journal article·2021-03-14Open access

Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses of Human and Organizational Risks in Fire Safety Systems for High-Rise Residential Buildings with Probabilistic T-H-O-Risk Methodology

Samson Tan, Darryl Weinert, Paul Joseph, Khalid Moinuddin

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 6

Abstract

Given that existing fire risk models often ignore human and organizational errors (HOEs) ultimately leading to underestimation of risks by as much as 80%, this study employs a technical-human-organizational risk (T-H-O-Risk) methodology to address knowledge gaps in current state-of-the-art probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) for high-rise residential buildings with the following goals: (1) Develop an improved PRA methodology to address concerns that deterministic, fire engineering approaches significantly underestimate safety levels that lead to inaccurate fire safety levels. (2) Enhance existing fire safety verification methods by incorporating probabilistic risk approach and HOEs for (i) a more inclusive view of risk, and (ii) to overcome the deterministic nature of current verification methods. (3) Perform comprehensive sensitivity and uncertainty analyses to address uncertainties in numerical estimates used in fault tree/event trees, Bayesian network and system dynamics and their propagation in a probabilistic model. (4) Quantification of human and organizational risks for high-rise residential buildings which contributes towards a policy agenda in the direction of a sustainable, risk-based regulatory regime. This research contributes to the development of the next-generation building codes and risk assessment methodologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Risk and Safety Analysis · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Wind and Air Flow Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre for Environmental Safety and Risk Engineering, Victoria University, Melbourne 3000, Australia

