Enzymatic Modification of Apple Pomace and Its Application in Conjunction with Probiotics for Jelly Candy Production
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the applicational possibilities of enzymatically modified apple pomace (AP) in conjunction with probiotics as value-added ingredients for the production of jelly candies. AP was enzymatically modified with Pectinex® Ultra Tropical, Viscozyme® L, and Celluclast® 1.5 L (Novozyme A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark), and the soluble and insoluble dietary fibre content was determined using the Megazyme kit (Megazyme International Ireland Ltd., Wicklow, Ireland), reducing sugar content using the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid assay. The technological properties of the modified AP, such as its swelling capacity, water-retention capacity, oil-retention capacity, bulk density, and static and thermal emulsion stability, were evaluated. Enzymatically modified AP hydrolysed with Celluclast® 1.5 L was used for the production of jelly candies supplemented with Bifidobacterium animalis DSM 20105. The survival of probiotics in the jelly candies during in vitro digestion, the viability of probiotics during candy storage, and candy quality characteristics were analysed. Enzymatically modified AP had different carbohydrate compositions and technological properties, depending on the enzyme preparation used. Although the viability of probiotics in the jelly candies decreased during storage, a significantly higher viability of B. animalis was determined in jelly candies supplemented with hydrolysed AP compared with control candies made without AP after digestion in the saline, gastric, and intestine phases. This study shows that Celluclast® 1.5 L can be used for increasing the soluble dietary fibre in AP (18.4%), which can be further applied, in conjunction with B. animalis, for added-value jelly candy production.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Food composition and properties · Proteins in Food Systems · Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Food Science and Technology, Kaunas University of Technology, Radvilenu Rd. 19, LT-50254 Kaunas, Lithuania
Food Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Radvilenu Rd. 19, LT-50254 Kaunas, Lithuania
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Wine Grape Pomace as Antioxidant Dietary Fibre for Enhancing Nutritional Value and Improving Storability of Yogurt and Salad Dressing10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.09.148 ↗
2. Physicochemical, Textural and Rheological Properties of Probiotic Yogurt Fortified with Fibre-Rich Pineapple Peel Powder during Refrigerated Storage10.1016/j.lwt.2015.09.027 ↗
3. Kauser, S., Murtaza, M.A., Hussain, A., Imran, M., Kabir, K., Najam, A., An, Q.U., Akram, S., Fatima, H., and Batool, S.A. (2024). Apple Pomace, a Bioresource of Functional and Nutritional Components with Potential of Utilization in Different Food Formulations: A Review. Food Chem. Adv., 4.10.1016/j.focha.2023.100598 ↗
4. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition, and Allergies (NDA) (2016). Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for Carbohydrates and Dietary Fibre. EFSA J., 8.
5. Shalini, R., and Gupta, D.K. (2010). Utilization of Pomace from Apple Processing Industries: A Review. J. Food Sci. Technol., 47.10.1007/s13197-010-0061-x ↗
6. Processing of Apple Pomace for Bioactive Molecules10.1080/07388550802368895 ↗
7. Lyu, F., Luiz, S.F., Azeredo, D.R.P., Cruz, A.G., Ajlouni, S., and Ranadheera, C.S. (2020). Apple Pomace as a Functional and Healthy Ingredient in Food Products: A Review. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8030319 ↗
8. Ezzat, S.M., Salama, M., El Kersh, D., and Salem, M. (2022). Apple Pomace as a Source of Nutraceuticals. Food and Agricultural Byproducts as Important Source of Valuable Nutraceuticals, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-98760-2_5 ↗
9. Industrial Apple Pomace By-Products as a Potential Source of pro-Health Compounds in Functional Food10.15414/jmbfs.2017.7.1.22-26 ↗
10. Kschonsek, J., Wolfram, T., Stöckl, A., and Böhm, V. (2018). Polyphenolic Compounds Analysis of Old and New Apple Cultivars and Contribution of Polyphenolic Profile to the In Vitro Antioxidant Capacity. Antioxidants, 7.10.3390/antiox7010020 ↗
11. Soluble vs Insoluble Fiber: Different Physiological Responses
12. Dietary Fiber Concentrates from Fruit and Vegetable By-Products: Processing, Modification, and Application as Functional Ingredients10.1007/s11947-018-2117-2 ↗
13. Use of Berry Pomace to Design Functional Foods10.1080/87559129.2021.2010217 ↗
14. FDA (2022, May 28). Authors Health Claims: Fruits, Vegetables, and Grain Products That Contain Fiber, Particularly Soluble Fiber, and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease, Available online: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-101/subpart-E/section-101.77.
