Anomaly Detection of Control Moment Gyroscope Based on Working Condition Classification and Transfer Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
The process of human exploration of the universe has accelerated, and aerospace technology has developed rapidly. The health management and prognosis guarantee of spacecraft systems has become an important basic technology. However, with thousands of telemetry data channels and massive data scales, spacecraft systems are increasingly complex. The anomaly detection that relied on simple threshold judgment and expert manual annotation in the past is no longer applicable. In addition, the particularity of the anomaly detection task leads to the lack of fault data for training. Therefore, a data-driven deep transfer learning-based approach is needed for rapid analysis and accurate detection of large-scale data. The control moment gyroscope (CMG) is a significant inertial actuator in the process of large-scale, long-life spacecraft in-orbit operation and mission execution. Its anomaly detection plays a major role in the prevention and elimination of early failures. Based on the research of SincNet and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, this paper proposed a Sinc-LSTM neural network based on transfer learning and working condition classification for CMG anomaly detection. First, a two-stage pre-training method is proposed to alleviate the data imbalance, using the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) dataset and a satellite dataset from NASA. Second, the Sinc-LSTM network is designed to enhance the local fitting and long-period memory ability of the model for CMG time series data. Finally, a dynamic threshold judgment anomaly detection method based on working condition classification is designed to accommodate threshold changes for CMG full-cycle anomaly detection. The method is validated on the spacecraft CMG dataset.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Fault Detection and Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Beijing Aerospace Control Center, Beijing 100094, China
School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Advances in Integrated System Health Management for mission-essential and safety-critical aerospace applications10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100758 ↗
2. The application of reasoning to aerospace Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM): Challenges and opportunities10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.01.001 ↗
3. A review on the application of deep learning in system health management10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.024 ↗
4. Failure prognosis and remaining useful life prediction of control moment gyroscopes onboard satellites10.1016/j.asr.2021.09.016 ↗
5. Liu, L., Zhang, Q., Wei, D., Li, G., Wu, H., Wang, Z., Guo, B., and Zhang, J. (2020). Chaotic Ensemble of Online Recurrent Extreme Learning Machine for Temperature Prediction of Control Moment Gyroscopes. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20174786 ↗
6. Redundancy gyroscopes bias fault diagnosis based on the correlated measurement equations in Fengyun-4 spacecraft10.1016/j.asr.2022.04.065 ↗
7. Yan, S., Wei, W., Rui, W., and Zhengyi, W. (2022, January 25–27). Application of Matrix Algorithm Based on Graph Theory in Real-time Fault Diagnosis Knowledge Perfection Detection of Spacecraft Telemetry Data. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC), Xi’an, China.10.1109/ICSPCC55723.2022.9984420 ↗
8. A Reliable Deep Learning Approach for Time-Varying Faults Identification: Spacecraft Reaction Wheel Case Study10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3191331 ↗
9. Data-driven fault monitoring for spacecraft control moment gyro with slice residual attention network10.1016/j.jfranklin.2022.09.004 ↗
10. Fault diagnosis of control moment gyroscope based on a new CNN scheme using attention-enhanced convolutional block10.1007/s11431-022-2141-9 ↗
11. Neural network-based fault diagnosis for spacecraft with single-gimbal control moment gyros10.1016/j.cja.2021.11.020 ↗
12. Yang, K., Wang, Y., Han, X., Cheng, Y., Guo, L., and Gong, J. (2022). Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Time Series Data of Spacecraft Using Multi-Task Learning. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12136296 ↗
13. A review on outlier/anomaly detection in time series data
14. Hundman, K., Constantinou, V., Laporte, C., Colwell, I., and Soderstrom, T. (2018, January 19–23). Detecting spacecraft anomalies using lstms and nonparametric dynamic thresholding. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, London, UK.10.1145/3219819.3219845 ↗
15. Ravanelli, M., and Bengio, Y. (2018). Interpretable convolutional filters with sincnet. arXiv.
16. Vercruyssen, V., Meert, W., and Davis, J. (2017, January 18). Transfer learning for time series anomaly detection. Proceedings of the Workshop and Tutorial on Interactive Adaptive Learning@ ECMLPKDD 2017, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Skopje, Macedonia.
17. Baireddy, S., Desai, S.R., Mathieson, J.L., Foster, R.H., Chan, M.W., Comer, M.L., and Delp, E.J. (2021, January 19–25). Spacecraft time-series anomaly detection using transfer learning. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Virtual.10.1109/CVPRW53098.2021.00223 ↗
18. A comprehensive survey on transfer learning10.1109/JPROC.2020.3004555 ↗
19. A survey on transfer learning10.1109/TKDE.2009.191 ↗
20. Prognostics and health management: A review on data driven approaches10.1155/2015/793161 ↗
21. Ryadchikov, I., Sechenev, S., Mikhalkov, N., Biryuk, A., Svidlov, A., Gusev, A., Sokolov, D., and Nikulchev, E. Feedback control with equilibrium revision for CMG-actuated inverted pendulum. Proceedings of the Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Electromechanics and Robotics “Zavalishin’s Readings”, Kursk, Russia, 17–20 April 2019.10.1007/978-981-13-9267-2_35 ↗
22. A new data-driven transferable remaining useful life prediction approach for bearing under different working conditions10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106602 ↗
23. A review of the space environment effects on spacecraft in different orbits10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2927811 ↗
24. Precise orbit determination for BDS satellites10.1186/s43020-021-00062-y ↗
25. Thayer, J.P., Tobiska, W.K., Pilinski, M.D., and Sutton, E.K. (2021). Space Weather Effects and Applications, American Geophysical Union.
