Pathologic Complete Response Prediction after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer Using Radiomics and Deep Embedding Network of MRI
Source abstract
Abstract
Assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) is essential in rectal cancer staging and treatment planning. However, when predicting the pathologic complete response (pCR) after nCRT for rectal cancer, existing works either rely on simple quantitative evaluation based on radiomics features or partially analyze multi-parametric MRI. We propose an effective pCR prediction method based on novel multi-parametric MRI embedding. We first seek to extract volumetric features of tumors that can be found only by analyzing multiple MRI sequences jointly. Specifically, we encapsulate multiple MRI sequences into multi-sequence fusion images (MSFI) and generate MSFI embedding. We merge radiomics features, which capture important characteristics of tumors, with MSFI embedding to generate multi-parametric MRI embedding and then use it to predict pCR using a random forest classifier. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that using all given MRI sequences is the most effective regardless of the dimension reduction method. The proposed method outperformed any variants with different combinations of feature vectors and dimension reduction methods or different classification models. Comparative experiments demonstrate that it outperformed four competing baselines in terms of the AUC and F1-score. We use MRI sequences from 912 patients with rectal cancer, a much larger sample than in any existing work.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Seoul, Seoul 02504, Korea
Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Prediction of cancer incidence and mortality in Korea, 2019
2. Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): A propensity-score matched cohort analysis10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00467-2 ↗
3. Assessment of clinical complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer with digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and MRI: Selection for organ-saving treatment10.1245/s10434-015-4687-9 ↗
4. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and histopathological response to chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer10.1245/s10434-012-2309-3 ↗
5. Diffusion MRI for prediction of response of rectal cancer to chemoradiation10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09520-X ↗
6. Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: Correlation with radical prostatectomy findings10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.007 ↗
7. Assessment of clinical complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer with digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and MRI10.1245/s10434-015-4691-0 ↗
8. MR imaging of rectal cancer: Radiomics analysis to assess treatment response after neoadjuvant therapy10.1148/radiol.2018172300 ↗
9. Value of ADC measurements for nodal staging after chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer—A per lesion validation study10.1007/s00330-010-1937-x ↗
10. Rectal cancer: Assessment of neoadjuvant chemoradiation outcome based on radiomics of multiparametric MRI10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2997 ↗
11. Radiomics analysis for evaluation of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1038 ↗
12. Radiomics analysis of multiparametric MRI for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer10.1007/s00330-018-5683-9 ↗
13. Huynh, B.Q., Antropova, N., and Giger, M.L. (2017, January 11–16). Comparison of breast DCE-MRI contrast time points for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using deep convolutional neural network features with transfer learning. Proceedings of the Medical imaging 2017: Computer-Aided Diagnosis. International Society for Optics and Photonics, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1117/12.2255316 ↗
14. Ravichandran, K., Braman, N., Janowczyk, A., and Madabhushi, A. (2018, January 10–15). A deep learning classifier for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy from baseline breast DCE-MRI. Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2018: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, International Society for Optics and Photonics, Houston, TX, USA.10.1117/12.2294056 ↗
15. A deep learning methodology for improved breast cancer diagnosis using multiparametric MRI
16. Radiomic features and multilayer perceptron network classifier: A robust MRI classification strategy for distinguishing glioblastoma from primary central nervous system lymphoma10.1038/s41598-019-42276-w ↗
17. Deep learning-based radiomic features for improving neoadjuvant chemoradiation response prediction in locally advanced rectal cancer10.1088/1361-6560/ab7970 ↗
18. Li, H., Boimel, P., Janopaul-Naylor, J., Zhong, H., Xiao, Y., Ben-Josef, E., and Fan, Y. (2019, January 8–11). Deep convolutional neural networks for imaging data based survival analysis of rectal cancer. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019), Venice, Italy.10.1109/ISBI.2019.8759301 ↗
19. Kornblith, S., Shlens, J., and Le, Q.V. (2019, January 15–20). Do better imagenet models transfer better?. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00277 ↗
20. CT textural analysis of large primary renal cell carcinomas: Pretreatment tumor heterogeneity correlates with histologic findings and clinical outcomes10.2214/AJR.15.15451 ↗
21. Feasibility of Simultaneous Multislice Acceleration Technique in Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Rectum10.3348/kjr.2019.0406 ↗
22. Dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI for the detection of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer10.1007/s00330-011-2321-1 ↗
23. Radiomics: Images are more than pictures, they are data10.1148/radiol.2015151169 ↗
24. Radiomics: Extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036 ↗
25. Deep Learning and Radiomics predict complete response after neo-adjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer
26. Regression models and life-tables10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x ↗
27. Random survival forests10.1214/08-AOAS169 ↗
28. Pieper, S., Halle, M., and Kikinis, R. (2004, January 15–18). 3D Slicer. Proceedings of the 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821), Arlington, VA, USA.10.1109/ISBI.2004.1398617 ↗
29. Gosain, A., and Sardana, S. (2017, January 13–16). Handling class imbalance problem using oversampling techniques: A review. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Udupi, India.10.1109/ICACCI.2017.8125820 ↗
30. B-spline signal processing. I. Theory10.1109/78.193220 ↗
31. Repeatability of multiparametric prostate MRI radiomics features10.1038/s41598-019-45766-z ↗
32. Robustness of magnetic resonance radiomic features to pixel size resampling and interpolation in patients with cervical cancer10.1186/s40644-021-00388-5 ↗
33. Duron, L., Balvay, D., Vande Perre, S., Bouchouicha, A., Savatovsky, J., Sadik, J.C., Thomassin-Naggara, I., Fournier, L., and Lecler, A. (2019). Gray-level discretization impacts reproducible MRI radiomics texture features. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0213459 ↗
34. Hussain, Z., Gimenez, F., Yi, D., and Rubin, D. (2017, January 6–8). Differential data augmentation techniques for medical imaging classification tasks. Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, American Medical Informatics Association, Washington, DC, USA.
