Efficient Calibration Strategy for Crystal Plasticity Constitutive Law to Model Additively Manufactured Alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Spatial heterogeneity in microstructure presents a significant challenge for part qualification in metal additive manufacturing, particularly when relying on physically accurate computational models to replace costly trial-and-error testing. Reliable structural simulation needs a large amount of offline data and several very expensive forward runs to learn the most appropriate material model parameters. This work introduces a systematic framework for accurately calibrating crystal plasticity (CP) material law parameters using limited characterization data. The calibrated CP law is validated through blind predictions of mechanical responses in laser powder-bed fusion Inconel 625 (IN 625) tensile coupons across varying build orientations and strategies. Two surrogate modeling approaches—a higher-order proper generalized decomposition (HOPGD) and a novel interpolating neural network (INN)—are evaluated for their ability to approximate full-field simulations. The study presents an adaptive sampling strategy to efficiently utilize an offline database and outlines a methodology for representing microstructure from sparse characterization inputs. Results demonstrate that the differentiable INN surrogate achieves accurate calibration with significantly reduced data requirements and avoids reliance on computationally expensive genetic algorithms. Both surrogate models exhibit strong predictive performance, and the proposed workflow was instrumental in winning the 2022 NIST Additive Manufacturing Benchmark Challenge.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. Buchanan C, Gardner L (2019) Metal 3D printing in construction: a review of methods, research, applications, opportunities and challenges. Eng Struct 180:332–34810.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.045 ↗
2. Armstrong M, Mehrabi H, Naveed N (2022) An overview of modern metal additive manufacturing technology. J Manuf Process 84:1001–102910.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.060 ↗
3. Jia Y, Naceur H, Saadlaoui Y, Dubar L, Bergheau J-M (2024) A comprehensive comparison of modeling strategies and simulation techniques applied in powder-based metallic additive manufacturing processes. J Manuf Process 110:1–2910.1016/j.jmapro.2023.12.048 ↗
4. King WE, Anderson AT, Ferencz RM, Hodge NE, Kamath C, Khairallah SA, Rubenchik AM (2015) Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals; physics, computational, and materials challenges. Appl Phys Rev, 2(4)10.1063/1.4937809 ↗
5. Chowdhury S, Yadaiah N, Prakash C, Ramakrishna S, Dixit S, Gupta LR, Buddhi D (2022) Laser powder bed fusion: a state-of-the-art review of the technology, materials, properties & defects, and numerical modelling. J Market Res 20:2109–2172
6. Abd-Elaziem W, Elkatatny S, Abd-Elaziem A-E, Khedr M, Abd El-baky MA, Hassan MA, Abu-Okail M, Mohammed M, Järvenpää A, Allam T et al (2022) On the current research progress of metallic materials fabricated by laser powder bed fusion process: a review. J Market Res 20:681–707
7. Li X, Zhao C, Sun T, Tan W (2020) Revealing transient powder-gas interaction in laser powder bed fusion process through multi-physics modeling and high-speed synchrotron x-ray imaging. Addit Manuf 35:101362
8. Abdi M, Mosbah S, Ayadi M (2024) High fidelity multi-physics modeling of laser metal interaction and keyhole dynamics in powder bed fusion. Progress in Additive Manufacturing 1–1810.1007/s40964-024-00702-0 ↗
9. Qin H, Fallah V, Dong Q, Brochu M, Daymond MR, Gallerneault M (2018) Solidification pattern, microstructure and texture development in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) of Al10SiMg alloy. Mater Charact 145:29–3810.1016/j.matchar.2018.08.025 ↗
10. Knapp GL, Raghavan N, Plotkowski A, Debroy T (2019) Experiments and simulations on solidification microstructure for inconel 718 in powder bed fusion electron beam additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 25:511–521
11. Mohammadpour P, Yuan H, Phillion A (2022) Microstructure evolution of inconel 625 alloy during single-track laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 55:102824
12. Arısoy YM, Criales LE, Özel T (2019) Modeling and simulation of thermal field and solidification in laser powder bed fusion of nickel alloy in625. Optics Laser Technol 109:278–29210.1016/j.optlastec.2018.08.016 ↗
