journal article·2022-09-29Open access

Structural Augmentation in Seismic Data for Fault Prediction

Shenghou Wang, Xu Si, Zhongxian Cai, Yatong Cui

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 19

Abstract

Fault interpretation tasks become more and more difficult as the complexity of seismic exploration increases, especially for ultra-deep seismic data. Recently, numerous researchers have utilized automatic interpretation techniques based on deep learning to improve the efficiency and accuracy of fault prediction. Although deep learning methods have powerful data information processing capabilities, the applicability of deep neural networks may still be limited by the range of learned information. Therefore, we develop a new technique called structural data augmentation to enhance the diversity of the datasets. Concretely, we utilize different geological structure theories to incorporate virtual folds and faults in the field seismic data to improve the diversity and generalization ability of the training datasets. To cope with the multi-stage and multi-scale complex structures developed in ultra-deep strata, the proposed augmentation workflow increases data diversity by generating various virtual structures containing multi-scale folds, listric faults, oblique-slip displacement fields, and multi-directional fault drags. Tests on the field seismic data show that our method not only outperforms conventional seismic attributes but also has advantages over other machine learning methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Seismology and Earthquake Studies · Drilling and Well Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China

School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Tianjin Survey Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300191, China

Funding

Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Evaluations of oil and gas lateral migration across faults: A case study of Shigezhuang nose structure of Wen’an slope in Baxian sag, Jizhong depression, Bohai Bay Basin, East China10.1016/S1876-3804(17)30105-2 ↗
2. Sinistral strike slip of the Zhangjiakou-Penglai Fault and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation in the northeast of Shaleitian Bulge, Bohai Bay Basin, East China10.1016/S1876-3804(18)30025-9 ↗
3. A model for faults to link the Neogene reservoirs to the Paleogene organic-rich sediments in low-relief regions of the south Bohai Sea, China10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108360 ↗
4. Structural properties of fractured and faulted Cretaceous platform carbonates, Murge Plateau (southern Italy)10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.05.004 ↗
5. Development of extensional fault and fold system: Insights from 3D seismic interpretation of the Enderby Terrace, NW Shelf of Australia10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.03.003 ↗
6. Image processing of seismic attributes for automatic fault extraction10.1190/geo2018-0369.1 ↗
7. Big data analytics for seismic fracture identification using amplitude-based statistics10.1007/s10596-019-09890-z ↗
8. Structural geometry and evolution of an intracratonic strike-slip fault zone: A case study from the north SB5 fault zone in the Tarim Basin, China10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104159 ↗
9. Interactive Seismic Interpretation: ABSTRACT
10. Practical Seismic Interpretation10.1029/EO067i047p01342-06 ↗
11. Interactive Computer Graphics and the Fault Problem: ABSTRACT
12. Interactive computer modeling of complex multizone faulted reservoirs using both seismic and well data
13. Three-Dimensional Seismic Interpretation of a Piercement Salt Dome: ABSTRACT
14. Jacquemin, P., and Mallet, J. (2005). Automatic faults extraction using double hough transform. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2005, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.2144436 ↗
15. Autotracking of faults on 3D seismic data10.1190/1.2358399 ↗
16. 3-D seismic discontinuity for faults and stratigraphic features: The coherence cube10.1190/1.1437077 ↗
17. Least squares dip and coherency attributes10.1190/1.1438051 ↗
18. 3-D seismic attributes using a semblance-based coherency algorithm10.1190/1.1444415 ↗
19. Eigenstructure based coherence computations as an aid to 3-D structural and stratigraphic mapping10.1190/1.1444651 ↗
20. Coherence attribute at different spectral scales10.1190/INT-2013-0089.1 ↗
21. Predictive coherence10.1190/INT-2015-0030.1 ↗
22. Directional structure-tensor-based coherence to detect seismic faults and channels10.1190/geo2016-0473.1 ↗
