journal article·2022-06

Data-Driven Modeling of Mechanical Properties for 17-4 PH Stainless Steel Built by Additive Manufacturing

Michael Porro, Bin Zhang, Akanksha Parmar, Yung C. Shin

Publisher page

Abstract

This study examines the link between microstructure and mechanical properties of additively manufactured metal parts by developing a predictive model that can estimate properties such as ultimate tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation at fracture based upon microstructural data for 17-4 PH stainless steel. The main benefit of the approach presented is the generalizability, as necessary testing is further reduced in comparison with similar methods that generate full process–structure–property linkages. Data were collected from the available literature on AM-built 17-4 PH stainless steel, in-house tensile testing and imaging, and testing conducted by an AM company. After standardizing the image size and grain boundary extraction via image processing, the features such as grain size distributions and aspect ratios were extracted. By using artificial neural networks, relationships were established between grain size and shape features and corresponding mechanical properties, and subsequently, properties were predicted for novel samples to which the network had not previously been exposed. The model produced correlation coefficients of R2 = 0.957 for ultimate tensile strength, R2 = 0.939 for yield strength, and R2 = 0.931 for fracture elongation. These results demonstrate the efficacy of predictive models that focus upon microstructure–property relationships and highlight an opportunity for further exploration as predictive modeling of metal additive manufacturing continues to improve.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Tenner J, Linkens DA, Morris PF, Bailey TJ (2001) Prediction of mechanical properties in steel heat treatment process using neural networks. Ironmak Steelmak 28(1):15–22. https://doi.org/10.1179/irs.2001.28.1.1510.1179/irs.2001.28.1.15 ↗
2. Sterjovski Z, Nolan D, Carpenter KR, Dunne DP, Norrish J (2005) Artificial neural networks for modelling the mechanical properties of steels in various applications. J Mater Process Technol 170(3):536–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.04010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.040 ↗
3. DebRoy T, Mukherjee T, Wei HL, Elmer JW, Milewski JO (2020) Metallurgy, mechanistic models and machine learning in metal printing. Nat Rev Mater 6(1):48–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-00236-110.1038/s41578-020-00236-1 ↗
4. Popova E, Rodgers TM, Gong X, Cecen A, Madison JD, Kalidindi SR (2017) Process-structure linkages using a data science approach: application to simulated additive manufacturing data. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 6(1):54–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-017-0088-110.1007/s40192-017-0088-1 ↗
5. Herriot C, Spear AD (2020) Predicting microstructure-dependent mechanical properties in additively manufactured metals with machine- and deep-learning methods. Comput Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10959910.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109599 ↗
6. Wan HY, Chen GF, Li CP, Qi XB, Zhang GP (2019) Data-driven evaluation of fatigue performance of additive manufactured parts using miniature specimens. J Mater Sci Technol 35(6):1137–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2018.12.01110.1016/j.jmst.2018.12.011 ↗
7. Yang Z, Yu C-H, Buehler MJ (2021) Deep learning model to predict complex stress and strain fields in hierarchical composites. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd741610.1126/sciadv.abd7416 ↗
8. Bayraktar Ö, Uzun G, Çakiroğlu R, Guldas A (2017) Experimental study on the 3D-printed plastic parts and predicting the mechanical properties using artificial neural networks. Polym Adv Technol 28(8):1044–1051. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.396010.1002/pat.3960 ↗
9. Xie X, Bennett J, Saha S, Lu Y, Cao J, Liu WK, Gan Z (2021) Mechanistic data-driven prediction of as-built mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing. npj Comput Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00555-z10.1038/s41524-021-00555-z ↗
10. Lu L, Dao M, Kumar P, Ramamurty U, Karniadakis GE, Suresh S (2020) Extraction of mechanical properties of materials through deep learning from instrumented indentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 117(13):7052–7062. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192221011710.1073/pnas.1922210117 ↗
11. Yan W, Lian Y, Yu C, Kafka OL, Liu Z, Liu WK, Wagner GJ (2018) An integrated process–structure–property modeling framework for additive manufacturing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 339(1):184–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.05.00410.1016/j.cma.2018.05.004 ↗
12. Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D, Ramani K, Chen Y, Williams CB, Wang CCL, Shin YC, Zhang S, Zavattieri PD (2015) The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput-Aided Des 69(1):65–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.00110.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001 ↗
13. Yadollahi A, Shamsaei N, Thompson SM, Elwany A, Bian L (2015) mechanical and microstructural properties of selective laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2015 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, 2A(1). https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2015-5236210.1115/imece2015-52362 ↗
14. Rafi HK, Pal D, Patil N, Starr TL, Stucker BE (2014) Microstructure and mechanical behavior of 17-4 precipitation hardenable steel processed by selective laser melting. J Mater Eng Perform 23(12):4421–4428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-1226-y10.1007/s11665-014-1226-y ↗
15. Yadollahi A, Mahmoudi M, Elwany A, Doude H, Bian L, Newman JC (2020) Effects of crack orientation and heat treatment on fatigue-crack-growth behavior of AM 17-4 PH stainless steel. Eng Fract Mech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10687410.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106874 ↗
16. Pasebani S, Ghayoor M, Badwe S, Irrinki H, Atre SV (2018) Effects of atomizing media and post processing on mechanical properties of 17-4 PH stainless steel manufactured via selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 22(1):127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.01110.1016/j.addma.2018.05.011 ↗
17. Hsu TH, Chang YJ, Huang CY, Yen HW, Chen CP, Jen KK, Yeh AC (2019) Microstructure and property of a selective laser melting process induced oxide dispersion strengthened 17-4 PH stainless steel. J Alloy Compd 803(1):30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.28910.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.289 ↗
18. Mahmoudi M, Elwany A, Yadollahi A, Thompson SM, Bian L, Shamsaei N (2017) Mechanical properties and microstructural characterization of selective laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel. Rapid Prototyp J 23(2):280–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-12-2015-019210.1108/rpj-12-2015-0192 ↗
19. Alnajjar M, Christien F, Bosch C, Wolski K (2020) A comparative study of microstructure and hydrogen embrittlement of selective laser melted and wrought 17–4 PH stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.13936310.1016/j.msea.2020.139363 ↗
20. Yadollahi A, Shamsaei N, Thompson SM, Elwany A, Bian L (2017) Effects of building orientation and heat treatment on fatigue behavior of selective laser melted 17–4 PH stainless steel. Int J Fatigue 94(1):218–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.03.01410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.03.014 ↗
21. Wang X, Liu Y, Shi T, Wang Y (2020) Strain rate dependence of mechanical property in a selective laser melted 17–4 PH stainless steel with different states. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.13977610.1016/j.msea.2020.139776 ↗
22. Callister WD (2000) Fundamentals of materials science and engineering, vol 471660817. Wiley, London
23. Raeisinia B, Poole WJ (2011) Modelling the elastic–plastic transition of polycrystalline metals with a distribution of grain sizes. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 20(1):015015. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/20/1/01501510.1088/0965-0393/20/1/015015 ↗
24. Kumar IE, Venkatasubramanian S, Scheidegger C, Friedler S (2020) Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measures. In: International conference on machine learning. PMLR, pp 5491–5500