Rethinking Learnable Proposals for Graphical Object Detection in Scanned Document Images
Source abstract
Abstract
In the age of deep learning, researchers have looked at domain adaptation under the pre-training and fine-tuning paradigm to leverage the gains in the natural image domain. These backbones and subsequent networks are designed for object detection in the natural image domain. They do not consider some of the critical characteristics of document images. Document images are sparse in contextual information, and the graphical page objects are logically clustered. This paper investigates the effectiveness of deep and robust backbones in the document image domain. Further, it explores the idea of learnable object proposals through Sparse R-CNN. This paper shows that simple domain adaptation of top-performing object detectors to the document image domain does not lead to better results. Furthermore, empirically showing that detectors based on dense object priors like Faster R-CNN, Mask R-CNN, and Cascade Mask R-CNN are perhaps not best suited for graphical page object detection. Detectors that reduce the number of object candidates while making them learnable are a step towards a better approach. We formulate and evaluate the Sparse R-CNN (SR-CNN) model on the IIIT-AR-13k, PubLayNet, and DocBank datasets and hope to inspire a rethinking of object proposals in the domain of graphical page object detection.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Neural Network Applications · Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Kaiserslautern, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
Mindgarage, Technical University of Kaiserslautern, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
German Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
Department of Computer Science, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87 Luleå, Sweden
Funding
European project INFINITY
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. The digital universe in 2020: Big data, bigger digital shadows, and biggest growth in the far east
2. Bhatt, J., Hashmi, K.A., Afzal, M.Z., and Stricker, D. (2021). A survey of graphical page object detection with deep neural networks. Appl. Sci., 11.10.20944/preprints202104.0739.v1 ↗
3. Li, X.H., Yin, F., and Liu, C.L. (2018, January 20–24). Page object detection from pdf document images by deep structured prediction and supervised clustering. Proceedings of the 2018 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Beijing, China.10.1109/ICPR.2018.8546073 ↗
4. Yi, X., Gao, L., Liao, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, R., and Jiang, Z. (2017, January 9–15). CNN based page object detection in document images. Proceedings of the 2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Kyoto, Japan.10.1109/ICDAR.2017.46 ↗
5. Gao, L., Yi, X., Jiang, Z., Hao, L., and Tang, Z. (2017, January 9–15). ICDAR2017 competition on page object detection. Proceedings of the 2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Kyoto, Japan.10.1109/ICDAR.2017.231 ↗
6. Robust Detection of Tables in Documents Using Scores from Table Cell Cores10.1007/s42979-022-01041-z ↗
7. Current Status and Performance Analysis of Table Recognition in Document Images with Deep Neural Networks10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3087865 ↗
8. Nazir, D., Hashmi, K.A., Pagani, A., Liwicki, M., Stricker, D., and Afzal, M.Z. (2021). HybridTabNet: Towards better table detection in scanned document images. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11188396 ↗
9. Mondal, A., Lipps, P., and Jawahar, C. (2020). IIIT-AR-13K: A new dataset for graphical object detection in documents. International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-57058-3_16 ↗
10. Smith, R. (2007, January 23–26). An overview of the Tesseract OCR engine. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR 2007), Curitiba, Brazil.10.1109/ICDAR.2007.4376991 ↗
11. Hashmi, K.A., Pagani, A., Liwicki, M., Stricker, D., and Afzal, M.Z. (2021). CasTabDetectoRS: Cascade Network for Table Detection in Document Images with Recursive Feature Pyramid and Switchable Atrous Convolution. J. Imaging, 7.10.20944/preprints202109.0059.v1 ↗
12. Girshick, R. (2015, January 7–13). Fast r-cnn. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Santiago, Chile.10.1109/ICCV.2015.169 ↗
13. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., and Sun, J. (2015, January 7–12). Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.
14. Liang, T., Chu, X., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Tang, Z., Chu, W., Chen, J., and Ling, H. (2021). Cbnetv2: A composite backbone network architecture for object detection. arXiv.10.1109/TIP.2022.3216771 ↗
15. Sun, P., Zhang, R., Jiang, Y., Kong, T., Xu, C., Zhan, W., Tomizuka, M., Li, L., Yuan, Z., and Wang, C. (2021, January 20–25). Sparse r-cnn: End-to-end object detection with learnable proposals. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, TN, USA.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01422 ↗
16. Green, E., and Krishnamoorthy, M. (1995, January 24–26). Recognition of tables using table grammars. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, Las Vegas, NA, USA.
17. Tupaj, S., Shi, Z., Chang, C.H., and Alam, H. (1996). Extracting Tabular Information from Text Files, EECS Department, Tufts University.
18. Kieninger, T., and Dengel, A. (2001, January 13). Applying the T-RECS table recognition system to the business letter domain. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.
19. Medium-independent table detection10.1117/12.373506 ↗
20. e Silva, A.C. (2009, January 26–29). Learning rich hidden markov models in document analysis: Table location. Proceedings of the 2009 10th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/ICDAR.2009.185 ↗
21. Shigarov, A., Mikhailov, A., and Altaev, A. (2016, January 13–16). Configurable table structure recognition in untagged PDF documents. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, Vienna, Austria.10.1145/2960811.2967152 ↗
22. Chandran, S., and Kasturi, R. (1993, January 20–22). Structural recognition of tabulated data. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR’93), Tsukuba, Japan.
