Vertically and Horizontally Reinforced End-Bearing Stone Column: An Experimental and Numerical Investigation
Source abstract
Abstract
In the present study, experiments were conducted using model testing to explore the load-carrying capability of horizontally and vertically reinforced end-bearing stone columns. Single columns with three different diameters, i.e., 50 mm, 75 mm, and 100 mm, were tested under compressive loading in both unreinforced and reinforced circumstances. This study examined three different variations in horizontal reinforcement. In the first case, the geotextile was evenly distributed at regular intervals along the entire height of the column (L). Secondly, horizontal layering was implemented from the column head to the centre of the column. Lastly, in the third case, horizontal layering was applied from the centre of the column to the base of the column. For vertical reinforcement, four different lengths of reinforcement (Lr) were used, i.e., L, 0.75 L, 0.5 L, and 0.25 L. According to the experimental results, using horizontal as well as vertical layers of reinforcement improved the bearing capacity of the stone columns. In addition, the process of layering as well as vertical encasing served to mitigate the lateral bulging of the columns under examination, as it capitalised on the interlocking and frictional interactions among the stones that comprised the columns. Numerical modelling with a finite element (FE) code, Plaxis 3D, was also performed to validate the experimental results. An exhaustive comparison of all the cases was performed, and the experimental results demonstrated a high level of concurrence with the numerical findings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Delhi Technological University, New Delhi 110089, India
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Performance of Stone Columns in Soft Clay: Numerical Evaluation10.1007/s10706-011-9409-x ↗
2. and Gupta, A.K. (2021). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing.
3. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Load Carrying Capacity of Vertically and Horizontally Reinforced Floating Stone Column Group10.1007/s10706-020-01674-y ↗
4. Munfakh, G.A., Sarkar, S.K., and Castelli, R.P. (1983, January 2–4). Performance of a test embankment founded on stone columns. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Piling and Ground Treatment for Foundations, London, UK.
5. Simplified method for consolidation rate of stone column reinforced foundations10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:7(597) ↗
6. Reliability of conventional settlement evaluation for circular foundations on stone columns10.1007/s10706-007-9169-9 ↗
7. Improved clay characteristics due to stone column installation10.1016/j.compgeo.2006.09.008 ↗
8. Deformation and consolidation around encased stone columns10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.12.001 ↗
9. Studies on the Behavior of Single and Group of Geosynthetic Encased Stone Columns10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000187 ↗
10. Experimental Analysis of Embankment on Ordinary and Encased Stone Columns10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000579 ↗
11. and Gupta, A.K. (2020, January 2–4). Effectiveness of triangular and square pattern of stone column with varying s/d ratio on consolidation be-haviour of soil. Proceedings of the ASCE India Conference on Challenges of Resilient and Sustainable Infrastructure Development in Emerging Economies, Kolkata, India.
12. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.05.001 ↗
13. The effect of using a sand column on the expansive soil’s swelling characteristics
14. Experimental and Numerical Studies on Response of the Stone Column in Layered Soil10.1007/s40891-015-0029-z ↗
15. A Method of Settlement Calculation of Ground Improved by Floating Deep Mixed Columns Based on Laboratory Model Tests and Finite Element Analysis10.1007/s40999-021-00662-4 ↗
16. Ground Improvement for Transportation Infrastructure: Experimental Investigations on Cyclic Behavior of a Group of Granular Columns10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-7880 ↗
17. Barksdale, R.D., and Bachus, R.C. (1983). Design and Construction of Stone Column, Report No. FHWA/R 83/026.
18. Ali, M. (2018, January 24–28). Behavior of Ordinary and Encased Stone Columns End-Bearing and Floating in Soft Clay (Numerical Model). Proceedings of the International Congress and Exhibition “Sustainable Civil Infrastructures: Innovative Infrastructure Geotechnology”, Cairo, Egypt.10.1007/978-3-030-01917-4_2 ↗
19. Experimental study of ground improvement by using encased stone columns10.1007/s41062-020-00383-y ↗
20. Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced granular piles in soft clays: Model tests and numerical analysis10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.02.016 ↗
21. Model tests on single and groups of stone columns with different geosynthetic reinforcement arrangement10.1680/gein.14.00002 ↗
22. Numerical evaluation of a granular column reinforced by geosynthetics using en-casement and laminated disks10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.06.002 ↗
23. Greenwood, D.A. (1970, January 13). Mechanical improvement of soils below ground surfaces. Proceedings of the Ground Engineering Conference, Institution of Civil Engineers, London, UK.
24. The design of vibro replacement
25. The performance of foundations on various soils stabilized by the vibro-compaction method10.1139/t74-056 ↗
26. Behavior of stone columns based on experimental and FEM analysis10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(405) ↗
27. A review of field performance of stone columns in soft soils10.1680/geng.2009.162.6.323 ↗
28. Clayey soil reinforced with stone column group: Model tests and analyses10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000552 ↗
29. Model test of clogging effects on composite foundation of geosynthetic-encased steel slag column10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.05.001 ↗
30. Effect of subgrade on tensile strains in a geomembrane for tailings storage applications10.1139/cgj-2022-0019 ↗
31. Effect of subgrade on leakage through a defective geomembrane seam below saturated tailing10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.12.003 ↗
32. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft clay: A numerical study10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.09.015 ↗
33. Group effects in stone column foundations: Model tests10.1680/geot.2000.50.6.689 ↗
34. A field trial of the reinforcing effect of a stone column in soil10.1680/geot.1975.25.1.31 ↗
35. Experimental and numerical analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced floating granular pies in soft clays10.1007/s40891-016-0062-6 ↗