A Reproducible Method for Growing Biofilms on Polystyrene Surfaces: Biomass and Bacterial Viability Evolution of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Staphylococcus epidermidis
Source abstract
Abstract
Since biofilm development represents a crucial issue within industrial, clinical and domestic sectors, innovative technologies/approaches (e.g., light technology for inactivation, antibiofilm coatings) are required to eradicate them. In this multidisciplinary scenario, protocols for the development of biofilms are necessary, particularly, in laboratories (not specialised in biofilm science) lacking in sophisticated devices for their growth. A protocol was developed for growing Pseudomonas fluorescens (Gram-negative) biofilms on wide, flat, polystyrene surfaces within 24 h. Several factors, such as inoculum level, area size and growth medium concentration, were investigated. Biofilm development was studied via viable cells and biomass quantification. A comparative analysis between kinetics and growth parameters, estimated using the Baranyi and Roberts model, was conducted at different inoculum levels (104 and 107 CFU/mL). The inoculum levels did not influence the final population within the 24-h-grown biofilms, but they influenced the total biomass development, which followed different kinetics. Confocal laser scanning microscopy confirmed that overnight growth allowed for development of a densely packed biofilm with its 3D structure. The developed protocol was validated for Staphylococcus epidermidis (Gram-positive). The present work is the first study to develop an easy-to-use protocol to obtain highly reproducible biofilms, on flat polystyrene surfaces, with no need for sophisticated technologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
BioTeC+-Chemical and Biochemical Process Technology and Control, Department of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, 9000 Gent, Belgium
Procter&Gamble, Newcastle Innovation Center, Newcastle NE12 9TS, UK
Funding
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme · KU Leuven · Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. Alginate overproduction affects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm structure and function10.1128/JB.183.18.5395-5401.2001 ↗
2. Baum, M.M., Kainović, A., O’Keeffe, T., Pandita, R., McDonald, K., Wu, S., and Webster, P. (2009). Characterization of structures in biofilms formed by a Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from soil. BMC Microbiol., 9.10.1186/1471-2180-9-103 ↗
3. Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 ↗
4. The biofilm matrix10.1038/nrmicro2415 ↗
5. Isolation and characterization of extracellular polysaccharides produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens Biovar II10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.04.008 ↗
6. Philips, J., Rabaey, K., Lovley, D.R., and Vargas, M. (2017). Biofilm formation by Clostridium ijungdahlii is induced by sodium chloride stress: Experimental evaluation and transcriptome analysis. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0170406 ↗
7. Acyl homoserine-lactone quorum-sensing signal generation10.1073/pnas.96.8.4360 ↗
8. Influence of culture conditions on biofilm frmation by Escherichia coli O157:H710.1016/0168-1605(94)00103-D ↗
9. Effects of nutritional and environmental conditions on Salmonella sp. biofilm formation
10. Photodynamic inactivation of foodborne bacteria by eosin Y10.1111/jam.13727 ↗
11. Bonneville, L., Ortiz, S., Maia, V., Brito, L., and Martínez-Suárez, J.V. (2020). Strain and Growth Conditions may Regulate Resistance of Listeria monocytogenes Biofilms to Benzalkonium Chloride. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10030988 ↗
12. Galdiero, E., Di Onofrio, V., Maione, A., Gambino, E., Gesuele, R., Menale, B., Ciaravolo, M., Carraturo, M., and Guida, M. (2020). Allium ursinum and Allium oschaninii against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Candida albicans Mono- and Polymicrobic Biofilms in In Vitro Static and Dynamic Models. Microorganisms, 8.10.3390/microorganisms8030336 ↗
13. Efflux as a glutaraldehyde resistance mechanism in Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms10.1128/AAC.05152-14 ↗
14. The effects of extrinsic factors on the structural and mechanical properties of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms: A combined study of nutrient concentrations and shear conditions10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.02.035 ↗
