journal article·2024-09-21Open access

Optimal Sensor Placement and Multimodal Fusion for Human Activity Recognition in Agricultural Tasks

Lefteris Benos, Dimitrios Tsaopoulos, Aristotelis C. Tagarakis, Dimitrios Kateris, Dionysis Bochtis

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 18

Abstract

This study examines the impact of sensor placement and multimodal sensor fusion on the performance of a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-based model for human activity classification taking place in an agricultural harvesting scenario involving human-robot collaboration. Data were collected from twenty participants performing six distinct activities using five wearable inertial measurement units placed at various anatomical locations. The signals collected from the sensors were first processed to eliminate noise and then input into an LSTM neural network for recognizing features in sequential time-dependent data. Results indicated that the chest-mounted sensor provided the highest F1-score of 0.939, representing superior performance over other placements and combinations of them. Moreover, the magnetometer surpassed the accelerometer and gyroscope, highlighting its superior ability to capture crucial orientation and motion data related to the investigated activities. However, multimodal fusion of accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer data showed the benefit of integrating data from different sensor types to improve classification accuracy. The study emphasizes the effectiveness of strategic sensor placement and fusion in optimizing human activity recognition, thus minimizing data requirements and computational expenses, and resulting in a cost-optimal system configuration. Overall, this research contributes to the development of more intelligent, safe, cost-effective adaptive synergistic systems that can be integrated into a variety of applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), Centre of Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH), GR57001 Thessaloniki, Greece