23. Gilani, A., Qasim, S.R., Malik, I., and Shafait, F. (2017, January 9–15). Table detection using deep learning. Proceedings of the 2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Kyoto, Japan.10.1109/ICDAR.2017.131 ↗
24. Schreiber, S., Agne, S., Wolf, I., Dengel, A., and Ahmed, S. (2017, January 9–15). Deepdesrt: Deep learning for detection and structure recognition of tables in document images. Proceedings of the 2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Kyoto, Japan.10.1109/ICDAR.2017.192 ↗
25. Göbel, M., Hassan, T., Oro, E., and Orsi, G. (2013, January 25–28). ICDAR 2013 table competition. Proceedings of the 2013 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/ICDAR.2013.292 ↗
26. Vo, N.D., Nguyen, K., Nguyen, T.V., and Nguyen, K. (2018, January 5–7). Ensemble of deep object detectors for page object detection. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, Langkawi, Malaysia.10.1145/3164541.3164644 ↗
27. Decnt: Deep deformable cnn for table detection10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2880211 ↗
28. Sun, N., Zhu, Y., and Hu, X. (2019, January 20–25). Faster R-CNN based table detection combining corner locating. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Sydney, NSW, Australia.10.1109/ICDAR.2019.00212 ↗
29. Saha, R., Mondal, A., and Jawahar, C. (2019, January 20–25). Graphical object detection in document images. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Sydney, NSW, Australia.10.1109/ICDAR.2019.00018 ↗
30. He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollár, P., and Girshick, R. (2017, January 22–29). Mask r-cnn. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.322 ↗
31. Shigarov, A., Altaev, A., Mikhailov, A., Paramonov, V., and Cherkashin, E. (2018). TabbyPDF: Web-based system for PDF table extraction. International Conference on Information and Software Technologies, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-99972-2_20 ↗
32. Chi, Z., Huang, H., Xu, H.D., Yu, H., Yin, W., and Mao, X.L. (2019). Complicated table structure recognition. arXiv.
33. Raja, S., Mondal, A., and Jawahar, C. (2020). Table structure recognition using top-down and bottom-up cues. European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-58604-1_5 ↗
34. Split, embed and merge: An accurate table structure recognizer10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108565 ↗
35. Prasad, D., Gadpal, A., Kapadni, K., Visave, M., and Sultanpure, K. (2020, January 14–19). CascadeTabNet: An approach for end to end table detection and structure recognition from image-based documents. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPRW50498.2020.00294 ↗
36. Cai, Z., and Vasconcelos, N. (2018, January 18–23). Cascade r-cnn: Delving into high quality object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00644 ↗
37. Agarwal, M., Mondal, A., and Jawahar, C. (2021, January 10–15). Cdec-net: Composite deformable cascade network for table detection in document images. Proceedings of the 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Milan, Italy.10.1109/ICPR48806.2021.9411922 ↗
38. Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, S., Liang, T., Zhao, Q., Tang, Z., and Ling, H. (2020, January 7–12). Cbnet: A novel composite backbone network architecture for object detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New York, NY, USA.10.1609/aaai.v34i07.6834 ↗
39. Nguyen, P., Ngo, L., Truong, T., Nguyen, T.T., Vo, N.D., and Nguyen, K. (2021, January 21–22). Page Object Detection with YOLOF. Proceedings of the 2021 8th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS), Hanoi, Vietnam.10.1109/NICS54270.2021.9701449 ↗
40. Shahab, A., Shafait, F., Kieninger, T., and Dengel, A. (2010, January 9–11). An open approach towards the benchmarking of table structure recognition systems. Proceedings of the 9th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems, Boston, MA, USA.10.1145/1815330.1815345 ↗
41. Fang, J., Tao, X., Tang, Z., Qiu, R., and Liu, Y. (2012, January 27–29). Dataset, ground-truth and performance metrics for table detection evaluation. Proceedings of the 2012 10th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.10.1109/DAS.2012.29 ↗
42. Gao, L., Huang, Y., Déjean, H., Meunier, J.L., Yan, Q., Fang, Y., Kleber, F., and Lang, E. (2019, January 20–25). ICDAR 2019 competition on table detection and recognition (cTDaR). Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Sydney, NSW, Australia.10.1109/ICDAR.2019.00243 ↗
43. Li, M., Cui, L., Huang, S., Wei, F., Zhou, M., and Li, Z. (2020, January 11–16). Tablebank: Table benchmark for image-based table detection and recognition. Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Marseille, France.
44. Zhong, X., Tang, J., and Yepes, A.J. (2019, January 20–25). Publaynet: Largest dataset ever for document layout analysis. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Sydney, NSW, Australia.10.1109/ICDAR.2019.00166 ↗
45. Li, M., Xu, Y., Cui, L., Huang, S., Wei, F., Li, Z., and Zhou, M. (2020). DocBank: A Benchmark Dataset for Document Layout Analysis. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.82 ↗
46. Lin, T.Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., and Zitnick, C.L. (2014). Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 ↗
47. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
48. Blaschko, M.B., and Lampert, C.H. (2008). Learning to localize objects with structured output regression. European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_2 ↗
49. Chen, K., Wang, J., Pang, J., Cao, Y., Xiong, Y., Li, X., Sun, S., Feng, W., Liu, Z., and Xu, J. (2019). MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmark. arXiv.