CFD Assessment of the Hydrodynamic Performance of Two Impellers for a Baffled Stirred Reactor
Source abstract
Abstract
When converting a baffled stirred reactor to work with a different fluid, usually the original impeller must be replaced with a customized one. If the original impeller was designed for mixing liquids, its performance for liquid–solid suspensions may not be satisfactory. A case study is presented, where a two-blade original impeller is replaced with a new three-blade design. The new impeller shows clear improvements in mixing a liquid–solid suspension, while keeping the shaft power practically at the same level. As a result, a practically homogenous liquid–solid mixture is obtained, thus ensuring the required quality of the final product. The present numerical investigations employ the Eulerian multiphase model with renormalization (RNG) k–ε turbulence model to simulate the three-dimensional unsteady free-surface liquid–solid flow in a stirred tank. A sliding mesh approach was used to account for the impeller rotation within the expert code, FLUENT 16. The comparative quantitative analysis of the solid phase distribution and the relevant velocity profiles show that the new design of three-blade-impeller is significantly increasing the sedimentation time of the solid phase beyond the chemical reaction specific time. The necessary power to drive the new impeller has a slightly higher value than for the original impeller but it can be sustained by the existing driving system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Mixing · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
MMUT, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Politehnica University Timisoara, 300222 Timisoara, Romania
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Paul, E.L., Atiemo-Obeng, V.A., and Kresta, S.M. (2004). Handbook of Industrial Mixing, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0471451452 ↗
2. CFD simulations of gas-liquid-solid stirred reactor: Prediction of critical impeller speed for solid suspension10.1016/j.ces.2007.07.005 ↗
3. CFD modeling of solid suspension in a stirred tank: Effect of drag models and turbulent dispersion on cloud height10.1155/2012/956975 ↗
4. Experimental characterization and modelling of homogeneous solid suspension in an industrial stirred tank
5. LES and URANS simulations of hydrodynamics in mixing tank: Comparison to PIV experiments10.1016/j.cherd.2008.07.008 ↗
6. Assessment of standard k-ε, RSM and LES turbulence models in a baffled stirred vessel agitated by various impeller designs10.1016/j.ces.2008.06.019 ↗
7. CFD modeling of gas-liquid-solid mechanically agitated contactor10.1016/j.cherd.2008.08.008 ↗
8. CFD simulation of solid suspension in stirred tanks: Review10.2298/HEMIND100714051O ↗
9. CFD simulation of liquid-phase mixing in solid-liquid stirred reactor10.1016/j.ces.2008.04.018 ↗
10. Experiments and CFD prediction of solid particle distribution height in a vessel agitated with four pitched blade turbines10.1205/02638760152721253 ↗
11. CFD simulation of particle suspension height in stirred vessels10.1205/cerd.82.9.1204.44171 ↗
12. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of the solid suspension in a stirred slurry reactor10.1021/ie050941q ↗
13. CFD simulation of particle distribution in stirred vessels10.1205/026387600527338 ↗
14. CFD simulation of solid-liquid stirred tanks10.1016/j.apt.2012.03.007 ↗
15. Impeller shape-optimization of stirred-tank reactor: CFD and fluid structure interaction analyses10.1016/j.cej.2020.127497 ↗
16. A parametric study to simulate the non-Newtonian turbulent flow in spiral tubes10.1002/ese3.514 ↗
17. Identifying dominant spatial and time characteristics fo flow dynamics within free-surface baffled stirred-tanks from CFD simulations
18. Stuparu, A., Susan-Resiga, R., and Bosioc, A. (2021). CFD simulation of solid suspension for a liquid-solid industrial stirred reactor. Appl. Sci., under review.10.3390/app11125705 ↗
19. (2015). ANSYS Fluent 16 Help Documentation, Ansys, Inc.. Version 16.2.0;.
20. Montante, G., and Bakker, A. (2004). Solid-Liquid Multiphase Flow Validation in Tall Stirred Vessels with Multiple Impeller Systems, Fluent Inc.. University of Bologna: Bologna, Italy.
21. Traffic Replay Compression (TRC): A highly efficient method for handling parallel numerical simulation data
22. Anton, A.A. (2011, January 26–29). A method for submodelling inside transient flows. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing, Timisoara, Romania.10.1109/SYNASC.2011.48 ↗
23. Anton, A.A. (2011, January 19–21). Reconstruction of a space-time window in a transient simulation of the breaking of a dam. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI), Timisoara, Romania.
24. Numerical Investigation of Unsteady Flows Using OpenFOAM
25. Anton, A.A. (2010, January 27–29). A new method for reducing the storage requirements of numerical simulation data. Proceedings of the 2010 International Joint Conference on Computational Cybernetics and Technical Informatics, Timisoara, Romania.