Applying Design Thinking to Develop AI-Based Multi-Actor Decision-Support Systems: A Case Study on Human Capital Investments
Source abstract
Abstract
Artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning, has revolutionized organizational decision-making processes by assuming many decision responsibilities traditionally allocated to humans. In this scenario, decision-support systems based on AI have gained considerable relevance, although the attitudes of managers toward intelligent agents are still unbalanced towards human intervention in decision-making. An additional level of complexity arises when the development of these systems occurs within the context of investments in human capital, such as startup funding or organizational development. In this field, decision-making becomes even more critical, since it implies the will, goals, and motivations of every human actor involved: the investors and those seeking investments. termed multi-actor decision-making, this process involves multiple individuals or groups of individuals who, starting from non-coincident objectives, must reach a mutual agreement and converge toward a common goal for the success of the investment. Considering these challenges, this study aims to apply the design thinking technique as a human-centered methodology to support the design of an AI-based multi-actor decision-support system, conceived by Mylia (The Adecco Group), in the field of organizational development. Additionally, the integration of strategic organizational counseling will be introduced to facilitate the modeling of internal DM processes within the provider organization, enabling the seamless flow of internal behaviors from the decision-support system’s conceptualization to its integration in the external market.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
Mylia—Adecco Formazione s.r.l., 20132 Milano, Italy
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Integrating intuition and artificial intelligence in organizational decision-making10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.008 ↗
2. Lai, V., Chen, C., Smith-Renner, A., Liao, Q.V., and Tan, C. (2023, January 12–15). Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: An Overview of Design Space in Empirical Human-Subject Studies. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ‘23), Chicago, IL, USA.10.1145/3593013.3594087 ↗
3. Co-evolution of platform architecture, platform services, and platform governance: Expanding the platform value of industrial digital platforms10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102218 ↗
4. European Commission (2018). Artificial Intelligence for Europe, European Commission.
5. Insights from “the machine stops” to better understand rational assumptions in algorithmic decision making and its implications for organizations10.5465/amr.2018.0181 ↗
6. How AI will change the way we make decisions
7. Deloitte (2023, October 24). Global Artificial Intelligence Industry Whitepaper. Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/cn/en/pages/technology-media-and-telecommunications/articles/global-ai-development-white-paper.html.
8. Keeping humans in the loop: Pooling knowledge through artificial swarm intelligence to improve business decision making10.1177/0008125619862256 ↗
9. What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121390 ↗
10. AI tools in decision making support systems: A review10.1142/S0218213012400052 ↗
11. Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence10.1177/0008125619862257 ↗
12. What drives managers towards algorithm aversion and how to overcome it? Mitigating the impact of innovation resistance through technology readiness10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122641 ↗
13. Machine learning for decision support systems
14. Lin, S., and Döngül, E.S. (2022). Exploring the Relationship between Abusive Management, Self-Efficacy, and Organizational Performance in the Context of Human–Machine Interaction Technology and Artificial Intelligence with the Effect of Ergonomics. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14041949 ↗
15. Brynjolfsson, E., and McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies, WW Norton & Company.
16. Daugherty, P.R., and Wilson, H.J. (2018). Human + Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI, Harvard Business Review Press.
17. Davenport, T.H., and Kirby, J. (2016). Only Humans Need Apply: Winners and Losers in the Age of Smart Machines, Harper Business.
18. Smith, G.F. (2019). Decision support systems and artificial intelligence. Encyclopedia of Decision Making and Decision Support Technologies, IGI Global. [2nd ed.].
19. Context-aware emotion-based model for group decision-making10.1109/MIS.2010.46 ↗
20. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems
21. Human-machine collaboration in managerial decision making10.1016/j.chb.2021.106730 ↗
22. Agarwal, V., Chui, M., Das, K., Lath, V., and Wibowo, P. (2019). Automation and the Future of Work in Indonesia, McKinsey & Company.
