Comparison of Waste Biomass from Pine, Eucalyptus, and Acacia and the Biochar Elaborated Using Pyrolysis in a Simple Double Chamber Biomass Reactor
Source abstract
Abstract
Using waste biomass is considered one of the ways to reduce climate change. Arboreal waste biomass from pine, eucalyptus, and particularly invasive plants (Acacias) would make it possible to transform this natural resource, but needs to be adjusted to current and innovative technologies. The production of high fixed carbon biochar with this biomass would improve not only environmental aspects, but also the use of currently not susceptible materials for other types of exploitation. The objective of this study is to develop biochar from three different waste biomass materials and compare their parameters with those of the original biomass. Thermochemical conversion processes were used in a simple double chamber reactor developed for this study. Temperatures between 400 and 500 °C during 280 min were achieved and allowed to transform the initial biomass in a biochar with a high content of fixed carbon. By comparing the original biomass with the final biochar through tests of humidity, density, calorific values, fixed carbon, and cationic and elemental analysis, an increase in the parameters was confirmed. Fixed carbon of 70%, 77%, and 71% with pine, acacia, and eucalyptus biomass have been obtained, respectively, with yields between 30% and 40%. The results are favorable, particularly with acacia invasive plants, and could help in their difficult silviculture management.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes · Forest Biomass Utilization and Management · Environmental Impact and Sustainability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Natural Resources and Environment Engineering, University of Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain
Funding
Operational Group · European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) within the framework of the Rural Development Program (PDR) of Galicia
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. MITECO (2011). Dirección General de Medio Natural y Política Forestal Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, y Medio Rural y Marino, MITECO.
2. MITECO (2022, January 11). Mapa Forestal de España (MFE) de Máxima Actualidad. Available online: https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/cartografia-y-sig/ide/descargas/biodiversidad/mfe.aspx.
3. Grupo Especialista en Invasiones Biológicas (2012). En: GEIB, EEI. Notas Científicas.
4. Managing an invasive tree in coastal dunes: The importance of follow-up treatments to improve the recovery of protected habitats10.3389/fenvs.2023.1113876 ↗
5. Lorenzo, P., and Morais, M.C. (2023). Strategies for the Management of Aggressive Invasive Plant Species. Plants, 12.10.3390/plants12132482 ↗
6. Thermodegradation characterization of hardwoods and softwoods in torrefaction and transition zone between torrefaction and pyrolysis10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122281 ↗
7. Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility10.1007/s11104-009-0050-x ↗
8. Production of solid biochar fuel from waste biomass by hydrothermal carbonization10.1016/j.fuel.2012.07.069 ↗
9. Physical and Chemical Properties of Bio-Oils from Microwave Pyrolysis of Corn Stover
10. Biochar effects on soil biota—A review10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022 ↗
11. Recent advances in utilization of biochar10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.074 ↗
12. Schmidt, H.P., Bucheli, T., Kammann, C., Glaser, B., Samuel, A., and Leifeld, J. (2016). Guidelines for a Sustainable Production of Biochar, European Biochar Foundation (EBC). Arbaz (CH).
13. Biochar production techniques utilizing biomass waste-derived materials and environmental applications—A review10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100134 ↗
14. Parametric influence of process conditions on thermochemical techniques for biochar production: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.joei.2024.101559 ↗
15. Current technologies for analysis of biomass thermochemical processing: A review10.1016/j.aca.2009.08.016 ↗
16. Biochar as a Geoengineering Climate Solution: Hazard Identification and Risk Management10.1080/10643389.2010.507980 ↗
17. Lee, J. (2013). Advance Biofuels and Bioproducts, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-3348-4 ↗
18. Pyrolysis technologies for municipal solid waste: A review10.1016/j.wasman.2014.08.004 ↗
19. Torrefaction, pyrolysis and two-stage thermodegradation of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116168 ↗
20. Brown, R.C. (2009). Center for Sustainable Environmental Technologies, Bioenergy Conference. Available online: https://www.calameo.com/read/000702033e08ebbff80b1.
21. Gheorghe, C., Marculescu, C., Badea, A., Dinca, C., and Apostol, T. (2009, January 1–3). Effect of pyrolysis conditions on bio-char production from biomass. Proceedings of the 3rd WSEAS International Conference on Renewable Energy Sources, Tenerife Canary Island, Spain.
22. Optimization of Biochar Preparation from Acacia Wood for Soil Amendment10.4186/ej.2017.21.2.99 ↗
23. Sriburi, T. (2011, January 8–9). Biochar researches for Soil Amendment at Pa-deng Biochar Research Center (PdBRC) (CC2941), Thailand. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biochar for Climate Change Mitigation & Soil and Environment Management, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
24. Sohi, S., Lopez-Capel, E., Krull, E., and Bol, R. (2009). Biochar, Climate Change and Soil: A Review to Guide Future Research, CSIRO.
25. Research and application of biochar in Europe
26. A comprehensive assessment of the method for producing biochar, its characterization, stability, and potential applications in regenerative economic sustainability—A review10.1016/j.clema.2022.100045 ↗
27. Li, Y., Xing, B., Ding, Y., Han, X., and Wang, S. (2020). Bioresource technology a critical review of the production and advanced utilization of biochar via selective pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol., 312.10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123614 ↗
28. A comprehensive review of engineered biochar: Production, characteristics, and environmental applications10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122462 ↗
29. (2018). Solid biofuels. Sample Preparation. Amendment 1 (ISO 14780:2017/Amd 1:2019) (Standard No. UNE-EN ISO 14780:2018/A1: 2020).