23. Detection of Zones of Abnormal Strains in Structures Using Gaussian Curvature Analysis1
24. Curvature attributes and their application to 3D interpreted horizons10.1046/j.0263-5046.2001.00142.x ↗
25. 3D volumetric multispectral estimates of reflector curvature and rotation10.1190/1.2242449 ↗
26. Integrating 3D seismic curvature and curvature gradient attributes for fracture characterization: Methodologies and interpretational implications10.1190/geo2012-0190.1 ↗
27. Efficient volumetric extraction of most positive negative curvature and flexure for fracture characterization from 3D seismic data10.1111/1365-2478.12350 ↗
28. Di, H. (2016). Seismic Geometric Attribute Analysis for Fracture Characterization: New Methodologies and Applications. [Ph.D. Thesis, West Virginia University].
29. New paradigm of fault interpretation
30. Jyoti, K., Burman, R., Datta, K., Desgoutte, N., and Cuilh, L. (2010). Subseismic faults detection and characterization using Seismic Continuity Analysis in Mauddud Formation, Burgan Field. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2010, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.3513096 ↗
31. Neff, D.B., Grismore, J.R., and Lucas, W.A. (2000). Automated Seismic Fault Detection and Picking. (No 6,018,498), U.S. Patent.
32. Detection and extraction of fault surfaces in 3D seismic data10.1190/1.2215357 ↗
33. Methods to compute fault images, extract fault surfaces, and estimate fault throws from 3D seismic images10.1190/geo2012-0331.1 ↗
34. 3D seismic image processing for faults10.1190/geo2015-0380.1 ↗
35. Methods to enhance seismic faults and construct fault surfaces10.1016/j.cageo.2017.06.015 ↗
36. Using generative adversarial networks to improve deep-learning fault interpretation networks10.1190/tle37080578.1 ↗
37. Pedersen, S.I., Randen, T., and Sonneland, L. (2002). Automatic fault extraction using artificial ants. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2002, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.1817297 ↗
38. Seismic imaging of migration pathways by advanced attribute analysis, Alaminos Canyon 21, Gulf of Mexico10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.09.005 ↗
39. Multiazimuth coherence
40. Automatic fault interpretation with optimal surface voting10.1190/geo2018-0115.1 ↗
41. Fracture Identification in a Tight Sandstone Reservoir: A Seismic Anisotropy and Automatic Multisensitive Attribute Fusion Framework10.1109/LGRS.2018.2853631 ↗
42. Improving seismic fault detection by super-attribute-based classification10.1190/INT-2018-0188.1 ↗
43. Ashraf, U., Zhang, H., Anees, A., Mangi, H.N., and Zhang, X. (2020). Application of Unconventional Seismic Attributes and Unsupervised Machine Learning for the Identification of Fault and Fracture Network. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10113864 ↗
44. FaultNet3D: Predicting fault probabilities, strikes, and dips with a single convolutional neural network10.1109/TGRS.2019.2925003 ↗
45. Generative Adversarial Networks
46. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
47. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects10.1126/science.aaa8415 ↗
48. Rise of the machines10.1038/s41415-019-1051-7 ↗
49. Machine learning for medicine
50. Advancing mathematics by guiding human intuition with AI10.1038/s41586-021-04086-x ↗
51. Machine learning for data-driven discovery in solid Earth geoscience10.1126/science.aau0323 ↗
52. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1 ↗
53. High-resolution seismic tomography of Long Beach, CA using machine learning10.1038/s41598-019-50381-z ↗
54. P-wave arrival picking and first-motion polarity determination with deep learning10.1029/2017JB015251 ↗
55. Convolutional Neural Network for Earthquake Detection and Location10.1126/sciadv.1700578 ↗
56. High-resolution seismic event detection using local similarity for Large-N arrays10.1038/s41598-018-19728-w ↗
57. Machine Learning Predicts Laboratory Earthquakes10.1002/2017GL074677 ↗
58. Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition10.1073/pnas.2011362118 ↗
59. MyShake: A smartphone seismic network for earthquake early warning and beyond10.1126/sciadv.1501055 ↗
60. Seismic fault detection with convolutional neural network10.1190/geo2017-0666.1 ↗
61. Guo, B., Li, L., and Luo, Y. (2018). A new method for automatic seismic fault detection using convolutional neural network. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/segam2018-2995894.1 ↗
62. Deep convolutional neural network for automatic fault recognition from 3D seismic datasets10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104776 ↗