23. The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551 ↗
24. Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research10.5465/annals.2018.0057 ↗
25. Yu, L., and Li, Y. (2022). Artificial Intelligence Decision-Making Transparency and Employees’ Trust: The Parallel Multiple Mediating Effect of Effectiveness and Discomfort. Behav. Sci., 12.10.3390/bs12050127 ↗
26. Investment in Human Capital
27. Marocco, S., and Talamo, A. (2022). The contribution of activity theory to modeling multi-actor decision-making: A focus on human capital investments. Front. Psychol., 13.10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997062 ↗
28. Marocco, S., Talamo, A., and Quintiliani, F. (2024). From service design thinking to the third generation of activity theory: A new model for designing AI-based decision-support systems. Front. Artif. Intell., 7.10.3389/frai.2024.1303691 ↗
29. Talamo, A., Giorgi, S., and Mellini, B. (2011, January 13–16). Designing technologies for ageing: Is simplicity always a leading criterion?. Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCHI Italian Chapter International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Facing Complexity, Alghero Italy.10.1145/2037296.2037308 ↗
30. Bruni, A., Parolin, L.L., and Schubert, C. (2015). Studying practices to inform design: Organizational issues and local artifacts. Designing Technology, Work, Organizations and Vice Versa, Vernon Press.
31. Bridging the gap between brand strategy and customer experience10.1108/09604521211218936 ↗
32. Stickdorn, M., and Schneider, J. (2011). This Is Service Design Thinking: Basics, Tools, Cases, Bis Publisher. English Edition.
33. Curedale, R. (2016). Design Thinking Process and Methods, Design Community College Incorporated. [3rd ed.].
34. Increasing the Understandability and Explainability of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Solutions: A Design Thinking Approach10.1007/978-3-030-74009-2_5 ↗
35. Design Thinking for a User-Centered Approach to Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.sheji.2019.11.015 ↗
36. Catellani, P., Carfora, V., and Piastra, M. (2021). Connecting social psychology and deep reinforcement learning: A probabilistic predictor on the intention to do home-based physical activity after message exposure. Front. Psychol., 12.10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696770 ↗
37. Catellani, P., Carfora, V., and Piastra, M. (2022). Framing and tailoring Prefactual messages to reduce red meat consumption: Predicting effects through a psychology-based graphical causal model. Front. Psychol., 13.10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825602 ↗
38. “The Flow in the Funnel”: Modeling Organizational and Individual Decision-Making for Designing Financial AI-Based Systems10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697101 ↗
39. Marocco, S., Marini, M., and Talamo, A. (2024). Enhancing organizational processes for service innovation: Strategic organizational counseling and organizational network analysis. Front. Res. Metrics Anal., 9.10.3389/frma.2024.1270501 ↗
40. Atkinson, R. (2002). L’intervista Narrativa. Raccontare la Storia di sé Nella Ricerca Formativa, Organizzativa e Sociale, Cortina Raffaello.
41. Using thematic analysis in psychology10.1191/1478088706qp063oa ↗
42. Bland, D. (2023, October 10). Agile Coaching Tip—What is an Empathy Map?. Available online: https://www.solutionsiq.com/resource/blog-post/what-is-an-empathy-map/.
43. Young, I. (2008). Mental Models: Aligning Design Strategy with Human Behavior, Rosenfeld Media.10.1145/1376142.1376141 ↗
44. Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Sociology Press.10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 ↗
45. Wood, L.A., and Kroger, R.O. (2000). Doing Discourse Analysis, Sage.
46. Bratsberg, S. (2012, January 27–30). Empathy Mapping: Design Research Applied in the Evaluation of a Learning Environment. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (DIGITEL), Takamatsu, Japan.
47. Gray, D., Brown, S., and Macanufo, J. (2010). Gamestorming: A Playbook for Innovators, Rulebreakers, and Changemakers, O’Reilly Media.
48. Designing Business Models and Similar Strategic Objects: The Contribution of IS
49. Using Empathy Maps for Design Thinking in Software Engineering Education
50. Matthews, C. (2023, October 10). An Introduction to Empathy Maps. Available online: https://medium.com/the-xplane-collection/an-introduction-to-empathy-maps-1f364f9bf29b.
51. Leont’ev, A. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality, Prentice-Hall.
52. The problem of activity in psychology10.2753/RPO1061-040513024 ↗
53. Kaptelinin, V., and Nardi, B.A. (2006). Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design, MIT Press.10.5210/fm.v12i4.1772 ↗
54. Polaine, A., Løvlie, L., and Reason, B. (2013). Service Design: From Insight to Implementation, Rosenfeld Media.
55. Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization10.1080/13639080020028747 ↗
56. Interobjectivity and culture10.1177/1354067X030093004 ↗
57. The tension between dialogicality and interobjectivity in cooperative activities10.1177/1354067X11408131 ↗