15. Health Benefits of Dietary Fiber10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00189.x ↗
16. Procentese, A., Russo, M.E., Di Somma, I., and Marzocchella, A. (2020). Kinetic Characterization of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Apple Pomace as Feedstock for a Sugar-Based Biorefinery. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13051051 ↗
17. Putra, N.R., Rizkiyah, D.N., Abdul Aziz, A.H., Che Yunus, M.A., Veza, I., Harny, I., and Tirta, A. (2023). Waste to Wealth of Apple Pomace Valorization by Past and Current Extraction Processes: A Review. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15010830 ↗
18. Sensory and Physical Quality Characteristics of Bread Fortified with Apple Pomace Using Fuzzy Mathematical Model10.1111/ijfs.13280 ↗
19. Effect of the Addition of Apple Pomace and Erythritol on the Antioxidant Capacity and Antidiabetic Properties of Shortbread Cookies10.31883/pjfns/187941 ↗
20. Patel, A., Naik, S.N., Satya, S., Ghodki, B.M., Jana, S., and Sharma, P. (2022). Utilization of Industrial Waste of Amla and Apple Pomace for Development of Functional Biscuits: Physical, Microstructural, and Macroscopic Properties. J. Food Process Preserv., 46.10.1111/jfpp.16835 ↗
21. Antioxidant and Cyto/DNA Protective Properties of Apple Pomace Enriched Bakery Products10.1007/s13197-015-2151-2 ↗
22. Terpou, A., Papadaki, A., Lappa, I.K., Kachrimanidou, V., Bosnea, L.A., and Kopsahelis, N. (2019). Probiotics in Food Systems: Significance and Emerging Strategies towards Improved Viability and Delivery of Enhanced Beneficial Value. Nutrients.10.3390/nu11071591 ↗
23. Probiotics10.1016/j.disamonth.2015.03.011 ↗
24. Influence of PH and Soy Protein Isolate Addition on the Physicochemical Properties of Functional Grape Pectin Confections10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.01.013 ↗
25. (2024, November 17). Confectionery Market Size & Share Report, 2028. Available online: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/confectionery-market#.
26. Gok, S., Toker, O.S., Palabiyik, I., and Konar, N. (2020). Usage Possibility of Mannitol and Soluble Wheat Fiber in Low Calorie Gummy Candies. LWT, 128.10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109531 ↗
27. Renaldi, G., Junsara, K., Jannu, T., Sirinupong, N., and Samakradhamrongthai, R.S. (2022). Physicochemical, Textural, and Sensory Qualities of Pectin/Gelatin Gummy Jelly Incorporated with Garcinia atroviridis and Its Consumer Acceptability. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci., 28.10.1016/j.ijgfs.2022.100505 ↗
28. (2022, August 22). Viscozyme® L—Vegetables|Novozymes. Available online: https://biosolutions.novozymes.com/en/juice-fruit-vegetables/products/vegetables/viscozyme-l?gclid=Cj0KCQjw0oyYBhDGARIsAMZEuMv6eLmjvJUAG_R4_V8FY0UQv8f5ZzY9dp-b7bZx_mxH4ex0B3vnud8aAtTZEALw_wcB.
29. (2022, August 22). Pectinex® Ultra Tropical|Novozymes. Available online: https://biosolutions.novozymes.com/en/juice-fruit-vegetables/products/tropical-fruits/pectinex-ultra-tropical.
30. Physical, Chemical, and Technofunctional Properties of Okara Modified by a Carbohydrase Mixture10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110141 ↗
31. Chokeberry Pomace Valorization into Food Ingredients by Enzyme-Assisted Extraction: Process Optimization and Product Characterization10.1016/j.fbp.2017.06.001 ↗
32. Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar10.1021/ac60147a030 ↗
33. A Comparative Assess of High Hydrostatic Pressure and Superfine Grinding on Physicochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Grape Pomace10.1111/ijfs.13489 ↗
34. INFOGEST Static in Vitro Simulation of Gastrointestinal Food Digestion10.1038/s41596-018-0119-1 ↗
35. (2024, December 17). ISO 13299:2016. Sensory Analysis—Methodology—General Guidance for Establishing a Sensory Profile. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/58042.html.