15. Elimination of Klebsiella pneumoniae NDM from the air and selected surfaces in hospital using radiant catalytic ionization10.1111/lam.13223 ↗
16. Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on plastic surface10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01513.x ↗
17. Microfluidic bioanalytical flow cells for biofilm studies: A review10.1039/C8AN01526K ↗
18. Passerini, D., Fécamp, F., Marchand, L., Kolypczuk, L., Bonnetot, S., Sinquin, C., Verrez-Bagnis, V., Hervio-Heath, D., Colliec-Jouault, S., and Delbarre-Ladrat, C. (2019). Characterization of biofilm extracts from two marine bacteria. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9224971 ↗
19. Lorenzo, F., Sanz-Puig, M., Bertó, R., and Orihuel, E. (2020). Assessment of performance of two rapid methods for on-site control of microbial and biofilm contamination. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10030744 ↗
20. Effect of surface shear stress on the attachment of Pseudomonas fluorescens to stainless steel under defined flow conditions10.1002/bit.260240113 ↗
21. Adhesion of Aeromonas hydrophila to water distribution system pipes after different contact times10.4315/0362-028X-61.10.1321 ↗
22. Effects of operating conditions on the adhesive strength of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms in tubes10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.04.004 ↗
23. Mathematics of predictive food microbiology
24. Airborne Staphylococcus aureus in different environments—A review10.1007/s11356-019-06557-1 ↗
25. Staphylococcal Biofilms10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0023-2018 ↗
26. Environmental signals and regulatory pathways that influence biofilm formation10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04036.x ↗
27. Syndiotactic polystyrene: Process and applications10.1002/adv.20069 ↗
28. An overview on biodegradation of polystyrene and modified polystyrene: The microbial approach10.1080/07388551.2017.1355293 ↗
29. Plasma surface modification of polystyrene and polyethylene10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.04.033 ↗
30. The evolution of polystyrene as a cell culture material10.1089/ten.teb.2018.0056 ↗
31. The effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens biosurfactant pseudofactin II on the conformational changes of bovine serum albumin: Pharmacheutical and biomedical applications10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111001 ↗
32. Biofilm formation and cellulose expression among diverse environmental Pseudomonas isolates10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01080.x ↗
33. Microbiology, genomics, and clinical significance of the Pseudomonas fluorescens scpecies complex, an unappreciated colonizer of humans10.1128/CMR.00044-14 ↗
34. Iron and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation10.1073/pnas.0504266102 ↗
35. Effects of the colonization sequence of Listeria monocytogenes and Pseudomonas fluorescens on survival of biofilm cells under food-related stresses and transfer to salmon10.1016/j.fm.2019.02.002 ↗
36. Quorum-sensing system influences root colonization and biological control ability in Pseudomonas fluorescens 2P2410.1007/s10482-005-9028-8 ↗
37. Quintieri, L., Fanelli, F., and Caputo, L. (2019). Antibiotic resistant Pseudomonas spp. Spoilers in fresh dairy products: An underestimated risk and the control strategies. Foods, 8.10.3390/foods8090372 ↗
38. Comparison of the growth kinetics and proteolytic activities of Chryseobacterium species and Pseudomonas fluorescens10.1139/cjm-2015-0236 ↗
39. Population dynamics of a dual Pseudomonas putida-Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilm in a capillary bioreactor10.1080/08927014.2019.1598397 ↗
40. Cattò, C., and Cappitelli, F. (2019). Testing anti-biofilm polymeric surfaces: Where to start?. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20.10.3390/ijms20153794 ↗
41. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm efficacy of self-cleaning surfaces functionalized by TiO2 photocatalytic nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas putida10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.07.005 ↗
42. Angarano, V., Smet, C., Akkermans, S., Watt, C., Chieffi, A., and Van Impe, J.F.M. (2020). Visible light as an antimicrobial strategy for inactivation of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Antibiotics, 9.10.3390/antibiotics9040171 ↗
43. How to optimize the drop plate method for enumerating bacteria10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00241-4 ↗
