameter estimation in CLM4.5bgc using surrogate global optimization10.5194/gmd-8-3285-2015 ↗
79. Intelligent modelling in the chemical process industry with neural networks: A case study10.1016/S0098-1354(98)00104-5 ↗
80. Neural Network Based Modelling and Control in Batch Reactor10.1205/cherd.05096 ↗
81. Optimization of fischer-tropsch synthesis using neural networks10.1002/ceat.200500310 ↗
82. Surrogate-based superstructure optimization framework10.1002/aic.12341 ↗
83. Analysis of Support Vector Regression for Approximation of Complex Engineering Analyses10.1115/1.1897403 ↗
84. Efficient Optimization Design Method Using Kriging Model10.2514/1.6386 ↗
85. Iterative Response Surface Based Optimization Scheme for Transonic Airfoil Design10.2514/1.19688 ↗
86. MultiObjective Aerodynamic Exploration of Elements’ Setting for High-Lift Airfoil Using Kriging Model10.2514/1.25422 ↗
87. Han, Z.H., Liu, J., Song, W.P., and Liu, J. (2013, January 7–10). Surrogate-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization with Application to Wind Turbine Airfoils. Proceedings of the 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Grapevine, TX, USA.10.2514/6.2013-1108 ↗
88. Efficient Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Transonic Wings Using a Parallel Infilling Strategy and Surrogate Models10.1007/s00158-016-1546-7 ↗
89. Metamodeling in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: How Far Have We Really Come?10.2514/1.J052375 ↗
90. Luo, X., Xu, Y., and Yi, S. (2011, January 24–26). Comparison of interpolation methods for spatial precipitation under diverse orographic effects. Proceedings of the 2011 19th International Conference on Geoinformatics, Shanghai, China.10.1109/GeoInformatics.2011.5980666 ↗
91. Isotropic and anisotropic kriging approaches for interpolating surface-level wind speeds across large, geographically diverse regions10.1080/19475705.2016.1185749 ↗
92. The 2 k—p fractional factorial designs
93. Fractional factorial design10.1002/wics.27 ↗
94. Antony, J. (2014). Design of Experiments for Engineers and Scientists, Elsevier. [2nd ed.].
95. Box-Behnken design: An alternative for the optimization of analytical methods10.1016/j.aca.2007.07.011 ↗
96. Experimental design and optimization10.1016/S0169-7439(98)00065-3 ↗
97. Highlighting photonics: Looking into the next decade10.1186/s43593-021-00002-y ↗
98. A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code
99. The Monte Carlo Method10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310 ↗
100. Owen, A.B. (1998, January 13–16). Monte Carlo extension of quasi-Monte Carlo. Proceedings of the Simulation Conference, Washington, DC, USA.