journal article·2023-10-25Open access

Drilling Parameters Multi-Objective Optimization Method Based on PSO-Bi-LSTM

Jianhua Wang, Zhi Yan, Tao Pan, Zhaopeng Zhu, Xianzhi Song, Donghan Yang

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 21

Abstract

The increasing exploration and development of complex oil and gas fields pose challenges to drilling efficiency and safety due to the presence of formations with varying hardness, abrasiveness, and rigidity. Consequently, there is a growing demand for drilling parameter optimization and speed-up technologies. However, existing models based on expert experience can only achieve single-objective optimization with limited accuracy, making real-time adaptation to changing drilling conditions and formation environments challenging. The emergence of artificial intelligence provides a new approach for optimizing drilling parameters. In this study, we introduce the Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) deep learning algorithm with the attention mechanism to predict the rate of penetration (ROP). This algorithm improves the ROP prediction accuracy to 98.33%, ensuring reliable subsequent optimization results. Additionally, we propose a coupling optimization algorithm that combines Bi-LSTM with the particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO) to enhance drilling efficiency through parameter optimization. Our approach aims to maximize drilling footage while maintaining the highest ROP. The optimal solutions obtained are verified through multi-parameter cloud image analysis, yielding consistent results. The application of our approach demonstrates an 81% increase in drilling speed and a 28% reduction in drill bit energy losses. Moreover, the real-time optimization results effectively guide field operations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Oil and Gas Production Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Kunlun Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100007, China

School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China

Funding

Strategic Cooperation Technology Projects of CNPC and CUPB · National Key Research and Development Program · National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars · China Petroleum Innovation Fund Project · Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Using Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) models with the Matérn covariance function to predict the dynamic viscosity and torque of SiO2/Ethylene glycol nanofluid: A machine learning approach10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106107 ↗
2. Thermal conductivity enhancement via synthesis produces a new hybrid mixture composed of copper oxide and multi-walled carbon nanotube dispersed in water: Experimental characterization and artificial neural network modeling10.1007/s10765-020-02702-y ↗
3. Artificial neural networks in accounting and finance: Modeling issue10.1002/1099-1174(200006)9:2<119::AID-ISAF182>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗
4. An optimum drill bit selection technique using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms to increase the rate of penetration
5. A novel custom ensemble learning model for an improved reservoir permeability and water saturation prediction10.1016/j.jngse.2021.103962 ↗
6. Abdulmalek, A.S., Salaheldin, E., Abdulazeez, A., Mohammed, M., Abdulwahab, Z.A., and Mohamed, I.M. (2018, January 23–26). Prediction of rate of penetration of deep and tight formation using support vector machine. Proceedings of the SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.10.2118/192316-MS ↗
7. Drilling rate of penetration prediction through committee support vector regression based on imperialist competitive algorithm10.1007/s13146-016-0291-8 ↗
8. Computational intelligence based prediction of drilling rate of penetration: A comparative study10.1016/j.petrol.2018.09.027 ↗
9. Machine learning methods applied to drilling rate of penetration prediction and optimization-A review10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106332 ↗
10. Hinduja, H., and Datta, A. (2020). Rate of Penetration Prediction using K-means and Ensembles, a Machine Learning Approach. IJRASET, 8.10.22214/ijraset.2020.30357 ↗
11. Al-Sahlanee, D.T., Allawi, R.H., Al-Mudhafar, W.J., and Yao, C. (2023, January 25). Ensemble Machine Learning for Data-Driven Predictive Analytics of Drilling Rate of Penetration (ROP) Modeling: A Case Study in a Southern Iraqi Oil Field. Proceedings of the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Anchorage, AK, USA.10.2118/213043-MS ↗
12. Predicting rate of penetration during drilling of deep geothermal well in Korea using artificial neural networks and real-time data collection10.1016/j.jngse.2019.05.004 ↗
13. A comprehensive data mining approach to estimate the rate of penetration: Application of neural network, rule based models and feature ranking10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.039 ↗
14. Comparison of accuracy and computational performance between the machine learning algorithms for rate of penetration in directional drilling well
15. Prediction of rock penetration rate using a novel Antlion optimized ANN and statistical modelling10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2021.104287 ↗
16. Data-driven recurrent neural network model to predict the rate of penetration: Upstream Oil and Gas Technology10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100047 ↗
17. Hundman, K., Constantinou, V., Laporte, C., Colwell, I., and Soderstrom, T. (2018, January 19). Detecting spacecraft anomalies using LSTMs and nonparametric dynamic thresholding. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3219819.3219845 ↗
18. Malhototra, P., Ramakrishnana, A., Anand, G., Vig, L., Agarwal, P., and Shroff, G. (2016, January 24). LSTM-based encoder-decoder for multi-sensor anomaly detection. Proceedings of the ICML 2016 Anomaly Detection Workshop, New York, NY, USA.
19. Statistical estimation the thermal conductivity of MWCNTs-SiO2/Water-EG nanofluid using the ridge regression method10.1016/j.physa.2019.122782 ↗
20. Fabrication and characterization of synthesized hydroxyapatite/ethanolamine for bone tissue engineering application10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129591 ↗
21. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. (2017, January 4–9). Attention is all you need. Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA.
22. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
23. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks10.1126/science.1127647 ↗
24. Hawkins, S., He, H., Williams, G., and Baxter, R. (2002, January 1). Outlier detection using replicator neural networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery, Heidelberg, Germany.10.1007/3-540-46145-0_17 ↗
25. Kingma, D.P., and Welling, M. (2013). Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv.