journal article·2024-12Open access

Benchmark Sample Design for the Validation of Residual Stress Measurements by Diffraction: Insights and Practicalities

Gowtham Nimmal Haribabu, David Canelo-Yubero, Emad Maawad, Guilherme Abreu Faria, Peter Staron, Norbert Schell, Ranggi Sahmura Ramadhan, Sandra Cabeza, Arnold Paecklar, Thilo Pirling, Philip J. Withers, Matthew J. Roy

Abstract

Abstract Non-destructive determination of residual stresses can present significant challenges. Two benchmark samples having the same geometry have been developed which can be measured by diffraction techniques and adapted to other material systems to validate RS measurements. While having the same geometry, one was solely elastically loaded while the other had stresses generated by significant plasticity. Measurements by a neutron diffraction and two synchrotron X-ray diffraction instruments (white beam and monochromatic beam) have been made in the ferrite phase at identical locations on S355 ferrite/pearlite steel benchmark samples. Broadly consistent results (± 30–50 MPa) are obtained across the three diffractometers. These results were corroborated by finite element predictions, with standard deviation on differences between predictions and measurements being ± 22 MPa for benchmarks with elastic sources of stress and ± 77 MPa for the plastically deformed case. Differences in the stresses were found when making near-surface measurements but only when around 80% of the gauge volume was outside the sample. The larger discrepancies between the measurements and the FE model in the plastic case may be due to plastic load transfer from the softer ferrite to the harder cementite during plastic deformation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Schajer GS, Ruud CO (2013) Overview of residual stresses and their measurement. In: Practical residual stress measurement methods. pp 1–2710.1002/9781118402832.ch1 ↗
2. Withers PJ, Bhadeshia HKDH (2001) Residual stress. Part 1 –measurement techniques. Mater Sci Technol 17:355–365. https://doi.org/10.1179/02670830110150998010.1179/026708301101509980 ↗
3. Withers PJ, Bhadeshia HKDH (2001) Residual stress. Part 2 –nature and origins. Mater Sci Technol 17:366–375. https://doi.org/10.1179/02670830110151008710.1179/026708301101510087 ↗
4. Daymond MR, Johnson MW, Sivia DS (2002) Analysis of neutron diffraction strain measurement data from a round robin sample. J Strain Anal Eng Des 37:73–86. https://doi.org/10.1243/030932402151484410.1243/0309324021514844 ↗
5. Withers PJ (2007) Residual stress and its role in failure. Rep Prog Phys 70:2211–2264. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/70/12/R0410.1088/0034-4885/70/12/R04 ↗
6. Petry W (2015) Neutrons for industry. EPJ Web Conf 104:01001. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20151040100110.1051/epjconf/201510401001 ↗
7. Suzuki M (2014) Recent trends in industrial applications. Synchrotron Radiat News 27:2. https://doi.org/10.1080/08940886.2014.90869610.1080/08940886.2014.908696 ↗
8. Ohms C, Youtsos AG, Webster GA, Wimpory RW (2002) Polycrystalline materials determination of residual stresses by neutron diffraction, TWA 20 ISO/TTA3 Euro Commission, ISSN 1018–5593 20265
9. Webster GA, Youtsos AG, Ohms C, Wimpory RC (2002) Draft standard for the measurement of residual stresses by neutron diffraction. In: Gdoutos, EE (ed) Recent advances in experimental mechanics. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 467–47610.1007/0-306-48410-2_44 ↗
10. Smith MC, Smith AC (2018) Advances in weld residual stress prediction: a review of the NeT TG4 simulation round robins part 2, mechanical analyses. Int J Press Vessels Pip 164:130–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2018.03.00710.1016/j.ijpvp.2018.03.007 ↗
11. Rathbun HJ, Fredette LF, Scott PM, et al (2011) NRC welding residual stress validation program international round robin program and findings. In: Volume 6: Materials and Fabrication, Parts A and B. ASMEDC, pp 1539–154510.1115/PVP2011-57642 ↗
12. Kerr M, Prime MB, Swenson H et al (2013) Residual stress characterization in a dissimilar metal weld nuclear reactor piping system mock up. J Press Vessel Technol. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.402444610.1115/1.4024446 ↗
13. Fredette LF, Broussard JE, Kerr M, Rathbun HJ (2011) NRC/EPRI welding residual stress validation program-Phase III details and findings. In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP. ASMEDC, pp 1547–155510.1115/PVP2011-57645 ↗
14. Goldak JA, Tchernov S, Zhou J, Downey D (2012) A sensitivity analysis of NRC welding residual stress validation program international round Robin program. In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP. pp 1245–125410.1115/PVP2012-78657 ↗
15. Phan TQ, Strantza M, Hill MR et al (2019) Elastic residual strain and stress measurements and corresponding part deflections of 3D additive manufacturing builds of IN625 AM-bench artifacts using neutron diffraction, synchrotron x-ray diffraction, and contour method. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 8:318–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-019-00149-010.1007/s40192-019-00149-0 ↗
16. Schajer GS, Prime MB, Withers PJ (2022) Why is it so challenging to measure residual stresses? Exp Mech 62:1521–1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-022-00879-x10.1007/s11340-022-00879-x ↗
17. Fitzpatrick ME, Hutchings MT, Withers PJ (1997) Separation of macroscopic, elastic mismatch and thermal expansion misfit stresses in metal matrix composite quenched plates from neutron diffraction measurements. Acta Mater 45:4867–4876. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00209-710.1016/S1359-6454(97)00209-7 ↗
18. British Standards Institution (2020) BS EN ISO 21432:2020: Non-destructive testing. Standard test method for determining residual stresses by neutron diffraction
19. ASTM E112–10 (2010) Standard test methods for determining average grain size ASTM International. 13:1 27. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0112-1310.1520/E0112-13 ↗
