Framework for Assessing Ethical Aspects of Algorithms and Their Encompassing Socio-Technical System
Source abstract
Abstract
In the transition to a data-driven society, organizations have introduced data-driven algorithms that often apply artificial intelligence. In this research, an ethical framework was developed to ensure robustness and completeness and to avoid and mitigate potential public uproar. We take a socio-technical perspective, i.e., view the algorithm embedded in an organization with infrastructure, rules, and procedures as one to-be-designed system. The framework consists of five ethical principles: beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice, and explicability. It can be used during the design for identification of relevant concerns. The framework has been validated by applying it to real-world fraud detection cases: Systeem Risico Indicatie (SyRI) of the Dutch government and the algorithm of the municipality of Amersfoort. The former is a controversial country-wide algorithm that was ultimately prohibited by court. The latter is an algorithm in development. In both cases, it proved effective in identifying all ethical risks. For SyRI, all concerns found in the media were also identified by the framework, mainly focused on transparency of the entire socio-technical system. For the municipality of Amersfoort, the framework highlighted risks regarding the amount of sensitive data and communication to and with the public, presenting a more thorough overview compared to the risks the media raised.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
M&I/Partners, 3708 Zeist, The Netherlands
Faculty of EEMCS, University of Twente, 7522 Enschede, The Netherlands
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. (2021, February 28). Domo. Data Never Sleeps 6th Edition. Available online: https://www.domo.com/assets/downloads/18_domo_data-never-sleeps-6+verticals.pdf.
2. Doove, S., and Otten, D. (2020, February 04). Verkennend Onderzoek Naar Het Gebruik van Algoritmen Binnen Overheidsorganisaties. Available online: https://kennisopenbaarbestuur.nl/media/255836/verkennend-onderzoek-naar-het-gebruik-van-algoritmen-binnen-overheidsorganisaties.pdf.
3. Wong, P.H., and Simon, J. (2021, September 28). Thinking about ‘Ethics’ in the Ethics of AI. Available online: https://revistaidees.cat/en/thinking-about-ethics-in-the-ethics-of-ai/.
4. (2021, July 01). Raad van State. Participatiewet (NL). Available online: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0015703/2021-07-01#Hoofdstuk2.
5. van Geldrop, A., and de Vries, T. (2015). Fraude Loont… Nog Steeds. Number NUR 980 in STT-Publicatie, Stichting Toekomstbeeld der Techniek, University of Twente. Available online: https://5dok.net/document/wq2vdery-fraude-loont-nog-steeds.html.
6. Hoe de toeslagenaffaire kon gebeuren10.1007/s41190-020-0260-2 ↗
7. de Jonge, A. (2021, September 28). SyRI Grootste Privacyschender 2019. Available online: https://www.binnenlandsbestuur.nl/sociaal/nieuws/syri-grootste-privacyschender-2019.11606010.lynkx.
8. (2021, November 24). Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal. Vragenuur (NL). Available online: https://debatgemist.tweedekamer.nl/debatten/vragenuur-257?start=622.
9. Applicability of Artificial Intelligence in Different Fields of Life
10. Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scans10.1038/s42256-021-00307-0 ↗
11. Sociotechnical System Principles and Guidelines: Past and Present10.1177/0021886395311009 ↗
12. AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 ↗
13. van Wynsberghe, A., Been, H., and van Keulen, M. (2020, February 05). To Use or Not to Use: Guidelines for Researchers Using Data from Online Social Networking Sites. RRI, Rict Responsible Innovation, UK. Available online: https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/to-use-or-not-to-use-guidelines-for-researchers-using-data-from-o.
14. (2021, September 28). Partnership on AI; Our Tenets. Available online: https://partnershiponai.org/about/.
15. (2021, September 28). Utrecht Data School. Data Ethics Decision Aid. Available online: https://dataschool.nl/deda/?lang=en.
16. ECP—Platform for the Information Society (2020, February 04). Artificial Intelligence Impact Assessment. Available online: https://ecp.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Artificial-Intelligence-Impact-Assessment-English.pdf.
17. Future of Life Institute (2021, September 28). Asilomar AI Principles. Available online: https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/.
18. European Commission (2021, September 28). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Available online: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai.
19. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (2020, February 07). Statement on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and “Autonomous” Systems. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/european_group_on_ethics_ege/ege_ai_statement_2018.pdf.
20. When Machine Learning Meets Privacy: A Survey and Outlook
21. Cyber security meets artificial intelligence: A survey10.1631/FITEE.1800573 ↗
22. Privacy and Artificial Intelligence10.1109/TAI.2021.3088084 ↗
23. Myths and Fallacies of ”Personally Identifiable Information”10.1145/1743546.1743558 ↗
24. A firm foundation for private data analysis10.1145/1866739.1866758 ↗
25. Federated Learning: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3013541 ↗
26. A survey on federated learning10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106775 ↗
27. Value-Sensitive Design10.1145/242485.242493 ↗
28. Value sensitive design as a formative framework10.1007/s10676-021-09579-x ↗
29. Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights: A Business Ethical Assessment10.1017/bhj.2019.28 ↗
30. Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., and McCallum, A. (2019, January 5–10). Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy.10.18653/v1/P19-1355 ↗
31. Hardware and Software Optimizations for Accelerating Deep Neural Networks: Survey of Current Trends, Challenges, and the Road Ahead10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3039858 ↗
32. Capra, M., Bussolino, B., Marchisio, A., Shafique, M., Masera, G., and Martina, M. (2020). An Updated Survey of Efficient Hardware Architectures for Accelerating Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Future Internet, 12.10.3390/fi12070113 ↗
33. Bias in computer systems10.1145/230538.230561 ↗
34. Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases10.1126/science.aal4230 ↗
35. Blodgett, S.L., Barocas, S., Daumé, H., and Wallach, H. (2019, January 5–10). Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy.10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.485 ↗
36. Hovy, D., and Prabhumoye, S. (2021). Five sources of bias in natural language processing. Lang. Linguist. Compass, 15.10.1111/lnc3.12432 ↗
37. Gonen, H., and Goldberg, Y. (2019, January 2–7). Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings However, do not Remove Them. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, MN, USA.
38. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0 ↗
39. European Union Regulations on Algorithmic Decision-Making and a “Right to Explanation”
40. Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052 ↗
41. Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x ↗
42. Nauta, M., van Bree, R., and Seifert, C. (2021, January 19–25). Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-Grained Image Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Online.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01469 ↗
43. Seifert, C., Scherzinger, S., and Wiese, L. (2019, January 12–14). Towards Generating Consumer Labels for Machine Learning Models. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE First International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI), Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1109/CogMI48466.2019.00033 ↗
44. van Bruxvoort, X. (2021). Towards the Design of Legally Privacy-Proof and Ethically Justified Data-Driven Fraud Risk Assessment Algorithms. [Master’s Thesis, University of Twente]. Available online: http://essay.utwente.nl/85984/.
45. (2019). The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent System. Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-Being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems, IEEE. [1st ed.]. Available online: https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-standards/standards/web/documents/other/ead1e.pdf.
46. Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): A Guide for Authors and Reviewers10.1148/ryai.2020200029 ↗
47. Computers Play the Beer Game: Can Artificial Agents Manage Supply Chains?10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00019-2 ↗
48. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
49. (2019). PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies. Ann. Intern. Med., 170, 51–58.10.7326/M18-1376 ↗
50. (2020, May 01). Ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid. Kamerbrief over Waarborgen Tegen Risico’s van Data-Analyses Door de Overheid-Kamerstuk-Rijksoverheid.nl. Available online: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/kamerstukken/2019/10/08/tk-waarborgen-tegen-risico-s-van-data-analyses-door-de-overheid.
51. Sohail, S.A., Bukhsh, F.A., van Keulen, M., and Krabbe, J.G. (2021, January 4–5). Identifying Materialized Privacy Claims of Clinical-Care Metadata Share using Process-Mining and REA ontology. Proceedings of the 15th Int’l Workshop on Value Modelling and Business Ontologies, VMBO 2021, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Online. Available online: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2835/paper12.pdf.
52. Haag, R.D. (2020, September 28). Court Case on Systeem Risico Indicatie (SyRI). Available online: https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2020:1878.
53. (2021, September 30). Bijvoorbaatverdacht. Wat Is SyRI?. Available online: https://bijvoorbaatverdacht.nl/wat-is-syri/.
54. Hofmans, T. (2021, September 30). Moet SyRI Worden Stopgezet?. Uitkeringsfraude Bestrijden met een Algoritme, Available online: https://tweakers.net/reviews/7452/2/moet-syri-worden-stopgezet-fraude-bestrijden-met-een-algoritme-inzet-en-kritiek.html.
55. (2021, September 30). Bijvoorbaatverdacht. Bart de Koning over de Dubbele Moraal in de Fraudebestrijding. Available online: https://bijvoorbaatverdacht.nl/gedachte-burgers-potentiele-fraudeurs-zit-systemen-als-syri-gebakken/.
56. Burg, P. (2021, September 30). SyRI Ligt nu al Onder Vuur. Available online: https://www.computable.nl/artikel/opinie/computable-next/6829101/1509029/syri-ligt-nu-al-onder-vuur.htm.
57. Janssen, G. (2021, September 30). Maxim Februari: ‘Je Moet soms Flink Tegen de Wet aan Duwen’. Wordt Vervolgd. Available online: https://www.amnesty.nl/wordt-vervolgd/je-moet-soms-flink-tegen-de-wet-aan-duwen.
58. Teitsma, T. (2021, September 30). FNV op Ramkoers met Nissewaard over Fraude-Opsporing: Rechtszaak Dreigt. Algemeen Dagblad, 27 April 2020. Available online: https://www.ad.nl/voorne-putten/fnv-op-ramkoers-met-nissewaard-over-fraude-opsporing-rechtszaak-dreigt~a4bd9b0c/.
59. Teitsma, T. (2021, September 30). Totta Data Lab Blijft Bijstandsfraude Opsporen, Ondanks ‘Ondoorzichtige’ Controles. Algemeen Dagblad, 17 April 2020. Available online: https://www.ad.nl/voorne-putten/totta-data-lab-blijft-bijstandsfraude-opsporen-ondanks-ondoorzichtige-controles~a87b4743/.
60. van Dijk, M. (2021, September 30). Nissewaard Belooft Burger Transparantie over ‘Fraudescore’. Available online: https://www.fnv.nl/nieuwsbericht/sectornieuws/uitkeringsgerechtigden/2020/06/fnv-sceptisch-nissewaard-belooft-burger-transparan.
61. de Jonge, A. (2021, September 30). ‘Rookgordijn’ Rondom Fraudesysteem Nissewaard. Binnenlands Bestuur. Available online: https://www.binnenlandsbestuur.nl/sociaal/nieuws/rookgordijn-rondom-fraudesysteem-nissewaard.13026523.lynkx.
62. Huissen, R. (2021, September 30). Nissewaard Weigert Alsnog Beloftes Transparantie na te Komen. Platform Burgerrechten. Available online: https://platformburgerrechten.nl/2020/09/22/nissewaard-weigert-alsnog-beloftes-transparantie-na-te-komen/?s=nissewaard.