journal article·2022-07-15Open access

Evaluating the Benefits of Collaborative VR Review for Maintenance Documentation and Risk Assessment

Hanna Heinonen, Alisa Burova, Sanni Siltanen, Jussi Lähteenmäki, Jaakko Hakulinen, Markku Turunen

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 14

Abstract

Technical documentation creation is a collaborative process involving several departments in R&D. Even though virtual reality (VR) has been demonstrated to facilitate industrial collaboration and advance the product development lifecycle in earlier studies, it has not been utilized for technical documentation review and risk assessment processes in industrial companies. This article presents a case study where the benefits of VR to maintenance documentation reviews and risk assessments were studied. The virtual reality environment was tested by nine domain experts from an industrial company in a user study that replicated their actual real-life industrial collaboration tasks. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected during the study. Our findings show that collaborative VR has the potential to enhance the documentation review and risk assessment processes. Overall, the concept of using virtual reality for documentation review and risk assessment processes was rated positively by participants, and even though further development is needed for the review tools, VR was viewed as a concept that facilitates collaboration, enhances the current review practices, and increases spatial understanding. The benefits of VR are evident, especially for geographically scattered teams that rarely meet face-to-face or do not have access to the actual physical equipment. In cases where traditional means of communication are not enough, process improvements are needed for documentation review and risk assessment processes, and our proposed solution is VR.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Technology Assessment and Management · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