farmB Digital Agriculture, Doiranis 17, GR54639 Thessaloniki, Greece

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Agricultural robots for field operations: Concepts and components10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.06.014 ↗
2. Mapping smart farming: Addressing agricultural challenges in data-driven era10.1016/j.rser.2023.113858 ↗
3. Benos, L., Moysiadis, V., Kateris, D., Tagarakis, A.C., Busato, P., Pearson, S., and Bochtis, D. (2023). Human-Robot Interaction in Agriculture: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23156776 ↗
4. Lytridis, C., Kaburlasos, V.G., Pachidis, T., Manios, M., Vrochidou, E., Kalampokas, T., and Chatzistamatis, S. (2021). An Overview of Cooperative Robotics in Agriculture. Agronomy, 11.10.3390/agronomy11091818 ↗
5. Human–robot interaction in agriculture: A survey and current challenges10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.12.005 ↗
6. Liu, H., Gamboa, H., and Schultz, T. (2024). Human Activity Recognition, Monitoring, and Analysis Facilitated by Novel and Widespread Applications of Sensors. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24165250 ↗
7. A review of vision-based indoor HAR: State-of-the-art, challenges, and future prospects10.1007/s11042-023-15443-5 ↗
8. Donisi, L., Cesarelli, G., Pisani, N., Ponsiglione, A.M., Ricciardi, C., and Capodaglio, E. (2022). Wearable Sensors and Artificial Intelligence for Physical Ergonomics: A Systematic Review of Literature. Diagnostics, 12.10.3390/diagnostics12123048 ↗
9. Human–Robot Interaction through Dynamic Movement Recognition for Agricultural Environments10.3390/agriengineering6030146 ↗
10. Advances in ground robotic technologies for site-specific weed management in precision agriculture: A review10.1016/j.compag.2024.109363 ↗
11. Tagarakis, A.C., Benos, L., Kyriakarakos, G., Pearson, S., Sørensen, C.G., and Bochtis, D. (2024). Digital Twins in Agriculture and Forestry: A Review. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24103117 ↗
12. Moysiadis, V., Katikaridis, D., Benos, L., Busato, P., Anagnostis, A., Kateris, D., Pearson, S., and Bochtis, D. (2022). An Integrated Real-Time Hand Gesture Recognition Framework for Human-Robot Interaction in Agriculture. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12168160 ↗
13. Human activity recognition using wearable sensors by heterogeneous convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116764 ↗
14. Sensor-based and vision-based human activity recognition: A comprehensive survey10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107561 ↗
15. Bian, S., Liu, M., Zhou, B., and Lukowicz, P. (2022). The State-of-the-Art Sensing Techniques in Human Activity Recognition: A Survey. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22124596 ↗
16. Wearable Sensors for Real-Time Kinematics Analysis in Sports: A Review10.1109/JSEN.2020.3019016 ↗
17. Gokul, S., Dhiksith, R., Sundaresh, S.A., and Gopinath, M. (2019, January 15–16). Gesture Controlled Wireless Agricultural Weeding Robot. Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Systems (ICACCS), Coimbatore, India.10.1109/ICACCS.2019.8728429 ↗
18. Patil, P.A., Jagyasi, B.G., Raval, J., Warke, N., and Vaidya, P.P. (2015, January 6–10). Design and development of wearable sensor textile for precision agriculture. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS), Bangalore, India.10.1109/COMSNETS.2015.7098714 ↗
19. Sharma, S., Raval, J., and Jagyasi, B. (2013, January 20–23). Mobile sensing for agriculture activities detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), GHTC 2013, San Jose, CA, USA.10.1109/GHTC.2013.6713707 ↗
20. Sharma, S., Raval, J., and Jagyasi, B. (2014, January 11–13). Neural network based agriculture activity detection using mobile accelerometer sensors. Proceedings of the Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON), Pune, India.10.1109/INDICON.2014.7030539 ↗
21. Sharma, S., Jagyasi, B., Raval, J., and Patil, P. (2015, January 23–27). AgriAcT: Agricultural Activity Training using multimedia and wearable sensing. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops), St. Louis, MO, USA.10.1109/PERCOMW.2015.7134078 ↗
22. Worker safety in agriculture 4.0: A new approach for mapping operator’s vibration risk through Machine Learning activity recognition10.1016/j.compag.2021.106637 ↗
23. Tagarakis, A.C., Benos, L., Aivazidou, E., Anagnostis, A., Kateris, D., and Bochtis, D. (2021). Wearable Sensors for Identifying Activity Signatures in Human-Robot Collaborative Agricultural Environments. Eng. Proc., 9.10.3390/engproc2021009005 ↗
24. Anagnostis, A., Benos, L., Tsaopoulos, D., Tagarakis, A., Tsolakis, N., and Bochtis, D. (2021). Human activity recognition through recurrent neural networks for human-robot interaction in agriculture. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11052188 ↗
25. (2024, September 16). Open Datasets—iBO. Available online: https://ibo.certh.gr/open-datasets/.
26. Data-driven agriculture and sustainable farming: Friends or foes?10.1007/s11119-023-10061-5 ↗
27. Towards Comprehensive European Agricultural Data Governance: Moving Beyond the “Data Ownership” Debate
28. A Review of Robots, Perception, and Tasks in Precision Agriculture10.3390/applmech3030049 ↗
29. The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments10.1080/001401399185838 ↗
30. Winter, L., Bellenger, C., Grimshaw, P., and Crowther, R.G. (2023). Analysis of Movement Variability in Cycling: An Exploratory Study. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23104972 ↗
31. A comparative analysis of lumbar spine mechanics during barbell- and crate-lifting: Implications for occupational lifting task assessments
32. Elongation of the surface of the spine during lifting and lowering, and implications for design of an upper body industrial exoskeleton10.1016/j.apergo.2018.04.011 ↗
33. Hlucny, S.D., and Novak, D. (2020). Characterizing Human Box-Lifting Behavior Using Wearable Inertial Motion Sensors. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20082323 ↗
34. Ghislieri, M., Gastaldi, L., Pastorelli, S., Tadano, S., and Agostini, V. (2019). Wearable Inertial Sensors to Assess Standing Balance: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19194075 ↗
35. Detection of daily postures and walking modalities using a single chest-mounted tri-axial accelerometer10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.04.008 ↗
36. (2024, August 19). Capture U-ImeasureU. Available online: https://imeasureu.com/capture-u/.
37. Del Choosing a Lifting Posture: Squat, Semi-Squat or Stoop10.15406/mojypt.2017.02.00019 ↗
38. (2024, August 26). VICON Blue Trident Inertial Measurement Unit. Available online: https://www.vicon.com/hardware/blue-trident/.
39. So many ways for assessing outliers: What really works and does it matter?10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.066 ↗
40. Body-Worn Sensors for Recognizing Physical Sports Activities in Exergaming via Deep Learning Model10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3239692 ↗
41. Li, J., Xu, Y., and Shi, H. (2019, January 20–22). Bidirectional LSTM with Hierarchical Attention for Text Classification. Proceedings of the IEEE 4th Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC), Chengdu, China.10.1109/IAEAC47372.2019.8997969 ↗
42. Sklearn.Preprocessing (2021, January 20). StandardScaler—Scikit-Learn 0.24.1 Documentation. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.StandardScaler.html.
43. Recurrent Neural Networks for Time Series Forecasting: Current status and future directions10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.06.008 ↗
44. A review on big data based on deep neural network approaches10.1007/s10462-023-10512-5 ↗
45. Working Memory Connections for LSTM10.1016/j.neunet.2021.08.030 ↗
46. Harmonic Loss Function for Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition Based on LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3003162 ↗
47. (2024, September 12). Scikit-Learn User Guide. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/cross_validation.html.
48. LSTM-CNN Architecture for Human Activity Recognition10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982225 ↗
49. Chung, S., Lim, J., Noh, K.J., Kim, G., and Jeong, H. (2019). Sensor Data Acquisition and Multimodal Sensor Fusion for Human Activity Recognition Using Deep Learning. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19071716 ↗
50. Hand dominance in the performance and perceptions of virtual reach control10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103494 ↗
51. Nazari, F., Mohajer, N., Nahavandi, D., Khosravi, A., and Nahavandi, S. (2022, January 28–31). Comparison Study of Inertial Sensor Signal Combination for Human Activity Recognition based on Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI), Melbourne, Australia.10.1109/HSI55341.2022.9869457 ↗
52. Marinoudi, V., Benos, L., Villa, C.C., Lampridi, M., Kateris, D., Berruto, R., Pearson, S., Sørensen, C.G., and Bochtis, D. (2024). Adapting to the Agricultural Labor Market Shaped by Robotization. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16167061 ↗
53. Safety and ergonomics in human-robot interactive agricultural operations10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.09.009 ↗
54. Occupational health and safety issues in human-robot collaboration: State of the art and open challenges10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106313 ↗