The Influencing Factors of CO2 Utilization and Storage Efficiency in Gas Reservoir
Source abstract
Abstract
Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) technology is one of the most practical means to meet zero greenhouse gas emission goal of the Paris Agreement and to ensure profitability, which could achieve permanent sequestration of CO2. Due to the cost constraints of CCUS implementation, improving recovery and maximizing storage efficiency have become a critical part of ensuring economic efficiency. This research aims to analyze the effects of key factors on enhancing gas recovery and storage efficiency, combined with the validation of CO2 displacement and storage mechanisms. Therefore, long core experiments and different dimensional simulations were established based on R gas reservoir (one of the actual gas reservoirs in Northeast China), which were designed for sensitivity analyses of different influencing parameters and quantitative analyses of different storage mechanisms during CCUS process. When the conditions (temperature and pressure) were closer to the CO2 critical point, when the following parameters (the CO2 purity, the injection rate and the dip angle) became larger, when the reservoir rhythm was reversed and when the irreducible water was is in existence, the final displacement and storage effects became better because of weaker diffusion, stronger gravity segregation and slower CO2 breakthrough. The contributions of different storage mechanisms were quantified: 83.78% CO2 existed as supercritical fluid; 12.67% CO2 was dissolved in brine; and 3.85% CO2 reacted with minerals. Some supercritical and dissolved CO2 would slowly transform to solid precipitation over time. This work could provide theoretical supports for CCUS technology research and references for CCUS field application. At the same time, countries should further improve CCUS subsidy policies and make concerted efforts to promote the globalization and commercialization of CO2 transport.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
Dagang Zhaodong Operation Branch, PetroChina Company Limited, Tianjin 300457, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Sichuan Province Science and Technology Program
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. CCUS: Paving the way from COP26 to net zero10.1002/ghg.2150 ↗
2. CCUS deployment under the U.S. 45Q tax credit and adaptation by other North American Governments: MARKAL modeling results10.1016/j.cie.2022.108269 ↗
3. Technical and economic prospects of CCUS projects in Russia
4. Study on multi-subject behavior game of CCUS cooperative alliance10.1016/j.energy.2022.125229 ↗
5. COP27 Climate Change Conference: Urgent action needed for Africa and the world
6. International chains of CO2 capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) in a carbon-neutral world10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105433 ↗
7. Economic viability of full-chain CCUS-EOR in Indonesia10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106069 ↗
8. Development of Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage Technology in China10.15302/J-SSCAE-2021.06.004 ↗
9. Terdal, R.M., Steeghs, N., and Craig, W. (2022, January 16–17). Carbon, Capture, Utilization and Storage CCUS: How to Commercialize a Business with No Revenue. Proceedings of the Canadian Energy Technology Conference, Calgary, AB, Canada.10.2118/208905-MS ↗
10. Betiku, A., and Bassey, O.B. (2022, January 21–23). Exploring the Barriers to Implementation of Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage in Nigeria. Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.10.2523/IPTC-22387-MS ↗
11. CO2 capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) storage site selection using DEMATEL-based Grey Relational Analysis and evaluation of carbon emissions with the ARIMA method10.1007/s11356-022-23108-3 ↗
12. Magzymov, D., Dindoruk, B., and Johns, R.T. (2022, January 25–29). Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage in the Context of Petroleum Industry: A State-of-the-art Review. Proceedings of the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Virtual.10.2118/209368-MS ↗
13. A multi-criteria CCUS screening evaluation of the Gulf of Mexico, USA10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103688 ↗
14. Guo, H., Liu, X., Meng, E., Xu, Y., Zhang, M., Fu, H., Zhang, Y., and Song, K. (2022, January 25–29). CCUS in China: Challenges and Opportunities. Proceedings of the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Virtual.10.2118/209468-MS ↗
15. Economic feasibility of carbon sequestration with enhanced gas recovery (CSEGR)10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.075 ↗
16. Research progress of CO2 flooding and geological storage in gas reservoirs
17. Coupled optimization of enhanced gas recovery and carbon dioxide sequestration in natural gas reservoirs: Case study in a real gas field in the south of Iran10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.06.007 ↗
18. Marbun, B.T.H., Zulkhifly, S., Lie, H.S., and Promediaz, A. (2012, January 7–9). Northwest Java and East Natuna Field: Perspective to Apply Carbon Capture And Storage (CCS) In Indonesia. Proceedings of the Carbon Management Technology Conference, Orlando, FL, USA.10.7122/151319-MS ↗
19. Carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) in tight gas and oil reservoirs10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103458 ↗
20. Influence of gravity differentiation and heterogeneity on CO2 sequestration in gas reservoirs: A case of the XC Gas Reservoir in South China
21. Influence of anisotropic and heterogeneous permeability coupled with in-situ stress on CO2 sequestration with simultaneous enhanced gas recovery in shale: Quantitative modeling and case study10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103208 ↗
22. Liu, S., Lv, J., Li, G., Song, Y., and Zhang, Y. (2018, January 21–26). Visulized and Quantitative Investigation of CO2-CH4 Diffusion Using X-ray Computed Tomography. Proceedings of the 14th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference Melbourne, Cheltenham, UK.
23. Numerical study of CO2 enhanced natural gas recovery and sequestration in shale gas reservoirs10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.09.011 ↗
24. Effects of Anisotropy and CO2 Wettability on CO2 Storage Capacity in Sandstone
25. Impact of karstification in trapping mechanisms of CO2 storage10.1007/s13202-021-01375-z ↗
26. Effects of N2 and H2S binary impurities on CO2 geological storage in stratified formation—A sensitivity study10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.083 ↗
27. Mobility ratio, relative permeability and sweep efficiency of supercritical CO2 and methane injection to enhance natural gas and condensate recovery: Coreflooding experimentation10.1016/j.jngse.2012.05.011 ↗
28. CO2 storage with enhanced gas recovery (CSEGR): A review of experimental and numerical studies10.1016/j.petsci.2021.12.009 ↗
29. Numerical modeling for CO2 storage with impurities associated with enhanced gas recovery in depleted gas reservoirs10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104554 ↗
30. Study on the influence of various factors on dispersion during enhance natural gas recovery with CO2 sequestration in depleted gas reservoir10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104644 ↗
31. Supercritical CO2 sequestration and enhanced gas recovery in tight gas reservoirs: Feasibility and factors that influence efficiency10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103234 ↗
32. Enhanced gas recovery with CO2 sequestration: The effect of medium heterogeneity on the dispersion of supercritical CO2–CH410.1016/j.ijggc.2015.04.014 ↗
33. Jia, Y., Shi, Y., and Yan, J. (April, January 23). The Feasibility Appraisal for CO2 Enhanced Gas Recovery of Tight Gas Reservoir: Case Analysis and Economic Evaluation. Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Virtual.
34. The Numerical Simulation of CO2 Displacement and Storage in Low-permeability Gas Reservoir
35. The probable error of a mean10.2307/2331554 ↗