Human-Related Hazardous Events Assessment for Suffocation on Ships by Integrating Bayesian Network and Complex Network
Source abstract
Abstract
To investigate the human-related factors associated with suffocation on ships during docking repair, a comprehensive analysis model composed of a Bayesian network (BN) and a complex network (CN) is proposed in the present study. The principle of event tree analysis (ETA) is firstly applied to identify the hazardous events involved in the accident according to the accident report, based on which the CN would then be developed with the logic relationships among the hazardous events. The improved K-shell decomposition algorithm is utilized to determine the criticality of nodes in the CN, the results of which are then used to develop the BN model within the framework of a human factor analysis classification system (HFACS). Then, the developed BN model can be simulated with the probability distribution of all the nodes within the BN, which are obtained on the basis of node criticality. Finally, the results of the BN simulation are interpreted from the perspectives of a brief analysis, backward analysis and sensitivity analysis. The results are verified with existing studies and the accident investigation report issued by authority, which are presented as evidence to verify the effectiveness of the proposed methodology to evaluate the human-related risk involved in the suffocation on ships. The methodology proposed in this study integrates the advantages of BN and CN to investigate the human-related hazardous events involved in maritime accidents, which can be seen as the main innovation of this work.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Maritime Navigation and Safety · Risk and Safety Analysis · Occupational Health and Safety Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Marine Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
School of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
COSCO Shipping Seafarer Management Co., Ltd., Dalian Branch, Dalian 116026, China
Funding
National Key Research and Development program of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universitie · Program of Innovative Talents of Dalian
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Prediction of occupational risk in the shipbuilding industry using multivariable linear regression and genetic algorithm analysis10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.010 ↗
2. Axiomatic Design for Lean-oriented Occupational Health and Safety systems: An application in shipbuilding industry10.1016/j.cie.2016.08.007 ↗
3. Analysis of operational safety risks in shipbuilding using failure mode and effect analysis approach10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106214 ↗
4. Shipyard fatalities in Turkey10.1016/j.ssci.2011.12.037 ↗
5. Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) of Singapore (2022, April 20). Workplace Safety and Health (Amendment) Act 2017, Available online: https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Acts-Supp/44-2017/Published/20171226?DocDate=20171226.
6. ILO (2022, April 20). ILO Code of Practice: Safety and Health in Shipbuilding and Ship Repair. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---safework/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_107897.pdf.
7. Unsafety and unions in Singapore’s state-led industrialization, 1965–199410.1080/0023656X.2019.1655141 ↗
8. Testing the boundaries between the Basel and MARPOL regimes: Are they complementary or mutually exclusive?10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.391 ↗
9. A tripartite approach to operator-error evaluation in ballast water management system operation10.1016/j.ergon.2018.12.002 ↗
10. Liu, Y., Ma, X., Qiao, W., Luo, H., and He, P. (2022). Human Factor Risk Modeling for Shipyard Operation by Mapping Fuzzy Fault Tree into Bayesian Network. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19010297 ↗
11. Major industrial accidents in Korea: The characteristics and implication of statistics 1996–201110.1002/prs.11551 ↗
12. Individual and workplace factors related to fatal occupational accidents among shipyard workers in Turkey10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.012 ↗
13. An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (anfis) model for assessing occupational risk in the shipbuilding industry10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.013 ↗
14. Quantitative Risk Assessment of Seafarers’ Nonfatal Injuries Due to Occupational Accidents Based on Bayesian Network Modeling10.1111/risa.13374 ↗
15. A semi-quantitative assessment of occupational risks using bow-tie representation10.1016/j.ssci.2009.08.008 ↗
16. Risk evaluation of pin jig work unit in shipbuilding by using fuzzy AHP method
17. Application of human reliability analysis to repair & maintenance operations on-board ships: The case of HFO purifier overhauling10.1016/j.apor.2019.04.019 ↗
18. An investigation into the rate and mechanism of incident of work-related confined space fatalities10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.014 ↗
19. Occupational safety during interventions in confined spaces10.1016/j.ssci.2015.05.003 ↗
20. Confined space fatalities in Virginia10.1016/0022-4375(93)90011-B ↗
21. Development of a human reliability assessment technique for t-he maintenance procedures of marine and offshore operations10.1016/j.jlp.2017.10.015 ↗
22. Human factors risk assessment and management: Process safety in engineering10.1016/j.psep.2017.11.018 ↗
23. Human factors analysis for maritime accidents based on a dynamic fuzzy Bayesian Network10.1111/risa.13444 ↗
24. Analysis of accidents t-hrough combination of CAST and TRACEr techniques: A case study10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104639 ↗
25. A methodology to evaluate human factors contributed to maritime accident by mapping fuzzy FT into ANN based on HFACS10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106892 ↗
26. An, J., Liu, Y., Sun, Y., and Liu, C. (2020). Impact of work-family conflict, job stress and job satisfaction on seafarer performance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17072191 ↗
27. A methodology to quantify the risk propagation of hazardous events for ship grounding accidents based on directed CN10.1016/j.ress.2022.108334 ↗
28. Shappell, S.A., and Wiegmann, D.A. (2022, April 20). The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System-HFACS. Available online: https://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1777&context=publication.
29. Human error and commercial aviation accidents: An analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system10.1518/001872007X312469 ↗
30. Risk assessment in ship hull structure production using FMEA
31. Clustering risk assessment method for shipbuilding industry10.1108/IMDS-06-2014-0193 ↗
32. A hybrid accident analysis method to assess potential navigational contingencies: The case of ship grounding10.1016/j.ssci.2015.06.019 ↗
33. Incorporation of human factors into ship co-llision risk models focusing on human centred design aspects10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.007 ↗
34. A marine accident analysing model to evaluate potential operational causes in cargo ships10.1016/j.ssci.2016.09.010 ↗
35. Application of Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis (FFTA) to maritime industry: A risk analysing of ship mooring operation10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.03.029 ↗
36. Evaluation of human error contribution to oil tanker collision using fault tree analysis and modified fuzzy Bayesian Network based CREAM10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.03.031 ↗
37. Maritime accident prevention strategy formulation from a human factor perspective using Bayesian Networks and TOPSIS10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107544 ↗
38. Assessing and mapping maritime transportation risk based on spatial fuzzy multicriteria decision making: A case study in the South China sea10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107403 ↗
39. An analysis of severity of oil spill caused by vessel accidents10.1016/j.trd.2020.102662 ↗
40. Risk analysis of grounding accidents by mapping a fault tree into a bayesian network10.1016/j.apor.2021.102764 ↗
41. A methodology to assess the causation relationship of seafarers’ unsafe acts for ship grounding accidents based on Bayesian SEM10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106189 ↗
42. Resilience evaluation of maritime liquid cargo emergency respons-e by integrating FRAM and a BN: A case study of a propylene leakage emergency scenario10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110584 ↗
43. (2022, April 20). Office of Emergency Management of Shanghai, 2021, Available online: http://yjglj.sh.gov.cn/xxgk/xxgkml/dcpghtj/dcbg/20210929/02d576e5363f4b4e9b26738145401093.html.
44. Complex networks: Structure and dynamics10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 ↗
45. A Survey on Centrality Metrics and Their Network Resilience Analysis10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3094196 ↗
46. Qiao, W., Ma, X.X., Liu, Y., and Lan, H. (2021). Resilience assessment for the northern sea route based on a fuzzy Bayesian network. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11083619 ↗