36. Borujeni, N.E., Karimi, K., Denayer, J.F.M., and Kumar, R. (2022). Apple Pomace Biorefinery for Ethanol, Mycoprotein, and Value-Added Biochemicals Production by Mucor Indicus. Energy, 240.10.1016/j.energy.2021.122469 ↗
37. Apple Pomace as Food Fortification Ingredient: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1111/1750-3841.15449 ↗
38. Extraction and Functional Properties of Water-Soluble Dietary Fiber from Apple Pomace10.1111/jfpe.12085 ↗
39. Pectic Substances Isolated from Apple Cellulosic Residue: Structural Characterisation of a New Type of Rhamnogalacturonan I10.1016/S0144-8617(02)00214-X ↗
40. Apple Pomace Liquefaction with Pectinases and Cellulases: Analytical Data of the Corresponding Juices10.1007/s002170000171 ↗
41. Enzymatic Degradation of Cell Walls of Apples and Characterization of Solubilized Products10.1016/0141-8130(96)81842-3 ↗
42. Enzymatic Conversion of Date Fruit Fiber Concentrates into a New Product Enriched in Antioxidant Soluble Fiber10.1016/j.lwt.2016.10.017 ↗
43. Dietary Fibre and Fibre-Rich by-Products of Food Processing: Characterisation, Technological Functionality and Commercial Applications: A Review10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.06.077 ↗
44. Characterization of Partial Acid Hydrolysates of Citrus Pectin for Their Pasting, Rheological and Thermal Properties10.1007/s13197-020-04304-w ↗
45. Dranca, F., Vargas, M., and Oroian, M. (2020). Physicochemical Properties of Pectin from Malus domestica ‘Fălticeni’ Apple Pomace as Affected by Non-Conventional Extraction Techniques. Food Hydrocoll., 100.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105383 ↗
46. Pectin Recovery from Apple Pomace: Physico-Chemical and Functional Variation Based on Methyl-Esterification10.1111/ijfs.15129 ↗
47. Effect of Drying Methods on the Physical Properties and Microstructures of Mango (Philippine ‘Carabao’ Var.) Powder10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.01.010 ↗
48. Nemetz, N.J., Schieber, A., and Weber, F. (2021). Application of Crude Pomace Powder of Chokeberry, Bilberry, and Elderberry as a Coloring Foodstuff. Molecules, 26.10.3390/molecules26092689 ↗
49. Convective Drying of Orange Pomace at Different Temperatures and Characterization of the Obtained Powders10.1007/s13197-021-05108-2 ↗
50. Structural Rearrangement of β-Lactoglobulin at Different Oil-Water Interfaces and Its Effect on Emulsion Stability10.1021/la201483y ↗
51. Effect of Heat Treatments on the Structure and Emulsifying Properties of Protein Isolates from Cumin Seeds (Cuminum cyminum)10.1177/1082013218788753 ↗
52. Emulsifying Properties of Food By-Products: Valorizing Apple Pomace and Oat Bran10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.02.001 ↗
53. Investigation of Antibacterial Activity and Probiotic Properties of Strains Belonging to Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Genera for Their Potential Application in Functional Food and Feed Products10.1007/s12602-021-09777-5 ↗
54. Screening of Cholesterol-Lowering Bifidobacterium from Guizhou Xiang Pigs, and Evaluation of Its Tolerance to Oxygen, Acid, and Bile10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.1.37 ↗
55. O’Mahony, D., Murphy, S., Boileau, T., Park, J.S., O’Brien, F., Groeger, D., Konieczna, P., Ziegler, M., Scully, P., and Shanahan, F. (2010). Bifidobacterium animalis AHC7 Protects against Pathogen-Induced NF-ΚB Activation in Vivo. BMC Immunol., 11.10.1186/1471-2172-11-63 ↗
56. Optimization of experimental model systems for evaluating reciprocal influence of Bifidobacterium animalis and human breast cancer cells in vitro10.15407/exp-oncology.2023.04.504 ↗
