journal article·2021-09

A Computer Vision Approach to Evaluate Powder Flowability for Metal Additive Manufacturing

Jiahui Zhang, Mahdi Habibnejad-korayem, Zhiying Liu, Tianyi Lyu, Qiang Sun, Yu Zou

Publisher page

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a transformative technology to many industries that enables the fabrication of parts with complex geometries. A vast majority of powder-bed metal AM techniques use powder as feedstock. The powder packing behavior and flowability significantly influence the defect density of as-built parts and, eventually, affect their reliability and mechanical performance. The experimental characterization methods of powder flowability, for example, Hausner ratio, Carr index, and angle of repose, are rather time-consuming and cost-inefficient. Here, we show a rapid-deployed, low-cost, and reliable computer vision approach to evaluate powder flowability based on scanning electron microscopy images. We have trained seven machine learning models using 2,212 SEM images from 16 types of commonly used plasma-atomized metal powders in AM. Our results indicate that the vector of locally aggregated descriptors model with speedup robust features performs best among the models, represented by about 12 ± 7%. Mean absolute percentage error value is lower than traditional convolutional neural network model. The image analysis model can be implemented without a powerful computing system. The performance of such model is robust to the changes of image brightness. This study also demonstrates that our model can successfully predict the flowability of metal powder that does not exist in the original dataset. Such a computer vision approach provides an effective and efficient tool to evaluate and predict the powder flowability for AM.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Injection Molding Process and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Sachs E (1992) Three dimensional printing: rapid tooling and prototypes directly from a CAD model. J Eng Ind 10(1115/1):2900701
2. Sames WJ (2016) The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. Annu Rev Mater Res 61(5):315–36010.1080/09506608.2015.1116649 ↗
3. Lewandowski JJ, Seifi M (2016) Metal additive manufacturing: a review of mechanical properties. Annu Rev Mater Res. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-03202410.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-032024 ↗
4. Meiners W, Wissenbach KD, Gasser AD (1998) Shaped body especially prototype or replacement part production. U.S. patent DE19649849C1
5. Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2014) Additive manufacturing technologies. Springer, New York10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 ↗
6. Nguyen QB (2017) Characteristics of inconel powders for powder-bed additive manufacturing. Eng 3(5):695–70010.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.012 ↗
7. Sutton AT (2020) Characterization of AISI 304L stainless steel powder recycled in the laser powder-bed fusion process. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10098110.1016/j.addma.2019.100981 ↗
8. Zhai W (2020) Characterization of nanoparticle mixed 316 L powder for additive manufacturing. J Mater Sci Technol 47:162–16810.1016/j.jmst.2020.02.019 ↗
9. Gu DD (2012) Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms. Int Mater Rev 57(3):33–16410.1179/1743280411Y.0000000014 ↗
10. Averardi A (2020) Effect of particle size distribution on the packing of powder beds: A critical discussion relevant to additive manufacturing. Mater Today Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10096410.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.100964 ↗
11. Seyda V, Herzog D, Emmelmann (2017) Relationship between powder characteristics and part properties in laser beam melting of Ti–6Al–4V and implications on quality. J Laser Appl. https://doi.org/10.2351/1.498324010.2351/1.4983240 ↗
12. Spierings AB (2015) Powder flowability characterisation methodology for powder-bed-based metal additive manufacturing. Prog Additi Manuf 1(1–2):9–20 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-015-0001-410.1007/s40964-015-0001-4 ↗
13. Ballard DH, Brown CM (1982) Computer vision. Englewood cliffs, Prentice Hall, NJ
14. Sonka M, Hlavac V, Boyle R (2014) Image processing, analysis, and machine vision. Cengage Learning
15. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1453910.1038/nature14539 ↗
16. Li Q (2004) Interparticle van der Waals force in powder flowability and compactibility. Int J Pharm. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.05.00110.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.05.001 ↗
17. DeCost BL, Holm EA (2017) Characterizing powder materials using keypoint-based computer vision methods. Comput Mater Sci 12:438–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.08.03810.1016/j.commatsci.2016.08.038 ↗
18. DeCost BL (2016) Computer vision and machine learning for autonomous characterization of AM powder feedstocks. Jom 69(3):456–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2226-110.1007/s11837-016-2226-1 ↗
19. Scime L, Beuth J (2018) Anomaly detection and classification in a laser powder bed additive manufacturing process using a trained computer vision algorithm. Addit Manuf 19:114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.00910.1016/j.addma.2017.11.009 ↗
20. Scime L, Beuth JJAM (2018) A multi-scale convolutional neural network for autonomous anomaly detection and classification in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process. Additi Manuf 24:273–28610.1016/j.addma.2018.09.034 ↗
21. Liang Z (2019) A particle shape extraction and evaluation method using a deep convolutional neural network and digital image processing. Powder Technol 353:156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.05.02510.1016/j.powtec.2019.05.025 ↗
22. Hausner HHJPT (1981) Powder characteristics and their effect on powder processing. Powder Technol 30(1):3–810.1016/0032-5910(81)85021-8 ↗
