Probing Local Mechanical Properties in Polymer-Ceramic Hybrid Acetabular Sockets Using Spherical Indentation Stress-Strain Protocols
Source abstract
Abstract
Mechanical properties exhibited by the materials used in biomedical device components for articulating joints play an important role in determining the implant performance. In the fabrication of complex-shaped parts, the thermomechanical history experienced in different locations of the final part can be substantially dissimilar, which may lead to large differences in the local microstructures and properties. In many instances, it is not feasible to evaluate experimentally the local mechanical properties in the as-manufactured bioimplant prototypes using standardized tests, and use this information in refining the manufacturing cycle to develop implants with improved performance. In order to bridge this critical gap between materials development and manufacturing, we explore here the use of recently developed spherical indentation stress-strain analysis protocols for the mechanical characterization of local properties in the as-manufactured biomedical device prototype. More specifically, this paper presents two main advances: (i) extension of spherical indentation stress-strain analysis protocols needed to extract reliable estimates of elastic modulus and indentation yield strength from polymer matrix composite (PMC) samples and (ii) demonstration of the differences in the properties between samples produced specifically for the standard tension tests and the as-fabricated PMC acetabular socket prototype intended for total hip joint replacement applications. The results of the present study revealed large differences in the mean and variance of the measured moduli and indentation yield strengths in the acetabular socket and the tensile specimen. Based on the extensive micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis, an attempt has been made to rationalize the local property differences on the basis of microstructural attributes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Advanced materials and composites · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Dowling NE (2012) Mechanical behavior of materials: engineering methods for deformation, fracture, and fatigue. Pearson
2. Haque M, Saif M (2003) A review of MEMS-based microscale and nanoscale tensile and bending testing. Exp Mech 43(3):248–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0241052310.1007/BF02410523 ↗
3. Li X, Wang X, Chang WC, Chao YJ, Chang M (2005) Effect of tensile offset angles on micro/nanoscale tensile testing. Rev Sci Instrum 76(3):033904. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.186573210.1063/1.1865732 ↗
4. Ding W, Guo Z, Ruoff RS (2007) Effect of cantilever nonlinearity in nanoscale tensile testing. J Appl Phys 101(3):034316. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.243506410.1063/1.2435064 ↗
5. Gupta HS, Seto J, Wagermaier W, Zaslansky P, Boesecke P, Fratzl P (2006) Cooperative deformation of mineral and collagen in bone at the nanoscale. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(47):17741–17746. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.060423710310.1073/pnas.0604237103 ↗
6. Castro J, Lee C (1987) Thermal and cure analysis in sheet molding compound compression molds. Polym Eng Sci 27(3):218–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.76027030710.1002/pen.760270307 ↗
7. Lee LJ (1981) Curing of compression molded sheet molding compound. Polym Eng Sci 21(8):483–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.76021080810.1002/pen.760210808 ↗
8. Patel A, Kravchenko O, Manas-Zloczower I (2018) Effect of curing rate on the microstructure and macroscopic properties of epoxy fiberglass composites. Polym 10(2):125. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1002012510.3390/polym10020125 ↗
9. Choi K, Kuhn JL, Ciarelli MJ, Goldstein SA (1990) The elastic moduli of human subchondral, trabecular, and cortical bone tissue and the size-dependency of cortical bone modulus. J Biomech 23(11):1103–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(90)90003-L10.1016/0021-9290(90)90003-L ↗
10. Rho JY, Ashman RB, Turner CH (1993) Young's modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: ultrasonic and microtensile measurements. J Biomech 26(2):111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(93)90042-D10.1016/0021-9290(93)90042-D ↗
11. Meira JBC, Ballester RY, Lima RG, Martins de Souza R, Driemeier L (2005) Geometrical aspects on bi-material microtensile tests. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 27(3):310–313. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-5878200500030001410.1590/S1678-58782005000300014 ↗
12. Armstrong SR, Boyer DB, Keller JC (1998) Microtensile bond strength testing and failure analysis of two dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 14(1):44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00008-610.1016/S0109-5641(98)00008-6 ↗
13. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F (1999) The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1(4). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11725659 . Accessed 17 Apr 2018
14. Oilo G (1993) Bond strength testing--what does it mean? Int Dent J 43(5):492–498 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8138312 . Accessed 17 Apr 2018
15. Sudsangiam S, van Noort R (1999) Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose. J Adhes Dent 1(1):57–67 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11725686 . Accessed 17 Apr 2018
16. Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G (1989) A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 17(2):61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(89)90131-010.1016/0300-5712(89)90131-0 ↗
17. Pethicai JB, Hutchings R, Oliver WC (1983) Hardness measurement at penetration depths as small as 20 nm. Philos Mag A 48(4):593–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141861830823491410.1080/01418618308234914 ↗
18. Pharr GM, Oliver WC, Brotzen FR (1992) On the generality of the relationship among contact stiffness, contact area, and elastic modulus during indentation. J Mater Res 7(3):613–617. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1992.061310.1557/JMR.1992.0613 ↗
19. Pharr GM, Strader JH, Oliver WC (2009) Critical issues in making small-depth mechanical property measurements by nanoindentation with continuous stiffness measurement. J Mater Res 24(3):653–666. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2009.009610.1557/jmr.2009.0096 ↗
20. Pathak S, Stojakovic D, Doherty R, Kalidindi SR (2009) Importance of surface preparation on the nano-indentation stress-strain curves measured in metals. J Mater Res 24(3):1142–1155. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr2009.13710.1557/jmr2009.137 ↗
21. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7(6):1564–1583. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
22. Johnson KL, Johnson KL (1987) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press
23. Tabor D (2000) The hardness of metals. Oxford University Press10.1093/oso/9780198507765.001.0001 ↗
24. Pathak S, Kalidindi SR (2015) Spherical nanoindentation stress–strain curves. Mater Sci Eng R 91:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2015.02.00110.1016/j.mser.2015.02.001 ↗
25. Kalidindi SR, Pathak S (2008) Determination of the effective zero-point and the extraction of spherical nanoindentation stress–strain curves. Acta Mater 56(14):3523–3532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.03610.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.036 ↗
26. Pathak S, Shaffer J, Kalidindi SR (2009) Determination of an effective zero-point and extraction of indentation stress–strain curves without the continuous stiffness measurement signal. Scr Mater 60(6):439–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.11.02810.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.11.028 ↗
27. Weaver JS, Priddy MW, McDowell DL, Kalidindi SR (2016) On capturing the grain-scale elastic and plastic anisotropy of alpha-Ti with spherical nanoindentation and electron back-scattered diffraction. Acta Mater 117:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.05310.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.053 ↗
28. Patel DK, Kalidindi SR (2016) Correlation of spherical nanoindentation stress-strain curves to simple compression stress-strain curves for elastic-plastic isotropic materials using finite element models. Acta Mater 112:295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.04.03410.1016/j.actamat.2016.04.034 ↗
29. Donohue BR, Ambrus A, Kalidindi SR (2012) Critical evaluation of the indentation data analyses methods for the extraction of isotropic uniaxial mechanical properties using finite element models. Acta Mater 60(9):3943–3952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actanat/2012.03.03410.1016/j.actanat/2012.03.034 ↗
30. Nath S, Bodhak S, Basu B (2009) HDPE-Al2O3-HAp composites for biomedical applications: processing and characterizations. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 88(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.3105010.1002/jbm.b.31050 ↗
31. Weaver JS (2015) Hierarchical and high throughput mechanical characterization of titanium alloys using spherical indentation stress-strain curves. Georgia Institute of Technology
32. Vachhani SJ, Doherty RD, Kalidindi SR (2013) Effect of the continuous stiffness measurement on the mechanical properties extracted using spherical nanoindentation. Acta Mater 61(10):3744–3751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.03.00510.1016/j.actamat.2013.03.005 ↗
33. Li X, Bhushan B (2002) A review of nanoindentation continuous stiffness measurement technique and its applications. Mater Charact 48(1):11–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-410.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-4 ↗
34. Hay J, Agee P, Herbert E (2010) Continuous stiffness measurement during instrumented indentation testing. Exp Tech 34(3):86–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2010.00618.x10.1111/j.1747-1567.2010.00618.x ↗
35. Hertz H, Jones DE, Schott GA (1896) Miscellaneous papers. Macmillan and Company
36. Sneddon IN (1965) The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Eng Sci 3(1):47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-410.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
37. Menčík J, Swain MV (1995) Errors associated with depth-sensing microindentation tests. J Mater Res 10(6):1491–1501. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1995.149110.1557/JMR.1995.1491 ↗
38. Deuschle J, Enders S, Arzt E (2007) Surface detection in nanoindentation of soft polymers. J Mater Res 22(11):3107–3119. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2007.039410.1557/JMR.2007.0394 ↗
39. Moseson AJ, Basu S, Barsoum MW (2008) Determination of the effective zero point of contact for spherical nanoindentation. J Mater Res 23(1):204–209. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2008.001210.1557/JMR.2008.0012 ↗