63. Seismic Fault Interpretation Using Deep Learning-Based Semantic Segmentation Method
64. Illuminating Earth’s faults10.1126/science.aaz7750 ↗
65. A scalable deep learning platform for identifying geologic features from seismic attributes10.1190/tle36030249.1 ↗
66. FaultSeg3D: Using synthetic data sets to train an end-to-end convolutional neural network for 3D seismic fault segmentation10.1190/geo2018-0646.1 ↗
67. Multitask learning for local seismic image processing: Fault detection, structure-oriented smoothing with edge-preserving, and seismic normal estimation by using a single convolutional neural network10.1093/gji/ggz418 ↗
68. Building realistic structure models to train convolutional neural networks for seismic structural interpretation10.1190/geo2019-0375.1 ↗
69. Applications of supervised deep learning for seismic interpretation and inversion10.1190/tle38070526.1 ↗
70. Deep Relative Geologic Time: A Deep Learning Method for Simultaneously Interpreting 3-D Seismic Horizons and Faults10.1029/2021JB021882 ↗
71. Research on fault recognition method combining 3D Res-UNet and knowledge distillation10.1007/s11770-021-0894-2 ↗
72. Automatic fault detection on seismic images using a multiscale attention convolutional neural network10.1190/geo2020-0945.1 ↗
73. Fault Detection on Seismic Structural Images Using a Nested Residual U-Net
74. Yan, Z., Zhang, Z., and Liu, S. (2021). Improving Performance of Seismic Fault Detection by Fine-Tuning the Convolutional Neural Network Pre-Trained with Synthetic Samples. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14123650 ↗
75. Seismic fault detection in real data using transfer learning from a convolutional neural network pre-trained with synthetic seismic data10.1016/j.cageo.2019.104344 ↗
76. Automatic fault recognition with residual network and transfer learning
77. Learning from unlabelled real seismic data: Fault detection based on transfer learning10.1111/1365-2478.13097 ↗
78. Seismic fault detection with progressive transfer learning10.1007/s11600-021-00668-5 ↗
79. A gigabyte interpreted seismic dataset for automatic fault recognition10.1016/j.dib.2021.107219 ↗
80. Automatic Fault Delineation in 3D Seismic Images with Deep Learning: Data Augmentation or Ensemble Learning?
81. Best Practices for Convolutional Neural Networks Applied to Visual Document Analysis
82. Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology prediction10.1093/mnras/stv632 ↗
83. Data augmentation method for improving the accuracy of human pose estimation with cropped images10.1016/j.patrec.2020.06.015 ↗
84. Random seismic noise attenuation based on data augmentation and CNN
85. Residual Learning of Cycle-GAN for Seismic Data Denoising10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3049479 ↗
86. Buslaev, A., Iglovikov, V.I., Khvedchenya, E., Parinov, A., and Kalinin, A.A. (2020). Albumentations: Fast and Flexible Image Augmentations. Information, 11.10.3390/info11020125 ↗
87. Random-Drop Data Augmentation of Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Mineral Prospectivity Mapping10.1007/s11053-020-09742-z ↗
88. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015). U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
89. Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., and Zagoruyko, S. (2020). End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13 ↗
90. Caron, M., Touvron, H., Misra, I., J’egou, H., Mairal, J., Bojanowski, P., and Joulin, A. (2021, January 11–17). Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00951 ↗
91. He, K., Chen, X., Xie, S., Li, Y., Doll’ar, P., and Girshick, R.B. (2021). Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01553 ↗
92. Alias-Free Generative Adversarial Networks
93. Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., and Guo, B. (2021, January 11–17). Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986 ↗
94. Deep Neural Networks for Acoustic Modeling in Speech Recognition: The Shared Views of Four Research Groups10.1109/MSP.2012.2205597 ↗
95. Structural data constraints for implicit modeling of folds10.1016/j.jsg.2017.09.013 ↗
96. Fault displacement modelling using 3D vector fields10.1007/s10596-011-9257-z ↗
97. Displacement geometry in the volume containing a single normal fault
98. Definition and classification of fault damage zones: A review and a new methodological approach10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.11.006 ↗
99. Distributions of cumulative displacement and seismic slip on a single normal fault surface10.1016/0191-8141(87)90012-5 ↗
100. Displacement gradients on fault surfaces10.1016/0191-8141(89)90070-9 ↗