57. Probiotic Functional Foods: Survival of Probiotics during Processing and Storage10.1016/j.jff.2014.04.030 ↗
58. Abedinia, A., Alimohammadi, F., Teymori, F., Razgardani, N., Asl, M.R.S., Ariffin, F., Nafchi, A.M., Huda, N., and Roslan, J. (2021). Characterization and Cell Viability of Probiotic/Prebiotics Film Based on Duck Feet Gelatin: A Novel Poultry Gelatin as a Suitable Matrix for Probiotics. Foods, 10.10.3390/foods10081761 ↗
59. Campaniello, D., Bevilacqua, A., Speranza, B., Sinigaglia, M., and Corbo, M.R. (2020). Alginate- and Gelatin-Coated Apple Pieces as Carriers for Bifidobacterium animalis Subsp. Lactis DSM 10140. Front. Microbiol., 11.10.3389/fmicb.2020.566596 ↗
60. Alvarez, M.V., Bambace, M.F., Quintana, G., Gomez-Zavaglia, A., and Moreira, M.d.R. (2021). Prebiotic-Alginate Edible Coating on Fresh-Cut Apple as a New Carrier for Probiotic Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria. LWT, 137.10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110483 ↗
61. Wilkowska, A., Nowak, A., Antczak-Chrobot, A., Motyl, I., Czy, A., and Paliwoda, A. (2019). Structurally Different Pectic Oligosaccharides Produced from Apple Pomace and Their Biological Activity In Vitro. Foods, 8.10.3390/foods8090365 ↗
62. Vlad, C.C., Păcularu-Burada, B., Vasile, A.M., Milea Ștefania, A., Bahrim, G.E., Râpeanu, G., and Stănciuc, N. (2022). Upgrading the Functional Potential of Apple Pomace in Value-Added Ingredients with Probiotics. Antioxidants, 11.10.3390/antiox11102028 ↗
63. Ibrahim, I.N., Kamaruding, N.A., Ismail, N., and Shaharuddin, S. (2022). Value Addition to Ice Cream by Fortification with Okara and Probiotic. J. Food Process Preserv., 46.10.1111/jfpp.16253 ↗
64. La Cava, E., Gerbino, E., Sgroppo, S., and Gomez-Zavaglia, A. (2022). Baked Mango Slices Coated with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Immobilized in Pectic Extracts. Appl. Food Res., 2.10.1016/j.afres.2022.100236 ↗
65. Gómez-García, R., Vilas-Boas, A.A., Machado, M., Campos, D.A., Aguilar, C.N., Madureira, A.R., and Pintado, M. (2022). Impact of Simulated in Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion on Bioactive Compounds, Bioactivity and Cytotoxicity of Melon (Cucumis melo L. Inodorus) Peel Juice Powder. Food Biosci., 47.10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101726 ↗
66. Soares, M.B., Martinez, R.C.R., Pereira, E.P.R., Balthazar, C.F., Cruz, A.G., Ranadheera, C.S., and Sant’Ana, A.S. (2019). The Resistance of Bacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus Strains with Claimed Probiotic Properties in Different Food Matrices Exposed to Simulated Gastrointestinal Tract Conditions. Food Res. Int., 125.10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108542 ↗
67. Talebzadeh, S., and Sharifan, A. (2017). Developing Probiotic Jelly Desserts with Lactobacillus acidophilus. J. Food Process Preserv., 41.10.1111/jfpp.13026 ↗
68. Mandura, A., Šeremet, D., Ščetar, M., Vojvodić Cebin, A., Belščak-Cvitanović, A., and Komes, D. (2020). Physico-Chemical, Bioactive, and Sensory Assessment of White Tea-Based Candies during 4-Months Storage. J. Food Process Preserv., 44.10.1111/jfpp.14628 ↗
69. Altınok, E., Palabiyik, I., Gunes, R., Toker, O.S., Konar, N., and Kurultay, S. (2020). Valorisation of Grape By-Products as a Bulking Agent in Soft Candies: Effect of Particle Size. LWT, 118.10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108776 ↗
70. Spinei, M., and Oroian, M. (2024). Characterization of Băbească Neagră Grape Pomace and Incorporation into Jelly Candy: Evaluation of Phytochemical, Sensory, and Textural Properties. Foods, 13.10.3390/foods13010098 ↗