journal article·2023-06-30Open access

A Method of Assessing the Effectiveness of the Use of Available Resources When Implementing Production Processes

Joanna Kochańska, Anna Burduk

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 13

Abstract

This paper deals with an assessment of the effectiveness of resource management in production processes. A comprehensive and standardized approach to the issue of effectiveness contributes to the maximization of the potential of production resources. In this paper, the concept of effectiveness was used in the sense of the praxeological approach, and its components were distinguished by availability, performance and quality, which were assessed through the prism of losses occurring in production processes. The main purpose of this work was to develop a method for assessing the effectiveness of the use of available resources when implementing production processes. The method is based on a set of quantitative indicators and takes into account the categorization of production losses. Losses in availability, performance and quality in terms of areas of production, logistics, and maintenance, as well as organization and management, were identified. It was developed in response to the research gap identified in the literature review, which showed that there is a lack of a quantitative method for assessing the effectiveness of production processes. The method also takes into account the categorization of production losses, and at the same time allows the contribution of the main areas (production and production-related) with regard to the generation of these losses. The method is primarily intended to identify the causes of problems occurring in any production process, to determine their importance in a measurable way, and to monitor the course of processes after introducing changes of a different nature. The method was verified on a real example in a branch of an automotive industry company located in Lower Silesia.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quality and Management Systems · Quality and Supply Management · Quality and Safety in Healthcare

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Penrose, E., and Penrose, E.T. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford University Press.
2. OEE and equipment effectiveness: An evaluation10.1080/00207540600573402 ↗
3. On the complexity of using performance measures: Enhancing sustained production improvement capability by combining OEE and productivity10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.12.003 ↗
4. Trojanowska, J., Kolinski, A., Galusik, D., Varela, M.L., and Machado, J. (2018). Advances in Manufacturing, Springer International Publishing.
5. Slack, N., and Lewis, M. (2008). Operations Strategy, Pearson Education. [2nd ed.].
6. Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda10.1108/01443579510083622 ↗
7. Designing and developing smart production planning and control systems in the industry 4.0 era: A methodology and case study10.1007/s10845-021-01808-w ↗
8. Mathiyazhagan, K., Vimal, K.E.K., Kumar, H., Ramesh, A., and Agarwal, V. (2022). Lean and Green Manufacturing: Towards Eco-Efficiency and Business Performance, Springer.10.1007/978-981-16-5551-7 ↗
9. The evolution and future of manufacturing: A review10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.03.001 ↗
10. A review of energy-efficient scheduling in intelligent production systems10.1007/s40747-019-00122-6 ↗
11. Research on intelligent workshop resource scheduling method based on improved NSGA-II algorithm10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102141 ↗
12. Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) evaluation for an automated ice cream production line: A case study10.1108/IJPPM-03-2019-0126 ↗
13. Nakajima, S. (1988). Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance, Productivity Press.
14. Performance measurement using overall equipment effectiveness (OEE): Literature review and practical application discussion10.1080/00207540601142645 ↗
15. Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M., and Piechowski, M. (2016). International Conference on Management Science and Management Innovation, Atlantis Press.
16. Overall material usage effectiveness (OME): A structured indicator to measure the effective material usage within manufacturing processes10.1080/09537287.2017.1395920 ↗
17. Optimizing & Analysing Overall equipment efficiency (OEE) through Design of Experiments10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.347 ↗
18. The possibilities of improving the human-machine co-operation in semi-automatic production process
19. A resource-based view on SMEs regarding the transition to more sophisticated stages of Industry 4.010.1016/j.emj.2021.10.001 ↗
20. Implementation of digital twins in the process industry: A systematic literature review of enablers and barriers10.1016/j.compind.2021.103558 ↗
21. A digital readiness check for the evaluation of supply chain aspects and company size for Industry 4.010.1108/JMTM-10-2020-0382 ↗
22. Digital Twin-driven approach towards manufacturing processes support10.1088/1742-6596/2198/1/012007 ↗
23. Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M., Antosz, K., Wyczółkowski, R., Mazurkiewicz, D., Sun, B., Qian, C., and Ren, Y. (2021). Application of MICMAC, Fuzzy AHP, and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Evaluation of the Maintenance Factors Affecting Sustainable Manufacturing. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14051436 ↗
24. Artificial intelligence-based hybrid forecasting models for manufacturing systems
25. Challenges in the implementation of autonomous robots in the process of feeding materials on the production line as part of Logistics 4.010.17270/J.LOG.2021.611 ↗
26. Collaborative robot UR10 integration with CNC lathe Haas ST1010.1088/1742-6596/2198/1/012044 ↗
27. Antosz, K., Paśko, Ł., and Gola, A. (2020). The Use of Artificial Intelligence Methods to Assess the Effectiveness of Lean Maintenance Concept Implementation in Manufacturing Enterprises. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10217922 ↗
28. Decision analysis of warehouse productivity performance indicators to enhance logistics operational efficiency
29. Hamrol, A., Ciszak, O., Legutko, S., and Jurczyk, M. (2018). Advances in Manufacturing, Springer. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6 ↗
30. Toke, L.K., and Kalpande, S.D. (2023). An assessment of key performance indicators and its relationship for implementation of total productive maintenance in manufacturing sector. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf.10.1007/s12008-023-01252-5 ↗
31. Fuzzy judgement model for assessment of improvement effectiveness to performance of processing characteristics10.1080/00207543.2022.2044531 ↗
32. (2015). Quality Management Systems—Fundamentals and Vocabulary (Standard No. ISO 9000:2015).
33. Measuring resource efficiency and resource effectiveness in manufacturing10.1108/IJPPM-11-2017-0282 ↗
34. Kochańska, J., Burduk, A., Markowski, M., Kłusek, A., and Wojciechowska, M. (2023). Improvement of factory transport efficiency with use of WiFi-based technique for monitoring industrial vehicles. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15021113 ↗
35. The Productivity Press Development Team (2009). OEE for Operators. Overall Equipment Effectiveness, The Productivity Press Development Team.
36. Overall equipment efficiency (OEE) Calculation—Automation through Hardware & Software Development10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.082 ↗
37. Global Process Effectiveness: When Overall Equipment Effectiveness Meets Adherence to Schedule10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.123 ↗
38. Evaluation and improvement of manufacturing performance measurement systems—The role of OEE10.1108/01443579910244223 ↗
39. Marr, B. (2012). Key Performance Indicators: The 75 Measures Every Manager Needs to Know, FT Press.
40. Sasor, S. (2016). Improvement of machines reliability by TPM implementation.
41. Ptak, D. (2015). Analyze and improvement of the technological machines in the chosen company.
42. Armisted, C., and Rowland, P. (1996). Managing Business Processes, Wiley and Sons.
43. Müller, R., and Rupper, P. (2000). Process Reengineering, Astrum.
44. Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage, Free Press.
45. Miller, J.G., and Vollman, T.E. (1985). The Hidden Factory, Harvard Business Review.
46. A new model of Ishikawa diagram for quality assessment