Show source-provided references
1. Prevalence of impacted third molars in dental students
4. Impacted lower third molars and periodontal health. An epidemiological, methodological, retrospective and prospective clinical, study
9. (1980). NIH consensus development conference for removal of third molars. J. Oral Surg., 38, 235–236.
12. Effect of mechanical debridement on distal periodontal aspects of second molars after the extraction of third molars: A systematic review
10.1902/jop.2011.110462 ↗14. Evaluation of treatment outcome after impacted mandibular third molar surgery with the use of autologous platelet-rich fibrin: A randomized controlled clinical study
10.1016/j.joms.2014.11.013 ↗15. The influence of anatomical, pathophysiological and other factors on periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery: A multiple regression analysis
10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb01117.x ↗16. Effect of flap design on periodontal healing after impacted third molar extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1016/j.ijom.2016.08.005 ↗17. The effect of regenerative periodontal therapy in preventing periodontal defects after the extraction of third molars: A systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1016/j.adaj.2016.03.005 ↗18. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma combined with hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes in the treatment of intra-bony defects in maxillofacial region
10.3109/00016357.2014.926023 ↗20. The effects of guided tissue regeneration on healing after impacted mandibular third-molar surgery: 1-year results
21. Guided bone regeneration using nonexpanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in preparation for dental implant placements—A report of 420 cases
10.1097/ID.0b013e3181cda72c ↗23. Cell attachment and proliferation of osteoblast-like MG63 cells on silk fibroin membrane for guided bone regeneration
10.1186/s40902-016-0062-4 ↗24. Comparison of unprocessed silk cocoon and silk cocoon middle layer membranes for guided bone regeneration
10.1186/s40902-016-0057-1 ↗25. Bone regeneration is associated with the concentration of tumour necrosis factor-alpha induced by sericin released from a silk mat
10.1038/s41598-017-15687-w ↗26. In vivo bone regeneration ability of different layers of natural silk cocoon processed using an eco-friendly method
10.1007/s13233-017-5085-x ↗27. Comparison of the physical properties and in vivo bioactivities of silkworm-cocoon-derived silk membrane, collagen membrane, and polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for guided bone regeneration
10.1007/s13233-014-2138-2 ↗29. Treatment of intrabony defects after impacted mandibular third molar removal with bioabsorbable and non-resorbable membranes
10.1902/jop.2011.100466 ↗30. Prevention of mandibular third molar extraction-associated periodontal defects: A comparative study
10.1902/jop.2009.080503 ↗32. Sealed Envelope Ltd (2016, August 20). Power Calculator for Continuous Outcome Non-Inferiority Trial. Available online: https://www.sealedenvelope.com/power/continuous-noninferior/.
35. Effect of Surgical Intervention for Removal of Mandibular Third Molar on Periodontal Healing of Adjacent Mandibular Second Molar: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
10.1902/jop.2015.150363 ↗36. Effects of lower third molar extraction on attachment level and alveolar bone height of the adjacent second molar
10.1016/j.ijom.2005.02.006 ↗37. Effect of removing an impacted mandibular third molar on the periodontal status of the mandibular second molar
10.1016/j.joms.2011.06.205 ↗39. Exploring natural silk protein sericin for regenerative medicine: An injectable, photoluminescent, cell-adhesive 3D hydrogel
10.1038/srep07064 ↗