13. Joshi S, Martukanitz RP, Nassar AR, Michaleris P (2023) Solidification during additive manufacturing. In: Additive manufacturing with metals: design. processes, materials, quality assurance, and applications. Springer, Cham, pp 427–48010.1007/978-3-031-37069-4_15 ↗
14. Dixit S, Liu S, Murdoch HA, Smith PM (2023) Investigating build orientation-induced mechanical anisotropy in additive manufacturing 316l stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng, A 880:14530810.1016/j.msea.2023.145308 ↗
15. Yang S, Zhang Y, Juan R, Li Z, Wu J, Akinwamide SO, Kuva J, Björkstrand RV, Lian J (2024) Effect of building orientation, thickness, and contouring on the microstructure and mechanical properties of alsi10mg via laser powder bed fusion. Mater Sci Eng A, 14768510.1016/j.msea.2024.147685 ↗
16. Huang G, He G, Liu Y, Huang K (2024) Anisotropy of microstructure, mechanical properties and thermal expansion in invar 36 alloy fabricated via laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 82:104025
17. Aiza I, Baldi C, Vega FM, Sebastiani S, Veronese NE, Yousefi M, Mosallanejad M, Maleki E, Guagliano M, Iuliano L et al (2024) Effects of build orientation and inclined features on physical, microstructural and mechanical properties of powder bed fusion additively manufactured metallic parts. Progress Mater Sci 10:101357
18. Watring DS, Benzing JT, Hrabe N, Spear AD (2020) Effects of laser-energy density and build orientation on the structure-property relationships in as-built inconel 718 manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 36:101425
19. Leicht A, Yu C-H, Luzin V, Klement U, Hryha E (2020) Effect of scan rotation on the microstructure development and mechanical properties of 316l parts produced by laser powder bed fusion. Mater Charact 163:11030910.1016/j.matchar.2020.110309 ↗
20. Yan W, Lian Y, Yu C, Kafka OL, Liu Z, Liu WK, Wagner GJ (2018) An integrated process-structure-property modeling framework for additive manufacturing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 339:184–20410.1016/j.cma.2018.05.004 ↗
21. Yan W, Lin S, Kafka OL, Lian Y, Yu C, Liu Z, Yan J, Wolff S, Wu H, Ndip-Agbor E et al (2018) Data-driven multi-scale multi-physics models to derive process-structure-property relationships for additive manufacturing. Comput Mech 61(5):521–54110.1007/s00466-018-1539-z ↗
22. Mukherjee T, Wei H, De A, DebRoy T (2018) Heat and fluid flow in additive manufacturing-part ii: powder bed fusion of stainless steel, and titanium, nickel and aluminum base alloys. Comput Mater Sci 150:369–38010.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.027 ↗
23. Gan Z, Lian Y, Lin SE, Jones KK, Liu WK, Wagner GJ (2019) Benchmark study of thermal behavior, surface topography, and dendritic microstructure in selective laser melting of inconel 625. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 8:178–19310.1007/s40192-019-00130-x ↗
24. Wang M, Han C, Jiang M, Trofimov V, Yang Y, Yang C, Feng Y, Yan M, Wei S, Wang D (2024) Molten pool behaviors and printability of tungsten anti-scattering grids with extremely thin wall thickness fabricated via laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 94:104487
25. Leonor JP, Wagner GJ (2024) Go-melt: gpu-optimized multilevel execution of lpbf thermal simulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 426:11697710.1016/j.cma.2024.116977 ↗
26. Trejos-Taborda J, Reyes-Osorio L, Garza C, Carmen Zambrano-Robledo P, Lopez-Botello O (2022) Finite element modeling of melt pool dynamics in laser powder bed fusion of 316l stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120(5):3947–396110.1007/s00170-022-09029-y ↗
27. Lian Y, Lin S, Yan W, Liu WK, Wagner GJ (2018) A parallelized three-dimensional cellular automaton model for grain growth during additive manufacturing. Comput Mech 61:543–55810.1007/s00466-017-1535-8 ↗
28. Sabau AS, Yuan L, Fattebert J-L, Turner JA (2023) An openmp gpu-offload implementation of a non-equilibrium solidification cellular automata model for additive manufacturing. Comput Phys Commun 284:10860510.1016/j.cpc.2022.108605 ↗
29. Rodgers TM, Madison JD, Tikare V (2017) Simulation of metal additive manufacturing microstructures using kinetic monte carlo. Comput Mater Sci 135:78–8910.1016/j.commatsci.2017.03.053 ↗
30. Saha S, Kafka OL, Lu Y, Yu C, Liu WK (2021) Macroscale property prediction for additively manufactured in625 from microstructure through advanced homogenization. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 10(3):360–37210.1007/s40192-021-00221-8 ↗
