journal article·2024-12-05Open access

Distalization Methods for Maxillary Molars Utilizing Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs): A Narrative Review

Fırat Oğuz, Samet Özden, Orhan Cicek

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 23

Abstract

Class II malocclusions, characterized by the mesial positioning of the maxillary molars relative to the mandibular molars, are among the most frequently encountered orthodontic issues. One of the widely adopted non-extraction approaches for addressing this malocclusion is maxillary molar distalization, which has been utilized for decades to create space within the dental arch. Historically, extraoral appliances such as headgear were commonly employed. However, with technological advancements, intraoral distalization devices, particularly those incorporating temporary anchorage devices (TADs), have gained prominence due to their compact size, not being visible externally, and improved patient acceptance. These appliances offer significant advantages, including being less invasive compared with extraction-based camouflage treatments, being more readily accepted by patients due to the absence of extraction spaces, and not requiring the complex biomechanical principles involved in extraction-based methods. TADs have revolutionized distalization techniques by providing superior anchorage control, reducing treatment duration, and offering a straightforward, patient-friendly application. The purpose of this comprehensive narrative review is to focus specifically on intraoral distalization techniques utilizing TADs, summarizing their efficacy and outcomes in the management of Class II malocclusions as reported in clinical studies over the past three decades.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · dental development and anomalies · Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, İnönü University, Malatya 44280, Türkiye