40. Lee EH, Radok JRM (1960) The contact problem for viscoelastic bodies. J Appl Mech 27(3):438–444. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.364402010.1115/1.3644020 ↗
41. Hunter SC (1960) The Hertz problem for a rigid spherical indenter and a viscoelastic half-space. J Mech Phys Solids 8(4):219–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(60)90028-410.1016/0022-5096(60)90028-4 ↗
42. Yang WH (1966) The contact problem for viscoelastic bodies. J Appl Mech 33(2):395–401. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.362505510.1115/1.3625055 ↗
43. Ting TCT (1968) Contact problems in the linear theory of viscoelasticity. J Appl Mech 35(2):248–254. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.360118810.1115/1.3601188 ↗
44. Ting TCT (1966) The contact stresses between a rigid indenter and a viscoelastic half-space. J Appl Mech 33(4):845–854. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.362519210.1115/1.3625192 ↗
45. Abba MT (2015) Spherical nanoindentation protocols for extracting microscale mechanical properties in viscoelastic materials. Georgia Institute of Technology
46. Weaver JS, Khosravani A, Castillo A, Kalidindi SR (2016) High throughput exploration of process-property linkages in Al-6061 using instrumented spherical microindentation and microstructurally graded samples. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 5(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-016-0054-310.1186/s40192-016-0054-3 ↗
47. Khosravani A, Cecen A, Kalidindi SR (2017) Development of high throughput assays for establishing process-structure-property linkages in multiphase polycrystalline metals: application to dual-phase steels. Acta Mater 123:55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.03310.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.033 ↗
48. Nath S, Bodhak S, Basu B (2007) Tribological investigation of novel HDPE-HAp-Al2O3 hybrid biocomposites against steel under dry and simulated body fluid condition. J Biomed Mater Res A 83(1):191–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3120310.1002/jbm.a.31203 ↗
49. Bodhak S, Nath S, Basu B (2009) Friction and wear properties of novel HDPE—HAp—Al2O3 biocomposites against alumina counterface. J Biomater Appl 23(5):407–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/088532820809001210.1177/0885328208090012 ↗
50. Basu B, Jain D, Kumar N, Choudhury P, Bose A, Bose S, Bose P (2011) Processing, tensile, and fracture properties of injection molded Hdpe-Al2O3-HAp hybrid composites. J Appl Polym Sci 121(5):2500–2511. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3396110.1002/app.33961 ↗
51. Tripathi G, Gough JE, Dinda A, Basu B (2013) In vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo osseointergration properties of compression-molded HDPE-HA-Al2O3 hybrid biocomposites. J Biomed Mater Res A 101(6):1539–1549. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3445210.1002/jbm.a.34452 ↗
52. Bodhak S, Nath S, Basu B (2008) Fretting wear properties of hydroxyapatite, alumina containing high density polyethylene biocomposites against zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res A 85(1):83–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3139310.1002/jbm.a.31393 ↗
53. Tripathi G, Basu B (2014) In vitro osteogenic cell proliferation, mineralization, and in vivo osseointegration of injection molded high-density polyethylene-based hybrid composites in rabbit animal model. J Biomater Appl 29(1):142–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/088532821452080510.1177/0885328214520805 ↗
54. Zeng K, Chiu CH (2001) An analysis of load–penetration curves from instrumented indentation. Acta Mater 49(17):3539–3551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00245-210.1016/S1359-6454(01)00245-2 ↗
55. Deák Z, Grimm JM, Treitl M, Geyer LL, Linsenmaier U, Körner M, Reiser MF, Wirth S (2013) Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. Radiol 266(1):197–206. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.1211270710.1148/radiol.12112707 ↗
56. Pan X, Sidky EY, Vannier M (2009) Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction? Inverse Probl 25(12):123009. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/25/12/12300910.1088/0266-5611/25/12/123009 ↗
57. Censor Y (1983) Finite series-expansion reconstruction methods. Proc IEEE 71(3):409–419. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1983.1259810.1109/PROC.1983.12598 ↗
58. Turner DM, Niezgoda SR, Kalidindi SR (2016) Efficient computation of the angularly resolved chord length distributions and lineal path functions in large microstructure datasets. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 24(7):075002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/24/7/07500210.1088/0965-0393/24/7/075002 ↗
59. Forbes C, Evans M, Hastings N, Peacock B (2011) Statistical distributions. John Wiley & Sons10.1002/9780470627242 ↗
60. Patel DK, Al-Harbi HF, Kalidindi SR (2014) Extracting single-crystal elastic constants from polycrystalline samples using spherical nanoindentation and orientation measurements. Acta Mater 79:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.02110.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.021 ↗
61. Patel DK, Kalidindi SR (2017) Estimating the slip resistance from spherical nanoindentation and orientation measurements in polycrystalline samples of cubic metals. Int J Plast 92:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.03.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2017.03.004 ↗