44. Govaert, M., Smet, C., Baka, M., Janssens, T., and Van Impe, J.F.M. (2018). Influence of incubation conditions on the formation of model biofilms by Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella Typhimurium on abiotic surfaces. J. Appl. Microbiol.10.1111/jam.14071 ↗
45. Achinas, S., Charalampogiannis, N., and Euverink, G.J.W. (2019). A Brief Recap of Microbial Adhesion and Biofilms. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9142801 ↗
46. Attachment of Listeria monocytogenes to stainless steel surfaces at various temperatures and pH values10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb09321.x ↗
47. Biofilm formation and food safety in food industries10.1016/j.tifs.2009.01.054 ↗
48. Oxygen tension and nutrient starvation are major signals that regulate agfD promoter activity and expression of the multicellular morphotype in Salmonella Typhimurium10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00235.x ↗
49. Spatial physiological heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm is determined by oxygen availability10.1128/AEM.64.10.4035-4039.1998 ↗
50. NMR and microelectrode studies of hydrodynamics and kinetics in biofilms10.1021/bp00019a006 ↗
51. Spatial organization of bacterial populations in response to oxygen and carbon counter-gradient in pore networks10.1038/s41467-018-03187-y ↗
52. Paired methods to measure biofilm killing and removal: A case study with Penicillin G treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm10.1111/lam.12843 ↗
53. Antimicrobial blue light inactivation of polymicrobial biofilms10.3389/fmicb.2019.00721 ↗
54. The CpxA/CpxR two-component system Affects biofilm formation and virulence in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae10.3389/fcimb.2018.00072 ↗
55. Initial biofilm formation of acetoclastic methanogenic bacteria10.1080/08927019009378145 ↗
56. Pseudomonas sp. biofilm development on fresh-cut food equipment surfaces—A growth curve—Fitting approach to building a comprehensive tool for studying surface contamination dynamics10.1016/j.fbp.2017.11.001 ↗
57. Significance of bacterial surface-active compounds in interaction of bacteria with interfaces10.1128/mr.60.1.151-166.1996 ↗
58. Inoculation density and nutrient level determine the formation of mushroom-shaped structures in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms10.1038/srep32097 ↗
59. Growth phase-regulated expression of bolA and morphology of stationary-phase Escherichia coli cells are controlled by the novel sigma factor sigma S10.1128/jb.173.14.4474-4481.1991 ↗
60. Biofilm formation of Salmonella Typhimurium on stainless steel and acrylic surfaces as affected by temperature and pH level10.1016/j.lwt.2013.09.022 ↗
61. Physiological responses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 to oxidative stress in controlled microaerobic and aerobic cultures10.1099/00221287-148-10-3195 ↗
62. Characterization of a novel air-liquid interface biofilm of Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW2510.1099/mic.0.025064-0 ↗
63. The exopolysaccharide Psl–eDNA interaction enables the formation of a biofilm skeleton in Pseudomonas aeruginosa10.1111/1758-2229.12252 ↗
64. Marsden, A.E., Grudzinski, K., Ondrey, J.M., Deloney-Marino, C.R., and Visick, K.L. (2017). Impact of Salt and Nutrient Content on Biofilm Formation by Vibrio fischeri. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0169521 ↗
65. Sinibaldi, G., Iebba, V., and Chinappi, M. (2018). Swimming and rafting of E.coli microcolonies at air–liquid interfaces. MicrobiologyOpen, 7.10.1002/mbo3.532 ↗
66. Biofilm formation and dispersal in Gram-positive bacteria10.1016/j.copbio.2010.10.016 ↗
67. Flagellar motility is critical for Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation10.1128/JB.01967-06 ↗
68. Genetic analysis of Escherichia coli biofilm formation: Roles of flagella, motility, chemotaxis and type I pili10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01061.x ↗
69. Aeromonas flagella (polar and lateral) are enterocyte adhesins that contribute to biofilm formation on surfaces10.1128/IAI.72.4.1939-1945.2004 ↗
70. Draft genome sequence of the industrially significant bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens ATCC 13525
71. Involvement of motility and flagella in Bacillus cereus biofilm formation10.1099/mic.0.034827-0 ↗
72. Efficiency of riboflavin and ultraviolet light treatment against high levels of biofilm-derived Staphylococcus epidermidis in buffy coat platelet concentrates10.1111/vox.12519 ↗