An Adaptive Multitask Network for Detecting the Region of Water Leakage in Tunnels
Source abstract
Abstract
Tunnels water leakage detection in complex environments is difficult to detect the edge information due to the structural similarity between the region of water seepage and wet stains. In order to address the issue, this study proposes a model comprising a multilevel transformer encoder and an adaptive multitask decoder. The multilevel transformer encoder is a layered transformer to extract the multilevel characteristics of water leakage information, and the adaptive multitask decoder comprises the adaptive network branches. The adaptive network branches generate the ground truths of wet stains and water seepage through the threshold value and transmit them to the network for training. The converged network, the U-net, fuses coarse images from the adaptive multitask decoder, and the fusion images are the final segmentation results of water leakage in tunnels. The experimental results indicate that the proposed model achieves 95.1% Dice and 90.4% MIOU, respectively. This proposed model demonstrates a superior level of precision and generalization when compared to other related models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Fire Detection and Safety Systems · Water Systems and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Information and Control Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
School of Building Services Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Deep learning-based automatic recognition of water leakage area in shield tunnel lining10.1016/j.tust.2020.103524 ↗
2. Instance-level recognition and quantification for concrete surface bug hole based on deep learning10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102920 ↗
3. Deep learning based image recognition for crack and leakage defects of metro shield tunnel10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.002 ↗
4. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗
5. Ma, L. (2018). Research on Pavement Crack Recognition Method Based on Digital Image Processing, Southeast University.
6. FoSA: F* seed-growing approach for crack-line detection from pavement images10.1016/j.imavis.2011.10.003 ↗
7. Fujita, Y., Mitani, Y., and Hamamoto, Y. (2006, January 20–24). A method for crack detection on a concrete structure. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’06), Hong Kong, China.10.1109/ICPR.2006.98 ↗
8. DNS tunneling detection method based on multilabel support vector machine10.1155/2018/6137098 ↗
9. Buczak, A.L., Hanke, P.A., Cancro, G.J., Toma, M.K., Watkins, L.A., and Chavis, J.S. (2016, January 5–7). Detection of tunnels in PCAP data by random forests. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Cyber and Information Security Research Conference, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.10.1145/2897795.2897804 ↗
10. Artificial Intelligence for civil engineering
11. Review and prospect of digital-image-based crack detection of structure surface
12. Khalaf, A.F., Yassine, I.A., and Fahmy, A.S. (2016, January 25–28). Convolutional neural networks for deep feature learning in retinal vessel segmentation. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Phoenix, AZ, USA.10.1109/ICIP.2016.7532384 ↗
13. Long, J., Shelhamer, E., and Darrell, T. (2015, January 7–12). Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298965 ↗
14. Image recognition for water leakage in shield tunnel based on deep learning
15. Chen, L.C., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., Murphy, K., and Yuille, A.L. (2014). Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets and fully connected crfs. arXiv.
16. Deeplab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2699184 ↗
17. Chen, L.C., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., and Adam, H. (2017). Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation. arXiv.
18. Chen, L.C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., and Adam, H. (2018, January 8–14). Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_49 ↗
19. Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615 ↗
20. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015). Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer.
21. Zhou, Z., Siddiquee, M.M.R., Tajbakhsh, N., and Liang, J. (2018). Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support, Springer.
22. Huang, H., Lin, L., Tong, R., Hu, H., Zhang, Q., Iwamoto, Y., and Wu, J. (2020, January 4–8). Unet 3+: A full-scale connected unet for medical image segmentation. Proceedings of the ICASSP 2020—2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053405 ↗
23. A deep-learning-based multiple defect detection method for tunnel lining damages10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2931074 ↗
24. A research on an improved Unet-based concrete crack detection algorithm10.1177/1475921720940068 ↗
25. Automatic pixel-level crack detection for civil infrastructure using Unet++ and deep transfer learning10.1109/JSEN.2021.3089718 ↗
26. Li, M., Wang, H., Zhang, S., and Gao, P. (2022, January 23–25). Subway Water Leakage Detection Based on Improved deeplabV3+. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computer Systems (ICCS), Qingdao, China.10.1109/ICCS56273.2022.9988699 ↗
27. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., and Houlsby, N. (2020). An image is worth 16×16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv.
28. Datasets and processing methods for boosting visual inspection of civil infrastructure: A comprehensive review and algorithm comparison for crack classification, segmentation, and detection10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129226 ↗
29. A hybrid deep segmentation network for fundus vessels via deep-learning framework10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.085 ↗
30. SegFormer: Simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers
31. Chu, X., Tian, Z., Zhang, B., Wang, X., Wei, X., Xia, H., and Shen, C. (2021). Conditional positional encodings for vision transformers. arXiv.
32. Chollet, F. (2017, January 21–26). Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.195 ↗
33. Chicco, D., and Jurman, G. (2020). The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genom., 21.10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7 ↗
34. Zhang, D., Wang, J., and Zhao, X. (2015, January 27–30). Estimating the uncertainty of average F1 scores. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval, Northampton, MA, USA.10.1145/2808194.2809488 ↗
35. Land cover classification from remote sensing images based on multi-scale fully convolutional network10.1080/10095020.2021.2017237 ↗
36. Chen, J., Lu, Y., Yu, Q., Luo, X., Adeli, E., Wang, Y., and Zhou, Y. (2021). Transunet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation. arXiv.