30. (2016). Solid Biofuels. Determination of Moisture Content. Oven Dry Method. Part 1: Total Moisture. Reference Method (ISO 18134-1:2015) (Standard No. UNE-EN ISO 18134-1: 2016).
31. (2017). Solid Biofuels. Determination of Moisture Content. Oven Dry Method. Part 2: Total Moisture. Simplified Method (ISO 18134-2:2017) (Standard No. EN ISO 18134-2: 2017).
32. (2016). Solid Biofuels. Determination of Particle Size Distribution for Uncompressed Fuels. Part 1: Oscillating Screen Method Using Sieves with Apertures of 3.15 mm and above (ISO 17827-1:2016) (Standard No. UNE-EN ISO 17827-1: 2016).
33. (2016). Solid Biofuels. Determination of Particle Size Distribution for Uncompressed Fuels. Part 2: Vibrating Screen Method Using Sieves with Aperture of 3.15 mm and below. (ISO 17827-2:2016) (Standard No. UNE-EN ISO 17827-2: 2016).
34. (2016). Solid Biofuels. Determination of Bulk Density. (ISO 17828:2015) (Standard No. UNE-EN ISO 17828: 2016).
35. (2018). Solid Biofuels. Determination of Calorific Value. (ISO 18125:2017) (Standard No. UNE-EN ISO 18125: 2018).
36. (2016). Solid Biofuels. Determination of the Content of Volatile Matter (ISO 18123:2015) (Standard No. UNE-EN ISO 18123: 2016).
37. (2016). Solid Biofuels. Determination of Ash Content (ISO 18122:2015) (Standard No. UNE-EN ISO 18122: 2016).
38. (2015). Solid Biofuels. Determination of Total Content of Carbon, Hydrogen and Nitrogen (ISO 16948:2015) (Standard No. UNE-EN ISO 16948: 2015).
39. (2015). Solid Biofuels. Determination of Major Elements. Al, Ca, Fe, Mg, P, K, Si, Na and Ti (ISO 16967:2015) (Standard No. UNE-EN ISO 16967: 2015). not applicable, since they are private paper and digital documents.
40. (2015). Solid Biofuels. Determination of Minor Elements (ISO 16968:2015) (Standard No. UNE-EN ISO 16968: 2015). not applicable, since they are private paper and digital documents.
41. (2017). Solid Biofuels. Determination of Total Content of Sulfur and Chlorine (ISO 16994:2016) (Standard No. UNE-EN ISO 16994: 2017). not applicable, since they are private paper and digital documents.
42. Nunes, L.J.R., Raposo, M.A.M., Meireles, C., Pinto Gomes, C.J., and Ribeiro, N.M.C. (2020). Control of Invasive Forest Species through the Creation of a Value Chain: Acacia dealbata Biomass Recovery. Environments, 7.10.3390/environments7050039 ↗
43. Suman, S. (2020). Conversion of Solid Biomass into Biochar: Act as a Green, Eco-Friendly Energy Source and a Substitute of Fossil Fuel Inputs. Proceedings, 58.10.3390/WEF-06916 ↗
44. Characterization of Thermochemical Conversion Processes in a Technical-Scale Fixed-Bed Reactor: Pyrolysis and Gasification10.18321/ectj184 ↗
45. Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.022 ↗
46. Enaime, G., Baçaoui, A., Yaacoubi, A., and Lübken, M. (2020). Biochar for wastewater treatment-conversion technologies and applications. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10103492 ↗
47. Environmental application of biochar: Current status and perspectives10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.122 ↗
48. Yaashikaa, P.R., Kumar, P.S., Varjani, S.J., and Saravanan, A. (2019). Advances in production and application of biochar from lignocellulosic feedstocks for remediation of environmental pollutants. Bioresour. Technol., 292.10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122030 ↗
49. Logistics issues of biomass: The storage problem and the multi-biomass supply chain10.1016/j.rser.2008.01.003 ↗
50. A systematic review of biochar uses in animal waste composting10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.054 ↗
51. Caracterización Bioenergética de los Residuos de Cosecha de las Principales Especies Forestales del Noroeste de España10.4067/S0718-07642015000400002 ↗
52. Yaashikaa, P.R., Kumar, P.S., Varjani, S., and Saravanan, A. (2020). A critical review on the biochar production techniques, characterization, stability and applications for circular bioeconomy. Biotechnol. Rep., 28.10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00570 ↗
53. Ayaz, M., Feizien, D., Tilvikien, V., Akhtar, K., and Stulpinait, U. (2021). Biochar Role in the Sustainability of Agriculture and Environment. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13031330 ↗
54. Environmental technology & innovation applications of biomass derived biochar in modern science and technology10.1016/j.eti.2020.101306 ↗
55. Science of the Total Environment Influences of feedstock sources and pyrolysis temperature on the properties of biochar and functionality as adsorbents: A meta-analysis10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140714 ↗
56. Compositions and sorptive propertiesofcropresidue-derivedchars10.1021/es035034w ↗
57. Conversion of sewage sludge into biochar: A potential resource in water and wastewater treatment10.1016/j.envres.2020.110656 ↗
58. Enhanced removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution using manganese dioxide-loaded biochar: Behavior and mechanism10.1038/s41598-020-63000-z ↗
59. Biomass-derived biochar materials as sustainable energy sources for electrochemical energy storage devices10.1016/j.rser.2020.110464 ↗
60. Zhou, J., Jiang, Z., Qin, X., and Zhang, L. (2020). Efficiency of Pb, Zn, Cd and Mn removal from karst water by eichhornia crassipes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17155329 ↗