journal article·2021-10-19Open access

Multi-Objective Optimization of CO2 Sequestration in Heterogeneous Saline Aquifers under Geological Uncertainty

Changhyup Park, Jaehwan Oh, Suryeom Jo, Ilsik Jang, Kun Sang Lee

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 20

Abstract

This paper presents a Pareto-based multi-objective optimization for operating CO2 sequestration with a multi-well system under geological uncertainty; the optimal well allocation, i.e., the optimal allocation of CO2 rates at injection wells, is obtained when there is minimum operation pressure as well as maximum sequestration efficiency. The distance-based generalized sensitivity analysis evaluates the influence of geological uncertainty on the amount of CO2 sequestration through four injection wells at 3D heterogeneous saline aquifers. The spatial properties significantly influencing the trapping volume, in descending order of influence, are mean sandstone porosity, mean sandstone permeability, shale volume ratio, and the Dykstra–Parsons coefficient of permeability. This confirms the importance of storable capacity and heterogeneity in quantitatively analyzing the trapping mechanisms. Multi-objective optimization involves the use of two aquifer models relevant to heterogeneity; one is highly heterogeneous and the other is less so. The optimal well allocations converge to non-dominated solutions and result in a large injection through one specific well, which generates the wide spread of a highly mobile CO2 plume. As the aquifer becomes heterogeneous with a large shale volume and a high Dykstra–Parsons coefficient, the trapping performances of the combined structural and residual sequestration plateau relatively early. The results discuss the effects of spatial heterogeneity on achieving CO2 geological storage, and they provide an operation strategy including multi-objective optimization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods · Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Energy and Resources Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea

Geo-ICT Convergence Research Team, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon 34132, Korea

Department of Energy and Resources Engineering, Chosun University, Gwangju 61425, Korea

