journal article·2024-06-20Open access

High Strain Rate Response of Sandstones with Different Porosity under Dynamic Loading Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB)

Grzegorz Stopka, Roman Gieleta, Robert Panowicz, Daniel Wałach, Grzegorz Piotr Kaczmarczyk

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 12

Abstract

This article presents the results of dynamic tests of sandstone samples differing in strength parameters and porosity, which were carried out with the use of the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). For this study, three types of sandstones were considered: two from the region of India (Kandla Grey and Apricot Pink) and one from Central Europe (Barwald). The strength parameters of the samples were identified in static tests (UCS, BTS tests), whereas the porosity was measured using computed tomography. The performed scanning allowed the volume of the pores and their distribution in the samples to be identified. Dynamic tests involved loading the cylindrical samples with a diameter of 23 m in the range of high strain rates, i.e., ε˙ = 102 ÷ 103/s, using the SHPB (split Hopkinson pressure bar) method. Samples with three different values of slenderness were used for testing (L/D = 1, 0.75 and 0.5). Based on the dynamic characteristics of the samples, the maximum dynamic stresses, Dynamic Increase Factor (DIF) and the amount of energy absorbed by the samples were determined. The conducted research indicates a significant impact of material porosity on the amount of dissipated energy under conditions of high strain rates. The research indicates that the values of this parameter for Apricot Pink and Kandla Grey sandstones (slenderness L/D = ¾ and L/D = ½) are similar, although the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of Kandla Grey sandstone is approximately 60% higher than that of Apricot Pink sandstone. As a result of the sample destruction process, various forms of sample destruction were obtained. The performed grain analysis indicates a significant increase in the smallest fraction (<0.5 mm) in the case of the sandstone with the highest porosity (Apricot Pink—55% of mass outcome) in comparison to the sandstone with the lowest porosity (Kandla Grey—12% of mass outcome).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Rock Mechanics and Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

AGH University of Krakow, Department of Machinery Engineering and Transport, Av. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Cracow, Poland

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, Gen. Kaliskiego 2 Str, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland

AGH University of Krakow, Department of Geomechanics, Civil Engineering and Geotechnics, Av. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Cracow, Poland

