A Machine Learning Approach for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction in Digital Mammography
Source abstract
Abstract
Breast cancer is among the most prevalent cancers in the female population globally. Therefore, screening campaigns as well as approaches to identify patients at risk are particularly important for the early detection of suspect lesions. This study aims to propose a workflow for the automatic classification of patients based on one of the most relevant risk factors in breast cancer, which is represented by breast density. The proposed classification methodology takes advantage of the features automatically extracted from mammographic images, as digital mammography represents the major screening tool in women. Textural features were extracted from the breast parenchyma through a radiomics approach, and they were used to train different machine learning algorithms and neural network models to classify the breast density according to the standard Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) guidelines. Both binary and multiclass tasks have been carried out and compared in terms of performance metrics. Preliminary results show interesting classification accuracy (93.55% for the binary task and 82.14% for the multiclass task), which are promising compared to the current literature. As the proposed workflow relies on straightforward and computationally efficient algorithms, it could serve as a basis for a fast-track protocol for the screening of mammograms to reduce the radiologists’ workload.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: AI in cancer detection · Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy
Department of Precision Medicine Division of Radiology, University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, 80131 Naples, Italy
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. GlobalCancerObservatory (2024, September 15). Breast Cancer. Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr/en.
2. Screening mammography in women 40–49 years old: Current evidence10.2214/AJR.17.18707 ↗
3. Screening mammography for women in their 40s: The potential impact of the American Cancer Society and US Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening recommendations10.2214/AJR.16.17759 ↗
4. United States preventive services task force screening mammography recommendations: Science ignored10.2214/AJR.10.5609 ↗
5. US Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer recommendation statement on risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3184 ↗
6. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034 ↗
7. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: Current understanding and future prospects10.1186/bcr2942 ↗
8. Almalki, Y.E., Soomro, T.A., Irfan, M., Alduraibi, S.K., and Ali, A. (2022). Impact of image enhancement module for analysis of mammogram images for diagnostics of breast cancer. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22051868 ↗
9. Optimization of image quality and dose in digital mammography10.1007/s10278-016-9928-3 ↗
10. Angelone, F., Ponsiglione, A.M., Grassi, R., Amato, F., and Sansone, M. (2024). A general framework for the assessment of scatter correction techniques in digital mammography. Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 89.10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105802 ↗
11. The mammogram that cried Wolfe10.1056/NEJMe068244 ↗
12. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008 ↗
13. Breast cancer screening in women with extremely dense breasts recommendations of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI)10.1007/s00330-022-08617-6 ↗
14. The image biomarker standardization initiative: Standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping10.1148/radiol.2020191145 ↗
15. Radiomics in medical imaging—“How-to” guide and critical reflection
16. Angelone, F., Ciliberti, F.K., Tobia, G.P., Jónsson Jr, H., Ponsiglione, A.M., Gislason, M.K., Tortorella, F., Amato, F., and Gargiulo, P. (2024). Innovative Diagnostic Approaches for Predicting Knee Cartilage Degeneration in Osteoarthritis Patients: A Radiomics-Based Study. Inf. Syst. Front., 1–23.10.1007/s10796-024-10527-5 ↗
17. Radiomics analysis from magnetic resonance imaging in predicting the grade of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter study10.1007/s00330-023-09957-7 ↗
18. Radiomics-based Machine Learning to Predict the Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A systematic review and Meta-analysis10.1016/j.acra.2023.09.008 ↗
19. A radiomics-based interpretable model to predict the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors10.1007/s00330-023-10186-1 ↗
20. Combining AI and Radiomics to Improve the Accuracy of Breast US10.1148/radiol.241795 ↗
21. Intra-and peritumoral based radiomics for assessment of Lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer10.1002/jmri.28776 ↗
22. Prediction of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer based on color doppler ultrasound radiomics10.1016/j.acra.2024.07.056 ↗
23. Angelone, F., Ricciardi, C., Gatta, G., Sansone, M., Ponsiglione, A.M., Belfiore, M.P., Amato, F., and Grassi, R. (2022, January 26–28). Breast Density Analysis on Mammograms: Application of Machine Learning with Textural Features. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Metrology for Extended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering (MetroXRAINE), Rome, Italy.10.1109/MetroXRAINE54828.2022.9967517 ↗
24. Machine Learning Approaches with Textural Features to Calculate Breast Density on Mammography10.3390/curroncol30010064 ↗
25. Angelone, F., Ponsiglione, A., Belfiore, M., Gatta, G., Grassi, R., Amato, F., and Sansone, M. (2023, January 21–23). Evaluation of breast density variability between right and left breasts. Proceedings of the Convegno Nazionale di Bioingegneria, Padua, Italy.