20. Cui W, Sánchez Poncela M, Badyka R, et al (2022) EASI-STRESS standardization of industrial residual stress measurement: benchmark specimen design. ICRS 11-The 11th International Conference of Residual Stresses, Nancy, France
21. (2023) ISO 5173:2023 Destructive tests on welds in metallic materials — Bend tests British Standards Institute. 24
22. Withers PJ, Preuss M, Steuwer A, Pang JWL (2007) Methods for obtaining the strain-free lattice parameter when using diffraction to determine residual stress. J Appl Crystallogr 40:891–904. https://doi.org/10.1107/S002188980703026910.1107/S0021889807030269 ↗
23. Forni D, Chiaia B, Cadoni E (2016) Strain rate behaviour in tension of S355 steel: base for progressive collapse analysis. Eng Struct 119:164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.01310.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.013 ↗
24. Youtsos AG, Ohms C (2002) European standardization activities on residual stress analysis by neutron diffraction. Appl Phys A: Mater Sci Process. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339020184110.1007/s003390201841 ↗
25. Johnson MW, Daymond MR, Ohm C, Youstos AG (2000) Neutron diffraction measurements of residual stress in a shrink-fit ring and plug VAMAS Report no 38 (ISSN 1016–2186) Technical Working Area 20
26. Pang JWL, Holden TM, Mason TE (1998) The development of intergranular strains in a high-strength steel. J Strain Anal Eng Design 33:373–383. https://doi.org/10.1243/030932498151307510.1243/0309324981513075 ↗
27. Pirling T, Bruno G, Withers PJ (2006) SALSA—A new instrument for strain imaging in engineering materials and components. Mater Sci Eng, A 437:139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2006.04.08310.1016/J.MSEA.2006.04.083 ↗
28. Pirling T (2011) Precise analysis of near surface neutron strain imaging measurements. Procedia Eng 10:2147–2152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.35510.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.355 ↗
29. Staron P, Fischer T, Eims EH et al (2014) Depth-resolved residual stress analysis with conical slits for high-energy x-rays. Mater Sci Forum 772:3–7. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.772.310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.772.3 ↗
30. Hammersley AP (2016) {\it FIT2D}: a multi-purpose data reduction, analysis and visualization program. J Appl Crystallogr 49:646–652. https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057671600045510.1107/S1600576716000455 ↗
31. Hammersley AP, Svensson SO, Hanfland M et al (1996) Two-dimensional detector software: from real detector to idealised image or two-theta scan. High Press Res 14:235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/0895795960820140810.1080/08957959608201408 ↗
32. Ramadhan RS, Cabeza S, Pirling T et al (2021) Quantitative analysis and benchmarking of positional accuracies of neutron strain scanners. Nuclear Instr Methods Phys Res Sect A: Accel, Spectrom, Detect Assoc Equip 999:165230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2021.16523010.1016/j.nima.2021.165230 ↗
33. Suzuki H, Harjo S, Abe J et al (2013) Effects of gauge volume on pseudo-strain induced in strain measurement using time-of-flight neutron diffraction. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect A 715:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2013.03.03110.1016/j.nima.2013.03.031 ↗
34. Creek SR, Santisteban JR, Edwards L (2005) Modelling pseudo-strain effects induced in strain measurement using time-of-flight neutron diffraction. Frg/2005/02/08 1–16
35. Rebelo Kornmeier J, Hofmann M, Luzin V et al (2019) Fast neutron surface strain scanning with high spatial resolution. Mater Charact 154:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2019.05.03110.1016/j.matchar.2019.05.031 ↗
36. Isavand S, Kardan-Halvaei M, Assempour A (2021) Crystal plasticity modeling and experimental characterization of strain localization and forming limits in ferrite-pearlite steels. Int J Solids Struct 233:111205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.11120510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111205 ↗
37. Isavand S, Assempour A (2021) Strain localization and deformation behavior in ferrite-pearlite steel unraveled by high-resolution in-situ testing integrated with crystal plasticity simulations. Int J Mech Sci 200:106441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10644110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106441 ↗
38. Isavand S, Assempour A (2021) Effects of microstructural morphology on formability, strain localization, and damage of ferrite-pearlite steels: experimental and micromechanical approaches. Metall Mater Trans A 52:711–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-020-06115-210.1007/s11661-020-06115-2 ↗
39. Basantia SK, Bhattacharya A, Khutia N, Das D (2021) Plastic behavior of ferrite-pearlite, ferrite-bainite and ferrite–martensite steels: experiments and micromechanical modelling. Met Mater Int 27:1025–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-019-00519-510.1007/s12540-019-00519-5 ↗
40. Gadalińska E, Baczmański A, Braham C et al (2020) Stress localisation in lamellar cementite and ferrite during elastoplastic deformation of pearlitic steel studied using diffraction and modelling. Int J Plast 127:102651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.10265110.1016/j.ijplas.2019.102651 ↗
41. Taran YV, Balagurov AM (2012) Correction of a neutron diffraction peak shift due to a partial immersion of a gauge volume in an unstressed sample. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect A 679:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2012.03.00910.1016/j.nima.2012.03.009 ↗
42. Oliver EC, Daymond MR, Withers PJ (2004) Interphase and intergranular stress generation in carbon steels. Acta Mater 52:1937–1951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.03510.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.035 ↗
43. Daymond MR, Bourke MAM, Von Dreele RB et al (1997) Use of Rietveld refinement for elastic macrostrain determination and for evaluation of plastic strain history from diffraction spectra. J Appl Phys 82:1554–1562. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.36595610.1063/1.365956 ↗