journal article·2026-06Open access

Machine Learning Prediction and Experimental Validation of Externally Solidified Crystal Formation in Aluminum Die Casting Process

Buwei Chen, Jianyue Zhang, Zhaoliang Yuan, Gabriel Garcia, Qigui Wang, Liang Wang, Chen Chen, Alan A. Luo

Abstract

Abstract Externally solidified crystals (ESCs) can easily form during high pressure die casting (HPDC) of aluminum alloys if the process is not properly controlled, leading to significant reduction of casting quality and performance. This study explores seven machine learning (ML) models, including decision tree, random forest, logistic regression, neural network, K-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and naïve Bayes classifier. The random forest and classification tree models showed the highest accuracy of 95% in predicting ESCs formation. The neural network, KNN, SVM, and logistic regression models all presented a good accuracy over 89%, while the naïve Bayes classifier model provided the lowest accuracy of 85%. Moreover, the importance of HPDC process parameters in ESCs formation was ranked, including superheat, melt temperature, die and shot sleeve temperatures, vacuum pressure level, intensification pressure level, and shot profile including both slow and fast speeds. Based on the ML prediction results, top four factors determining the ESCs formation are ranked as follows: Melt temperature > Superheat > Shot sleeve temperature > Fast shot speed. Prediction maps were also generated to predict the ESCs formation under different processing parameters. Two die casting trials using an Al-9Si-Mg alloy with various melt temperatures (720 °C and 680 °C) successfully validated the prediction that a lower melt temperature leads to a high probability of ESCs formation. These findings demonstrate how machine learning may be used to predict defects in HPDC products, offering a path to optimize the processing parameters and reduce casting defects.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Luo AA, Sachdev AK, Apelian D (2022) Alloy development and process innovations for light metals casting. J Mater Process Technol 306:117606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.11760610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117606 ↗
2. Blondheim D (2022) Improving manufacturing applications of machine learning by understanding defect classification and the critical error threshold. Int J Met 16:502–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-021-00637-010.1007/s40962-021-00637-0 ↗
3. Lehmhus D (2024) Advances in metal casting technology: a review of state of the art, challenges and trends—Part II: technologies new and revived. Metals. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1403033410.3390/met14030334 ↗
4. Forsmark JH, Zindel JW, Godlewski L, Zheng J, Allison JE, Li M (2015) Using quality mapping to predict spatial variation in local properties and component performance in Mg alloy thin-walled high-pressure die castings: an ICME approach and case study. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 4:81–118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-015-0033-010.1186/s40192-015-0033-0 ↗
5. Wang QG, Wang A, Coryell J (2024) Ultra-large aluminum shape casting: opportunities and challenges. China Foundry 21:397–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41230-024-4111-910.1007/s41230-024-4111-9 ↗
6. Lehmhus D (2022) Advances in metal casting technology: a review of state of advances in metal casting technology: a review of state of trends—Part I: I: changing changing products. Metals (Basel) 22:165–166. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1211195910.3390/met12111959 ↗
7. Jolly M, Katgerman L (2022) Modelling of defects in aluminium cast products. Prog Mater Sci 123:100824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.10082410.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100824 ↗
8. Zhang J, Chen B, Garcia G, Chang C, Kumar R, Wang Q, Furrer D, Apelian D, Luo AA (2025) Role of iron content in hot tearing susceptibility of recycled aluminum Alloy 6061. Metall Mater Trans B. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-025-03922-z10.1007/s11663-025-03922-z ↗
9. Trometer N, Zhang J, Wang Q, Wang L, Luo AA (2025) Mechanisms of externally solidified crystal formation in aluminum high-pressure die casting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 137:4825–4837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-15428-810.1007/s00170-025-15428-8 ↗
10. Zhang J, Trometer N, Luo AA (2022) An Investigation of externally solidified crystal formation in aluminum high pressure die casting, in: NADCA Trans
11. Winkler M, Kallien L (2015) Correlation between process parameters and quality characteristics in aluminum high pressure die casting, NADCA Trans.
12. Blondheim D (2020) Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data analytics: understanding the concepts to find value in die casting data
13. Kopper AE, Apelian D (2022) Predicting quality of castings via supervised learning method. Int J Met 16:93–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-021-00606-710.1007/s40962-021-00606-7 ↗
14. Sun N, Kopper A, Karkare R, Paffenroth RC, Apelian D (2021) Machine learning pathway for harnessing knowledge and data in material processing. Int J Met 15:398–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00506-210.1007/s40962-020-00506-2 ↗
15. Moosavi SM, Jablonka KM, Smit B (2020) The role of machine learning in the understanding and design of materials. J Am Chem Soc 142:20273–20287. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c0910510.1021/jacs.0c09105 ↗
16. Yang J, Shi R, Luo AA (2023) Unveiling the alloying-processing-microstructure correlations in high-formability sheet magnesium alloys. Metals (Basel) 13:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.11140210.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.111402 ↗
17. Tsopanidis S, Osovski S (2021) Unsupervised machine learning in fractography: evaluation and interpretation. Mater Charact. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2021.11155110.1016/j.matchar.2021.111551 ↗
18. Chen G, Ma X, Yang X, Huang W, Zhang J, Zhu X, Liu M, Qian Y, Zhang J, Qiu W, Dong H (2025) Multimodal fusion learning for fractrography auto-recognition and uncovering microstructure - fractography relationship in 7050 aluminum alloy. Mater Today Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.11140210.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.111402 ↗
19. Pachandrin S, Hoffmann N, Dilger K, Rokicki M, Niederée C, Stürenburg L, Noske H, Denkena B, Kallisch J, Wunck C (2025) Data-driven prediction of casting defects in magnesium high-pressure die casting using machine learning. Int J Metalcast. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-025-01592-w10.1007/s40962-025-01592-w ↗
20. Park S, Youm S (2023) Establish a machine learning based model for optimal casting conditions management of small and medium sized die casting manufacturers. Sci Rep 13:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44449-010.1038/s41598-023-44449-0 ↗
21. Chen S, Kaufmann T (2022) Development of data-driven machine learning models for the prediction of casting surface defects. Metals (Basel) 12:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1201000110.3390/met12010001 ↗
22. Kopper A, Karkare R, Paffenroth RC, Apelian D (2020) Model selection and evaluation for machine learning: deep learning in materials processing. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9:287–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-020-00185-110.1007/s40192-020-00185-1 ↗
23. Cinkilic E, Moodispaw M, Zhang J, Miao J, Luo AA (2022) A new recycled Al–Si–Mg alloy for sustainable structural die casting applications. Metall Mater Trans A. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-022-06711-410.1007/s11661-022-06711-4 ↗
24. Garcia G, Gavin M, Garren J, Zhang J, Das S, Luo AA (2025) Re-designing A380 secondary aluminum die cast alloys from automotive twitch scrap. J Sustain Metall 11:3477–3494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-025-01241-w10.1007/s40831-025-01241-w ↗