31. Saha S, Kafka OL, Lu Y, Yu C, Liu WK (2021) Microscale structure to property prediction for additively manufactured in625 through advanced material model parameter identification. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 10(2):142–15610.1007/s40192-021-00208-5 ↗
32. Roters F, Eisenlohr P, Hantcherli L, Tjahjanto DD, Bieler TR, Raabe D (2010) Overview of constitutive laws, kinematics, homogenization and multiscale methods in crystal plasticity finite-element modeling: theory, experiments, applications. Acta Mater 58(4):1152–121110.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.058 ↗
33. Wang Y, Zeng X, Sheng Y, Yang X, Wang F (2020) Multi-objective parameter identification and optimization for dislocation-dynamics-based constitutive modeling of ti-6al-4v alloy. J Alloy Compd 821:15346010.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153460 ↗
34. Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B, Elkhodary K (2014) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
35. Savage DJ, Feng Z, Knezevic M (2021) Identification of crystal plasticity model parameters by multi-objective optimization integrating microstructural evolution and mechanical data. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 379:11374710.1016/j.cma.2021.113747 ↗
36. Breumier S, Sao-Joao S, Villani A, Lévesque M, Kermouche G (2020) High strain rate micro-compression for crystal plasticity constitutive law parameters identification. Mater Des 193:10878910.1016/j.matdes.2020.108789 ↗
37. Veasna K, Feng Z, Zhang Q, Knezevic M (2023) Machine learning-based multi-objective optimization for efficient identification of crystal plasticity model parameters. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 403:11574010.1016/j.cma.2022.115740 ↗
38. Dorward H, Knowles DM, Demir E, Mostafavi M, Peel MJ (2024) Calibration and surrogate model-based sensitivity analysis of crystal plasticity finite element models. Mater Des 247:11340910.1016/j.matdes.2024.113409 ↗
39. Frydrych K, Tomczak M, Papanikolaou S (2024) Crystal plasticity parameter optimization in cyclically deformed electrodeposited copper-a machine learning approach. Materials 17(14):339710.3390/ma17143397 ↗
40. Lee J, Tasdemir B, Das S, Martin M, Knowles D, Mostafavi M (2024) Productive automation of calibration processes for crystal plasticity model parameters via reinforcement learning. Mater Des 248:11347010.1016/j.matdes.2024.113470 ↗
41. Kalidindi SR, Duvvuru HK, Knezevic M (2006) Spectral calibration of crystal plasticity models. Acta Mater 54(7):1795–180410.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.018 ↗
42. Sedighiani K, Diehl M, Traka K, Roters F, Sietsma J, Raabe D (2020) An efficient and robust approach to determine material parameters of crystal plasticity constitutive laws from macro-scale stress-strain curves. Int J Plast 134:10277910.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102779 ↗
43. Lu Y, Blal N, Gravouil A (2018) Adaptive sparse grid based HOPGD: toward a nonintrusive strategy for constructing space-time welding computational vademecum. Int J Numer Meth Eng 114(13):1438–146110.1002/nme.5793 ↗
44. Lu Y, Blal N, Gravouil A (2019) Datadriven HOPGD based computational vademecum for welding parameter identification. Comput Mech 64(1):47–6210.1007/s00466-018-1656-8 ↗
45. Park C, Saha S, Guo J, Xie X, Mojumder S, Bessa MA, Qian D, Chen W, Wagner GJ, Cao J, et al (2024) Engineering software 2.0 by interpolating neural networks: unifying training, solving, and calibration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10296
46. Moulinec H, Suquet P (1998) A numerical method for computing the overall response of nonlinear composites with complex microstructure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 157(1–2):69–9410.1016/S0045-7825(97)00218-1 ↗
47. Moser N, Benzing J, Kafka OL, Weaver J, Derimow N, Rentz R, Hrabe N (2024) Macroscale tensile challenge at different orientations (CHAL-AMB2022-04-MaTTO) and summary of predictions. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 13:155–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-023-00333-310.1007/s40192-023-00333-3 ↗
48. Groeber MA, Jackson MA (2014) Dream. 3d: a digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3d. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 3(1):56–7210.1186/2193-9772-3-5 ↗
