Characterizing Variances of Adulterated Extra Virgin Olive Oils by UV-Vis Spectroscopy Combined with Analysis of Variance-Projected Difference Resolution (ANOVA-PDR) and Multivariate Classification
Source abstract
Abstract
The analysis of variance-projected difference resolution (ANOVA-PDR) was proposed and compared with multivariate classification for its potential in detecting possible food adulteration in extra virgin olive oils (EVOOs) by UV-Vis spectra. Three factors including origin, adulteration level, and adulteration type were systematically examined by the ANOVA-derived methods. The ANOVA-PDR quantitatively presented the separation of the internal classes according to the three main factors. Specifically, the average ANOVA-derived PDRs of the EVOO origination and adulteration level, respectively, is 4.01 and 1.78, while the conventional PDRs of the three factors are all less than 1.5. Furthermore, the partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and the PLS regression (PLSR) modeling with the selected sub-datasets from different origins were used to verify the results. The resulting models suggested that the three main factors and their interactions were all important sources of spectral variations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses · Edible Oils Quality and Analysis · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Food and Nutraceutical Science, Department of Food Science and Technology, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. A critical review on analytical techniques to detect adulteration of extra virgin olive oil10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.045 ↗
2. International Olive Council (2023, February 01). World Olive Oil and Table Olive Figures. Available online: https://www.internationaloliveoil.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/IOC-Olive-Oil-Dashboard-1.html#production-2.
3. A novel method to quantify the adulteration of extra virgin olive oil with low-grade olive oils by UV-Vis10.1021/jf903308u ↗
4. Linear and non linear chemometric models to quantify the adulteration of extra virgin olive oil10.1016/j.talanta.2010.09.048 ↗
5. Application of UV spectrometry and chemometric models for detecting olive oil-vegetable oil blends adulteration10.1007/s13197-013-1003-1 ↗
6. Multivariate modeling for detecting adulteration of extra virgin olive oil with soybean oil using fluorescence and UV-Vis spectroscopies: A preliminary approach10.1016/j.lwt.2017.06.060 ↗
7. Detection of adulteration in extra virgin olive oils by using UV-IMS and chemometric analysis10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.10.012 ↗
8. Pigments in extra virgin olive oils produced in different mediterranean countries in 2014: Near UV-Vis spectroscopy versus HPLC-DAD10.1016/j.lwt.2017.06.025 ↗
9. Evaluation of olive oils from the Mediterranean region by UV-Vis spectroscopy and independent component analysis10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.126 ↗
10. He, H., and Lu, W. (2019). High-throughput chemometric quality assessment of extra virgin olive oils using a microtiter plate reader. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19194169 ↗
11. Analysis of variance-principal component analysis: A soft tool for proteomic discovery10.1016/j.aca.2005.02.042 ↗
12. Determination of variance of secondary metabolites in lettuces grown under different light sources by flow injection mass spectrometric (FIMS) fingerprinting and ANOVA-PCA10.1007/s41664-018-0072-6 ↗
13. Characterization of near-infrared spectral variance in the authentication of skim and nonfat dry milk powder collection using ANOVA-PCA, pooled-ANOVA, and partial least-squares regression10.1021/jf5013727 ↗
14. UV spectral fingerprinting and analysis of variance-principal component analysis: A useful tool for characterizing sources of variance in plant materials10.1021/jf0734572 ↗
15. Variance in the chemical composition of dry beans determined from UV spectral fingerprints10.1021/jf900852y ↗
16. Discriminating between cultivars and treatments of broccoli using mass spectral fingerprinting and analysis of variance-principal component analysis10.1021/jf801606x ↗
17. Comparison of differential mobility spectrometry and mass spectrometry for gas chromatographic detection of ignitable liquids from fire debris using projected difference resolution10.1007/s00216-009-2786-9 ↗
18. Automated principal component-based orthogonal signal correction applied to fused near infrared-mid-infrared spectra of French olive oils10.1021/ac900538n ↗
19. High-throughput chemotyping of cannabis and hemp extracts using an ultraviolet microplate reader and multivariate classifiers10.1007/s41664-018-0075-3 ↗
20. Comparative study of NMR spectral profiling for the characterization and authentication of cannabis10.5740/jaoacint.17-0089 ↗
21. Differentiating rice varieties by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry chemical profiling with singular value decomposition background correction10.1007/s41664-018-0055-7 ↗
22. Statistical validation of classification and calibration models using bootstrapped Latin partitions10.1016/j.trac.2006.10.010 ↗
23. Extraction of pigment information from near-UV Vis absorption spectra of extra virgin olive oils10.1021/jf503818k ↗
24. Rapid determination of olive oil chlorophylls and carotenoids by using visible spectroscopy10.1007/s11746-014-2515-1 ↗