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak 67600, Türkiye

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. Bishara, S. (2001). Textbook of Orthodontics, Saunders Company.
2. Huang, G.J., Graber, L.W., Vanarsdall, R.L., and Vig, K.W. (2016). Orthodontics-E-Book: Current Principles and Techniques, Elsevier Health Sciences.
3. Quinzi, V., Marchetti, E., Guerriero, L., Bosco, F., Marzo, G., and Mummolo, S. (2020). Dentoskeletal class II malocclusion: Maxillary molar distalization with no-compliance fixed orthodontic equipment. Dent. J., 8.10.3390/dj8010026 ↗
4. Periodontal status of buccally and palatally impacted maxillary canines after surgical-orthodontic treatment with open technique10.2334/josnusd.17-0394 ↗
5. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients
6. Maxillary molar distalization in treatment of angle class II malocclusion growing patients: Uncontrolled clinical trial10.1016/j.ortho.2019.11.003 ↗
7. Maxillary molar distalization using conventional versus skeletal anchorage devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.ortho.2019.06.002 ↗
8. Intraoral distalizer effects with conventional and skeletal anchorage: A meta-analysis10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.024 ↗
9. Evaluation of dentoalveolar and dentofacial effects of a mini-screw-anchored pendulum appliance in maxillary molar distalization10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.18004 ↗
10. Comparison between direct vs indirect anchorage in two miniscrew-supported distalizing devices10.2319/040715-231.1 ↗
11. Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.049 ↗
12. Maxillary molar distalization with miniplates assessed on digital models: A prospective clinical trial10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.031 ↗
13. Efficiency of maxillary total arch distalization using temporary anchorage devices (TADs) for treatment of Class II-malocclusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100666 ↗
14. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: Distal jet versus pendulum10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.031 ↗
15. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.031 ↗
16. Reference charts for controlled extraoral force application to maxillary molars10.1016/0002-9416(70)90025-4 ↗
17. Comparison of maxillary molar distalization with an implant-supported distal jet and a traditional tooth-supported distal jet appliance10.1155/2014/937059 ↗
18. Upper molar distalization: A critical analysis10.1034/j.1600-0544.2002.01155.x ↗
19. Efficacy of mandibular molar distalization by clear aligner treatment
20. Skeletal and dental effectiveness of treatment of class II malocclusion with headgear: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.07.008 ↗
21. Cephalometric evaluation of molar distalization by hyrax screw used in conjunction with a lip bumper
22. The role of the headgear in growth modification10.1053/j.sodo.2005.10.006 ↗
23. Clinical and quantitative assessment of headgear compliance: A pilot study10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.035 ↗
24. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: A comparison with other contemporary methods
25. Treatment of Class II, Division 1 maximum anchorage cases with the ACCO appliance
26. A comparative study between two molar distalization appliances
27. Maxillary molars distalization: A review10.21608/mjd.2020.198743 ↗
28. An evaluation of intraoral molar distalization with nickel-titanium coil springs
29. Asymmetric maxillary first molar distalization with the transpalatal arch
30. Comparative distalization effects of Jones jig and pendulum appliances10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.035 ↗
31. Sagittal, rotational and transverse changes with three intraoral distalization force systems: Jones jig, distal jet and first class
32. The First Class Appliance for rapid molar distalization
33. The K-loop molar distalizing appliance
34. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study10.4103/0970-4388.191411 ↗
35. Multi directional 3D functional class 2 treatment
36. Effects of three-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arches and cervical headgear on dentofacial structures10.1093/ejo/cjl029 ↗
37. Espansione mascellare a 360 gradi. Sistematica dell’utilizzo di apparecchi fissi con vite per la correzione delle anomalie del mascellare superiore
38. Comparison of two different types of molar distalization appliance
39. The simplified molar distalizer
40. Combined treatment with headgear and the Frog appliance for maxillary molar distalization: A randomized controlled trial10.4041/kjod.2013.43.2.101 ↗
41. A new Class II distalizer
42. Evaluating the treatment effectiveness and efficiency of Carriere Distalizer: A cephalometric and study model comparison of Class II appliances10.1186/s40510-019-0280-2 ↗
43. A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: Intraoral bodily molar distalizer10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70246-0 ↗
44. Unilateral molar distalization with a modified slider10.1093/ejo/cji118 ↗
45. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80041-2 ↗
46. Unilateral distal molar movement with an implant-supported distal jet appliance
47. Treatment efficiency of mini-implant-borne distalization depending on age and second-molar eruption Effizienz miniimplantatgestützter Molarendistalisierung abhängig vom Patientenalter und dem Durchbruch der zweiten Molaren10.1007/s00056-013-0199-z ↗
48. Application and effectiveness of the Beneslider: A device to move molars distally
49. Kaan, E. (2007). Mikro-Implant Destekli Modifiye Lokar Apareyinin Ortodontik Bölgeye Etkisi. [Ph.D. Thesis, Gazi Üniversitesi].
50. The skeletal frog appliance for maxillary molar distalization
51. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance
52. Distalization of maxillary molars with the bone-supported pendulum: A clinical study10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.012 ↗
53. Treatment effects of a modified palatal anchorage plate for distalization evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.03.023 ↗
54. Özdemir, G. (2013). Kemik ve Diş-Doku Destekli Keleş Slider Apareylerinin Etkilerinin 3 Boyutlu Görüntüleme Yöntemiyle Karşılaştırılması. [Ph.D. Thesis, Atatürk Üniversitesi]. Available online: https://www.atauni.edu.tr/yuklemeler/150718cf3e1e6234ca764507c5dcde0b.pdf.
55. Nonextraction treatment with microscrew implants
56. En-masse distalization with miniscrew anchorage in Class II nonextraction treatment
57. Long-term stability of miniscrew anchored maxillary molar distalization in Class II treatment10.2319/051619-335.1 ↗
58. Distalization pattern of the maxillary arch depending on the number of orthodontic miniscrews10.2319/032212-123.1 ↗
59. Three-dimensional evaluation on the effect of maxillary dentition distalization with miniscrews implanted in the infrazygomatic crest10.1097/ID.0000000000000706 ↗
60. Zygoma-gear appliance for intraoral upper molar distalization10.4041/kjod.2010.40.3.195 ↗
61. 3D cortical bone anatomy of the mandibular buccal shelf: A CBCT study to define sites for extra-alveolar bone screws to treat Class III malocclusion
62. Success of infrazygomatic crest bone screws: Patient age, insertion angle, sinus penetration, and terminal insertion torque10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.01.028 ↗
63. Simultaneous Intrusion and Distalization Using Miniscrews in the Maxillary Tuberosity
64. Clinical anatomy of the posterior maxilla pertaining to Le Fort I osteotomy in Thais
65. En-masse retraction using skeletal anchorage in the tuberosity and retromolar region
66. Failure rates of miniscrews inserted in the maxillary tuberosity10.1590/2177-6709.24.5.046-051.oar ↗
67. Simon, M., Keilig, L., Schwarze, J., Jung, B.A., and Bourauel, C. (2014). Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique–regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization. BMC Oral Health, 14.10.1186/1472-6831-14-68 ↗
68. Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review10.2319/061614-436.1 ↗
69. Maxillary molar distalization with aligners in adult patients: A multicenter retrospective study10.1186/s40510-016-0126-0 ↗
70. Miniscrew implant-supported Frog® appliance for maxillary molar distalization
71. Nonextraction treatment of severe Class II, division 2 malocclusions: Part 210.1016/S0889-5406(05)81683-X ↗
72. The surgical-orthodontic correction of mandibular deficiency. Part I10.1016/0002-9416(93)90004-Q ↗
73. Orthodontic facebow injuries and safety equipment10.1093/ejo/16.5.385 ↗
74. Ağız içi molar distalizasyon yöntemleri
75. Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: A randomized controlled trial
76. Uses of implants in orthodontics10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00327-5 ↗
77. Palatal implant anchorage reinforcement of posterior teeth: A prospective study10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70204-0 ↗
78. Zygomatic mini-implant for Class II correction in growing patients10.1007/s00056-014-0214-z ↗
79. Three-dimensional analysis of tooth movements after palatal miniscrew-supported molar distalization10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.12.024 ↗
80. Distal movement of maxillary molars in nongrowing patients with the skeletal anchorage system10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.036 ↗
81. Palatal implant versus zygoma plate anchorage for distalization of maxillary posterior teeth10.1093/ejo/cjs059 ↗