49. Saha S (2024) Mechanistic computational intelligence (mci) from theory to practice: Opening pathways for a new generation of engineering software. PhD thesis, Northwestern University10.26226/m.64c26777632e9539aa87d78b ↗
50. Kabel M, Böhlke T, Schneider M (2014) Efficient fixed point and newton-krylov solvers for fft-based homogenization of elasticity at large deformations. Comput Mech 54(6):1497–151410.1007/s00466-014-1071-8 ↗
51. Wang Z, Stoica AD, Ma D, Beese AM (2016) Diffraction and single-crystal elastic constants of inconel 625 at room and elevated temperatures determined by neutron diffraction. Mater Sci Eng A 674:406–41210.1016/j.msea.2016.08.010 ↗
52. Lu Y, Blal N, Gravouil A (2018) Multi-parametric space-time computational vademecum for parametric studies: application to real time welding simulations. Finite Elem Anal Des 139:62–7210.1016/j.finel.2017.10.008 ↗
53. Blal N, Gravouil A (2019) Non-intrusive data learning based computational homogenization of materials with uncertainties. Comput Mech 64(3):807–82810.1007/s00466-019-01682-7 ↗
54. Li Y, Mojumder S, Lu Y, Al Amin A, Guo J, Xie X, Chen W, Wagner GJ, Cao J, Liu WK (2024) Statistical parameterized physics-based machine learning digital shadow models for laser powder bed fusion process. Addit Manuf 87:104214
55. Néron D, Ladevèze P (2010) Proper generalized decomposition for multiscale and multiphysics problems. Archiv Comput Methods Eng 17(4):351–37210.1007/s11831-010-9053-2 ↗
56. Ammar A, Mokdad B, Chinesta F, Keunings R (2006) A new family of solvers for some classes of multidimensional partial differential equations encountered in kinetic theory modeling of complex fluids. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 139(3):153–17610.1016/j.jnnfm.2006.07.007 ↗
57. Modesto D, Zlotnik S, Huerta A (2015) Proper generalized decomposition for parameterized helmholtz problems in heterogeneous and unbounded domains: application to harbor agitation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 295:127–14910.1016/j.cma.2015.03.026 ↗
58. Ghnatios C, Masson F, Huerta A, Leygue A, Cueto E, Chinesta F (2012) Proper generalized decomposition based dynamic data-driven control of thermal processes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 213:29–4110.1016/j.cma.2011.11.018 ↗
59. Lu Y, Li H, Saha S, Mojumder S, Al Amin A, Suarez D, Liu Y, Qian D, Kam Liu W (2021) Reduced order machine learning finite element methods: concept, implementation, and future applications. Comput Model Eng Sci 129(1)10.32604/cmes.2021.017719 ↗
60. Lu Y, Mojumder S, Guo J, Li Y, Liu WK (2024) Extended tensor decomposition model reduction methods: training, prediction, and design under uncertainty. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 418:11655010.1016/j.cma.2023.116550 ↗
61. HOPGD-sHOPGD, https://yelu-git.github.io/hopgd
62. Saha S, Gan Z, Cheng L, Gao J, Kafka OL, Xie X, Li H, Tajdari M, Kim HA, Liu WK (2021) Hierarchical deep learning neural network (HiDeNN): an artificial intelligence (AI) framework for computational science and engineering. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 373:11345210.1016/j.cma.2020.113452 ↗
63. Park C, Lu Y, Saha S, Xue T, Guo J, Mojumder S, Wagner GJ, Liu WK (2023) Convolution hierarchical deep-learning neural network (C-HiDeNN) with graphics processing unit (gpu) acceleration. Computational Mechanics10.1007/s00466-023-02329-4 ↗
64. Lu Y, Li H, Zhang L, Park C, Mojumder S, Knapik S, Sang Z, Tang S, Apley DW, Wagner GJ et al (2023) Convolution hierarchical deep-learning neural networks (c-hidenn): finite elements, isogeometric analysis, tensor decomposition, and beyond. Comput Mech 72(2):333–36210.1007/s00466-023-02336-5 ↗
65. Zhang L, Lu Y, Tang S, Liu WK (2022) Hidenn-td: reduced-order hierarchical deep learning neural networks. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 389:11441410.1016/j.cma.2021.114414 ↗
66. Alet F, Jeewajee AK, Villalonga MB, Rodriguez A, Lozano-Perez T, Kaelbling L (2019) Graph element networks: adaptive, structured computation and memory. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 212–222. PMLR
67. Michelis MY, Katzschmann RK (2022) Physics-constrained unsupervised learning of partial differential equations using meshes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.16628
68. Gao H, Zahr MJ, Wang J-X (2022) Physics-informed graph neural galerkin networks: a unified framework for solving pde-governed forward and inverse problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 390:11450210.1016/j.cma.2021.114502 ↗