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Zawada, J. (1998). Wstęp Do Mechaniki Procesów Kruszenia, Wyd. Politechnika Warszawska.
2. Characterization of Kota sandstone under different strain rates in uniaxial loading10.1007/s10706-014-9810-3 ↗
3. High Strain Rate Response of Rocks Under Dynamic Loading Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar10.1007/s10706-017-0345-2 ↗
4. Experimental Investigation on Strength and Deformation Characteristics of Red Sandstone at Strain Rates10.1155/2020/8882976 ↗
5. Fracture Behaviors and Damage Evolution Anisotropy of Granite Under Coupling of Multiaxial Confinement and Dynamic Loading10.1007/s00603-022-03208-9 ↗
6. Empirical Estimation of Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rock: Database of Simple, Multiple, and Artificial Intelligence-Based Regressions10.1007/s10706-021-01772-5 ↗
7. Effects of microstructures on dynamic compression of barre granite10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.09.013 ↗
8. High strain rate damage of Carrara marble10.1029/2011GL049169 ↗
9. Fracturing and Failure Behavior of Carrara Marble in Quasistatic and Dynamic Brazilian Disc Tests10.1007/s00603-013-0465-9 ↗
10. Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties and Energy Dissipation of Gas Coal under Dynamic and Static Loads
11. Mechanical properties of coral concrete subjected to uniaxial dynamic compression10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.032 ↗
12. Dynamic compressive properties of dry and saturated coral rocks at high strain rates10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105615 ↗
13. Influence of Drying-Wetting Cycles on Dynamic Tensile Properties of Red-Sandstone Using the Brazilian Test
14. Experimental study on influence of wetting-drying cycle on dynamic fracture and energy dissipation of red-sandstone10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102619 ↗
15. Cai, X., Zhou, Z., Liu, K., Du, X., and Zang, H. (2019). Water-Weakening Effects on the Mechanical Behavior of Different Rock Types: Phenomena and Mechanisms. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9204450 ↗
16. Effect of Dry–Wet Cycling on the Degradation Characteristics and Mechanisms of Red Sandstone
17. Influence of cyclic wetting and drying on physical and dynamic compressive properties of sandstone10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.01.017 ↗
18. Effect of water saturation and loading rate on the mechanical properties of Red and Buff Sandstones10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.07.005 ↗
19. Dynamic mechanical properties of dry and water-saturated siltstones under sub-zero temperatures10.1007/s00603-019-02039-5 ↗
20. Water saturation effects on dynamic behavior and microstructure damage of sandstone: Phenomena and mechanisms10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105760 ↗
21. Fracture behavior and damage mechanisms of sandstone subjected to wetting-drying cycles10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107109 ↗
22. Strength characteristics of dry and saturated rock at different strain rates10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64314-5 ↗
23. Kotwica, K., Stopka, G., and Prostański, D. (2021). Study and Application of Asymmetrical Disk Tools for Hard Rock Mining. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14071826 ↗
24. Estimation of excavation forces in conditions of a complex cutting trajectory with asymmetrical disc tools in DEM method10.1016/j.tust.2023.105439 ↗
25. Effects of porosity and crack density on the compressive strength of rocks10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.08.031 ↗
26. Dynamic fracture behaviour and evolution mechanism of soft coal with different porosities and water contents10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102265 ↗
27. The Evaluation of the Physico-Mechanical Properties of Selected Carpathian Sandstones in Terms of Their Use as a Armourstone Ocena Właściwości Fizyko-Mechanicznych Wybranych Piaskowców Karpackich W Aspekcie Ich Wykorzystania Jako Kamienia Do Robót Hydrotechnicznych
28. Multi-disciplinary characterization and monitoring of sandstone (Kandla Grey) under different external conditions10.1144/qjegh2012-005 ↗
29. Jodhpur Sandstone: An Architectonic Heritage Stone from India10.1007/s12371-020-00441-y ↗
30. International Society for Rock Mechanics (1977). ISRM Suggested Methods for Determining Water Content, Porosity, Density, Absorption and Related Properties and Swelling and Slake-Durability Index Properties, Pergamon Press.
31. International Society for Rock Mechanics (1979). ISRM Suggested Methods for Determining the Uniaxial Compressive Strength and Deformability of Rock Materials, Pergamon Press.
32. International Society for Rock Mechanics (1978). ISRM Suggested Methods for Determining Tensile Strength of Rock Materials, Pergamon Press.
33. A plastic-damage model for concrete10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4 ↗
34. A consistent characteristic length for smeared cracking models10.1002/nme.1620280214 ↗
35. X-ray microtomography of materials10.1179/095066099101528261 ↗
36. A novel beam hardening correction method requiring no prior knowledge, incorporated in an iterative reconstruction algorithm10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.07.002 ↗
37. Nguyen, V., Sanctorum, J.G., Van Wassenbergh, S., Dirckx, J.J.J., Sijbers, J., and De Beenhouwer, J. (2021). Geometry Calibration of a Modular Stereo Cone-Beam X-ray CT System. J. Imaging, 7.10.3390/jimaging7030054 ↗
38. Chen, W., and Song, B. (2011). Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar: Design, Testing and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-7982-7 ↗
39. Influence of pulse shaper geometry on wave pulses in SHPB experiments10.15632/jtam-pl.56.4.1217 ↗
40. Panowicz, R., and Konarzewski, M. (2020). Influence of Imperfect Position of a Striker and Input Bar on Wave Propagation in a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) Setup with a Pulse-Shape Technique. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10072423 ↗
41. Ziętala, M., Durejko, T., Panowicz, R., and Konarzewski, M. (2020). Microstructure Evolution of 316L Steel Prepared with the Use of Additive and Conventional Methods and Subjected to Dynamic Loads: A Comparative Study. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13214893 ↗
42. Zastosowanie metody zmodyfikowanego pręta Hopkinsona do udarowego badania skał. Rozprawy Inżynierskie
43. Effects of loading rate on rock fracture: Fracture characteristics and energy partitioning10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00008-3 ↗