journal article·2021-10-02Open access

An Integrative Experimental Approach to Design Optimization and Removal Strategies of Supporting Structures Used during L-PBF of SS316L Aortic Stents

Marius Grad, Naresh Nadammal, Ulrich Schultheiss, Philipp Lulla, Ulf Noster

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 19

Abstract

One of the fundamental challenges in L-PBF of filigree geometries, such as aortic stents used in biomedical applications, is the requirement for a robust yet easily removable support structure that allows each component to be successfully fabricated without distortion. To solve this challenge, an integrative experimental approach was attempted in the present study by identifying an optimal support structure design and an optimized support removal strategy for this design. The specimens were manufactured using four different support structure designs based on the geometry exposed to the laser beam during the L-PBF. Support removal procedures included sand blasting (SB), glass bead blasting (GB), and electrochemical polishing (ECP). The two best-performing designs (line and cross) were chosen due to shorter lead times and lower material consumption. As an additional factor that indicates a stable design, the breaking load requirement to remove the support structures was determined. A modified line support with a 145° included angle was shown to be the best support structure design in terms of breaking load, material consumption, and manufacturing time. All three procedures were used to ensure residue-free support removal for this modified line support design, with ECP proving to be the most effective.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg, Galgenbergstrasse 30, 93053 Regensburg, Germany