KONE Corporation, Myllykatu 3, 05830 Hyvinkää, Finland

Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland

Funding

Business Finland Human Optimized XR (HUMOR) co-innovation project

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. (2022, June 20). KONE Corporation—Improving the Flow of Urban Life. Available online: https://www.kone.com/en/.
2. Hackos, J.T. (1994). Managing Your Documentation Projects, Wiley.
3. Jayaprakash, S. (2008). Technical Writing, Himalaya.
4. Stock, I., Weber, M., and Steinmeier, E. (2005, January 21–23). Metadata based authoring for technical documentation. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication Documenting & Designing for Pervasive Information—SIGDOC ’05, Coventry, UK.10.1145/1085313.1085330 ↗
5. Analyzing the Potential of Virtual Reality for Engineering Design Review10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.018 ↗
6. ONESVIEW: An Integrated System for One-Stop Virtual Design Review10.1177/1063293X10361624 ↗
7. Applications of Virtual Reality in Maintenance during the Industrial Product Lifecycle: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.07.007 ↗
8. An Empirical Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Collaborative Immersive Virtual Reality Systems for Designing Information Architecture of Software Systems10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.009 ↗
9. Virtual Reality-Integrated Workflow in BIM-Enabled Projects Collaboration and Design Review: A Case Study10.1186/s40327-018-0065-6 ↗
10. A Virtual Environment for the Design and Simulated Construction of Prefabricated Buildings10.1007/s10055-003-0107-8 ↗
11. Toward an Integrated CAD Assembly Sequence Planning Solution10.1177/0954406214564412 ↗
12. Schwarz, S., Regal, G., Kempf, M., and Schatz, R. (2020, January 25). Learning success in immersive virtual reality training environments: Practical evidence from automotive assembly. Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, Tallinn, Estonia.10.1145/3419249.3420182 ↗
13. Multi-user industrial training and education environment10.1007/978-3-319-95282-6_38 ↗
14. Burova, A., Mäkelä, J., Hakulinen, J., Keskinen, T., Heinonen, H., Siltanen, S., and Turunen, M. (2020, January 21). Utilizing VR and Gaze Tracking to Develop AR Solutions for Industrial Maintenance. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1145/3313831.3376405 ↗
15. Stephanidis, C. (2018, January 15–20). ExProtoVAR: A Lightweight Tool for Experience-Focused Prototyping of Augmented Reality Applications Using Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the HCI International 2018—Posters’ Extended Abstracts, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
16. An Industry Case Study: Investigating Early Design Decision Making in Virtual Reality10.1115/1.4034267 ↗
17. Wolfartsberger, J., Zenisek, J., Sievi, C., and Silmbroth, M. (November, January 31). A Virtual Reality Supported 3D Environment for Engineering Design Review. Proceedings of the 2017 23rd International Conference on Virtual System & Multimedia (VSMM), Dublin, Ireland.10.1109/VSMM.2017.8346288 ↗
18. Berni, A., and Borgianni, Y. (2020). Applications of Virtual Reality in Engineering and Product Design: Why, What, How, When and Where. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9071064 ↗
19. A Collaborative Apparel New Product Development Process Model Using Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Technologies as Enablers10.1080/17543266.2018.1462858 ↗
20. Collaborative Virtual Environments: An Introductory Review of Issues and Systems10.1007/BF01409793 ↗
21. Bailey, J.O., and Bailenson, J.N. (2014). Virtual Reality and Collaboration, Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199942237.013.007 ↗
22. CoVR: Cloud-Based Multiuser Virtual Reality Headset System for Project Communication of Remote Users10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001426 ↗
23. Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Communication for Construction Projects10.1007/s12205-019-0898-0 ↗
24. Collaborative Virtual Reality as an Adaptable Boundary Object in the Design Phase of Facility Life Cycle10.5220/0010020200630075 ↗
25. Multiuser Immersive Virtual Reality Application for Real-Time Remote Collaboration to Enhance Design Review Process in the Social Distancing Era
26. Supporting Teamwork in Industrial Virtual Reality Applications10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.016 ↗
27. Becerril Palma, P. (2021). Enhancing Lean and Agile Ways of Working Using an Asymmetric Multi-User Virtual Reality Setup. [Master’s Thesis, Tampere University].
28. Gamlin, A., Breedon, P., and Medjdoub, B. (2014, January 16–17). Immersive virtual reality deployment in a lean manufacturing environment. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Interactive Technologies and Games, Nottingham, UK.10.1109/iTAG.2014.13 ↗
29. Nevo, S., and Chengalur-Smith, I. (2011, January 4–7). Enhancing the Performance of Software Development Virtual Teams through the Use of Agile Methods: A Pilot Study. Proceedings of the 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, USA.10.1109/HICSS.2011.186 ↗
30. Schäfer, A., Reis, G., and Stricker, D. (2021). A Survey on Synchronous Augmented, Virtual and Mixed Reality Remote Collaboration Systems. ArXiv.10.1145/3533376 ↗
31. Siltanen, S., Heinonen, H., Burova, A., and Turunen, M. (December, January 29). Reimagining Innovation for Remote, Distributed Teams with Collaborative Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the ISPIM “Reconnect, Rediscover, Reimagine”, Valencia, Spain.
32. (2022, May 15). Defining Technical Communication. Available online: https://www.stc.org/about-stc/defining-technical-communication/.
33. Developing Technical Documentation the Smart Way
34. Pringle, A.S., and O’Keefe, S. (2000). Technical Writing 101: A Real-World Guide to Planning and Writing Technical Documentation, Scriptorium Press.
35. (2006). Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on Machinery, and Amending Directive 95/16/EC (Recast). Off. J. Eur. Union, 49, L157.
36. (2022, May 18). Directive 2014/33/EU—Lifts and Safety Components for Lifts (Recast) | Safety and Health at Work EU-OSHA. Available online: https://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/directive/directive-201433eu-lifts-and-safety-components-lifts-recast.
37. (2022, May 18). EN 13015:2001+A1:2008—Maintenance for Lifts and Escalators—Rules for Maintenance Instructions. Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/07ca9a23-173d-445a-839e-65a429305ab6/en-13015-2001a1-2008.
38. (2022, May 18). 14:00–17:00 ISO 12100:2010. Available online: https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/05/15/51528.html.
39. (2022, May 18). 14:00–17:00 ISO 14798:2009. Available online: https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/04/60/46048.html.
40. Risk Analysis (Assessment) Using Virtual Reality Technology—Effects of Subjective Experience: An Experimental Study10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.115 ↗
41. Slezak, R.J., Keren, N., and Finseth, T. (2018, January 26). Virtual Reality Application for Enhancing Risk Assessment Skills. Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), Orlando, FL, USA. Paper No. 18280.
42. Da Silva, A.G., Mendes Gomes, M.V., and Winkler, I. (2022). Virtual Reality and Digital Human Modeling for Ergonomic Assessment in Industrial Product Development: A Patent and Literature Review. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12031084 ↗
43. Application of Virtual Reality in Task Training in the Construction Manufacturing Industry
44. Virtual Reality as a New Approach for Risk Taking Assessment10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02532 ↗
45. Comparing Immersive Virtual Reality and Powerpoint as Methods for Delivering Safety Training: Impacts on Risk Perception, Learning, and Decision Making10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.021 ↗
46. Burova, A., Heinonen, H., Becerril Palma, P., Keskinen, T., Hakulinen, J., Opas, V., Mäkelä, J., Ronkainen, K., Siltanen, S., and Raisamo, R. (2021, January 1–3). Toward Efficient Academia-Industry Collaboration: A Case Study of Joint VR System Development. Proceedings of the Academic Mindtrek 2021 (Mindtrek ’21), Tampere, Finland.10.1145/3464327.3464367 ↗
47. Burova, A., Palma, P.B., Truong, P., Mäkelä, J., Heinonen, H., Hakulinen, J., Ronkainen, K., Raisamo, R., Turunen, M., and Siltanen, S. (2022). Distributed Asymmetric Virtual Reality in Industrial Context: Enhancing the Collaboration of Geographically Dispersed Teams in the Pipeline of Maintenance Method Development and Technical Documentation Creation. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12083728 ↗
48. Asynchronous Industrial Collaboration: How Virtual Reality and Virtual Tools Aid the Process of Maintenance Method Development and Documentation Creation10.1016/j.compind.2022.103663 ↗
49. Turunen, M., Hakulinen, J., Melto, A., Heimonen, T., Keskinen, T., and Hella, J. (2009, January 6–10). SUXES—User Experience Evaluation Method for Spoken and Multimodal Interaction. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Brighton, UK.10.21437/Interspeech.2009-676 ↗
50. Clergeaud, D., Roo, J.S., Hachet, M., and Guitton, P. (2017, January 8). Towards Seamless Interaction between Physical and Virtual Locations for Asymmetric Collaboration. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.10.1145/3139131.3139165 ↗
51. Bleakley, A., Wade, V., and Cowan, B.R. (2020, January 22). Finally a Case for Collaborative VR?: The Need to Design for Remote Multi-Party Conversations. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, Bilbao, Spain.10.1145/3405755.3406144 ↗
52. Virtual Reality Training System for Maintenance and Operation of High-Voltage Overhead Power Lines10.1007/s10055-015-0280-6 ↗
53. “Nice to See You Virtually”: Thoughtful Design and Evaluation of Virtual Avatar of the Other User in AR and VR Based Telexistence Systems10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100457 ↗
54. Piumsomboon, T., Lee, Y., Lee, G., and Billinghurst, M. (2017, January 27). CoVAR: A Collaborative Virtual and Augmented Reality System for Remote Collaboration. Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH Asia 2017 Emerging Technologies, Bangkok, Thailand.10.1145/3132818.3132822 ↗