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Investigations of Human and Organizational Factors in hazardous vapor accidents10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.040 ↗
2. Systematic review of human and organizational risks for probabilistic risk analysis in high-rise buildings10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.012 ↗
3. Fire Risk Assessment for Super High-rise Buildings10.1016/j.proeng.2014.04.071 ↗
4. Fire hazard in buildings: review, assessment and strategies for improving fire safety10.1108/PRR-12-2018-0033 ↗
5. Hackitt, J. (2018). Building a Safer Future—Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety: Final Report, Cm 9607, APS Group.
6. Hurley, M.J. (2016). SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, SFPE. [5th ed.].10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0 ↗
7. Data-theoretic methodology and computational platform to quantify organizational factors in socio-technical risk analysis10.1016/j.ress.2018.12.020 ↗
8. Incorporating organizational factors into probabilistic risk assessment of complex socio-technical systems: Principles and theoretical foundations10.1016/j.ssci.2008.12.008 ↗
9. Mohaghegh, Z. (2010, January 23–26). Combining System Dynamics and Bayesian Belief Networks for Socio-Technical Risk Analysis. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/ISI.2010.5484736 ↗
10. A hybrid algorithm for developing third generation HRA methods using simulator data, causal models, and cognitive science10.1016/j.ress.2019.106507 ↗
11. A paired comparison approach to improve the quantification of management influences in air transportation10.1016/j.ress.2012.12.001 ↗
12. Quantitative Risk Analysis of Offshore Fire and Explosion Based on the Analysis of Human and Organizational Factors10.1155/2015/813507 ↗
13. Meacham, B.J., Stromgren, M., and Van Hees, P. (2020). A holistic framework for development and assessment of risk-informed performance-based building regulation. Fire Mater.10.1002/fam.2930 ↗
14. A socio-technical system framework for risk-informed performance-based building regulation10.1080/09613218.2017.1299525 ↗
15. Keeping rail on track: preliminary findings on safety culture in Australian rail10.3233/WOR-2012-0124-4230 ↗
16. Penney, G., Habibi, D., and Cattani, M. (2020). The Handbook of Wildfire Engineering, Bushfire & Natural Hazards CRC.
17. The Need for Hierarchies of Acceptance Criteria for Probabilistic Risk Assessments in Fire Engineering10.1007/s10694-018-0746-7 ↗
18. British Standards Institution, and PD 7974-7:2003 (2003). Application of Fire Safety Engineering Principles to the Design of Buildings—Part 7.
19. Meacham, B.J., Tubbs, B., Bergeron, D., and Szigeti, F. (2003, January 20–23). Performance System Model—A Framework for Describing the Totality of Building Performance. Proceedings of the CIB-CTBUH International Conference on Tall Buildings: Strategies for Performance in the Aftermath of the World Trade Center, CIB and CTBUH, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
20. Fire Safety Verification Method—The Australia Research Experience10.1088/1742-6596/1107/4/042033 ↗
21. (2019). Fire Safety Verification Method—Handbook.
22. (2014). Verification Method: Framework for Fire Safety Design: For New Zealand Building Code Clauses C1-C6 Protection from Fire.
23. Meacham, B. (2018). Feasibility of a Centralized Hub for Verification of Complex Fire Engineered Solutions in Scotland.
24. Baker, G., Utstrand, J., and Norén, J. (2016). Probabilistic Method to Verify Fire Safety Design in Buildings, SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden.
25. Society of Fire Safety (Engineers Australia) (2020). SFS Fire Safety Verification Method Investigation, Engineers Australia, Society of Fire Safety.
26. Pau, D., Duncan, C., and Fleischmann, C. (2019). Pau Performance-Based Fire Engineering Design of a Heritage Building: McDougall House Case Study. Safety, 5.10.3390/safety5030045 ↗
27. Tan, S., Weinert, D., Joseph, P., and Moinuddin, K.A.M. (2020). Incorporation of technical, human and organizational risks in a dynamic probabilistic fire risk model for high-rise residential buildings. Fire Mater., 2872.10.1002/fam.2872 ↗
28. Tan, S., Weinert, D., Joseph, P., and Moinuddin, K.A.M. (2019, January 1–3). A dynamic probabilistic fire risk model incorporating technical, human and organizational risks for high-rise residential buildings. Proceedings of the Interflam 2019—Fire Science and Engineering Conference, Egham, UK.
29. Tan, S., Weinert, D., Joseph, P., and Moinuddin, K. (2020). Impact of Technical, Human, and Organizational Risks on Reliability of Fire Safety Systems in High-Rise Residential Buildings—Applications of an Integrated Probabilistic Risk Assessment Model. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10248918 ↗
30. Epistemic Uncertainty Propagation in Reliability Assessment of Complex Systems
31. Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00067-1 ↗
32. Tillander, K., and Keski-Rahkonen, O. (2003, January 16–21). The Ignition Frequency of Structural Fires in Fin-land 1996–1999. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, Worcester, MA, USA.10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.7-1051 ↗
33. Hybrid causal methodology and software platform for probabilistic risk assessment and safety monitoring of socio-technical systems10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.005 ↗
34. (2019). NPFA72 National Fire Alarm Code, National Fire Protection Association.
35. Wade, C., Baker, G., Frank, K., Robbins, A., Harrison, R., Spearpoint, M., and Fleischmann, C. (2013). B-RISK User Guide and Technical Manual, BRANZ. BRANZ study Report No 282.
36. An integration of human factors into quantitative risk analysis using Bayesian Belief Networks towards developing a ‘QRA+’10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104514 ↗
37. BSI, and PD 7974-7:2019 (2019). Application of Fire Safety Engineering Principles to the Design of Buildings—Part 7: Probabilistic Risk Assessment, British Standards Published Document.
38. Sun, M., Zheng, Z., and Gang, L. (2018). Uncertainty Analysis of the Estimated Risk in Formal Safety Assessment. Sustain. J. Rec., 10.10.3390/su10020321 ↗
39. Statistical screening of system dynamics models10.1002/sdr.322 ↗
40. Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Life Safety for a Six-Storey Commercial Building with an Open Stair Interconnecting Four Storeys: A Case Study10.1007/s10694-019-00859-z ↗
41. Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers10.1080/00401706.1971.10488770 ↗
42. Swain, A.D., and Guttman, H.E. (1982). Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications (NUREG CR-1278).10.2172/5752058 ↗
43. Reliability of sprinkler system in Australian high rise office buildings10.1016/j.firesaf.2013.11.009 ↗
44. Reliability of Sprinkler System in Australian Shopping Centres—A Fault Tree Approach10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.03.006 ↗
45. Det Norske Veritas (2015). OREDA-Offshore & Onshore Reliability Data Handbook, Det Norske Veritas. [6th ed.].
46. HSE (1999). The Implementation of CORE-DATA, a Computerised Human Error Probability Database.
47. Risk analysis of deepwater drilling operations using Bayesian network10.1016/j.jlp.2015.08.004 ↗
48. Reliability of fire (point) detection system in office buildings in Australia—A fault tree analysis10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103150 ↗
49. Benjamin, J.R., and Cornell, C.A. (1970). Probability, Statistics and Decisions for Civil Engineers, McGraw-Hill.
50. Risk of human fatality in building fires: A decision tool using Bayesian networks10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.01.006 ↗
51. Application of Bayesian methods to event trees with case studies
52. Dulac, N., Leveson, N., Zipkin, D., Friedenthal, S., Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J., Carroll, J., and Barrett, B. (2005, January 4–7). Using System Dynamics for Safety and Risk Management in Complex Engineering Systems. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Orlando, FL, USA.
53. System dynamics meta-modelling for reliability considerations in maintenance10.1504/IJPMB.2013.057723 ↗
54. Hall, J.R. (2010). US Experience with Sprinklers and Other Automatic Fire Extinguishing Equipment, National Fire Protection Association.
55. Fire safety design based on calculations: Uncertainty analysis and safety verification10.1016/S0379-7112(96)00050-1 ↗
56. Bukowski, R., Budnick, E., and Schemel, C. (2002, January 22–26). Estimates of the Operational Reliability of Fire Protection Systems. Proceedings of the third International Conference on Fire Research and Engineering, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
57. An analysis of fire sizes, fire growth rates and times between events using data from fire investigations10.1016/j.firesaf.2004.05.002 ↗
58. Zhao, L. (1998). Reliability of Stair Pressurisation and Zoned Smoke Control Systems, Victoria University of Technology.
59. U.S Fire Administration (2006). Structure Fire Response Times. Trop. Fire Res. Ser., 5, 5–10.