23. Bowker MJ, Stahl PH (2008) Preparation of water-soluble compounds through salt formation. The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry, Elsevier, pp 747–76610.1016/B978-0-12-374194-3.00037-8 ↗
24. Mehta A, Barker GJRoPiP (1994) The dynamics of sand. 57(4):38310.1088/0034-4885/57/4/002 ↗
25. Jillavenkatesa A, Dapkunas SJ, Lum HL-S (2001) Particle size characterization, vol 960, No. 1. National Institute of Standards and Technology
26. Eshel G, Levy GJ, Mingelgrin U, Singer MJ (2004) Critical evaluation of the use of laser diffraction for particle-size distribution analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68(3):736–74310.2136/sssaj2004.7360 ↗
27. Keck CM, Müller RHJIjop (2008) Size analysis of submicron particles by laser diffractometry—90% of the published measurements are false. Int J Pharm 355(1–2):150–16310.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.12.004 ↗
28. International Organization for Standardization ISO 2008. Representation of results of particle size analysis—part 6: descriptive and quantitative representation of particle shape and morphology. In: Protocol ISO 9276–6. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
29. Wadell HJTJoG (1935) Volume, shape, and roundness of quartz particles. J Geol 43(3):250–28010.1086/624298 ↗
30. Kaleem MA (2020) An experimental investigation on accuracy of Hausner ratio and Carr index of powders in additive manufacturing processes. Met Powder Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mprp.2020.06.06110.1016/j.mprp.2020.06.061 ↗
31. Zegzulka J (2020) Characterization and flowability methods for metal powders. Sci Rep 10(1):21004. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77974-310.1038/s41598-020-77974-3 ↗
32. Muñiz-Lerma JA (2018) A comprehensive approach to powder feedstock characterization for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: a case study on AlSi7Mg. Mater 11(12):238610.3390/ma11122386 ↗
33. Snow Z, Martukanitz R, Joshi S (2019) On the development of powder spreadability metrics and feedstock requirements for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 28:78–86
34. ASTM B212-17 (2017) Standard test method for apparent density of free-flowing metal powders using the Hall Flowmeter funnel. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
35. ASTM B527–20 (2020) Standard test method for tap density of metal powders and compounds. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA
36. ASTM B213-13 (2013) Standard test methods for flow rate of metal powders using the Hall Flowmeter funnel. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
37. Lowe David G (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comp Vision 60(2):91–11010.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94 ↗
38. Bay H (2008) Speeded-up robust features (SURF) Comput Vision Image Underst. 110(3):346–35910.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014 ↗
39. Vedaldi A, Fulkerson B (2010) Vlfeat: An Open and Portable Library of Computer Vision Algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on Multimedia https://doi.org/10.1145/1873951.187424910.1145/1873951.1874249 ↗
40. Corke P (2017) Robotics, vision and control: fundamental algorithms in MATLAB® second, completely revised. Springer, Cham10.1007/978-3-319-54413-7 ↗
41. Aloise D (2009) NP-hardness of Euclidean sum-of-squares clustering. Mach Learn 75(2):245–24810.1007/s10994-009-5103-0 ↗
42. Sivic J, Zisserman A (2003) Video Google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos in null. IEEE10.1109/ICCV.2003.1238663 ↗
43. Perronnin F, Dance C (2007) Fisher kernels on visual vocabularies for image categorization. In 2007 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition10.1109/CVPR.2007.383266 ↗
44. Jégou H et al (2010) Aggregating local descriptors into a compact image representation. In 2010 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition10.1109/CVPR.2010.5540039 ↗
45. Kohonen TJN (1988) An introduction to neural computing. Neural Netw 1(1):3–1610.1016/0893-6080(88)90020-2 ↗
46. Deng L, Yu DJF (2014) Deep learning: methods and applications FNT Signal Process. 7(3–4):197–38710.1561/2000000039 ↗
47. Goodfellow I et al (2016) Deep learning. MIT press, Cambridge
48. Aloysius N, Geetha M (2017) A review on deep convolutional neural networks. in 2017 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP)10.1109/ICCSP.2017.8286426 ↗
49. LeCun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P (1998) Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 86(11):2278–232410.1109/5.726791 ↗
50. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever A, Hinton GE (2017) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM 60(6):84–9010.1145/3065386 ↗
51. Simonyan K, Zisserman AJ (2014) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint
52. Szegedy C et al (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594 ↗
53. He K et al (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
54. Stavrou SG (2020) Investigation of powder flowability at low stresses: influence of particle size and size distribution. Powder Technol 364:98–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.01.06810.1016/j.powtec.2020.01.068 ↗
55. Brika SE (2020) Influence of particle morphology and size distribution on the powder flowability and laser powder bed fusion manufacturability of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Addit Manufact. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10092910.1016/j.addma.2019.100929 ↗
56. McGlinchey D (2009) Bulk solids handling: equipment selection and operation. John Wiley & Sons10.1002/9781444305449 ↗
57. Bay H, Tuytelaars T, Van Gool L (2006) Surf: speeded up robust features. in European conference on computer vision, Springer10.1007/11744023_32 ↗
58. Kodinariya TM, Makwana PRJIJ (2013) Review on determining number of Cluster in K-Means Clustering. Computer Vision – ECCV 2006: 9th European Conference on Computer Vision, Graz, Austria, Proceedings, Part I. Berlin, Heidelberg