journal article·2019-04-03Open access

Analysis of Causal Relationships for Nutrient Removal of Activated Sludge Process Based on Structural Equation Modeling Approaches

Yejin Kim, Seulah Lee, Yeongdae Cho, Minsoo Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 7

Abstract

The removal process of activated sludge in sewage treatment plants is very nonlinear, and removal performance has a complex causal relationship depending on environmental factors, influent load, and operating factors. In this study, how causal relationships are expressed in collected data was identified by structural equation modeling. First, path modeling was attempted as a preliminary step in structural equation model (SEM) construction and, as a result, the nutrient-removal mechanism could not be sufficiently represented as a direct causal relationship between measured variables. However, as a result of the deduced SEMs for effluent total nitrogen (T-N) and total phosphorus (T–P) concentrations, accompanied by exploratory factor analysis to extract latent variables, a causal network was formed that describes the direct or indirect effect of the latent factors and measured variables. Hereby, this study suggests that it is possible to construct an SEM explaining the nutrient-removal mechanism of the activated-sludge process with latent variables. Moreover, nonlinear features embedded in the mechanism could be represented by SEM, which is a model based on linearity, by including causal relations and variables that were not derived by path analysis. This attempt to model the direct and indirect causalities of the process could enhance the understanding of the process, and help decision making such as changing the driving conditions that would be required.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Environmental Engineering, Catholic University of Pusan, Busan 46252, Korea

Department of Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea

Funding

Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Jenkins, D., and Wanner, J. (2014). Activated Sludge—100 Years and Counting, IWA Publishing.10.2166/9781780404943 ↗
2. Rule-based versus probabilistic approaches to the diagnosis of faults in wastewater treatment processes10.1016/0954-1810(96)00003-9 ↗
3. Rieger, L., Gillot, S., Langergraber, G., Ohtsuki, T., Shaw, A., Takács, I., and Winkler, S. (2013). Chapter 5.4 Calibration and validation. Guidelines for Using Activated Sludge Models, IWA Publishing. Scientific and Technical Report No. 22.
4. Simplifications of Activated Sludge Model with preservation of its dynamic accuracy10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.01140 ↗
5. Parameter identification in dynamical models of anaerobic waste water treatment
6. Optimization of modified ABA2 process using linearized ASM2 for saving aeration energy10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.076 ↗
7. Reaction invariant-based of reduction of the activated sludge model ASM1 for batch applications10.1016/j.jece.2016.07.007 ↗
8. Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis10.1016/j.ces.2003.09.012 ↗
9. Adaptive multiscale principal component analysis for on-line monitoring of a sequencing batch reactor10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.10.012 ↗
10. Identification of process operating state with operational map in municipal wastewater treatment plant10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.01.008 ↗
11. Fault diagnosticability for an aerobic batch wastewater treatment process10.1016/j.conengprac.2008.03.002 ↗
12. Monitoring of wastewater treatment plants using improved univariate statistical technique10.1016/j.psep.2018.02.006 ↗
13. Development of smart data analysis tools to support wastewater treatment plant operation10.1016/j.chemolab.2018.03.006 ↗
14. A conceptual model to facilitate knowledge sharing for bulking solving in wastewater treatment plants
15. A knowledge-based approach to the deflocculation problem: Integrating on-line, off-line, and heuristic information10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00018-6 ↗
16. Application of fuzzy causal networks to waste water treatment plants10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00421-7 ↗
17. Supporting decision making in urban wastewater systems using a knowledge-based approach10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.11.009 ↗
18. Prediction analysis of a wastewater treatment system using a Bayesian network10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.08.011 ↗
19. Bayesian belief network modelling of chlorine disinfection for human pathogenic viruses in municipal wastewater10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.008 ↗
20. Grace, J.B. (2006). Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511617799 ↗
21. Exploring ecological patterns with structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.028 ↗
22. Representing general theoretical concepts in structural equation models; the role of composite variables10.1007/s10651-007-0047-7 ↗
23. On the specification of structural equation models for ecological systems10.1890/09-0464.1 ↗
24. Guidelines for a graph-theoretic implementation of structural equation modeling10.1890/ES12-00048.1 ↗
25. Assessing ecological integrity: A multi-scale structural and functional approach using Structural Equation Modeling10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.006 ↗
26. Unravelling direct and indirect effects of hierarchical factors driving microbial stream communities10.1111/jbi.13046 ↗
27. Development of a protocol for environmental impact studies using causal modeling10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.034 ↗
28. Direct and indirect effects of multiple stressors on stream invertebrates across watershed, reach and site scales: A structural equation modelling better informing on hydromorphological impacts10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.197 ↗
29. A partial least squares—Path modeling analysis for the understanding of biodiversity loss in rural and urban watersheds in Portugal10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.127 ↗
30. A general structural equation model for river water quality data10.1016/0022-1694(94)90012-4 ↗
31. Examining the relationship between ecosystem structure and function using structural equation modelling: A case study examining denitrification potential in restored wetland soils10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.11.015 ↗
32. Probabilistic Evaluation of Causal Relationship between Variables for Water Quality Management
33. Effects of floodgates operation on nitrogen transformation in a lake based on structural equation modeling analysis10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.134 ↗
34. Causal model to describe the variation of faecal coliform concentrations in a pilot-scale test consisting of ponds aligned in series10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.002 ↗
35. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 ↗
36. Structural equation modeling as a tool to develop conservation strategies using environmental indicators: The case of the forests of the Magdalena river basin in Mexico City10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.022 ↗
37. Jöreskog, K.G., and Sörbom, D. (1986). LISREL VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood and Least Square Methods, Scientific Software, Inc.
38. Jöreskog, K.G., and Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide, Scientific Softwaer Internationa, Inc.
39. Quinn, G.P., and Keough, M.J. (2002). Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511806384 ↗
40. The method of path coefficient10.1214/aoms/1177732676 ↗
41. Using Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Geostatistical Techniques and Structural Equation Modeling to Identify Spatial Variability of Groundwater Quality10.1007/s11269-015-0929-7 ↗
42. Factor analysis and structural equation modelling of sustainable behavior in contaminated land remediation10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.054 ↗
43. Hair, J.F.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall. [5th ed.].
44. Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit
45. A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument10.2307/249524 ↗
46. Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing and Consumer Research: A review10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0 ↗
47. Structural equation model of total phosphorus loads in the Red River of the north basin, USA and Cananda10.2134/jeq2017.04.0131 ↗
48. A structural equation model of energy consumption in the United States: Untangling the complexity of per-capita residential energy use10.1016/j.erss.2015.01.002 ↗
49. Understanding farmer’s adaptation intention to climate change: A structural equation modelling study in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam10.1016/j.envsci.2014.04.002 ↗
50. Structural equation model of the relationship between metals in contaminated soil and in earthworm (Metaphire californica) in Hunan Province, subtropical China10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.038 ↗
51. Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and moving forward10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_03 ↗
52. Specification, evaluation and interpretation of structural equation models10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x ↗