Technologie Campus Parsberg-Lupburg, Am Campus 1, 92331 Parsberg, Germany

FIT AG, Am Grohberg 1, 92331 Lupburg, Germany

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Near net shape manufacturing of metal: A review of approaches and their evolutions10.1177/0954405417708220 ↗
2. Mandal, D. (2021, July 11). Near Net Shape Casting through Investment, Die and Centrifugal Casting. CAFP-2008; Special Metal Casting and Forming Processes. Available online: http://eprints.nmlindia.org/5867.
3. Electron beam freeform fabrication for cost effective near-net shape manufacturing
4. Near net shape manufacturing of components using direct laser fabrication technology10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00906-8 ↗
5. Pérez, J.D., de Lacalle, L.N., Urbikain, G., Pereira, O., Martínez, S., and Bris, J. (2021). On the relationship between cutting forces and anisotropy features in the milling of LPBF Inconel 718 for near net shape parts. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 103801.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.103801 ↗
6. A new part consolidation method to embrace the design freedom of additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.06.024 ↗
7. Invited review article: Strategies and processes for high quality wire arc additive manufacturing
8. A review of the wire arc additive manufacturing of metals: Properties, defects and quality improvement10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.001 ↗
9. Effect of selective laser melting on microstructure, mechanical, and corrosion properties of biodegradable FeMnCS for implant applications10.1002/adem.202000182 ↗
10. An improved prediction of residual stresses and distortion in additive manufacturing10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.003 ↗
11. Jiang, J., Xu, X., and Stringer, J. (2018). Support structures for additive manufacturing: A review. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 2.10.3390/jmmp2040064 ↗
12. A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing10.1007/s00170-012-4403-x ↗
13. Ameen, W., Al-Ahmari, A., Mohammed, M.K., and Mian, S.H. (2018). Manufacturability of overhanging holes using electron beam melting. Metals, 8.10.3390/met8060397 ↗
14. Mhapsekar, K., McConaha, M., and Anand, S. (2018). Additive manufacturing constraints in topology optimization for improved manufacturability. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 140.10.1115/1.4039198 ↗
15. Manufacturability of AlSi10Mg overhang structures fabricated by laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10.043 ↗
16. Influence of support configurations on the characteristics of selective laser-melted inconel 71810.1007/s11837-017-2703-1 ↗
17. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: Update on pathogenesis and medical treatments10.1038/s41569-018-0114-9 ↗
18. Lack of an effective drug therapy for abdominal aortic aneurysm10.1111/joim.12958 ↗
19. Finite element analysis of the mechanical performances of 8 marketed aortic stent-grafts10.1583/12-4063.1 ↗
20. Endurant stent-graft: A 2-year, single-center experience with a new commercially available device for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms10.1583/10-3090.1 ↗
21. Research of customized aortic stent graft manufacture10.1088/1757-899X/187/1/012027 ↗
22. Additive manufacturing of cardiovascular CoCr stents by selective laser melting10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.091 ↗
23. Design rules for producing cardiovascular stents by selective laser melting: Geometrical constraints and opportunities10.1016/j.prostr.2019.07.004 ↗
24. Additive manufacturing of vascular implants by selective laser melting
25. Fischer, J., Kniepkamp, M., and Abele, E. (2014, January 4–6). Micro laser melting: Analyses of current potentials and restrictions for the additive manufacturing of micro structures. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium—An Additive Manufacturing Conference, Austin, TX, USA.
26. Influence of negative Poisson’s ratio on stent applications10.11648/j.am.20130203.14 ↗
27. Mechanical properties of selective laser sintering (SLS) additive manufactured chiral Auxetic cylindrical stent10.1007/s11340-019-00489-0 ↗
28. Calleja-Ochoa, A., Gonzalez-Barrio, H., Lacalle, N.L., Martínez, S., Albizuri, J., and Lamikiz, A. (2021). A New Approach in the Design of Microstructured Ultralight Components to Achieve Maximum Functional Performance. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14071588 ↗
29. Support structure design in additive manufacturing based on topology optimization10.1007/s00158-017-1743-z ↗
30. Topology optimization of thermal conductive support structures for laser additive manufacturing10.1016/j.cma.2019.03.054 ↗
31. Novel approach to optimized support structures in laser beam melting by combining process simulation with topology optimization10.2351/1.5096096 ↗
32. On utilizing topology optimization to design support structure to prevent residual stress induced build failure in laser powder bed metal additive manufacturing
33. Practical support structures for selective laser melting10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.08.006 ↗
34. Mukhametkaliyev, T.M., Ferrucci, M., Pavan, M., Villanueva, M.C., Craeghs, T., Claeys, C., Deckers, E., and Desmet, W. (2019, January 12–14). Optimization of the Additive Manufacturing Process for Geometrically Complex Vibro-acoustic Metamaterials. Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium–An Additive Manufacturing Conference, Austin, TX, USA.
35. Research on the fabricating quality optimization of the overhanging surface in SLM process10.1007/s00170-012-4271-4 ↗
36. Wiesent, L., Schultheiß, U., Schmid, C., Schratzenstaller, T., and Nonn, A. (2019). Experimentally validated simulation of coronary stents considering different dogboning ratios and asymmetric stent positioning. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0224026 ↗
37. Automatic support removal for additive manufacturing post processing10.1016/j.cad.2019.05.030 ↗
38. Influence of metal powder cross-contaminations on part quality in Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Copper alloy particles in maraging steel feedstock10.1016/j.procir.2020.09.032 ↗
39. Design and functional testing of a novel balloon-expandable cardiovascular stent in CoCr alloy produced by selective laser melting10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.03.060 ↗
40. Meboldt, M., and Klahn, C. (2020). Industrializing Additive Manufacturing: Proceedings of AMPA2020, Springer Nature AG Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-030-54334-1 ↗
41. Microstructural and mechanical characterization of thin-walled tube manufactured with selective laser melting for stent application10.1007/s11665-020-05366-9 ↗
42. Process optimization of complex geometries using feed forward control for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
43. Effect of hatch length on the development of microstructure, texture and residual stresses in selective laser melted superalloy Inconel 71810.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.049 ↗
44. Influence of the post-processing operations on surface integrity of metal components produced by laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: A review10.1080/10910344.2020.1855649 ↗
45. Investigation of laser powder bed fusion manufacturing and post-processing for surface quality of as-built 17-4PH stainless steel10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127492 ↗
46. A sustainable process for material removal on pure copper by use of extremophile bacteria10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.061 ↗