journal article·2020-11-09Open access

Exchange Rate Analysis for Ultra High Bypass Ratio Geared Turbofan Engines

Theoklis Nikolaidis, Soheil Jafari, David Bosak, Pericles Pilidis

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 21

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of thermal management methods on the design point and synthesis exchange rates of an ultra-high bypass ratio geared turbofan engine. In a typical thermal management system, where heat is managed by means of heat exchangers that transfer engine waste heat into oil, air, or fuel. However, the utilization of air–oil and fuel–oil heat exchangers has an adverse impact on engine performance. This paper investigates the impact on and engine’s specific fuel consumption and summarizes it into common exchange rates for different thermal management configurations. The results show that any pressure loss in the bypass duct results in a severe specific fuel consumption penalty (an increase of 1% pressure loss in the bypass duct causes a 2% specific fuel consumption increase at cruise conditions). In addition, quite severe is the impact of extracting air from the gas path, particularly when the bleed location is in the bypass duct or the high-pressure compressor. It is also found that the utilization of a fuel–oil heat exchanger improves the specific fuel consumption at a higher rate than an air–oil heat exchanger. For the performance characteristics of the examined engine, the specific fuel consumption benefit with the former is 1.33%, while for the latter it is 0.38%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research · Radiative Heat Transfer Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre of Propulsion Engineering, Cranfield University, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK

Meggitt PLC, Birmingham B1, UK

Funding

Innovate UK

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Directorate General for Mobility and Transport (1972). Flightpath 2050 Europe’s Vision for Aviation, Publications Office of the EU. Report of the High Level Group on Aviation Research.
2. Prospects for Improvement in Efficiency of Flight Propulsions Systems10.2514/3.58932 ↗
3. The aero engine and its progress—Fifty years after Griffith10.1017/S000192400003462X ↗
4. Some Future Trends in Aero Engine Design for Subsonic Transport Aircraft10.1115/1.3446164 ↗
5. Future large civil turbofans and power plants10.1017/S0001924000090928 ↗
6. European air transport up to the year 200010.1017/S000192400009093X ↗
7. Strack, W.C., Knip, G., Weisbrich, A.L., Godston, J., and Bradley, E. (1982, January 25–28). Technology and Benefits of Aircraft Counter Rotation Propellers. Proceedings of the 1982 Aerospace Congress and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, USA. NASA Technical Memorandum 82983, Document ID 19830002859.
8. Bates, R.E., and Morris, J. (1983, January 17–19). A McDonnell Douglas Perspective—Commercial Aircraft for the Next Generation. Proceedings of the AIAA Aircraft Design, Systems and Technology Meeting, Fort Worth, TX, USA.10.2514/6.1983-2502 ↗
9. Borradaile, J.A. (1988, January 11–13). Towards the optimum ducted UHBR engine. Proceedings of the AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE 24th Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA-89-2954, Boston, MA, USA.10.2514/6.1988-2954 ↗
10. Zimbrick, R.A., and Colehour, J.L. (1988, January 11–13). An Investigation of Very High Bypass Ratio Engines for Subsonic Transports. Proceedings of the AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE 24th Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA-88-2953, Boston, MA, USA.
11. Advanced Propulsion Systems for Large Subsonic Transports10.2514/3.23535 ↗
12. Cumpsty, N. (1997). Jet Propulsion: A Simple Guide to the Aerodynamic and Thermodynamic Design and Performance of Jet Engines, Cambridge University Press.
13. Jenkinson, L.R., Simpkin, P., and Rhodes, D. (1999). Civil Jet Aircraft Design, Arnold. [1st ed.].10.2514/4.473500 ↗
14. 2020 vision: The prospects for large civil aircraft propulsion10.1017/S0001924000063971 ↗
15. The future of aircraft propulsion10.1243/0954406001522967 ↗
16. Saravanamuttoo, H.I.H. (2002, January 8–13). The Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Memorial Lecture—Civil Propulsion; The Last 50 Years. Proceedings of the ICAS 23rd International Congress of Aeronautical Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
17. Counter Rotating Fans—An Aircraft Propulsion for the Future10.1007/s11630-003-0049-1 ↗
18. Newton, P., Holsclaw, C., Ko, M., and Ralph, M. (2007, January 14–16). Long Term Technology Goals for CAEP/7. Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of CAEP, ICAO Colloquium on Aviation Emissions with Exhibition, London, UK.
19. Kyprianidis, K.G., Grönstedt, T., Ogaji, S.O.T., Pilidis, P., and Singh, R. (2011). Assessment of Future Aero-engine Designs with Intercooled and Intercooled Recuperated Cores. ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133.10.1115/1.4001982 ↗
20. Larsson, L., Grönstedt, T., and Kyprianidis, K.G. (2011, January 6–10). Conceptual Design and Mission Analysis for a Geared Turbofan and an Open Rotor Configuration. Proceedings of the ASME 2011 Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1115/GT2011-46451 ↗
21. Bijewitz, J., Seitz, A., and Hornung, M. (2014). Architectural Comparison of Advanced Ultra-High Bypass Ratio Turbofans for Medium to Long Range Application, Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress. Document ID 340105.
22. The potential of future aircraft technology for noise and pollutant emissions reduction10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.017 ↗
23. Aircraft noise prediction10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.02.001 ↗
24. Leeham Co EU (2020, May 09). GE Engines Faces Challenge from PW, RR GTF Technology. Available online: http://leehamnews.com/2014/04/07/ge-engines-faces-challenge-from-pw-rr-gtf-technology/.
25. Tobi, A.L.M., and Ismail, A.E. (2016, January 19–20). Development in Geared Turbofan Aero-engine. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Manufacturing, Optimization, Industrial and Material Engineering (MOIME 2016), Bali, Indonesia.
26. Hemmer, H., Otten, T., Plohr, M., Lecht, M., and Döpelheuer, A. (2007, January 10–13). Influence of the Bypass Ratio on Low Altitude NOx Emissions. Proceedings of the 1st CEAS European Air and Space Conference Proceedings, CEAS-2007-137, Berlin, Germany.
27. Jackson, A.J.B. (2009). Optimisation of Aero and Industrial Gas Turbine Design for the Environment. [Ph.D. Thesis, Cranfield University].
28. Kyprianidis, K.G. (2010). Multi-Disciplinary Conceptual Design of Future Jet Engine Systems. [Ph.D. Thesis, Cranfield University].
29. Collier, F., Thomas, R., Burley, C., Nickol, C., Lee, C.M., and Tong, M. (2010, January 19–24). Environmentally Responsible Aviation—Real Solutions for Environmental Challenges Facing Aviation. Proceedings of the 27th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), Nice, France.
30. Matias, F.M. (2016). Turbofan Engine Optimization for Low NOx Emissions. [Master’s Thesis, University of Tecnico]. Available online: https://fenix.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/cursos/memec/dissertacao/283828618789824.
31. (2018, October 12). MTU Aero Engines AG Company Presentation, Investor Relations. Available online: http://www.mtu.de/fileadmin/EN/5_Investor_Relations/3_Company_Profile/IR_company_presentation.pdf.
32. Meggitt PLC (2019). Project Internal Presentation, Meggitt PLC.
33. International Civil Aviation Organization (2013). ICAO Engine Exhaust Emissions Data Bank—CFM56-5B1, ICAO.
34. European Turbine Network (ETN) (2017). Micro Gas Turbine Technology Summary: Research and Development for European Collaboration, European Turbine Network (ETN). Technical Report.
35. European Turbine Network (ETN) (2017). Research and Development Recommendation Report 2016—For the Next Generation of Gas Turbines, European Turbine Network (ETN). Technical Report.
36. Rahman, M., Zaccaria, V., Zhao, X., and Kyprianidis, K. (2018). Diagnostics-oriented modelling of micro gas turbines for fleet monitoring and maintenance optimization. J. Process., 6.10.3390/pr6110216 ↗
37. Zeinalpour, M., Mazaheri, K., and Irannejad, A. (2012, January 9–15). Sensitivity Analysis of Gas Turbine Fuel Consumption With Respect to Turbine Stage Efficiency. Proceedings of the ASME 2012 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Houston, TX, USA.10.1115/IMECE2012-89956 ↗
38. Sensitivity Analysis on Brayton Cycle Gas Turbine Performance10.1115/1.2817073 ↗
39. Sensitivity analysis of component efficiencies on performance of a gas turbine cogeneration system10.1504/IJEX.2011.043041 ↗
40. Macmillan, W.L. (1974). Development of a Modular Type Computer Program for the Calculation of Gas Turbine Off-Design Performance. [Ph.D. Thesis, Cranfield Institute of Technology].
41. Nikolaidis, T. (2019). The TURBOMATCH Scheme for Gas Turbine Performance Calculations, Cranfield University.
42. Laskaridis, P., Pilidis, P., and Kotsiopoulos, P. (2005, January 4–9). An integrated engine - aircraft performance platform for assessing new technologies in aeronautics. Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines, ISABE-2005-1165, Munich, Germany.
43. Techno-economic viability assessments of greener propulsion technology under potential environmental regulatory policy scenarios10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.017 ↗
44. (2019, May 14). Available online: http://www.eurocontrol.int/services/bada.
45. Walsh, P., and Fletcher, P. (2004). Gas Turbine Performance, Blackwell Science.10.1002/9780470774533 ↗