35. Perez, F., Vasconcelos, C., Avila, S., and Valle, E. (2018). Data augmentation for skin lesion analysis. OR 2.0 Context-Aware Operating Theaters, Computer Assisted Robotic Endoscopy, Clinical Image-Based Procedures, and Skin Image Analysis, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-01201-4_33 ↗
36. Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: CNN architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning10.1109/TMI.2016.2528162 ↗
37. Almourish, M.H., Saif, A.A., Radman, B.M., and Saeed, A.Y. (2021, January 22–24). Covid-19 Diagnosis Based on CT Images Using Pre-Trained Models. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference of Technology, Science and Administration (ICTSA), Taiz, Yemen.10.1109/ICTSA52017.2021.9406553 ↗
38. Tran, D., Wang, H., Torresani, L., Ray, J., LeCun, Y., and Paluri, M. (2018, January 18–23). A closer look at spatiotemporal convolutions for action recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00675 ↗
39. Kay, W., Carreira, J., Simonyan, K., Zhang, B., Hillier, C., Vijayanarasimhan, S., Viola, F., Green, T., Back, T., and Natsev, P. (2017). The kinetics human action video dataset. arXiv.
40. Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339 ↗
41. Radiomics: The facts and the challenges of image analysis10.1186/s41747-018-0068-z ↗
42. An actual survey of dimensionality reduction10.4236/ajcm.2014.42006 ↗
43. Schölkopf, B., Smola, A., and Müller, K.R. (1997). Kernel principal component analysis. International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Springer.10.7551/mitpress/1130.003.0026 ↗
44. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
45. Random forests to predict rectal toxicity following prostate cancer radiation therapy10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.027 ↗
46. Clinical utility of radiomics at baseline rectal MRI to predict complete response of rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy10.1007/s00261-020-02502-w ↗
47. Calders, T., and Jaroszewicz, S. (2007). Efficient AUC optimization for classification. European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-74976-9_8 ↗
48. Liu, L., Jiang, H., He, P., Chen, W., Liu, X., Gao, J., and Han, J. (2019). On the variance of the adaptive learning rate and beyond. arXiv.
49. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv.
50. Comelli, A., Stefano, A., Coronnello, C., Russo, G., Vernuccio, F., Cannella, R., Salvaggio, G., Lagalla, R., and Barone, S. (2020). Radiomics: A new biomedical workflow to create a predictive model. Annual Conference on Medical Image Understanding and Analysis, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-52791-4_22 ↗
51. Semi-supervised training of deep convolutional neural networks with heterogeneous data and few local annotations: An experiment on prostate histopathology image classification10.1016/j.media.2021.102165 ↗
52. MRI-based radiomics in breast cancer: Feature robustness with respect to inter-observer segmentation variability10.1038/s41598-020-70940-z ↗
53. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015). U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
54. He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollár, P., and Girshick, R. (2017, January 22–29). Mask r-cnn. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.322 ↗
55. Comelli, A., Dahiya, N., Stefano, A., Vernuccio, F., Portoghese, M., Cutaia, G., Bruno, A., Salvaggio, G., and Yezzi, A. (2021). Deep Learning-Based Methods for Prostate Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11020782 ↗
56. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: Long-term results10.1097/01.sla.0000141194.27992.32 ↗
57. Patterns of failure and survival for nonoperative treatment of stage c0 distal rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy10.1016/j.gassur.2006.09.005 ↗
58. MRI of rectal cancer: Tumor staging, imaging techniques, and management10.1148/rg.2019180114 ↗
59. Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting10.1007/s00330-017-5026-2 ↗