Department of Earth Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 06763, Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea · Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Coello, C.A.C., Lamont, G.B., and Van Veldhuizen, D.A. (2007). Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, Springer. [2nd ed.].
2. Comparison of multi-objective optimization methodologies for engineering applications10.1016/j.camwa.2011.11.057 ↗
3. Comparison between MOEA/D and NSGA-III on a set of novel many and multi-objective benchmark problems with challenging difficulties10.1016/j.swevo.2019.02.003 ↗
4. Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221 ↗
5. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
6. NSGA-II with simple modification works well a wide variety of many-objective problems10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3032240 ↗
7. Prediction of nonlinear production performance in waterflooding project using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm10.1260/0144-5987.29.2.129 ↗
8. Development of Pareto-based evolutionary model integrated with dynamic goal programming and successive linear objective reduction10.1016/j.asoc.2015.06.007 ↗
9. An improved nondominated sorting genetic algorithm for multiobjective problem10.1155/2016/1519542 ↗
10. Kim, J., Kang, J.M., Park, C., Park, Y., and Lim, S. (2017). Multi-objective history matching with a proxy model for the characterization of production performances at the shale gas reservoir. Energies, 10.10.3390/en10040579 ↗
11. Geological factors controlling CO2 storage capacity and performances: Case studies based on experience with heterogeneity in oil and gas reservoirs applied to CO2 storage10.1007/s00254-007-0940-2 ↗
12. Oh, J., Park, C., and Ahn, T. (2019, January 9–13). Sensitivity analysis of rock properties for CO2 sequestration into heterogeneous saline aquifers. In Proceeding of the 2019 AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA. Available online: https://agu-do03.confex.com/agu/fm19/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/562633.
13. Quantifying the effects of depositional environment on deep saline formation CO2 storage efficiency and rate10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.12.006 ↗
14. Integrated data assimilation and distance-based model selection with ensemble Kalman filter for characterization of uncertain geological scenarios10.1007/s11053-019-09489-2 ↗
15. Quantifying asymmetric parameter interactions in sensitivity analysis: Application to reservoir modeling10.1007/s11004-014-9530-5 ↗
16. DGSA: A Matlab toolbox for distance-based generalized sensitivity analysis of geoscientific computer experiments10.1016/j.cageo.2016.08.021 ↗
17. Scheidt, C., Li, L., and Caers, J. (2018). Quantifying Uncertainty in Subsurface Systems, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781119325888 ↗
18. Heterogeneity and prior uncertainty investigation using a joint heat and solute tracer experiment in alluvial sediments10.3389/feart.2019.00108 ↗
19. Direct forecasting of global and spatial model parameters from dynamic data10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104567 ↗
20. Review of CO2 storage efficiency in deep saline aquifers10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007 ↗
21. A comprehensive review of value-added CO2 sequestration in subsurface saline aquifers10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103437 ↗
22. Characteristics of CO2 sequestration in saline aquifers10.1007/s12182-010-0010-3 ↗
23. A study of methodologies for CO2 storage capacity estimation of saline aquifers10.1016/j.fuel.2011.07.004 ↗
24. Jo, S., Park, C., Ryu, D.W., and Ahn, S. (2021). Adaptive surrogate estimation with spatial features using a deep convolutional autoencoder for CO2 geological sequestration. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14020413 ↗
25. Detecting leakage of brine or CO2 through abandoned wells in a geological sequestration operation using pressure monitoring wells10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.292 ↗
26. Application of binary permeability fields for the study of CO2 leakage from geological carbon storage in saline aquifers of the Michigan basin10.1007/s11004-017-9706-x ↗
27. Actie CO2 reservoir management for carbon storage: Analysis of operational strategies to relieve pressure buildup and improve injectivity10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.007 ↗
28. Development of robust pressure management strategies for geological CO2 sequestration10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.06.012 ↗
29. Pressure management via brine extraction in geological CO2 storage: Adaptive optimization strategies under poorly characterized reservoir conditions10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.02.009 ↗
30. Enhancing capillary trapping effectiveness through proper time scheduling of injection of supercritical CO2 in heterogeneous formations10.1002/ghg.1646 ↗
31. Optimization of well placement, CO2 injection rates, and brine cycling for geological carbon sequestration10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.06.003 ↗
32. Tadjer, A., and Bratvold, R.B. (2021). Managing uncertainty in geological CO2 storage using Bayesian evidential learning. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14061557 ↗
33. Petvipusit, R., Elsheikh, A.H., Laforce, T., King, P.R., and Blunt, M.J. (October, January 30). A robust multi-criterion optimization of CO2 sequestration under model uncertainty. Proceedings of the Second EAGE Sustainable Earth Sciences Conference and Exhibition, Pau, France. cp-361-00015.
34. Geologic CO2 sequestration and permeability uncertainty in a highly heterogeneous reservoir10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.02.001 ↗
35. A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches10.1007/s12182-019-0340-8 ↗
36. Controlled CO2 injection into heterogeneous geological formations for improved solubility and residual trapping10.1029/2011WR010455 ↗
37. Modeling, simulation, and optimization of geological sequestration of CO210.1115/1.4043164 ↗
38. Estimating the pressure-limited CO2 injection and storage capacity of the United States saline formations: Effect of the presence of hydrocarbon reservoirs10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.09.011 ↗
39. Effects of variable injection rate on reservoir responses and implications for CO2 storage in saline aquifers10.1002/ghg.1888 ↗
40. CO2 injectivity into brine aquifers: Why relative permeability matters as much as absolute permeability10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.089 ↗
41. Co-optimization of carbon dioxide storage and enhanced oil recovery in oil reservoirs using a multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II)10.1007/s12182-014-0362-1 ↗
42. Multi-objective optimization for the deployment of carbon capture utilization and storage supply chain considering economic and environmental performance10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122481 ↗
43. Ma, Y.Z. (2019). Quantitative Geosciences: Data Analytics, Geostatistics, Reservoir Characterization and Modeling, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-17860-4 ↗
44. Lie, K.-A. (2019). An Introduction to Reservoir Simulation Using MATLAB/GNU Octave: User Guide for the MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (MRST), Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108591416 ↗
45. Open-source MATLAB implementation of consistent discretisations on complex grids10.1007/s10596-011-9244-4 ↗