26. Contrast-enhanced mammography radiomics analysis for preoperative prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes10.1016/j.acra.2023.12.005 ↗
27. Radiomics, deep learning and early diagnosis in oncology10.1042/ETLS20210218 ↗
28. Petrillo, A., Fusco, R., Di Bernardo, E., Petrosino, T., Barretta, M.L., Porto, A., Granata, V., Di Bonito, M., Fanizzi, A., and Massafra, R. (2022). Prediction of breast cancer histological outcome by radiomics and artificial intelligence analysis in contrast-enhanced mammography. Cancers, 14.10.3390/cancers14092132 ↗
29. Beyond breast density: Risk measures for breast cancer in multiple imaging modalities10.1148/radiol.222575 ↗
30. Automated breast density assessment in MRI using deep learning and radiomics: Strategies for reducing inter-observer variability10.1002/jmri.29058 ↗
31. Radiomics in photon-counting dedicated breast CT: Potential of texture analysis for breast density classification10.1186/s41747-022-00285-x ↗
32. Ultrasound radiomics features to identify patients with triple-negative breast cancer: A retrospective, single-center study10.1002/jum.16377 ↗
33. Hussain, S., Lafarga-Osuna, Y., Ali, M., Naseem, U., Ahmed, M., and Tamez-Peña, J.G. (2023). Deep learning, radiomics and radiogenomics applications in the digital breast tomosynthesis: A systematic review. BMC Bioinform., 24.10.1186/s12859-023-05515-6 ↗
34. Comparison between two packages for pectoral muscle removal on mammographic images10.1007/s11547-022-01521-5 ↗
35. Pertuz, S., Torres, G.F., Tamimi, R., and Kamarainen, J. (2019, January 19–22). Open framework for mammography-based breast cancer risk assessment. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical & Health Informatics (BHI), Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/BHI.2019.8834599 ↗
36. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment10.1118/1.4921996 ↗
37. Two-dimensional discrete Markovian fields10.1109/TIT.1972.1054786 ↗
38. Textural features for image classification10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314 ↗
39. Sum and difference histograms for texture classification10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767760 ↗
40. A framework for texture classification using the coordinated clusters representation10.1016/S0167-8655(02)00185-X ↗
41. Radiomic phenotypes of mammographic parenchymal complexity: Toward augmenting breast density in breast cancer risk assessment10.1148/radiol.2018180179 ↗
42. Support vector machines10.1109/5254.708428 ↗
43. Rokach, L., and Maimon, O. (2005). Decision trees. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, Springer.10.1007/0-387-25465-X_9 ↗
44. Therneau, T.M., and Atkinson, E.J. (1997). An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning Using the RPART Routines, Mayo Foundation. Technical Report.
45. Mehlig, B. (2021). Machine Learning with Neural Networks: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108860604 ↗
46. Izenman, A.J. (2013). Linear discriminant analysis. Modern Multivariate Statistical Techniques: Regression, Classification, and Manifold Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-78189-1_8 ↗
47. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
48. Liashchynskyi, P., and Liashchynskyi, P. (2019). Grid search, random search, genetic algorithm: A big comparison for NAS. arXiv.
49. Mammographic density: Comparison of visual assessment with fully automatic calculation on a multivendor dataset10.1007/s00330-015-3784-2 ↗
50. Breast density classification using Laws’ mask texture features10.1504/IJBET.2015.072999 ↗
51. Breast density pattern characterization by histogram features and texture descriptors10.1590/2446-4740.07916 ↗
52. Valencia-Hernandez, I., Peregrina-Barreto, H., Reyes-Garcia, C., and Lopez-Armas, G. (2021). Density map and fuzzy classification for breast density by using BI-RADS. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 200.10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105825 ↗