26. Hybrid distance-guided adversarial network for intelligent fault diagnosis under different working conditions10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109197 ↗
27. Multiscale cascading deep belief network for fault identification of rotating machinery under various working conditions10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105484 ↗
28. A new deep transfer learning method for bearing fault diagnosis under different working conditions10.1109/JSEN.2019.2936932 ↗
29. Gurrisi, C., Seidel, R., Dickerson, S., Didziulis, S., Frantz, P., and Ferguson, K. (2010, January 12–14). Space station control moment gyroscope lessons learned. Proceedings of the 40th Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium, Cocoa Beach, FL, USA.
30. Fault detection and isolation of control moment gyros for satellite attitude control subsystem10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106419 ↗
31. A novel data-driven method for fault detection and isolation of control moment gyroscopes onboard satellites10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.11.004 ↗
32. Gong, M., Tang, D., Yu, J., and Tian, L. (2021, January 15–17). A Physics-informed Transfer Learning Approach for Anomaly Detection of Aerospace CMG with Limited Telemetry Data. Proceedings of the 2021 Global Reliability and Prognostics and Health Management (PHM-Nanjing), Nanjing, China.10.1109/PHM-Nanjing52125.2021.9612988 ↗
33. A brief review of ground and flight failures of Chinese spacecraft10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.04.002 ↗
34. Iverson, D. (2008, January 3–5). Data mining applications for space mission operations system health monitoring. Proceedings of the SpaceOps 2008 Conference, Virtual.10.2514/6.2008-3212 ↗
35. Shao, Y., and Zhang, Y. (2018, January 17–19). A Failure Prediction Method for Spacecraft Loads Based on Time Series Model. Proceedings of the 2018 12th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability, and Safety (ICRMS), Shanghai, China.10.1109/ICRMS.2018.00059 ↗
36. Deep learning for anomaly detection: A review10.1145/3439950 ↗
37. Gong, D., Liu, L., Le, V., Saha, B., Mansour, M.R., Venkatesh, S., and Hengel, A.v.d. (November, January 27). Memorizing normality to detect anomaly: Memory-augmented deep autoencoder for unsupervised anomaly detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
38. Park, H., Noh, J., and Ham, B. (2020, January 14–19). Learning memory-guided normality for anomaly detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01438 ↗
39. Multi-head CNN–RNN for multi-time series anomaly detection: An industrial case study10.1016/j.neucom.2019.07.034 ↗
40. Nanduri, A., and Sherry, L. (2016, January 19–21). Anomaly detection in aircraft data using Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN). Proceedings of the 2016 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance (ICNS), Herndon, VA, USA.10.1109/ICNSURV.2016.7486356 ↗
41. Qureshi, A.U.H., Larijani, H., Mtetwa, N., Javed, A., and Ahmad, J. (2019). RNN-ABC: A new swarm optimization based technique for anomaly detection. Computers, 8.10.3390/computers8030059 ↗
42. Luo, W., Liu, W., and Gao, S. (2017, January 22–29). A revisit of sparse coding based anomaly detection in stacked rnn framework. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.45 ↗
43. A survey on anomaly detection for technical systems using LSTM networks10.1016/j.compind.2021.103498 ↗
44. Web traffic anomaly detection using C-LSTM neural networks10.1016/j.eswa.2018.04.004 ↗
45. Malhotra, P., Ramakrishnan, A., Anand, G., Vig, L., Agarwal, P., and Shroff, G. (2016). LSTM-based encoder-decoder for multi-sensor anomaly detection. arXiv.
46. Luo, W., Liu, W., and Gao, S. (2017, January 10–14). Remembering history with convolutional lstm for anomaly detection. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), Hong Kong, China.10.1109/ICME.2017.8019325 ↗
47. Unsupervised anomaly detection with LSTM neural networks10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2935975 ↗
48. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv.
49. Geiger, A., Liu, D., Alnegheimish, S., Cuesta-Infante, A., and Veeramachaneni, K. (2020, January 10–13). TadGAN: Time Series Anomaly Detection Using Generative Adversarial Networks. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/BigData50022.2020.9378139 ↗
50. Li, T., Comer, M.L., Delp, E.J., Desai, S.R., Mathieson, J.L., Foster, R.H., and Chan, M.W. (2019, January 12–14). A Stacked Predictor and Dynamic Thresholding Algorithm for Anomaly Detection in Spacecraft. Proceedings of the MILCOM 2019—2019 IEEE Military Communications Conference, Norfolk, VA, USA.10.1109/MILCOM47813.2019.9021055 ↗