journal article·2024-11-30Open access

Comparative Analysis of Marine Alternative Fuels for Offshore Supply Vessels

Chybyung Park, Insik Hwang, Hayoung Jang, Byongug Jeong, Seungman Ha, Joongwon Kim, Jaehoon Jee

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 23

Abstract

This paper provides an in-depth analysis of alternative fuels, including liquefied natural gas (LNG), hydrogen, ammonia, and biofuels, assessing their feasibility based on operational requirements, availability, safety concerns, and the infrastructure needed for large-scale adoption. Moreover, it examines hybrid and fully electric propulsion systems, considering advancements in battery technology and the integration of renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, to further reduce SOV emissions. Key findings from this research indicate that LNG serves as a viable short- to medium-term solution for reducing GHG emissions in the SOV sector, due to its relatively lower carbon content compared to MDO and HFO. This paper finally insists that while LNG presents an immediate opportunity for emission reduction in the SOV sector, a combination of hydrogen, ammonia, and hybrid propulsion systems will be necessary to meet long-term decarbonisation goals. The findings underscore the importance of coordinated industry efforts, technological innovation, and supportive regulatory frameworks to overcome the technical, economic, and infrastructural challenges associated with decarbonising the maritime industry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Marine Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G0 4LZ, UK

Europe-Korea Marine and Ocean Engineers Association (EKMOA), Southampton SO16 9WE, UK

Logistics and Maritime Industry Research Department, Korea Maritime Institute, Busan 49111, Republic of Korea

Korean Register, 36 Myeongji Ocean City 9-ro, Gangseo-gu, Busan 46762, Republic of Korea

Division of Coast Guard & Marine Engineering, Mokpo National Maritime University, Mokpo 58628, Republic of Korea

