Entanglement, and Unsorted Database Search in Noise-Based Logic
Source abstract
Abstract
We explore the collapse of “wavefunction” and the measurement of entanglement in the superpositions of hyperspace vectors in classical physical instantaneous-noise-based logic (INBL). We find both similarities with and major differences from the related properties of quantum systems. Two search algorithms utilizing the observed features are introduced. For the first one we assume an unsorted names database set up by Alice that is a superposition (unknown by Bob) of up to n = 2N strings; those we call names. Bob has access to the superposition wave and to the 2N reference noises of the INBL system of N noise bits. For Bob, to decide if a given name x is included in the superposition, once the search has begun, it takes N switching operations followed by a single measurement of the superposition wave. Thus, the time and hardware complexity of the search algorithm is O[log(n)], which indicates an exponential speedup compared to Grover’s quantum algorithm in a corresponding setting. An extra advantage is that the error probability of the search is zero. Moreover, the scheme can also check the existence of a fraction of a string, or several separate string fractions embedded in an arbitrarily long, arbitrary string. In the second algorithm, we expand the above scheme to a phonebook with n names and s phone numbers. When the names and numbers have the same bit resolution, once the search has begun, the time and hardware complexity of this search algorithm is O[log(n)]. In the case of one-to-one correspondence between names and phone numbers (n = s), the algorithm offers inverse phonebook search too. The error probability of this search algorithm is also zero.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques · Diverse Scientific and Engineering Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A & M University, 3128 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3128, USA
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A & M University, 3112 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3112, USA
Funding
TexasA&M University
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 ↗
2. Noise-based logic: Binary, multi-valued, or fuzzy, with optional superposition of logic states10.1016/j.physleta.2008.12.068 ↗
3. Noise-based logic hyperspace with the superposition of 2N states in a single wire10.1016/j.physleta.2009.03.059 ↗
4. Instantaneous noise-based logic10.1142/S0219477510000253 ↗
5. Instantaneous, non-squeezed, noise-based logic10.1142/S0219477511000521 ↗
6. Deterministic multivalued logic scheme for information processing and routing in the brain10.1016/j.physleta.2009.04.073 ↗
7. Liljenström, H. (2014). Brain: Biological Noise-Based Logic. Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (IV), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Cognitive Neurodynamics, Sigtuna, Sweden, 23 June 2013, Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-9548-7 ↗
8. Noise-Based logic: Why noise? A comparative study of the necessity of randomness out of orthogonality10.1142/S0219477512500216 ↗
9. New noise-based logic representations to avoid some problems with time complexity10.1142/S0219477512500034 ↗
10. Complex noise-bits and large-scale instantaneous parallel operations with low complexity10.1142/S0219477513500028 ↗
11. Fast measurement of hyperspace vectors in noise-based logic10.1142/S0219477512500010 ↗
12. Computation using noise-based logic: Efficient string verification over a slow communication channel10.1140/epjb/e2010-10399-x ↗
13. Bird’s-eye view on noise-based logic10.1142/S2010194514603639 ↗
14. Drawing from hats by noise-based logic10.1080/17445760.2016.1140168 ↗
15. Noise-Based Logic Gates by Operations on the Reference System10.1142/S0219477518500335 ↗
16. Tang, E. (2018, October 31). Quantum-inspired Classical Algorithms for Principal Component Analysis and Supervised Clustering. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00414 2018.
17. Tang, E. (2018, July 10). A Quantum-Inspired Classical Algorithm for Recommendation Systems 2018. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.04271.
18. Kish, L.B. (2017). The Kish Cypher. The Story of Kljn for Unconditional Security, World Scientific.10.1142/8707 ↗
19. Dyakonov, M. (2019, July 15). The Case Against Quantum Computing. IEEE Spectrum, 15 November 2019. Available online: https://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/the-case-against-quantum-computing.