Funding

Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. LNG as a Bridge Fuel in the Transition to Renewable Energy: A Global Perspective10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0480 ↗
2. Methane Slip Reduction of Conventional Dual-Fuel Natural Gas Diesel Engine Using Direct Fuel Injection Management and Alternative Combustion Modes10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125775 ↗
3. Alternative Fuel Options for Low Carbon Maritime Transportation: Pathways to 205010.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126651 ↗
4. Fuel Cell and Hydrogen in Maritime Application: A Review on Aspects of Technology, Cost, and Regulations
5. Challenges in the Use of Hydrogen for Maritime Applications10.1039/D0EE01545H ↗
6. Review and Evaluation of Sustainable Ammonia Production, Storage, and Utilization10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117869 ↗
7. A Review of Cleaner Alternative Fuels for Maritime Transportation
8. Direct Use of Vegetable Oil and Animal Fat as Alternative Fuel in Internal Combustion Engine
9. Internal Combustion Engines and Biofuels: Examining Why This Robust Combination Should Not Be Ignored for Future Sustainable Transportation10.1016/j.rser.2021.111292 ↗
10. Challenges and Opportunities for Alternative Fuels in the Maritime Sector10.1016/j.martra.2021.100033 ↗
11. Lagouvardou, S., Psaraftis, H.N., and Zis, T.J.S. (2020). A Literature Survey on Market-Based Measures for the Decarbonization of Shipping. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12103953 ↗
12. Strantzali, E., Livanos, G.A., and Aravossis, K.J.E. (2023). A Comprehensive Multicriteria Evaluation Approach for Alternative Marine Fuels. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16227498 ↗
13. Alternative Marine Fuels: Prospects Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Involving Swedish Stakeholders10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.05.008 ↗
14. Mandić, N., Ukić Boljat, H., Kekez, T., and Luttenberger, L.R.J.A.S. (2021). Multicriteria Analysis of Alternative Marine Fuels in Sustainable Coastal Marine Traffic. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11062600 ↗
15. Andersson, K., Brynolf, S., Hansson, J., and Grahn, M.J.S. (2020). Criteria and Decision Support for a Sustainable Choice of Alternative Marine Fuels. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12093623 ↗
16. DNV (2022). Maritime Forecast to 2050.
17. Hsieh, C.-W.C., and Fang, C. (Biofuels for the Marine Shipping Sector, 2017). Biofuels for the Marine Shipping Sector.
18. Law, L.C., Foscoli, B., Mastorakos, E., and Evans, S. (2021). A Comparison of Alternative Fuels for Shipping in Terms of Lifecycle Energy and Cost. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14248502 ↗
19. Bureau Veritas (BV) (2022). Alternative Fuels Outlook for Shipping.
20. Goldmeer, J., Buck, C., Suleiman, B., Selim, H., Tayebi, K., Agostinelli, G.-L., and Dawood, A. (2023). Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen and Ammonia as Low Carbon Fuels for Power Generation. Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/GT2023-100880 ↗
21. Electrochemical Performance of Direct Ammonia Solid Oxide Fuel Cell10.1149/MA2023-0154215mtgabs ↗
22. Application of Parametric Trend Life Cycle Assessment for Investigating the Carbon Footprint of Ammonia as Marine Fuel10.1007/s11367-022-02091-4 ↗
23. Hydrogen Carriers for Zero-Emission Ship Propulsion Using PEM Fuel Cells: An Evaluation10.1080/20464177.2023.2282691 ↗
24. Wang, H., Aung, M.Z., Xu, X., and Boulougouris, E. (2023). Life Cycle Analysis of Hydrogen Powered Marine Vessels—Case Ship Comparison Study with Conventional Power System. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151712946 ↗
25. Maniscalco, M.P., Longo, S., Cellura, M., Miccichè, G., and Ferraro, M. (2024). Critical Review of Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen Production Pathways. Environments, 11.10.3390/environments11060108 ↗
26. Negative Net Global Warming Potential Hydrogen Production Through Biomass Gasification Combined with Chemical Looping: Environmental and Economic Assessments10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.04.078 ↗
27. Sustainability of Hydrogen Production Considering Alternative Technologies Towards a Neutral Carbon Society10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.03.328 ↗
28. Pande, S., and Gahane, S. (2024). Waste Cooking Oil to Biodiesel—A Review. The Production of Biodiesel and Related Fuel Additives, Springer.10.2174/9789815196740124060012 ↗
29. Pramanik, A., Sinha, A., Chaubey, K.K., Hariharan, S., Dayal, D., Bachheti, R.K., Bachheti, A., and Chandel, A.K. (2023). Second-Generation Bio-Fuels: Strategies for Employing Degraded Land for Climate Change Mitigation Meeting United Nations-Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15097578 ↗
30. The Influences of Promising Feedstock Variability on Advanced Biofuel Production: A Review10.51400/2709-6998.2552 ↗
31. Wang, W. (2022). Agricultural and Forestry Biomass for Meeting the Renewable Fuel Standard: Implications for Land Use and GHG Emissions. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15238796 ↗
32. Datta, D., Ghosal, R.K., Biswas, S., Mandal, E., and Das, B. (2024). Biofuel Production: An Ecofriendly Way to Produce Sustainable Energy. Emerging Sustainable Technologies for Biofuel Production, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-52167-6_4 ↗
33. Transition to the New Green Maritime Era—Developing Hybrid Ecological Fuels Using Methanol and Biodiesel—An Experimental Procedure10.3390/eng5030100 ↗
34. Prakash, G.S.G. (2024). Long-Term Sustainability Through Carbon Dioxide Capture and Conversion: The Methanol Economy. Electrochemical Society Meeting Abstracts, The Electrochemical Society, Inc.10.1149/MA2024-01125mtgabs ↗
35. Chianese, L., Meloni, E., Vaiano, V., Iervolino, G., and Palma, V. (2024). Environmental Challenges and Economical Assessment of Methanol’s Production Feedstock. Heliyon, in press.10.1016/B978-0-443-15740-0.00015-X ↗
36. Seeking the Low-Carbon Route of Methanol Production with Sustainable Resources by Tracking Energy and Environment Indicators10.1021/acs.iecr.3c03667 ↗
37. Pavlenko, N., Comer, B., Zhou, Y., Clark, N., and Rutherford, D. (2020). The Climate Implications of Using LNG as a Marine Fuel, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
38. How to Decarbonise International Shipping: Options for Fuels, Technologies and Policies10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.080 ↗
39. Demystifying the Lifecycle Environmental Benefits and Harms of LNG as Marine Fuel10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116869 ↗
40. Pachauri, R.K., Allen, M.R., Barros, V.R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., Church, J.A., Clarke, L., Dahe, Q., and Dasgupta, P. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report, IPCC.10.59327/IPCC/AR5-9789291691432 ↗
41. IMO (2021). Comprehensive Impact Assessment of Short-Term Measure Approved by MEPC 75—Full Report on the Impacts on the Fleet and on States (MEPC 76/INF.68/Add.1).
42. Bei, Z., Wang, J., Li, Y., Wang, H., Li, M., Qian, F., and Xu, W. (2024). Challenges and Solutions of Ship Power System Electrification. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17133311 ↗
43. Comparative Analysis Among Different Alternative Fuels for Ship Propulsion in a Well-to-Wake Perspective10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26016 ↗
44. Cost-Effective Choices of Marine Fuels in a Carbon-Constrained World: Results from a Global Energy Model10.1021/es5018575 ↗
45. MWH (2016). Sustainable Energy Handbook, MWH.
46. DNV GL—Maritime (2018). Assessment of Selected Alternative Fuels and Technologies, DNV GL.
47. Techno-Economic Analysis of a Decarbonized Shipping Sector: Technology Suggestions for a Fleet in 2030 and 204010.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.098 ↗
48. Abma, D., Atli-Veltin, B., and Verbeek, R. (2019). Feasibility Study for a Zero Emission, Battery-Electric Powertrain for the Gouwenaar II, TNO.
49. Abma, D., Atli-Veltin, B., Verbeek, R., and van der Groep, R. (2019). Feasibility Study for a Zero Emission, Hydrogen Fuel Cell Powertrain for the Gouwenaar II, TNO.
50. De Vries, N. (2019). Safe and Effective Application of Ammonia as a Marine Fuel, TNO.
51. Hybrid Solar PV/PEM Fuel Cell/Diesel Generator Power System for Cruise Ship: A Case Study in Stockholm, Sweden10.1016/j.csite.2019.100497 ↗
52. Kim, K., An, J., Park, K., Roh, G., and Chun, K. (2019). Analysis of a Supercapacitor/Battery Hybrid Power System for a Bulk Carrier. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9081547 ↗
53. Feasibility Study of a Zero Emission PV/Wind Turbine/Wave Energy Converter Hybrid System for Stand-Alone Power Supply: A Case Study10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121250 ↗
54. Kim, K., Roh, G., Kim, W., and Chun, K. (2020). A Preliminary Study on an Alternative Ship Propulsion System Fueled by Ammonia: Environmental and Economic Assessments. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8030183 ↗
55. Lloyd’s Register (2020). Techno-Economic Assessment of Zero-Carbon Fuels, Lloyd’s Register.
56. Hydrogen storage technologies for stationary and mobile applications: Review, analysis and perspectives10.1016/j.rser.2021.111311 ↗
57. IEA (2019). The Future of Hydrogen, International Energy Agency.
58. Collins, L. (2023, July 20). A Wake-Up Call on Green Hydrogen: The Amount of Wind and Solar Needed Is Immense. Available online: https://www.rechargenews.com/transition/a-wake-up-call-on-green-hydrogen-the-amount-of-wind-and-solar-needed-is-immense/2-1-776481.
59. Shiozawa, B. (2023, May 20). The Cost of CO2-Free Ammonia. Available online: https://www.ammoniaenergy.org/articles/the-cost-of-co2-free-ammonia/.
60. IEF (2021). Ammonia: The Missing Link in the Energy Transition?, IEF.
61. Energy SGH2 (2023, July 20). Cost Comparison. Available online: https://www.sgh2energy.com/economics.
62. Hedreen, S. (2023, May 20). Blue Hydrogen Runs ‘Significant Risk’ of Becoming Stranded Asset—Advisory Firm. Available online: https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/blue-hydrogen-runs-significant-risk-of-becoming-stranded-asset-8211-advisory-firm-71222790.
63. Application of Fuel Cells with Zero-Carbon Fuels in Short-Sea Shipping10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118463 ↗
64. Bunker, S. (2024, November 18). Rotterdam Bunker Prices. Available online: https://shipandbunker.com/prices/emea/nwe/nl-rtm-rotterdam#LNG.
65. Methanol, M. (2023, July 15). Fuel Price Comparison. Available online: http://marinemethanol.com/?nav=meohp.
66. Oil Monster (2023, July 20). Bunker Fuel Prices in West & Northern Europe. Available online: https://www.oilmonster.com/bunker-fuel-prices/west-northern-europe/44.
67. NESTE (2023, July 10). Biodiesel Prices (SME & FAME). Available online: https://www.neste.com/investors/market-data/biodiesel-prices-sme-fame#ccc969da.
68. Department for Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy (2022). Energy Prices International Comparisons. GOV.UK.
69. DNV (2019). Comparison of Alternative Marine Fuels.
70. Directorate for Energy and Climate Change (2023). Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions.